I think there are many ways to view and label the energy-mass presented to mind such as comprise the Universe. In reading Krishnamurti's books I enjoyed his peaceful, contemplative approach to the matter of being. He seemed to have a point of view a little bit Buddhist--as the original Buddha might have regarded the world after his insight under the tree, yet he also seemed like a working Bodhhisatva-I believe the term is. However he seemed to advocate a social withdrawal and detachment from the world--and that is a little different than a philosophical contemplation of what is perceived.
Jesus Christ said that the Kingdom of God is within you--and of course I agree. God is transcendent of the nature of his creation, so I leave it at that, yet find the construction of ideas about the Universe worthwhile. Jesus Christ was a carpenter after all, and the right construction of ideas is as useful as the construction of geodesic domes instead of rectilinear structures in many instances, I would think.
Immanuel Kant writing on the topic of a priori thought continued the kind of thought that Pythagoras might have used a little in reasoning about triangles. String theory, if it had philosophically consistent structure--mathematically, might also contain an irresistible logic for-itself. I do not know for sure. When I think about a priori thought and necessary, self-consistent truths that could be abstractly represented in virtually any way such as with statistics of arbitrary magnitude, it might be impossible to make an a priori truth about the empirical world. Empiricism and Quine present a dead reckoning sort of pragmatism for language and logic perhaps. It is worth researching virtually any kind of cosmological avenue without requiring that one provide an ideal world of self-consistent platonic forms in a model first.
String Theory does have approximate criteria regarding the Universe that it is designed to fit. It's pre-big bang parameters seem to have a philosophical beauty. Their may be many realms of being that science cannot ever directly access nor prove or disprove. I realized that about the quantum computer--- I have also written a brief novel with a lot of philosophical dialogue in it so I could go over some of these points that surpass the finite. Science is restricted to material extrapolations and compression of data into algorithmic sensibility--philosophers are not.
Before the Big Bang--if there was a big bang--for the inflation is rather replacing that concept though they are semantically close-something existed. We could just leave it at mystery--yet the scholastic philosophers and St. Thomas in devising proofs for the existence of God also used logical argument about the first cause and etc that we can emulate, with less holiness perhaps that career ecclesiastics, though we may try to emulate the good points, in contemplating what occurred before the inflation. Philosophically the inflation is just a way of regarding an event of cosmic history from a parrticular point of view. It was a membrane viewed from outside perhaps with expanding contingent content that became heavier concentrations of mass as it cooled.
Heating and cooling are relative terms as Bishop Berkleys Three Dialogues made plain enough. A very high energy state, or as close to monistic condition known to exist occurred then-before the inflation there may have been a vacuum that created multi-verse starts of universes. This Universe could just be one infinitely small, contingent, consequent even of temporality within a field of nearly infinite starts of such universe temporalities.
These may occur within the One rather than without as in a vacuum. From the singular non-dimensional membrane of all space and monistic Idea the rest of everything emerged in more refined and comparatively less energetic event-universe flows. Or perhaps not--its philosophical contemplation of how the neo-Platonic One might have issued anything. This sort of speculation is at least as old as the second century a.d., its just that with string theory, the standard model, quantum mechanics and relativity theory there are new tools to help the contemplations. And I hope those physicists are hard at work making more research progress and writing it up to publish in an interesting form.
Following is my story excerpt from'The St. Novilistricka Plan'--I never really got beyond a final first draft...
An infinite number of cosmological theories may be invented and adumbrated onto the apparent facts and events of the universe we exist in. Many of those theories will equally well account for the observable facts of physical existence experienced, and none will ever accurately reach an absolute, exclusive and definitive account for the origin of the Universe to its ultimate source. Faith is required at several points to fill in the missing frame of reference footings. Faith accounts for the phenomenal existence of a perturbative vacuum, and where and when and why in the pre-big bang cosmology of things such a nearly eternal field of phenomenality could arise, or always did.
If such fundamental structures comprised the origin of a radion or vice versa, issues arise regarding why the construction of an expanded universe occurs. The word to begin-a kind of fat lady singing a high note breaking the symmetry of a perfectly composed non-dimensional point that is in a spiritual balance--a primordial non-dimensional Liebniitzian monad might have been spoken. Maybe God created the Universe to experiment with artistic designs of intervals and energy-appearance in a scalar, temporal field?
Why should a system of multi-verses and contingent dimensions always be unbalanced, or unstable, and why would an eternally stable structure of any size such as a non-dimensional point every change without an outside force acting upon it?
There are many possible relationships between knowledge and dimensions, energy and dimensions, and of knowledge about energy and dimensions obviously. In 1996 Earth Chronhistory a Gasperini wrote that 'toward a non-singular pre-big bang cosmology'. The elimination of singular points of origin within cosmological history is an approach possible with string theory I believe, yet the issues of proximal and fundamental origins of mass would then be transferred for philosophical purposes to virtual particles in the pre-big bang vacuum. Each virtual source of mass could be thought of as infinitely endowed yet finite when emerged into the peer space before the big bang-such that each does not bring its own displacement of every other virtual particle emerging space.
There are innumerable alternatives of course--philosophically imagine them. One non-dimensional point initially contained all the virtual particles--and it is rather like The One--and that is the source of subsequent virtual particles issued into a sub-routine space. Perhaps all these universe expand inward rather than outward, and can do so infinitely cascading from The One. Size and dimensionality would be relative like space-time. One cannot say then what knowledge would be in such a context--instead of a mem or knowl there could be a knowlegeton (like a graviton) that transcends universes to subtly changed quarks in human and other sentient minds.
Knowledge can be defined as information. Human sentience and cognition--awareness is knowledge. Knowing is knowledge.The sentient dimensions would be affixed to the mass track dimensions--on an apposite dimension 'side' for an interior purpose of course. Can a dimension have just one side?
If a material definition were wonted for what knowledge is-it would be difficult to describe in material or dimensional terms since it would be of another character.Information as data bits form content for a holographic theory of the universe. Bits stored in a non-dimensional point comprise an obvious paradox. They would be in a material dimensional context--maybe there is anti-knowledge in anti-dimensions?
I had visited many planets where economic theories grew to become consolidated into a hierarchical global religion and in which dissidents were outcast as heretics and anathema. Human or other sentient lives must be considered as abstract statistical machines for sale or trade as commodities most useful to the Utilitarian god of the globe who would allocate resources is arbitrary ways deemed most useful to the global imperial corporate governance. Democracy and individualism were dead on such planets. Individual political opinions were considered, as John Ralston Sauls had once observed in the 21st century on Earth, as protectionism that would interfere with management.
One of the planets of the Dogma Star Cluster Lush and I visited had a tax free shop in the space-port, extending from the Equator to the north pole, lamp shades made from the hides of exploited child laborers of the southern hemisphere offered for two galactic Juans. Each lampshade was offered as in compliance with thermodynamic recycling conservation of resources criteria. Corporate conversion of sentient life-forms into rent paying statistical machines had been maximized by planet managers increasing proplits.
"These crystal clusters would be a good study for paleo-genetic comparisons with fossilized inference analysis of polymorphism; did they have nucleotide divergence patterns of alleles comparable to that of humanoid MHC polymorphism that is evident in atomic molecular lattice deposition? Was the geology of these satisfied semi-sentients an evolved configuration by design or from pressures of natural selection? I realize we haven't the time for an in depth study of these creatures that appear so oddly rude, Patrick, yet we should chisel away a few easy pieces if we can before leaving the world."
I looked at my beautiful Lush; traveling companion since Drachonio, and considered what she said. It is true that the Crystalnachworsts had made the idiot's choice to end choices for themselves and others in preference for a continuum of untaxed constant pleasure input as interminably persisting neo-geological objects of artifact. The world around our mountain had no remaining glacial deposits--it was moving through stages of desiccation toward barrenness compatible with a world without atmosphere requiring careful expulsion space for content that would occlude star photon power for rechargeable superconducting circuit-suits of the neo-geos.
I said to Lush; "They are lint Lush, forget about them. There are many other worlds we shall repair to soon enough."
"Yeah, well we didn't document well enough the Crusher colony of robotic monster trucks from the future that found a candy wrapper on some planet in the Milky Way and used it to trace the location of Los Angles on Earth. Urban renewal by gigantic, city crushing robot monster trucks with government warranty started by cash bribes for Clunker Politicians non-government organizations centuries before was a fate the innocents of Newer Mexico did not deserve. Not even the Temple of Governor Rastaneggerian survived the blazing terminal anomalous orange phase of the crush rush of trucks a mile high."
I would have driven a plug in electric if I had lived on Earth early in the 21st century Lush,
"I agree Patrick, that sentient organizations and societies have eclipsed reason, largely in pursuit of economic objectives..."
"Is that what I said, Lush?"
"Inference Patrick, and distillation of paradigmatic references--maybe it's what you wanted to say."
"Oh right, continue Lush."
"Nature cannot be improved upon. Sentient beings can only remodel nature to make themselves more comfortable--that's all that can be done through technology with nature. Yet they unfortunately have a tendency to entirely disregard nature as the source and ideal of all material existence as they admire their own mud pie creative glorification as the pinnacle of phenomenality."
"That may be so Lush. What about the heavier elements that sentients created, aren't they creating their own nature then?"
"No, of course not Patrick. Heavier elements than those of the original periodic table created following nucleosynthesis and stellar synthesis by sentient artifice were a continuity of phenomenal evolution of the Universe at best. Reduced to more fundamental components than atomic elements they were comprised of particles that are made ultimately of strings of length L equals eternity emanated by quantum uncertainty from the perturbed vacuum before the big bang.
A quantum gush of uncertainty comprising virtual particles forming a black hole cut off by an event horizon from matching particle or string pairs allowed the inflation of a big bang from the perturbative vacuum like a faster than light mushroom growing from fertile quantum soil usually locked into balanced particle-anti-particle matching pairs of strings."
