A
Cruz PAC Published a Naked Mrs. Trump Photo?
If
that is a true report it is something of a new low in dirty politics.
Plainly wives of candidates for Presidents are fair dinkum since Mrs.
Clinton became a perennial candidate. Even so we don't want to see
any naked pictures of Hillary. Senator Cruz has let his chauvinism
show in putting wives in a reared position with kids and pets.
When
Trump modestly retaliated it drew the wrath of Senator Cruz. Ted Cruz
has lambasted Trump's posting of womano y womano pictures of his wife
and that of Cruz as the act of a petty, small, sniveling 'New York
bully' making him sound more like Barrack Obama imitating Sean
Hannity than a Cuban-Canadian Texan big shot of Dallas-Ft.
Worth-Austin oil politics. If Clintons and Bushes are aspirant
American royal political dynasties that are models for more people
with wives or other relatives running for office when term limits
stop the primary bully, Mrs. Trump or a Mrs. Cruz are already
potential candidates. Consider Michelle Obama- will she not be
interested in running for the Senate or the Bully Pulpit some day?
One can imagine Paul McCartney's song being a campaign theme when she
takes the convention stage.
Cruz apparently has a mild case of Texan hatred of New Yorkers calling Trump a 'New York bully'...plainly the worst kind that Texans have feared since the civil war presumably. The entire issue may be a Bilderberger martinet boast for Ted Cruz tghey made up in the bowels of the pit...
Cruz
used dueling challenge language in calling Trump 'a sniveling
coward'. Since dueling isn't legal any more-even in Kentucky-the
lawyer language sophisms are not impressive. Cruz is running a losing
campaign and hence his PACs are seeking to get some kind of leverage
rather like trying to get a leg up onto a sandworm though Trump is
more the Paul Atreides figure and Cruz of the House Harkonen.
Naked
photos of political candidates and their wives or student interns
should not appear during the primary Presidential campaign. That sort
of dirt should wait until after the election when the mainstream
media needs to pump up its ratings or if terrorism reporting loses
audience share. Some elites apparently want a Tom Clancy character in
the White House, yet that is a little stale a priori. Clancy's Ghost
Recon had more contemporary characters than Jack Ryan yet even that
is not job relevant.
The
Republican Party's greatest danger in trying to subvert the Trump
Presidential bid is in fundamentally losing any remaining trust of
Americans as the party seems to disdain the will of the people and
wants to run candidates by decree of secret elites. It may really be
time for the formation of a new national party in 2017.
With
the U.S. economy growing at an annual rate of 1% and so many people
forced out of the private sector and on to government programs, and
with 90% of the national income going to the rich who are propped up
with no or very low interest loans from the federal reserve to big
banks the economy seems in danger of slipping into some sort of
downward slope of interest to the global predator-opportunist sort of
conspiracy persons of interest.
Trump
may at least spice things up bit. Executive power rather than
bureaucratic consensus may be needed if everything becomes all f'd up
economically. It is challenging to imagine that anyone will have a
good plan to deal with 19 trillion dollars of debt and a global
economic trickle down to Americans dependent upon tightly regulated
global finance and production that is not at all nationally
independent.