Why
do cars exist? Wagons and automobiles were evolved for a purpose.
Driven by necessity of carrying loads easier efficiency increases and
concurrent technological innovations brought adaptations that are now
stagnated in a mature form as fossil fuel vehicles preponderantly
although alternative energy vehicles exist as swell.
Why
do people breathe through the mouth less so than the nose? Try
closing one nostril and inhaling deeply through the other until the
lungs are full, then switch and close the open nostril that you
inhaled through, and exhale through the formerly closed nostril. A
simply breathing exercise like that lets one experience the health of
full lungs more so than usual. Healthy lungs are a good thing. I
suppose one could use a Vick's nasal inhaler for a kind of minty
lung sensation carefully) if recently recovering from quiting smoking
of tobacco to move toward a better lung use experience. People get
used to doing things in a habitual way, from breathing to driving
cars, and don't consider the existential circumstance sometimes
whereby dialectical social phenomenal history brought them to a
particular point in life.
Do
cars still need to exist? Isn't it already possible to make a new
transportation infrastructure nationally with in-line electromagnet
networks create a Meisner lift half for any rightly configured
package placed on on it to let it levitate and move on down the line?
It should be feasible to overcome the worries about prolongued
exposure to an e.m.g. field by using 100% of the field for lift and
motion. The e.m.g. field is of a finite nature; like a tank of gas,
and should be used efficiently, leaving no part of the e.m.g. field
escape work to reach the individual moving alone the e.m.g. line on a
select package platform.
Early
wagon builders and automobile manufacturers didn't seek to create new
voyeur and pleasure opportunities with their products. Instead the
four wheeled critters really were made for work; joy-riding simply
evolved as a fact of life, and in the U.S.A. vast SUV with stuffed
leather star trek enterprise command chairs, bone shaking sound
systems and on-line INTERNET let a modern hippie-gypsy drive to the
office or field development to build stick frame rectilinear
buildings for interior trogs to watch large flat screen televisions.
Plainly cars are a link in the chain of consumerist life wherein the
planetary ecosphere is a seeming irrelevant externality that leftist
worry themselves with. Citizens of democracy shouldn't rely on
vicarious political brains for thinking or machines for movement
instead of their own two feet. Walking upright is a great human
acheivement of evolution-It even helps regularity. People may be
evolving constipation and obesity because of reliance on cars to get
to the liquor store to buy booze, spice and even dope (Spice, Booze,
Dope, Devil and Quear) does sound like a Chicago post-modern civil
rights law firm I suppose).
When
the Congress passes multi-year 300 billion or half-trillion dollar
transportation bills they effectively reinforce corporatism (an ad
hoc corporate-state socialist kickback loop) through propping up
automobile infrastructure. People simultaneously complain about
decaying national infrastructure and lack of creativity and
intelligence in leadership while providing vast support for a dirty,
ecospherically destructive, mostly foreign owned automobile industry
without investing even 10% of those transportation bills in
electro-magnetic highway research.
If
the national highway network was gradually replaced with advanced
electro-magnetic lines to levitate independent platforms (that make
no contact with the ground unless at rest) it might serve as a
laboratory for applying room temperature superconductors and solar
photon capture networks.
Though
the left regard the conservative right as too dumb to be concerned
about anything besides the optimal material all-day lolly pop
provided by fearless leaders, leftist leaders like the Clintons are
servants of the corporate 1% plutocracy too. Left and right
plutocrats simply exploit the majority from different channels. I
only mention that fact because automobiles and other ancient product
technologies are part of an ossified economic and political structure
that should be gracefully transitioned to a new infrastructure when
possible; political leaders of the left and right haven't an interest
in evolving transportation infrastructure to something completely new
that would help restore ecospheric health any more than the majority
of the electorate is concerned with ecological economics, axiology or
quantum mechanics.
With
personal morality large numbers of Americans may be conservative.
When the same people disregard global empirical facts and just think
about their narrow self-interest ,economically speaking they become
apathetic jellyfish without much prospect for evolving to an
upright, peripatetic social philosopher sort of thinking about
politics. Morality amidst a majority conditioned to economic
servility tends to folly the will of will. A corrupt Hollywood may
condition the public to amoral atheistic paradigms. Atheist leftists
acting through 'conservative' Wall Street and the media can reduce
the people to an Irwin Corrie level of political understanding (a
confused philosopher comic) if they think at all. Pre-tribulation
theologians of immanent doom happily accept it all as a
pre-determined spectacle of God (in error). Some post-tribulationists
wrongly infer that there is a necessary continuum of upward political
and religious evolution toward a global majority of Christians and
that the population of Christians (and others) could not crash as it
did during the Bubonic plagues of the 1300-1400s when most of the
world's Christians probably died (before increasing later). It is
pre-destined that in the end a majoritarian Christian world will
exist, yet the road to that destiny may be long and winding. They
need to work for a moral world now; a Christian world, and for
competent environmentally synergistic economic policy and
infrastructure wherever possible. If Christian Americans do not or
cannot lead; who can?
The
United States serves as a bulwark against tyranny. Though the
Democrat Party seeks to bind the Gulliver states with a thousand tiny
strings such as citizen gun disarmament, if America falls to leftist
authoritarianism there actually wouldn't be any other power (besides
God) that would exist to fight global authoritarianism effectively.
Bilderbergers and communists as well as Nazi socialists all could
evolve the black hole of global tyranny. New transportation
infrastructure that combines the best of world engineering that ends
the tramping pollution and habitat destruction of the over-mature
automobile economy plainly would also create a better human habitat
where walking was regarded as a good thing.
Walking
is a good thing. Auto drivers have an implicit cyborg paraplegia
voyeur mind set it would be good to lose. Driving a car is nearly a
required social way of economic life. It is difficult to drop out of
the lemming rush contributing to ecosphere oblivion. Electromagnetic
lines lifting and moving people and freight anywhere they want to
go-as ubiquitous as roads are today would make the highway itself the
engine and the people and boxes set on it as packages to be safely,
quickly delivered. I think that really is possible. The ways to
improve that kind of system are innumerable; existing chip technology
and software could support quite a lot of command and control safe
destination subtleties.
No comments:
Post a Comment