"Philosophically our beliefs about the Multiverse could still be wrong. A quantum computer could create an entirely real yet artificial duplicate reality with effects of quantum entanglement able to create an appearance of such a cosmological structure and genesological origin."
I regarded Lush thoughtfully for a moment before saying the obvious;
"I agree with your theory on the method of an emanation of one inflation to form a big bang Universe like an instant grow kit from an infinite fertile perturbative vacuum. Its a wonderful idea of an infinite, eternal perturbative vacuum giving rise to an infinite phenomenal field of universes forming for several trillion or quadrillion years like raindrops splashing in a pond and rebounding as space-time perhaps forever. I am certain that the concept of a perturbative vacuum is more theoretical than actual however, Lush.
Consider that the initial ground state of any cosmological theory needs to be stipulated as a given in order to back up the theoretical structure underlying the observable phenomena of the Universe. Though the theory may be self-consistent with the observable data, it is not an exclusive theory that might not be replaced equally well with another with a different ground state and system of relations giving rise to phenomena that are apparent as observable and measurable objects.
Why should the perturbative vacuum have quantum uncertainty or even strings? It is necessary but not always obvious that certain units of quanta that are ideas must be posited as fundamental in order to form any kind of analytical theory.
Even whole numbers are logical unit quanta with relationships meaningful to human reason. If larger relationships exist, or just different ones, even so it is necessary to express theories within the context of ones we know.
The idea of the perturbative vacuum and its quantum mechanical nature that through uncertainty could allow despairing off bound particle-anti-particle pairs such as the graviton or dilaton through the introduction of more motion and expansion of space-time creating intervals unbridgeable by the fundamental units creates more questions philosophically than it answers.
I consider a quantum computer's limits at reconstruction of artificial universes as inherently limited by an unknown even the most brilliant artificially intelligent quantum thinking machine could not transcend. It could not reach the infinite conditions of the one, nor fill the boundary conditions with accurate content. Its limits would always be a kind of inversion of the Cantorian set of all sets limits--the contingent quantum computer would have less material to work with than the universe itself.
The quantum computer would have field limitations of its principle quantum components unequal to the task of meta quantum compositions of more fundamental sections. Besides Lush, the original Universal emanation was a monistic whole of a singular nature. The quantum computer is a pluralistic phase of construction out of phase with a natural evolution and ungrounded in the deeper construction of the Universe in which it coheres. The quantum computer will always been less than the infinite truth in which it occurs. I am still placing my faith in a theistic evolution of Universal parameters for the construction of this Universe and the apparent others.
Quantum relativity provides it own terms and meanings of terminology for the comparative age and meanings of time passage in various meaningful contexts for this creation."
"True enough Patrick. We need to be agile skeptics about what appears, and even about what we believe, and have faith in Jesus Christ as the One God who became destiny management.
When idea copyrights and patents were reduced to seven years length with ten percent remittance to inventors and authors alone for public use thereafter, intellectual and material capital production increased quite a lot in the initial populated humanoid solar system. I recollect that if either Isaac Newton or Gottfried Leibniz--simultaneous inventors of the calculus had got exclusive patents upon it as an intellectual property inheritable for generations by their relations, or by corporations for hundreds of years because of the life of the corporations being equivalent to that of the life of an individual lasting hundreds of years legally, quite a substantial amount of science would never have got off the ground."
I asked Lush "So what's the point of that my Lush friend?"
"The point is that there is no point in making scientific, philosophical or even technical ideas exclusive after the first seven years because it retards intellectual progress. I doubt if we would have an ideas about the state of the perturbative vacuum if the inventors of string theory had not been so generous in writing about it after the end of the 20th Earth Century Christian era."
All of these neo-geo people are enrolled in a phenomenal pleasure principle without regard to the philosophical relationship they have to strings emanated from the perturbative vacuum. They have made themselves permanently ignorant of the nature of the Universe and have accepted pleasure as the utilitarian reason for being by default of having no reason or capacity to comprehend anything else greater than that. They have made of their lives a sort of living tombstone that basks in starlight so long as stars exist to provide light.
We might think that in their abrogation of being a human level structure evolved theistically in the Universe they have escaped the vicissitudes of experience, yet in quantum mechanical phenomena they may no longer be what or where they are or were. They might have transcended the cold stones they have become to move beyond space and time into union with the fundamental strings of the perturbative vacuum surpassing the boundaries of the extended space-time eruption of the inflation and big bang."
"Do you really think so Patrick"
"No, actual not at all Lush, its and interesting thought, though.
Basic philosophical questions that were once the best cosmological simplifications around, questions such as that of a prime mover, merged over time into practical questions found embedded with cosmological theories and quantum cosmology. Where did the first string of the perturbative vacuum originate? Where and when did the vacuum arise? Deeper theological questions remained theoretical and metaphysical.
Questions of a cosmological fundamental nature distilled in the era of pre-big bang theory for some synthetic analytical cosmological philosophy to such as those of the origin of dimensions, intervals continua and motion or mass. Fundamental questions of cosmology from a philosophical perspective could be such as are cosmological theories inevitably about continua as being and intervals structures and forms of relationships in continua and intervals? These were issues of being and nothingness in effect, and of where each arose? I think, Lush, that the questions of philosophical interest remained and even deepened co-variantly with the build-up of pre-big bang models with simultaneous varieties of temporal, phenomenal Universe inflations and expansions as space-time with mass arrays."
"Plainly Lush, the perturbative vacuum contains the universal expansion phenomenalizations into existence in addition to providing a ground environment from which they may grow. A new universe may start as a pre-big bang black hole from a field of balanced pairs of strings of fundamental length that become imbalanced because of quantum uncertainty. Sure this fundamental assumption may be supportable by a circumstantially contingent mathematical theoretical framework yet it is obvious that it is simply a practical place to rest our speculative labors because of the improbability of finding a pre-perturbative vacuum field causation trail from which to theorize.
Maybe black holes in our Universe draw string concatenations back to the perturbative field, and perhaps interactive effects of the surrounding field continue to affect the Universe. For thought the Hubble radius and the evolution of space-time in the Universe change, the change is universally subjective, while from within the larger and perhaps infinite perturbative vacuum of infinite extent no meaningful time or space has elapsed, and it remains in contact with the putter boundaries of the Universe in all directions.
Lush would not take her brown eyes off the distant three horizons of the world superimposed with space-time warps and the glorious refracted multiple sunsets unwitnessed by the planet-full of sleeping lotus eaters, she said;
"I would say my friend, that the lack of taxes on the rich and middle classes with subtle tax increases upon the poor is the transcendental way of political life; and that people believe that a non-representative corporate government is more democratic than a representative democracy, that will eventually be thought of as leftist or socialist.
Public interest will be erased and non-representative corporate leadership worshiped by raving idiots incapable of rational political analysis. Authoritarianism and dictatorship everywhere leads to these planets of eventual louts eaters that are living open tombs and tombstones in-themselves. They care not if the Universe arose from a silent or lightly charged vacuum, God issuing the string vacuum as one of an infinite number of spoken words, or a can of tuna cat. This planet gives me the creeps, as multi-dimensionally beautiful as it is."
Lush was a remarkable representation of human womanhood liberated from the Promethean Constellation. Since the War of the Satellites of Atrius we had been constant companions sharing together our mutual alienation from our own home worlds. We had been given our own key to the Universe of a kind enabling a variety of ways of experiencing space time travel faster than normal with too frequently inaccurate destination arrivals a part of the circumstance.
From the bench on Old Schleplglaubt the view is majestic. It is yet troubling when the usual quadrupole world of gravity topology radiated material eminences shaped from the pre-inflationary inhomogeneities of mass and energy that becomes was condensed in virtual coordinates before us. Extra-dimensional extrusions into this world were increasing; bending starlight toward them in surreal, sparkling beams.
'I think it's time we remove ourselves to the library shelves of the City Cliff of the Neo-geos, Lush. Rupturing of sub-lots of mass by extra-dimensional extrusions seem to be statistically increasing too fast to disregard. Let's go research what we can from the neo-geo database."
" Nearly two centuries before Sol time intellectual property rights had been altered in order to accelerate ecological economic recovery efforts. Instead of ninety five year copyrights for trans-national corporations and equally absurd patent rights time periods for socially generated ideas it was decided by remaining democracies of Earth that seven years would be the time period--non renewable too--for patents and copyrights with ideas registered becoming public domain thereafter. Inventors would be given ten per cent gross revenues for any idea exploited from the public domain for a century as well.
Such a radical revision of intellectual property rights assured that inventions and ideas could be used quickly by the national economies of the world to accelerate ecological economic growth, and that more inventions made by combining new public domain ideas could be synthesized further accelerating inventions. Inventors were well protected and received increased revenues by the more general applications of their ideas than in the exclusive for generations procedures that retarded global ecological security and supported oligopolistic corporatist business and management cartels.
Because democracy withered under trans-national corporatism the change to a freedom of ideas regime released too many sudden inventions for the corrupt federal governments of the worlds to control. Some of the initial population crash of the old Earth was brought by the chaos sub-discipline of federal weapons systems and compulsory health care data provisioning for the poor that enabled the world's corporations to delete selected Americans. Reactionary self-survivalism as a resistance moment followed and wars of western individualism versus Eastern globalism intensified.
Lush and I walked into the transport tube and arrived in a ghost village on the distal side of the planet in a couple minutes of acceleration and deceleration. The intelligent particle transport field read our thoughts for destination goals. There was little to say in the transport passage duration in which existential experience was reduced to immersion with the field.
