U.S. May Need to Send Marine Division to Syria to Defeat Turkish Invasion

Turkey's defense minister has plans to attack Syria if U.S. troops remain. They want to kill Kurds in Syria who are U.S. allies. Though direct military conflict with a N.A.T.O. member isn't good, it may be necessary. If so the United States should deploy a marine division to Syria ASAP.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/01/turkey-launch-syria-attack-delays-troop-pullout-190110092123874.html

Turkey was historically an enemy of the United States. Turks were on the German side of the First World War and would have sided with Hitler if they had thought they could get away with it. Turkey was worried sufficiently by the Soviet invasion threat to become a N.A.T.O. member, yet after the cold war ended the communist danger with its conclusion Turkey became an alien in N.A.T.O. serving to divide Euro-American interests in foreign policy. They only very reluctant allowed U.S. military forces access to the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. Now they are endangering and threatening the security of U.S.troops and national friends who were journeyman warriors in the conflicts in the region for more than a decade.

Turkish leadership has so little respect for the United States and friends that they use abusive ultimatum style language to order U.S. forces to hurry up and leave or they will just go ahead to invade Syria and kill Kurdish allies. Only Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi and possibly Representative Ocasio-Cortez would like that.

Universal Evolutionary Design Required Omniscience

Omniscience may be required for proper design of species evolution. If one configures an evolutionary system to generate a targeted product in a very complex ecosystem with innumerable variables, the likelihood of system errors deforming the system to bring system failure to evolve the desired product are great. Omniscience is required to design the evolving system such that it is pre-determined to create the proper product at the right moment.

One might regard the evolution of human life through heterosexual events as an archetypal example of creation through omniscient configuration of evolution. In my opinion, when mankind was created and God rested, the designed evolution era ceased and human intelligence became capable of deforming the functioning patterns through genetic redesign and sundry forms of sin for-itself and for-others.

I go over some of the points and correlate a few of the details with the Bible in this free to download book.

 http://www.lulu.com/shop/garrison-clifford-gibson/god-cosmology-and-nothingness-theory-and-theology-in-a-scientific-era/ebook/product-23941369.html

Consider one point; of all the proto-human species that existed the challenges of designing the ecosphere such that just one species would emerge to dominate are incalculable except for omniscience. Democrats today believe that evolution has no design, or had none in the era in which God created the Universe from emergence in His will to the solar system and let it become peopled before bringing the era of Adamas and Edith to fruition, hence its o.k. to sin and miss the mark of evolving human function and conditional health (everyone is spiritual dead unless reborn with faith in the Lord Jesus Christ).

The Kashoggi Option to Murder Kurds Sought by Pres Erdogan

Turkey seems to want the Kashoggi option at mass scale with the arrogation of power to murder Kurdish fighters in Syria. President Trump should put sanctions on Turkey until President Tayyip Erdogan resigns from office or is impeached. The United States can't support for killers just because the are Sunni leaders. The United States can't betray allies by commission or omission to such a degree as to allow murderous foreigners to kill U.S. allies simply because they were for some unnatural reason allowed to join NATO.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/erdogan-snubs-bolton-angered-over-demands-to-protect-kurdish-fighters-in-syria

Democrats May Be Dissimulating About Support for Real National Security at Boundaries

Democrats might be lying about supporting national security. That is fact checkers could examine if being unwilling to spend even five billion for border security of a five-hundred-ninety billion dollar annual security budget called defense is consistent with support for national security.

National security that is for theoretical security without immediate practical application if fine with Democrats yet reinforcing border security- the most basic national security measure for a nation to take, is something Democrats are entirely unwilling to do.

The Democrat Party apparently supports the right of foreigners to invade and occupy the United States illegally whenever they so choose.

Rep Ocasio-Cortez is Racist

 Rep. Ocasio-Cortez is a racist. Accusing white people of racism that aren't, or that at least do not make overt expressions of racism, providing basic neo-libel for people in order to benefit one's own expansive race (hispanics) is the essence of racism. La Raza wants to annex the U.S.A.  Racism accusations may be the soft underbelly of U.S. politics easy for foreign governments to attack for leverage. War is a continuation of politics through other means (Clausewitz).

