Since
the end of the cold war the left-leaning U.S. leadership has moved to
keep Russia out of main stream European and world business and of
course it must if it hopes to restart communism around the globe. If
Russia were to develop a very strong middle class and reduce poverty
with free enterprise even the left of Europe would lose leverage for
global socialism.
So
the main idea is to make nice with China, keep Russia sanctioned and
down so far as possible while putting the U.S. into such deep debt
that social welfare benefits necessary to relieve poverty's extremes
are eliminated and a restive underclass seeks more left leadership.
China is developing capitalism yet the state requires that the
majority of foreign owned companies be held by Chinese. China hence
is a far better prospect for continuing socialism than Russia in the
immediate future, and besides, China has cheap labor.
Recent
conflict with china of a minor sort regarding the next administration
reminds one of that of the Bush 43 administration that amounted to
nothing eventually. The United States has such leaky tech security it
seems that China probably has more filched tech items than they could
produce and use in their own military.
Initially
the Clinton administration sought to take Russia's spare nukes and
destroy them and get them to sign away the Ukraine and some of its
land that was part of Russia before Communism arrived in 1917. Then
they were happy with war on Russian interests and of course the Obama
administration placed tight sanctions on Russia because I suppose of
president Putin's failure to support the homosexual agenda of
President Obama and the Clintons.
No
U.S. president since Ronald Regan have been very dynamic. Donald
Trump will be an exception to thatline of insider style people in the
White House since 1989. It was Ralph Nadir though that was the last
candidate that seemed to have any sort of real competence and
business and environment with good sense. Ecospheric economics with
sustainability, strong nationalism on a democratic rather than an
absolutist foundation, and an ethic of total social well being of all
citizens won't be easy or even possible to accomplish without strong
leaders. Fortunately the incipient Clinton dynasty was cut down
leaving the possibility that quality Democratic candidates will arise
in the future that are more normal yet with excellent environmental
economic education.