Sky shadows and slowly illuminated clouds changing colors from exotic light extrusions presented our archaeological village in variegated perspectives implicitly altering the temporal appearance from one of a museum to that of a living inanimate present. Lush and I walked through the village over the hexagonal heat absorption tiles and upon a couple of transparent dimensional steps to the open door of the village library.
Inside the library door we returned through the familiar empty hallway and reached office 314. Inside the office was a long curved table with much of our data device material resting upon it. The view from the panoramic windows of the empty city below was breath-taking. With a word a temporal field window shattered for a while before reassembling behind us after we passed to step out onto a regional library particle sky-bridge for transition to the Library of the World.
We walked onto another transparent, insubstantial surface, fifty stories above a pulsing energy storage field. Above and below the library entrance were forty nine floors of data storage with as many answers as could be contained in the quantum computer occupying the area.
Lush was fairly good at languages and interpreting alien data structures. She could decompress algorithmic mysteries with the best of the meaning and logic compressors in the imperial bureaucracy of Blythe's Luck, yet was free and unencumbered of lifelong technical appliances.
"Lush, the liberation of ideas brought a rapid acceleration to my second home planet Earth's economy a few lifetimes ago. One combination of ideas sent a cryogenic gravity wave detector aboard a small stable spacecraft around intense gravity fields such as that of our central star with various gap sizes between special mass to seek to discover the frequency of gravity ways. Changes in the time oscillation of the masses were communicated back to a control station at light speed as the gravity wave observatory changed locations with its differently size configured wave measuring devices. In time the size of a gravity wave was discovered, and that discovery would bring many changes to science--but not upon the Earth as the wars of the Chaos overtook our world.
I brought some of the data to my own world Mars when I escaped Earth during the final evolution of conflicts to defend my own civilization from a mad emperor seeking absolute power. Perhaps that data I brought about the graviton could be found in this library of the neo-geos?"
"I think it might Patrick." Anything might be stored in here. Just because something is invented it doesn't follow that it will be used in the real world optimally or at all.
On my planet disk of origin, Gush, the calculus was simultaneously invented by two women simultaneously; Sigmunda Von Conservido and Hilda Lee-Newton. Each claimed to be the exclusive inventor of calculus, both received a royal patent and for the next two centuries no use of the patented intellectual property could be used by any outside the two royal corporate commercial conspiracies that owned the intellectual properties. Such a repression of knowledge slowed our development of space-flight and defense technology long enough to make survival of the Inebrion attack a real struggle. We nearly found our destiny as cherries in Inebrion Battle Space-ship cruise-pleasure fuel distillation quark smashers."
"I didn't mean to bring up a flashback babe. Distillation trauma is a bloody Sunday punch of a hangover to rain upon your parade Lush."
"What is a parade Patrick?"She walked back out the main entrance for some reason, and stood upon the platform looking into the distance. She faced the stars emerging through twilight and warped tri-horizontal celestialities.
Lush was my own bright star in space-time these months. Her color changing compu-dress changed with her moods and reflected a prevailing environment of syntegration. It was an artwork of tensor calculus and aesthetics with constellations of a non-recognizable pattern. A bizarre alien form landed on the platform in a squishy rush beside Lush. In a fraction of a struggling second they fell off the platform toward the energy grid hundreds of feet below.
American issues of Christianity, cosmology, politics, ecosphere, philosophy, contemporary history etc
3/11/10
Vice President Biden Delivers The Wrong Message to Israel
Vice President Biden; fresh from the new homosexual marriage era of Washington D.C., brought a message of reproach to Israel for building homes for 1800 people in the city of King David--Jerusalem. The new city God promises to the saved and elect of the Jewish-Christian tradition--the new Jerusalem, will transcend the old. Yet the same Adonai that condemned homosexuality in the old testament and new is yet aware of the tendencies existing in the Democratic Congress and with the D.O.D. and former Vice President Cheney. Such perversion (change) of the right way of political conduct should not be advanced by the administration.
If the Vice President ever returns to Israel, he should support Jerusalem as an undivided Jewish city, denounce sin, and try to be on the right side with God.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/11/bidens-middle-east-tour-plagued-snubs-mishaps/
David Axelerod; an aide of President Obama, took a belligerent tone toward the Israeli construction of homes for its people in the eastern area of Jerusalem--he said that the Jewish state has 'undermined peace', as if the Jewish people have no interest in that, and have no idea what is in their best interest.
Evidently the administration believes the United States is better at negotiating peace than Israeli. Mr. Axelrod could have cited Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran as examples. Mr. Axelrod said as well that Israel had 'insulted' the United States--perhaps for building homes while the U.S. housing market is in a slump. It was a kind of shock and awe to the Obama administration. I cannot imagine what rage the Obama administration might have felt if the Israelis had decided additionally to repaint a thousand buildings with self-priming, lifetime acrylic paint--in green and earth tone colors.
To show it's commitment to green-peace and harmonious living on Earth, Israel should build concrete monolithic dome homes with super-insulation quality and fully self-reliant energy production. They might also agree to help Palestinians gain access to home solar energy production technology. One cannot lead a march of humanity to peaceful progress faster than the slowest fossil fuel reliant cultures can go.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8566992.stm
If the Vice President ever returns to Israel, he should support Jerusalem as an undivided Jewish city, denounce sin, and try to be on the right side with God.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/11/bidens-middle-east-tour-plagued-snubs-mishaps/
David Axelerod; an aide of President Obama, took a belligerent tone toward the Israeli construction of homes for its people in the eastern area of Jerusalem--he said that the Jewish state has 'undermined peace', as if the Jewish people have no interest in that, and have no idea what is in their best interest.
Evidently the administration believes the United States is better at negotiating peace than Israeli. Mr. Axelrod could have cited Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran as examples. Mr. Axelrod said as well that Israel had 'insulted' the United States--perhaps for building homes while the U.S. housing market is in a slump. It was a kind of shock and awe to the Obama administration. I cannot imagine what rage the Obama administration might have felt if the Israelis had decided additionally to repaint a thousand buildings with self-priming, lifetime acrylic paint--in green and earth tone colors.
To show it's commitment to green-peace and harmonious living on Earth, Israel should build concrete monolithic dome homes with super-insulation quality and fully self-reliant energy production. They might also agree to help Palestinians gain access to home solar energy production technology. One cannot lead a march of humanity to peaceful progress faster than the slowest fossil fuel reliant cultures can go.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8566992.stm
3/8/10
The Non-Dimensional Point of an Inflationary Universe
Why even one dimensional surface becomes everything.
The omnipotent One emanates subsets...
A small bright point of light
such as receives the better of endless night
casting wave of change through day
soundless photon’s present way
Constructions write up paradigms
mountains scaled by nature’s journey
of non-dimensional universes collapsed as one
waveform field before time has begun
Those most small prominences like time quanta
categories of roses and oceans like a painta picassa
one quantum field shattered with infinite boundaries
the largest become infinitely smallest foundries of suns
Star fields in nebulous clouds
driven wind spirits for laughing out loud
observe upon a myriad Earths
exchanges of seasons for what it is worth
A Creator’s will to let be and become
such pre-big bang symbolic, fundamental continua strung
zero dimensional membrane of ccmprehensive yield
issued qubit structures of protocol of One.
The omnipotent One emanates subsets...
A small bright point of light
such as receives the better of endless night
casting wave of change through day
soundless photon’s present way
Constructions write up paradigms
mountains scaled by nature’s journey
of non-dimensional universes collapsed as one
waveform field before time has begun
Those most small prominences like time quanta
categories of roses and oceans like a painta picassa
one quantum field shattered with infinite boundaries
the largest become infinitely smallest foundries of suns
Star fields in nebulous clouds
driven wind spirits for laughing out loud
observe upon a myriad Earths
exchanges of seasons for what it is worth
A Creator’s will to let be and become
such pre-big bang symbolic, fundamental continua strung
zero dimensional membrane of ccmprehensive yield
issued qubit structures of protocol of One.
3/7/10
God is Good...
Design is a problem of the criterion, and teleology refers to purpose of the Universe. One can find purpose regardless of structure.
If the purpose of God is to train humanity a certain way perhaps with increased capability for independent, reliable thought of some value to divine purpose, the Universe probably exists in conformity to that purpose. If so the design is not in the structure perhaps so much as the effects it has upon relationships, upon human understanding and so forth. How to have faith in temporal and difficult to define criteria. The problem of the criterion (Chisholm's title) is present.
I have thought that perhaps one purpose of God might be in utilizing art within engineering actualizations--if a lighter, spacier use of quanta is desired with universal forces interacting locally and non-locally then He has created kind of a masterpiece--yet one would like to view other galaxies and Universes obviously in order to better appreciate the Divine constructions. I will repost a piece on God as good--and compare a little of our fallen human nature to the criterion.
God is perfect--he is not 'one of the guys'. He is approachable soley through the Son or otherwise as he discloses purposeful interaction. His essence is impeccably holy while human beings are temporal and fallen such that they write onerous chat-room like posts attacking good. We can only thank predestination that we need not read all of those wicked posts hidden from easy view down below in the nether-regions of internet dischord.
God's nature is absolutely perfect and mysterious. Perhaps he is experimenting with creating light constructions of universes with quanta spaced apart with intervals. God must redirect limited beings with less than His omniscience toward correct actions--to rightful paths that will allow at least synchopation in simultaneous constructions between the divine and the all-too-human.
Creating a multi-verse. Expanding scalar fields from non-dimensional singularties that are simply apparent proximal starts--these are good things that have allowed goodness to flow, along of course with human wickedness--and that of the original lost and fallen creature of mindless self-will.
One might wonder about necessity--modal requisites for a particular kind of behavior, and inquire also about the validity of subjective value judgments...can the pot judge the potter? May the tornado judge the storm? What spoken word to begin cracked isotropies into the unified field of the singularity and unified field? Nothing less than the divine wind brings the energization of when..
