Shadow Facts; Obama-Clinton-Bush Policy Draft of ISIS

American Presidential leadership nurtured the rise of ISIS. In a real sense President Obama is the de facto leader of ISIS. U.S. policy reinforces its increase drafting the latent populist Islamic forces along. ISUL could not have reached its present scale it does without his acts to develop the Syrian conflict, destroy Qaddafi in Libya , withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq and failure to support creation of a Kurdish state in part of Turkey and Syria. The rise of ISIS as a populist movement required U.S. military intervention in the Middle East for growth. ISIS exists in the shadows of large scale political destabilization and nullification of existing lawful governments in the region. Wars send refugees to Europe, the United States and other prosperous nations where intervening powers reside providing in turn the kernels of terrorist potential. President Obama's policy of removing the Syrian government is the catalyst for the transition of Sunni populist anti-state, anti-Zionism and anti-western civilization sentiments latent in the Muslim demographics of the Middle East formerly common in the Muslim Brotherhood movement.

Supporters of mass Muslim migration to the United States and Europe have broadcast opinions that the refugees are vetted. One must wonder if the intelligence of the immigration advocates was vetted. Large new foreign Muslim. Creating an internal proletariat of Middle Eastern Muslims in the United States, Europe and Canada provides a swamp in which ISIS crocs may grow to swim and design future attacks on the plump targets of enfeofed financial service sector office workers of the west. Expansion of the Dar al Harb to the west requires large numbers of potential support troops before the fighters arrive; before Muslim spooks of the Saudi Wahhabist world flow through the masses taking what support they require from the tens of thousands of masses that may intentionally or through coercion provide support to war actions in the United States.

Administration policy support critics of critics of administration policy refer to American extremists that might oppose Muslim immigration. One might wonder if any of the founders of the United States would not be regarded as extremists if they lived today and exercised common sense to oppose relocation of imperialists or theocrats and their supporters to the U.S.A. It is unimaginable that George Washington would have been concerned about what the Saudis might think about an American security policy banning Muslim migration to the United States. George Washington prayed to God; not Mecca or Rome.

Providing leadership for the growth of ISIS in the shadow of U.S. Middle East regime removal is wrong policy from recent American administrations. It seems as if Presidents and Secretaries of State are I.Q. challenged or closet Muslim jihadists themselves. Ad hoc and improvisational military units and political leadership in the past century have nearly invariably generated the most undisciplined warriors perpetrating atrocities.

In the Vietnam conflict, after the volunteers in the Army from the 1950s timed out and a conscript component increased the Defense Department formed a just-for-the-war new Army division- the Americal Division that lacked disciplined unit history-or any history for that matter. Undisciplined circumstances evolved Lt. William Calley's My Lai civilian massacre. Consider how undisciplined ad hoc ISIS fighting units are and hence their propensity for butchery. The new post-Soviet era Serb military had the same sort of lack of unit discipline and cohesion and was known for famous war crimes. New civilian government may have a comparable propensity for extremism or corruption. The year zero Khmer Rouge wasn't the sole newly formed monstrous government of modern history. Seldom have newly empowered extremist governments shared land or resources with loyalists of the dispossessed. Instead they have a tendency toward purges exemplified in Iraq a few times, in Khomeini's Iran and Ukraine.

ISIS terrorism and atrocities have developed in the chaos and indiscipline created in the ad hoc military structure. From Libya to Syria ad hoc Muslim killers armed generally with dumped military weapons from states deposed through American foreign policy design. The civil chaos and generation of new terrorists cannot be switched off through a particular military battlefield victory. Economic conditions for prosperity that require development or conservation of existing physical infrastructure cannot generally be maintained or transition with continuity to a hypothetical militant leadership that meets theoretically 'vetted' standards of the U.S. government. The left extolling the vetting of Muslim mass migrants may as well seek membership in the American Legion for them. Though Muslims tended to side with the 3^rd Reich in the war against Jews and the United States in my father's generation.

It is far easier to reinforce existing governments and encourage them through positive engagement to evolve to a more fair and equal sort of status with its citizens than to encourage and support rebellion against the existing government. While the founders described in the Declaration of Independence the situation wherein rebellion is necessary, the godless atheist leadership of the west too often simply increases short-term support for the increase of wars as a long term policy as a kind of decoration or flower arranging activity of the very powerful and advantaged that may require a little more force to put down where thereafter it is thought the Muslim population would settle true buy products and pay rent. Of course if the Declaration where published in the Corporatist era it would be censored for hate speech. One wonders if the advantaged don't have a reciprocal of unreality in their personal political epistemology because the knowledge that brought them to rise to the top of the political toilet bowl hasn't anything to do with competence in justice, sociology, political philosophy or history.