If the purpose of God is to train humanity a certain way perhaps with increased capability for independent, reliable thought of some value to divine purpose, the Universe probably exists in conformity to that purpose. If so the design is not in the structure perhaps so much as the effects it has upon relationships, upon human understanding and so forth. How to have faith in temporal and difficult to define criteria. The problem of the criterion (Chisholm's title) is present.
I have thought that perhaps one purpose of God might be in utilizing art within engineering actualizations--if a lighter, spacier use of quanta is desired with universal forces interacting locally and non-locally then He has created kind of a masterpiece--yet one would like to view other galaxies and Universes obviously in order to better appreciate the Divine constructions. I will repost a piece on God as good--and compare a little of our fallen human nature to the criterion.
God is perfect--he is not 'one of the guys'. He is approachable soley through the Son or otherwise as he discloses purposeful interaction. His essence is impeccably holy while human beings are temporal and fallen such that they write onerous chat-room like posts attacking good. We can only thank predestination that we need not read all of those wicked posts hidden from easy view down below in the nether-regions of internet dischord.
God's nature is absolutely perfect and mysterious. Perhaps he is experimenting with creating light constructions of universes with quanta spaced apart with intervals. God must redirect limited beings with less than His omniscience toward correct actions--to rightful paths that will allow at least synchopation in simultaneous constructions between the divine and the all-too-human.
Creating a multi-verse. Expanding scalar fields from non-dimensional singularties that are simply apparent proximal starts--these are good things that have allowed goodness to flow, along of course with human wickedness--and that of the original lost and fallen creature of mindless self-will.
One might wonder about necessity--modal requisites for a particular kind of behavior, and inquire also about the validity of subjective value judgments...can the pot judge the potter? May the tornado judge the storm? What spoken word to begin cracked isotropies into the unified field of the singularity and unified field? Nothing less than the divine wind brings the energization of when..
3/6/10
President Obama’s Sick Health Care Bill
President Obama's health care bill has shown up in the emergency room for extreme unction. Yet the reconciliation process--a kind of voodoo legislative zombification procedure to restore life to a captive, sedated health care bill, may yet walk the streets of the Federal District to receive winks from corporate lobbyists.
There are three economic classes of Americans; the rich, the middle class and the poor. The rich can afford any sort of health care and are fully insured. The poor generally have no health insurance and use emergency rooms a lot if they must; the middle class can afford health insurance generally, and sometimes has it through employers and other times at their own cost. They complain it is too expensive.
So the President has led an illogical effort to get more, better, cheaper, health coverage for the middle class. The middle class have a bad macro-economic rationale of consumerism. They have little savings, may have equity in a quarter million dollar home, own expensive cars that get low gas mileage and spend a lot as disposable income. Then they may get sick and want a half million dollars of medical treatment--with no savings.
People live longer than formerly and medical treatment technology has increased in skill level. It is possible to spend a lot more on medical treatment that before--yet the middle class can‘t really afford all of the treatment options then rich can. In some ways medical treatment is a commodity like that of other items, and reasonably the middle class cannot purchase the things the rich can.
So the President and the middle class believe that if they expand the ‘pool’ of health people buying insurance, but not using it, that will lower medical costs--and it might if insurance corporations did not just increase their profits as you know they would. Yet that is not the only problem. The people the President and the middle class want to recruit to add to those buying insurance are those that cannot afford medical insurance:the poor.
If there are 50 million poor, uninsured Americans that the Obama administration thinks are in America that could be paying for health coverage, or at least the middle class or rich could be paying for their health coverage--it defies reason to believe that increasing the taxpayer burden of buying medical coverage in the most expensive possible way for the nation’s poor will reduce the overall national health cost--its just plain dumb.
Four out of five of those fifty million people will annually not use the medical service at all, and the taxpayers will be paying for a free lunch windfall to health insurance corporations so that the middle class health costs might drop--there is no rational correlation that would necessitate middle class health costs decreasing by the increasing of purchase of medical insurance coverage for the poor.
Essentially, only way of providing health coverage for the 50 million poor, uninsured Americans effectively would be to create a national health service with federal physicians in a non-profit context that would treat only the poor. There is a Federal police force--the F.B.I., a federal army, a federal aviation administration--a federal health service for the poor would no more be socialist that they--it is a necessary, most cost efficient way of delivering medical treatment where needed.
When the poor no longer need to ad hoc medical coverage and can find affordable treatment just when its needed, the middle class should find lower costs when the medical industry does not need to absorb the costs of proving all that free or bad-debt treatment. At that point the middle class can deal forthrightly with their own insurance needs as a class without complications, smoke and mirrors, distractions and diversions such as the Obama Health Plan proffoists
Illegal aliens at would continue to use emergency rooms driving up middle class medical costs indirectly would continue to use emergency rooms if the poor are just insured--otherwise the middle class would need to buy medical insurance for illegal aliens too.
The middle class as a group of reasonably prosperous people should be able to buy affordable health insurance. If they are not a sickly class requiring liver transplants for debauchery pervasively, nor desirous of exotic rare treatments of elective natures generally--that is if they keep their health coverage to things that are rationally necessary and affordable, it should be no problem as some of the planets more prosperous people as a class. Many nations have better health care with less means over-all.
Like the social security system that cannot afford to pay out money to people in retirement earning more annually than average working people, a middle class cannot afford to spend more on medical treatments than it actually needs, nor perhaps can it afford to compel the nation’s poor to buy the same health coverage as the middle class with the middle class to pay for it. Understandably the poor need medical treatment--yet they do not generally need insurance before age 55. Walk-in clinics, screened referrals, advanced care for the majority of non-complicated problems can provide a public health system at lower cost than a private health system that would receive more complicated, uncommon referrals sick and injured poor screened from the public health system for the poor with Medicare kicking in..
The nation should have a medical safety net for those that are or become poor before retirement age. They should not accept the criticism and irrational excuses of the rich or their media mouthpieces such that it would be socialism. It is a necessary public service just like a police agency or food stamps, public utilities, sewer or highway departments. Only if public law enforcement is negated for being socialist might one reasonably argue that those being sick or injured should have no medical coverage of they can’t pay for it. When the chance for casualties to the rich and middle class from gunshot, laser beam or poison gas are as significant as they are for anyone else then its more fair to argue to leave the bodies where they lay groaning or rotting perhaps in the gutter.
Since Ronald Reagan left office the United States has seemingly progressed to more poiled Presidential leadership with a correlating increase of debt, moral decay, globalism, military adventurism incompetently administered. The saga of badly reasoned public health care leadership and maladroit political posturing--even demagoguery regarding socialism in health care has made the economic truth preventer have much success at avoiding the real reform needed to provide health care for the poor, keep the middle class from drowning in creating wage slavery for themselves and the poor , stop global warming, restart a renewably green economy, halt illegal alien immigration, encourage family and personal savings and so forth. Washington D.C. is more interested in gaying up the District of Columbia and the military than in balancing the federal budget. U.S. Congressmen and women that are homosexuals can know marry each other in Washington D.C.--they must be very gay about that. The Congress perhaps likes being courted by lobbyists so much that they desire proposals too.
Some talk of impeaching a President that planned for ten trillion of new public debt his first year in office as an high crime and more than a financial misdemeanor. At least the Obama-Orwellian Health Bill that would force all poor Americans to nup-date the U.S. government of their address and income continuously so the middle class can know, in theory, whose health insurance they are buying and where to send the proxy bill to return to themselves to lower their own insurance cost, can be defeated.
.
There are three economic classes of Americans; the rich, the middle class and the poor. The rich can afford any sort of health care and are fully insured. The poor generally have no health insurance and use emergency rooms a lot if they must; the middle class can afford health insurance generally, and sometimes has it through employers and other times at their own cost. They complain it is too expensive.
So the President has led an illogical effort to get more, better, cheaper, health coverage for the middle class. The middle class have a bad macro-economic rationale of consumerism. They have little savings, may have equity in a quarter million dollar home, own expensive cars that get low gas mileage and spend a lot as disposable income. Then they may get sick and want a half million dollars of medical treatment--with no savings.
People live longer than formerly and medical treatment technology has increased in skill level. It is possible to spend a lot more on medical treatment that before--yet the middle class can‘t really afford all of the treatment options then rich can. In some ways medical treatment is a commodity like that of other items, and reasonably the middle class cannot purchase the things the rich can.
So the President and the middle class believe that if they expand the ‘pool’ of health people buying insurance, but not using it, that will lower medical costs--and it might if insurance corporations did not just increase their profits as you know they would. Yet that is not the only problem. The people the President and the middle class want to recruit to add to those buying insurance are those that cannot afford medical insurance:the poor.
If there are 50 million poor, uninsured Americans that the Obama administration thinks are in America that could be paying for health coverage, or at least the middle class or rich could be paying for their health coverage--it defies reason to believe that increasing the taxpayer burden of buying medical coverage in the most expensive possible way for the nation’s poor will reduce the overall national health cost--its just plain dumb.
Four out of five of those fifty million people will annually not use the medical service at all, and the taxpayers will be paying for a free lunch windfall to health insurance corporations so that the middle class health costs might drop--there is no rational correlation that would necessitate middle class health costs decreasing by the increasing of purchase of medical insurance coverage for the poor.
Essentially, only way of providing health coverage for the 50 million poor, uninsured Americans effectively would be to create a national health service with federal physicians in a non-profit context that would treat only the poor. There is a Federal police force--the F.B.I., a federal army, a federal aviation administration--a federal health service for the poor would no more be socialist that they--it is a necessary, most cost efficient way of delivering medical treatment where needed.
When the poor no longer need to ad hoc medical coverage and can find affordable treatment just when its needed, the middle class should find lower costs when the medical industry does not need to absorb the costs of proving all that free or bad-debt treatment. At that point the middle class can deal forthrightly with their own insurance needs as a class without complications, smoke and mirrors, distractions and diversions such as the Obama Health Plan proffoists
Illegal aliens at would continue to use emergency rooms driving up middle class medical costs indirectly would continue to use emergency rooms if the poor are just insured--otherwise the middle class would need to buy medical insurance for illegal aliens too.
The middle class as a group of reasonably prosperous people should be able to buy affordable health insurance. If they are not a sickly class requiring liver transplants for debauchery pervasively, nor desirous of exotic rare treatments of elective natures generally--that is if they keep their health coverage to things that are rationally necessary and affordable, it should be no problem as some of the planets more prosperous people as a class. Many nations have better health care with less means over-all.
Like the social security system that cannot afford to pay out money to people in retirement earning more annually than average working people, a middle class cannot afford to spend more on medical treatments than it actually needs, nor perhaps can it afford to compel the nation’s poor to buy the same health coverage as the middle class with the middle class to pay for it. Understandably the poor need medical treatment--yet they do not generally need insurance before age 55. Walk-in clinics, screened referrals, advanced care for the majority of non-complicated problems can provide a public health system at lower cost than a private health system that would receive more complicated, uncommon referrals sick and injured poor screened from the public health system for the poor with Medicare kicking in..
The nation should have a medical safety net for those that are or become poor before retirement age. They should not accept the criticism and irrational excuses of the rich or their media mouthpieces such that it would be socialism. It is a necessary public service just like a police agency or food stamps, public utilities, sewer or highway departments. Only if public law enforcement is negated for being socialist might one reasonably argue that those being sick or injured should have no medical coverage of they can’t pay for it. When the chance for casualties to the rich and middle class from gunshot, laser beam or poison gas are as significant as they are for anyone else then its more fair to argue to leave the bodies where they lay groaning or rotting perhaps in the gutter.
Since Ronald Reagan left office the United States has seemingly progressed to more poiled Presidential leadership with a correlating increase of debt, moral decay, globalism, military adventurism incompetently administered. The saga of badly reasoned public health care leadership and maladroit political posturing--even demagoguery regarding socialism in health care has made the economic truth preventer have much success at avoiding the real reform needed to provide health care for the poor, keep the middle class from drowning in creating wage slavery for themselves and the poor , stop global warming, restart a renewably green economy, halt illegal alien immigration, encourage family and personal savings and so forth. Washington D.C. is more interested in gaying up the District of Columbia and the military than in balancing the federal budget. U.S. Congressmen and women that are homosexuals can know marry each other in Washington D.C.--they must be very gay about that. The Congress perhaps likes being courted by lobbyists so much that they desire proposals too.
Some talk of impeaching a President that planned for ten trillion of new public debt his first year in office as an high crime and more than a financial misdemeanor. At least the Obama-Orwellian Health Bill that would force all poor Americans to nup-date the U.S. government of their address and income continuously so the middle class can know, in theory, whose health insurance they are buying and where to send the proxy bill to return to themselves to lower their own insurance cost, can be defeated.
.
3/4/10
Globalism vs U.S. Investment in Federal Economic Policy--a comment
I think one must be cautious about arguing from the particular to the universal--it is a logical fallacy. In considering what a particular President or Congressional action has done that effects the economy--try to place it within a broader context historically to see how it fits in with the prior and subsequent economic positions of the United States; The same chess movement in different circumstances has different effects.
Here is a list of the worlds top 100 billionaires in 2009, a minority of which are Americans (34)-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_billionaires
Many of these people invest globally, are centered outside the United States, pursue policies that create a dysfunctional consumerism economy without a renewable ecological economic foundation for the United States. They have no need to be patriots of the United States striving to enrich their fellow Americans if they are Americans.
I have written a lot about this elsewhere. This is not the right place for that.
President Reagan inherited a bad post Vietnam War economy that President Carter mismanaged a little. His policies were designed to end the 'malaise', recession and so forth. The tax cuts and deficit spending were a Keynsianist approach to the max to stimulate the economy. Bush I called it 'voodoo' economics' rightly, if one considers a balanced budget as necessary.
I have written quite a bit about the media being owned by corporatists- and have supported a reallocation of the broadcast spectrum for Internet podcasts on radio frequency bursts. The technological exists already. Each citizen in a local area should be given a fair proportionate slice of dense broadcast data packing that radiowave Internet cheap am-fm digital receivers could select.
On Reagan's economic policy--For a one-term policy it did change the criterion. The trouble is that Americans became conditioned to accept it as a permanent rather than a temporary fix and became like patients addicted to pain killing narcotics piling up debt and so forth.
In the post cold war era there was no economic discipline in the Clinton administration nor Bush II; each outsourced jobs and reinforced a global approach the rich liked that was supposed to indirectly profit Americans. That was not fundamentally an intelligent belief.
The global trickle down trickled down globally--yet was not rational regarding ecological effects on local economies anywhere. The United States continued to borrow money to pay for imports and to purchase cheap consumer goods. 25% of U.S. rental properties were foreign owned. The Wall Street people became irresponsible globally in pursuit of cheap profits, and the basic infrastructure and direction of U.S. economic policy was no longer reinforced to preference of industry and opportunity for ecologically and nationally directly beneficial enterprise.
Corporatism is a political philosophy invented by the Italian Dictator Mussolini who was a socialist before inventing corporatism to synergize with fascism.
The American Eastern elite is heavily globalist via Wall Street and Government/Harvard. They own the media. It makes political, local self-determination rather complicated if not impossible. One's pockets stay empty not signed on board increasingly, and one's moral and political consciousness if subducted by the corporate totalitarian structures of power into working for them.
The administrative leadership of the U.S. Government from Bush I onward has outsourced jobs, invested overseas in China and elsewhere while letting the United States become a place to take profits from while reducing the middle class and poor to rent paying consumers with no savings.
Here is a list of the worlds top 100 billionaires in 2009, a minority of which are Americans (34)-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_billionaires
Many of these people invest globally, are centered outside the United States, pursue policies that create a dysfunctional consumerism economy without a renewable ecological economic foundation for the United States. They have no need to be patriots of the United States striving to enrich their fellow Americans if they are Americans.
I have written a lot about this elsewhere. This is not the right place for that.
President Reagan inherited a bad post Vietnam War economy that President Carter mismanaged a little. His policies were designed to end the 'malaise', recession and so forth. The tax cuts and deficit spending were a Keynsianist approach to the max to stimulate the economy. Bush I called it 'voodoo' economics' rightly, if one considers a balanced budget as necessary.
I have written quite a bit about the media being owned by corporatists- and have supported a reallocation of the broadcast spectrum for Internet podcasts on radio frequency bursts. The technological exists already. Each citizen in a local area should be given a fair proportionate slice of dense broadcast data packing that radiowave Internet cheap am-fm digital receivers could select.
On Reagan's economic policy--For a one-term policy it did change the criterion. The trouble is that Americans became conditioned to accept it as a permanent rather than a temporary fix and became like patients addicted to pain killing narcotics piling up debt and so forth.
In the post cold war era there was no economic discipline in the Clinton administration nor Bush II; each outsourced jobs and reinforced a global approach the rich liked that was supposed to indirectly profit Americans. That was not fundamentally an intelligent belief.
The global trickle down trickled down globally--yet was not rational regarding ecological effects on local economies anywhere. The United States continued to borrow money to pay for imports and to purchase cheap consumer goods. 25% of U.S. rental properties were foreign owned. The Wall Street people became irresponsible globally in pursuit of cheap profits, and the basic infrastructure and direction of U.S. economic policy was no longer reinforced to preference of industry and opportunity for ecologically and nationally directly beneficial enterprise.
Corporatism is a political philosophy invented by the Italian Dictator Mussolini who was a socialist before inventing corporatism to synergize with fascism.
The American Eastern elite is heavily globalist via Wall Street and Government/Harvard. They own the media. It makes political, local self-determination rather complicated if not impossible. One's pockets stay empty not signed on board increasingly, and one's moral and political consciousness if subducted by the corporate totalitarian structures of power into working for them.
The administrative leadership of the U.S. Government from Bush I onward has outsourced jobs, invested overseas in China and elsewhere while letting the United States become a place to take profits from while reducing the middle class and poor to rent paying consumers with no savings.
Health Reform Fiasco-End of Meaning of Marriage in Federal District of Columbia
I rather liked Soren Kierkeguaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript'. If politics in the District of Columbia is run for elites, if they get in synch with Obama administration elites they can administratively force a lot of unpopular policy through. Yesterday the President said that everything that could be said about health care has been said. It must be nice to have that kind of closure decretal ability--I don't recall anyone in Congress seeking to create a public health service exclusively for the poor-a true safety net. If the poor are forced to tithe the Global Health ncorporations and provide their addresses and financial information forever than a certain notch is tightened eliminating liberty.
The middle class will have to pay for the health service for the poor anyway--at least through a reduction in services. The cheapest way to get good health services for a safety bet for the poor in absolute terms is a public health services--mint a few more doctors. They don't need to treat more than about 90% of the problems-rare things can be farmed out to medicare.
Health insurance for the poor would require continuing emergency room treatment for the uninsured illegal aliens anyway. Insurance for all the poor that aren't sick would also be unneccessary cost. Basically the middle class would be grafting the global insurance companies so they can profit by getting payments for a lot of people that are healthy--and the middle class thinks thats a way to cut health costs for themselves!
A public health service for the poor can treat the illegal aliens the government can't stop from crossing the border, and maybe can provide faster electric wheels for the Homeland Security so it can catch Speedy Gonzalez more of the time.
Corporatism is a pervasive, encroaching economic fact of life. Americans have decreasing political competence because of the layers of complexity, networking and corrupt influence over local polities. They can have luck at voting for something they thing they need to find that it is counter-productive. Globalism makes a mockery of political sovereignty and the value of enfranchisement. Concentrated wealth, media organs and a vast evil empire of corporate-communist network have evolved a very undemocratic structure over America today.
So here is some reasoning about the corruption of marriage in the District of Columbia that occurs today or tomorrow when homosexual marriage becomes law. Concluding unscientific postscripts about the decline and fall of morality are such as can be made though the McCarthyite 'tail-gunners' of defense for the homosexual vanguard fire bursts at any sort of commentators that are not in agreement with the advance of the demonic world spirit.
If reduction of the global population was the intent of the non-homosexual advocates of homosexual usurpation of marriage, homosexual assault upon marriage was a bad choice of means. It will advance social dissolution of coherent bonding such that the eventual destruction of society for clean restart is reinforced. These fair weather over-the-top corruptions create substantial dysfunctional evils is deep water storms when society discovers that its allegiances and loyalties are as dysfunctional as a broken rudder.
Defending laws as they are, that were well formed for valid, rational causes is worthwhile if one considers their veracity and service.
Homosexual assaults upon the meaning of marriage--upon it's rational meaning, forces an evil upon society pervasively.
Terms are not perfect that cover general facts-that is becoause of the synonomic/associative nature of language terms. Marriage as the procreative union is what is at the heart of the concept-to divorce the meaning entirely to mean non-procreative association generally will kill the true meaning of marriage.
Marriage need not be perfect as an institution-or it could only be awarded post hoc after children are born. To exclude procreation as the core meaning of marriage however is to eliminate the concept of marrying the egg and sperm into a blastocycst and zygote. It would be like changing the meaning of the moon program to include a cargo cult in Washington D.C.
I have found that homosexual militants preponderantly attack personally--ad hominems, in the effort to censor opposite opinions from being published. They tend to be essential factors in the decline of civilization, considering Toynbean historical cycles. from the Roman Cult of Bacchus to the homosexual leadership of Hitler's S.A. the decadent, wild, freaky instability of homosexual cadres undermining traditional social stability is notorious.
One is not 'picking' on homosexuals by defense of traditional marriage, the truth of marriage-an institution thousands of years old, from the perversion of Congress. Homosexuals are not required to expropriate marriage-to end its rational meaning, in order to secure benefits for themselves. Men are not in some way women that need to act like women in relationship with another man. If they choose to they can at least have the honesty to seek a unique label for that relationship besides marriage.
It reminds me of efforts of the rich to be called poor on tax day,for the fearless leader to say that he is just one of the guys before counting his millions, for the labeling of an interminable Iraq and Afghan nation building effort as 'war', to have a host of Orwellian use-truth falsehood labels upon every sort of honest social relationship such that honest politics are impossible for ordinary people.
The middle class will have to pay for the health service for the poor anyway--at least through a reduction in services. The cheapest way to get good health services for a safety bet for the poor in absolute terms is a public health services--mint a few more doctors. They don't need to treat more than about 90% of the problems-rare things can be farmed out to medicare.
Health insurance for the poor would require continuing emergency room treatment for the uninsured illegal aliens anyway. Insurance for all the poor that aren't sick would also be unneccessary cost. Basically the middle class would be grafting the global insurance companies so they can profit by getting payments for a lot of people that are healthy--and the middle class thinks thats a way to cut health costs for themselves!
A public health service for the poor can treat the illegal aliens the government can't stop from crossing the border, and maybe can provide faster electric wheels for the Homeland Security so it can catch Speedy Gonzalez more of the time.
Corporatism is a pervasive, encroaching economic fact of life. Americans have decreasing political competence because of the layers of complexity, networking and corrupt influence over local polities. They can have luck at voting for something they thing they need to find that it is counter-productive. Globalism makes a mockery of political sovereignty and the value of enfranchisement. Concentrated wealth, media organs and a vast evil empire of corporate-communist network have evolved a very undemocratic structure over America today.
So here is some reasoning about the corruption of marriage in the District of Columbia that occurs today or tomorrow when homosexual marriage becomes law. Concluding unscientific postscripts about the decline and fall of morality are such as can be made though the McCarthyite 'tail-gunners' of defense for the homosexual vanguard fire bursts at any sort of commentators that are not in agreement with the advance of the demonic world spirit.
If reduction of the global population was the intent of the non-homosexual advocates of homosexual usurpation of marriage, homosexual assault upon marriage was a bad choice of means. It will advance social dissolution of coherent bonding such that the eventual destruction of society for clean restart is reinforced. These fair weather over-the-top corruptions create substantial dysfunctional evils is deep water storms when society discovers that its allegiances and loyalties are as dysfunctional as a broken rudder.
Defending laws as they are, that were well formed for valid, rational causes is worthwhile if one considers their veracity and service.
Homosexual assaults upon the meaning of marriage--upon it's rational meaning, forces an evil upon society pervasively.
Terms are not perfect that cover general facts-that is becoause of the synonomic/associative nature of language terms. Marriage as the procreative union is what is at the heart of the concept-to divorce the meaning entirely to mean non-procreative association generally will kill the true meaning of marriage.
Marriage need not be perfect as an institution-or it could only be awarded post hoc after children are born. To exclude procreation as the core meaning of marriage however is to eliminate the concept of marrying the egg and sperm into a blastocycst and zygote. It would be like changing the meaning of the moon program to include a cargo cult in Washington D.C.
I have found that homosexual militants preponderantly attack personally--ad hominems, in the effort to censor opposite opinions from being published. They tend to be essential factors in the decline of civilization, considering Toynbean historical cycles. from the Roman Cult of Bacchus to the homosexual leadership of Hitler's S.A. the decadent, wild, freaky instability of homosexual cadres undermining traditional social stability is notorious.
One is not 'picking' on homosexuals by defense of traditional marriage, the truth of marriage-an institution thousands of years old, from the perversion of Congress. Homosexuals are not required to expropriate marriage-to end its rational meaning, in order to secure benefits for themselves. Men are not in some way women that need to act like women in relationship with another man. If they choose to they can at least have the honesty to seek a unique label for that relationship besides marriage.
It reminds me of efforts of the rich to be called poor on tax day,for the fearless leader to say that he is just one of the guys before counting his millions, for the labeling of an interminable Iraq and Afghan nation building effort as 'war', to have a host of Orwellian use-truth falsehood labels upon every sort of honest social relationship such that honest politics are impossible for ordinary people.
3/3/10
Nancy House of Congress Perverts Marriage in D.C., Bungles Health Reform
The U.S. House of Representatives has allowed homosexual marriage to become law in the Federal District of Columbia. Along with the effort in the Health Bill to force the nation's poor and uninsured to buy insurance from wealthy global corporations, the primary assault by the Democratic Party on traditional American common sense continues to spend its force like a tsunami with its elite and singular endowment of power.
A last minute reconciliation bill approach requiring just a simple majority to compel expensive, inefficient and neo-authoritarian conditions of tracking of the poor, the homeless, the oppressed about the nation instead of creating a practical walk-in national health service for the poor adds to the perfidious construction of global corporate control of the U.S. Government.
The high cost of health care is just one element in the post-cold war abandonment of responsibility and intellect by the U.S. Congress in the frenzied greed to profit from the end of the cold war and expansion of global corporate profit taking. With the demise of labor unions, the degradation of U.S. labor wages, concentration of wealth and stagnation and decline of real income for the majority of the middle class and poor the leverage on health costs was an inevitable step in the end of democratic pragmatism. The U.S. Congress-an institution by and for the rich these days, has yet a host of sympathizers of the poor who estimate what the poor should need, and what it might be like to be uninsured and injured. Pain was evolved such that sleeping mammals might awaken from sleep if a predator started nibbling on one's extremities.
The Congress has decided that the poor need the same sort of purchasing of insurance from the rich that the middle class has and can't afford--the middle class and rich can pay for the insurance. Lost in the reasoning is the fundamentally bad negotiating position the Congress continues to advance for the poor and middle class in economics and politics. A national health service for the poor would not lower health costs for the middle class directly--yet it would make a most cost effective delivery of medical services to the uninsured poor. The middle class must find their own path to lowering their health costs.
A last minute reconciliation bill approach requiring just a simple majority to compel expensive, inefficient and neo-authoritarian conditions of tracking of the poor, the homeless, the oppressed about the nation instead of creating a practical walk-in national health service for the poor adds to the perfidious construction of global corporate control of the U.S. Government.
The high cost of health care is just one element in the post-cold war abandonment of responsibility and intellect by the U.S. Congress in the frenzied greed to profit from the end of the cold war and expansion of global corporate profit taking. With the demise of labor unions, the degradation of U.S. labor wages, concentration of wealth and stagnation and decline of real income for the majority of the middle class and poor the leverage on health costs was an inevitable step in the end of democratic pragmatism. The U.S. Congress-an institution by and for the rich these days, has yet a host of sympathizers of the poor who estimate what the poor should need, and what it might be like to be uninsured and injured. Pain was evolved such that sleeping mammals might awaken from sleep if a predator started nibbling on one's extremities.
The Congress has decided that the poor need the same sort of purchasing of insurance from the rich that the middle class has and can't afford--the middle class and rich can pay for the insurance. Lost in the reasoning is the fundamentally bad negotiating position the Congress continues to advance for the poor and middle class in economics and politics. A national health service for the poor would not lower health costs for the middle class directly--yet it would make a most cost effective delivery of medical services to the uninsured poor. The middle class must find their own path to lowering their health costs.
3/1/10
Sin Amplified in Global Financial Networks
I thought I would write something about the new non-locality of financial sin. Since the increase of telecommunications globally and of planetary financial networking, traditional local financial sins have found new realms to romp through for plundering the people. Since the wicked may most desire wealth without social regard, a false interpretation of Adam Smith's quarter millenia old economic philosophy is used as a gospel for plundering the people and is presented as one false alternative-the only authorized alternative-- to the evil of communist totalitarianism. In such a political environment without much reason sin flourishes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diner's_dilemma
The Diner's dilemma and The Prisoner's dilemma are gaming strategies for exploiting best in a social environment. Each strategy applies to the evolutionary pressures to plunder the global financial and global production and eco-resource environments too. Sinners must out-profit other sinners without regard before the potential pot for plundering is depleted. I will not provide too much detail on the topic, being an unemployed house repainter myself--yet giving this topic some consideration before I move on to other issues by force of circumstance is worthwhile.
Sin has been with humanity since its emergence in the mists of time. It became formalized as deleterious human activity in the Bible. Humanity could recognize the patterns of conduct--actual ethical practices of evil, that lead to social anomie, injustice and strife. For most of human history sin was a local phenomena and was thus contained.
That is no longer the case. Sin has been liberated and spans the globe through telecommunications and transport. A disease forming from chimps with retroviruses up a vaguely named river in the challenged jungles of the Congo may be spread to Washington D.C. within days. Networks of financial crime may be established through originally well meaning establishments of business transaction to permit global culling of innocent investors. Sin has entered a new age where it is not contained by the plain geographic isolation and independence of business practices.
A kind of four-dimensional global financial chess game is played with the nations and corporations being the independently moving pieces seeking to win all capital for themselves. They are reluctantly moved by politicians and popular revolutionary pressures, yet the world people and environment are the losers for allowing the game to proceed--what is needed is restricted capital concentration by individuals and corporations such that competition and intelligence are required to win in a non-lethal business environmemmnt with just rules.
With new liberated opportunity for financial sin--with the transformation through Wall Street and other global investment venues of materially productive factories into units of billion and trillion dollar gambling and Rube Goldberg schemes of deception and perfidy limited only by the financial cunning and skills of economic innovators the world's firewalls of geographical security have been breached. The recent economic slump in much of the world's economic regions is a result of the rash, driving, plundering of all associated with the political-financial networks who have an implicit vulnerability to victimization by the financial manipulation and transaction classes.
Global networking and freeing up of mortgages and assets, real property and capital such that it is a liquid sea of cold mercury presents innumerable temptations and opportunities for financial sin. Traditionally only the good side of networking and mass marketing is advertised, yet the dark side of the financial network force is equally powerful and may bring the United States to financial ruin. Networking in sundry forms reduces the privacy and independent nature of business. Large corporations with tens of thousands of employees reduce competition. The global stock ownership class creates a de facto elitist corporate hegemony over democratic politics. Democracy and the environment are endangered. It is the amplification of sin from the local to the networked global level that has perhaps transformed the global business elite into being partners inn financial sin with the demonic spiritual realm that formerly was generally limited to imperial rulers, military generals and a rare few others.
In a 19th century kind of western civilization those business people that were financially unethical were restricted in there opportunities to plunder the people. Today global traders, investors and schemers must compete with each other to skim as much capital as possible from that liquid, mercurial abstract commodity below the surface of the everyday world. The financial war is perhaps more extreme than the military technology race I would think, as the fruits the management-owner class pursue are ownership of everything on Earth.
Many of us have experienced our own personal crystalnachts of small scale and diluted form when a corporation has decided its time to cash in and confiscate our personal profits and intellectual capital investments--these are trifling troubles in comparison to the vast evil empire of sin assaulting the global local property interests like a host of Genghis Khan's elites with M.B.A.'s from Harvard.
Human beings have off-line blood supply. If all human beings shared one blood circulatory system, one virus or illness might kill everyone. The world business and financial networks in many respects have that same vulnerability. It may be offended from innumerable unforeseen causes.
If corporations were limited to three thousand employees and if individuals could own stock of just three corporations it would help to place firewalls in the world economic and business order. There should also be firewalls in innumerable financial institutions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diner's_dilemma
The Diner's dilemma and The Prisoner's dilemma are gaming strategies for exploiting best in a social environment. Each strategy applies to the evolutionary pressures to plunder the global financial and global production and eco-resource environments too. Sinners must out-profit other sinners without regard before the potential pot for plundering is depleted. I will not provide too much detail on the topic, being an unemployed house repainter myself--yet giving this topic some consideration before I move on to other issues by force of circumstance is worthwhile.
Sin has been with humanity since its emergence in the mists of time. It became formalized as deleterious human activity in the Bible. Humanity could recognize the patterns of conduct--actual ethical practices of evil, that lead to social anomie, injustice and strife. For most of human history sin was a local phenomena and was thus contained.
That is no longer the case. Sin has been liberated and spans the globe through telecommunications and transport. A disease forming from chimps with retroviruses up a vaguely named river in the challenged jungles of the Congo may be spread to Washington D.C. within days. Networks of financial crime may be established through originally well meaning establishments of business transaction to permit global culling of innocent investors. Sin has entered a new age where it is not contained by the plain geographic isolation and independence of business practices.
A kind of four-dimensional global financial chess game is played with the nations and corporations being the independently moving pieces seeking to win all capital for themselves. They are reluctantly moved by politicians and popular revolutionary pressures, yet the world people and environment are the losers for allowing the game to proceed--what is needed is restricted capital concentration by individuals and corporations such that competition and intelligence are required to win in a non-lethal business environmemmnt with just rules.
With new liberated opportunity for financial sin--with the transformation through Wall Street and other global investment venues of materially productive factories into units of billion and trillion dollar gambling and Rube Goldberg schemes of deception and perfidy limited only by the financial cunning and skills of economic innovators the world's firewalls of geographical security have been breached. The recent economic slump in much of the world's economic regions is a result of the rash, driving, plundering of all associated with the political-financial networks who have an implicit vulnerability to victimization by the financial manipulation and transaction classes.
Global networking and freeing up of mortgages and assets, real property and capital such that it is a liquid sea of cold mercury presents innumerable temptations and opportunities for financial sin. Traditionally only the good side of networking and mass marketing is advertised, yet the dark side of the financial network force is equally powerful and may bring the United States to financial ruin. Networking in sundry forms reduces the privacy and independent nature of business. Large corporations with tens of thousands of employees reduce competition. The global stock ownership class creates a de facto elitist corporate hegemony over democratic politics. Democracy and the environment are endangered. It is the amplification of sin from the local to the networked global level that has perhaps transformed the global business elite into being partners inn financial sin with the demonic spiritual realm that formerly was generally limited to imperial rulers, military generals and a rare few others.
In a 19th century kind of western civilization those business people that were financially unethical were restricted in there opportunities to plunder the people. Today global traders, investors and schemers must compete with each other to skim as much capital as possible from that liquid, mercurial abstract commodity below the surface of the everyday world. The financial war is perhaps more extreme than the military technology race I would think, as the fruits the management-owner class pursue are ownership of everything on Earth.
Many of us have experienced our own personal crystalnachts of small scale and diluted form when a corporation has decided its time to cash in and confiscate our personal profits and intellectual capital investments--these are trifling troubles in comparison to the vast evil empire of sin assaulting the global local property interests like a host of Genghis Khan's elites with M.B.A.'s from Harvard.
Human beings have off-line blood supply. If all human beings shared one blood circulatory system, one virus or illness might kill everyone. The world business and financial networks in many respects have that same vulnerability. It may be offended from innumerable unforeseen causes.
If corporations were limited to three thousand employees and if individuals could own stock of just three corporations it would help to place firewalls in the world economic and business order. There should also be firewalls in innumerable financial institutions.
2/28/10
Networks of Sin and Wickedness
That's a snappy title-maybe someone will read it for or ignore it for that. The topics of sin and wickedness are highly subjective topics. We know about ethical definitions for sin and wickedness--some have their own, others share an ontology of meaning and others are agnostic on right and wrong--the U.S. Congress for example has a net ambivalence about the need to reform health care for the benefit of the poor right away--its all about the middle class and the rich instead.
In the brave new world the poor will need to pay the rich for health insurance and the middle class will have public debt added in their name--the rich will get tax cuts and corporations pay no taxes anyway--it is written in instant message script. There must be a network of sin and wickedness in there somewhere. Yet we must move on...
The poor and their free or cheap software may be controlled by hidden code in the word processors of politics--these are not open source documents that transfer transparently from notepad to msword to open office, Google docs and yahoo things--only joking! Everything gets cut up, blocked and disappeared in such integrations of writing modalities. Microsoft's software proprietary needs places walls in the Internet world difficult for some to overcome. I don't blame them, yet it is exemplary of the problems with the elitist side of politics and software for legislative combinations producing nothing except public opportunity cost for time lost.
The world's poor, if on-line with cheaper, better, faster waterproof Internet technology will likely find a universe of politi-techical obstructions and software conditioning walls from the Communist Party of China to the Italian elites distrustful of political free speech on the Internet--and I don't blame them because the Internet is a kind of natural redistributor of free speech access and dissolvant compound for exclusive control of public thought...Much sin will be used and infused to repress the masses and restrict access to political control of rights to exhaust finite natural resources irresponsibly (they will say they are responsible)
If Satan is a real power, then the increase of sin would be a Satanic goal I would imagine; the more sin flourishes the easier it is to accomplish egregious wickedness in society and politics. A good corrupt political swamp has minions of corruption at all levels who have learned that virtue and democratic rights for all equally are quaint concepts. Many regimes on Earth validate the presence of evil, and Satan may be gaining strength in that regard even though it is an ephemeral increase of power that perishes in the bright light and heat of God and the Day ahead.
Sin may be like a tide that rolls in making all the ships of sophisticated wickedness in the harbor rise. Sin in one places enables wickedness in others. It is not necessary to be judgmental regarding sin--simply abstain from it-resist wickedness yourself so far as possible and do not wire up new connections for evil such that the increase of newtworks of sin tie up the world.
To brake up the hogtied society subjugated by sophisticated powers of wickedness and sin requires a cutting of the Gordian knots of evil that bind the decent human impulses and inalienable rights of civil liberties each individual has. Philosophically wickedness may be all those things that drive mankind towards the brink of chaos and disasters of sundry sorts--sin-not just the obvious sins such as theft and homosexuality, adultery, murder and so forth, but the less obvious ones such as avarice (greed), gluttony etc. make mankind less trusting and less willing to solve mass social challenges successfully.
The world may be headed towards several disasters-even in Haiti steel pipe geodesic domes approved by the Fuller Institute are not being prioritized for construction--instead wood and plastic instant boxy slummier housing than donating countries are going up--there are innumerable economic and political sins that together strengthen the networks of sin and wickedness that could be associated with a planet-wide real-politik misery index. The reduction of the misery and sin index requires simultaneous advances and not with violence and persecutions either.
--post script
Someone usefully commented that entitlements may be considered to be a pervasive evil. I thought I would consider the topic of entitlements a little here in order to try to define what they are...
Entitlements must be perjoratively all those things that one has or uses yet does noot supply for-oneself. That would include not only those receiving government payments such as Medicare, social security, veterans benefits and so forth, but also things like airports, traffic signals, schools and any accumulated public infrastructure that one has not paid for oneself but feels entitled to. The list may be quite lengthy.
Some 'entitlements' are necessary; one is entitled to good police and fire protection most may think, or to a good military defense--one wants good chefs and hospitals and good highways rather than those with potholes. One is entitled to a good government that runs a balanced budget while supplying all the aforementioned and doesn't get it; so that I may reasonably ask; What is the social reasoning for having a good society-is that an entitlement?
A good society is not just a matter of switching word-terms about and blaming this or that imbalance--it is a matter of public intelligence and will equal to the challenging era eco-politically in which they live. A millionaire is one that owned a mill and had plenty--he or she had a lot of paper credits for being an owner of a productive fact (ory). A healthy society sets real goals (L.B.J. tried with The Great Society) to achieve within the actual means at its disposal--it is not simply a matter of possessing paper cash loaned by productive societies.
To achieve quality lifestyles and plentiful opportunities for all U.S. citizens within a stable population, with secure borders, with a recovering ecosystem and the proverbial liberty and justice for all requires intention and political will. A lassez fair attitude toward democratic responsibility in the present global demographic environment is a recipe for disaster.
Writing on a cosmology thread--someone used the term 1 to -1 to describe a relationship of the presence of quanta in the vacuum before the big bang. The problem of a terminology to describe real political space is absent in the United States today. Cash or capital power is the basic entitlement as an abstract moral right, it is held by some.
Yet cash and personal power to have property are civil determined by force. It may be the intellectual force of an enlightened democratic electorate or a guy with a totaliitarian control of nuclear weapons. In a limited, finite geo-political area orderly change and universal political liberty for the greatest number of people must be a fundamental entitlement for-itself.
Defining terms, and understanding them as well as the true social intentions of others, are essential for the effort to assure that corrupt social and political hegemony is cut back and contained.
Terms such as entitlement are perhaps referents to government pay-outs of tax money to people such as retirees, veterans, the disabled corporate contractors and so forth. Sin however is far more fundamental and subtle--why did the bad reconstruction for Iraq occur causing two trillion dollars of subsequent expense, why did the Wall Street Mortgage crisis occur?
A bad social environment steeped in sin and networks of wickedness stimulates the promulgation of legislation that is only less bad than others instead of being forthright and neccesary corrections beneficial for the public interest.
In the brave new world the poor will need to pay the rich for health insurance and the middle class will have public debt added in their name--the rich will get tax cuts and corporations pay no taxes anyway--it is written in instant message script. There must be a network of sin and wickedness in there somewhere. Yet we must move on...
The poor and their free or cheap software may be controlled by hidden code in the word processors of politics--these are not open source documents that transfer transparently from notepad to msword to open office, Google docs and yahoo things--only joking! Everything gets cut up, blocked and disappeared in such integrations of writing modalities. Microsoft's software proprietary needs places walls in the Internet world difficult for some to overcome. I don't blame them, yet it is exemplary of the problems with the elitist side of politics and software for legislative combinations producing nothing except public opportunity cost for time lost.
The world's poor, if on-line with cheaper, better, faster waterproof Internet technology will likely find a universe of politi-techical obstructions and software conditioning walls from the Communist Party of China to the Italian elites distrustful of political free speech on the Internet--and I don't blame them because the Internet is a kind of natural redistributor of free speech access and dissolvant compound for exclusive control of public thought...Much sin will be used and infused to repress the masses and restrict access to political control of rights to exhaust finite natural resources irresponsibly (they will say they are responsible)
If Satan is a real power, then the increase of sin would be a Satanic goal I would imagine; the more sin flourishes the easier it is to accomplish egregious wickedness in society and politics. A good corrupt political swamp has minions of corruption at all levels who have learned that virtue and democratic rights for all equally are quaint concepts. Many regimes on Earth validate the presence of evil, and Satan may be gaining strength in that regard even though it is an ephemeral increase of power that perishes in the bright light and heat of God and the Day ahead.
Sin may be like a tide that rolls in making all the ships of sophisticated wickedness in the harbor rise. Sin in one places enables wickedness in others. It is not necessary to be judgmental regarding sin--simply abstain from it-resist wickedness yourself so far as possible and do not wire up new connections for evil such that the increase of newtworks of sin tie up the world.
To brake up the hogtied society subjugated by sophisticated powers of wickedness and sin requires a cutting of the Gordian knots of evil that bind the decent human impulses and inalienable rights of civil liberties each individual has. Philosophically wickedness may be all those things that drive mankind towards the brink of chaos and disasters of sundry sorts--sin-not just the obvious sins such as theft and homosexuality, adultery, murder and so forth, but the less obvious ones such as avarice (greed), gluttony etc. make mankind less trusting and less willing to solve mass social challenges successfully.
The world may be headed towards several disasters-even in Haiti steel pipe geodesic domes approved by the Fuller Institute are not being prioritized for construction--instead wood and plastic instant boxy slummier housing than donating countries are going up--there are innumerable economic and political sins that together strengthen the networks of sin and wickedness that could be associated with a planet-wide real-politik misery index. The reduction of the misery and sin index requires simultaneous advances and not with violence and persecutions either.
--post script
Someone usefully commented that entitlements may be considered to be a pervasive evil. I thought I would consider the topic of entitlements a little here in order to try to define what they are...
Entitlements must be perjoratively all those things that one has or uses yet does noot supply for-oneself. That would include not only those receiving government payments such as Medicare, social security, veterans benefits and so forth, but also things like airports, traffic signals, schools and any accumulated public infrastructure that one has not paid for oneself but feels entitled to. The list may be quite lengthy.
Some 'entitlements' are necessary; one is entitled to good police and fire protection most may think, or to a good military defense--one wants good chefs and hospitals and good highways rather than those with potholes. One is entitled to a good government that runs a balanced budget while supplying all the aforementioned and doesn't get it; so that I may reasonably ask; What is the social reasoning for having a good society-is that an entitlement?
A good society is not just a matter of switching word-terms about and blaming this or that imbalance--it is a matter of public intelligence and will equal to the challenging era eco-politically in which they live. A millionaire is one that owned a mill and had plenty--he or she had a lot of paper credits for being an owner of a productive fact (ory). A healthy society sets real goals (L.B.J. tried with The Great Society) to achieve within the actual means at its disposal--it is not simply a matter of possessing paper cash loaned by productive societies.
To achieve quality lifestyles and plentiful opportunities for all U.S. citizens within a stable population, with secure borders, with a recovering ecosystem and the proverbial liberty and justice for all requires intention and political will. A lassez fair attitude toward democratic responsibility in the present global demographic environment is a recipe for disaster.
Writing on a cosmology thread--someone used the term 1 to -1 to describe a relationship of the presence of quanta in the vacuum before the big bang. The problem of a terminology to describe real political space is absent in the United States today. Cash or capital power is the basic entitlement as an abstract moral right, it is held by some.
Yet cash and personal power to have property are civil determined by force. It may be the intellectual force of an enlightened democratic electorate or a guy with a totaliitarian control of nuclear weapons. In a limited, finite geo-political area orderly change and universal political liberty for the greatest number of people must be a fundamental entitlement for-itself.
Defining terms, and understanding them as well as the true social intentions of others, are essential for the effort to assure that corrupt social and political hegemony is cut back and contained.
Terms such as entitlement are perhaps referents to government pay-outs of tax money to people such as retirees, veterans, the disabled corporate contractors and so forth. Sin however is far more fundamental and subtle--why did the bad reconstruction for Iraq occur causing two trillion dollars of subsequent expense, why did the Wall Street Mortgage crisis occur?
A bad social environment steeped in sin and networks of wickedness stimulates the promulgation of legislation that is only less bad than others instead of being forthright and neccesary corrections beneficial for the public interest.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The President's Irrational Ukraine Policy
Nuclear weapons are an existential threat. Presidents are not welcome to egress toward the direction of nuclear war. It's just bad polic...
-
Alaskan officials have cut down or banned King Salmon fishing in much of Alaska because so few of the large fish are returning. The Ancho...
-
Here and there pointillist continua build rowing the skiff clambering over the road staying in shadows until spring insouciant compact snow ...
-
Why do F-22 pilots lose consciousness and let their planes crash and burn? The air superiority fighters are designed to survive oppositio...