White people have been having the zero population growth experience for a half century while some hispanics have expanded demographics like a vast left-wing balloon. All the while they sought to dominate the nation through aggressive racial expansion they accuse the zpg white community of racism as their social demographics dwindle. Cortez may attack the President because he was a greatest symbol of capitalism during the cold war versus the Communist and she is a socialist with fellow travelers seeking to reignite cold war because Russia is no longer communist. Socialists should use more wisdom than to ignore nuclear brinksmanship and cold war conflicts that were past and not bring a revival. It would be better to reform capitalism, democracy and free enterprise starting with adequate taxation on the 1% of 90%.

The Demo perception may be that President Trump doesn't have the back of those shooting policeman as some of the public may have believed of President Obama during the BLM riots and police ambushes. The Dem party apparently wants to get racism as a political issue going with new accelerants since they lack any sort of substantive thought on economic and ecospheric reform.

Some-not all, hispanics seek to forcibly change racial balances//demographics as if their race had a right too. Actually that is racism. Rep Cortez probably is activating her racist mode now in order to try to get support for more illegal aliens invading the nation. To keep the wall from being built. Race trumps civil rights in her case.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-60-minutes-trump_us_5c32bce0e4b0bcb4c25d2179

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-calls-president-trump-a-racist-in-60-minutes-interview-2019-01-06/

Democrats Seek to Defeat Border Security With Government Closure

The Democrat Party hasn’t much capacity to work cooperatively these days. President Trump and tens of millions of Americans want more Mexican border security. Democrats are more concerned with foreign interests and attacking the President. They would spend 50 billion on a highway bill, nearly a trillion on defense and not even 5 billion for border security. They would rather let the government remain partially closed.

Several foreign governments if they were asked would likely opt for an open border in order to better degrade California with drug smuggling and infiltrate people into the U.S.A. Democrats are more concerned with passing tax cuts for the most rich as President Obama forced through so they can have bigger wine cellars and more cheap illegal grape pickers.

Democrats just want to argue and attack the President. Maybe they believe a partial government closure can help them to impeach the President. I don’t know if zombies blink.

China Should Recognize Taiwan's Independence

A government has more than hegemony in relation to its citizen/subjects. Few governments are self-abnegating. The will to power exists in the people that are in government generally. The basic goal isn’t to create utopia unless that idea is defined as the ideal bureaucratic state. Taiwan is a free island-nation. It historically was independent of China and is likely to remain so even though it presently has a majority of ethnically Chinese people. Mainlanders often desire to oppress islanders and assert their tyranny. The Communist mainland dictator apparently feels he has a valid historical claim to annex Taiwan because he can bum rush in on the backs of the previous invaders of Taiwan- nationalist Chinese- that have since relinquished claims to rule the mainland and have adapted to Taiwan to become native Taiwanese. Dictators always want to invade someplace and have megalomaniacal claims. The late Saddam Hussein was that way.

https://www.newsweek.com/china-president-xi-jinping-tells-army-be-ready-battle-taiwan-calls-support-1280534

In my opinion reckless Chinese expansionism is counter-productive to the general welfare of the mainland Chinese that endangers Chinese security and economic development. A respectful recognition of Taiwanese independence alternatively would enable peaceful trade and concentration upon ecospherically productive business and governing ventures and even joint efforts.

Today the Communist government has more similarity with the role of Nazis seeking to invade France or Poland. I suppose Hitler could have argued that he was just seeking the inevitable reunification of the Carolingian Empire disingenuously. The circumstance of Germany was quite unlike that of the independent nation of Taiwan. In fact the Dutch settled Taiwan before the Chinese (according to the wiki article). They imposed upon the native Taiwanese that were not a part of China.

History of Taiwan - Wikipedia

The Qing dynasty did own Taiwan through invasion for a couple hundred years before the Japanese arrived and took it for themselves. The exiled nationalist government arrived eventually with the Japanese leaving. The Qing government was definitely not communist.

Virtually any independent democratic Taiwanese government would be more efficient and responsive to the people locally than the Borg of the Chinese Communist Party that is a swollen, economically prospering new power seeking to glom up everything it can.

Sure China had a civil war with two groups asserting the right of sovereignty. Ideally self-determination is the better way for political existence rather than coercion and subjugation beneath an authoritarian government. Taiwan though has a self-standing geographical identity apart from China, and apart from the claims to rule China. That old political split is a social phenomenon that cannot rightly be healed with even a semblance of justice if the rights and status of Taiwan and the Taiwanese were to be erased under authoritarian communist mainland rule.

Actually China is of course composed of a hodgepodge of peoples and nations built up since the Shang dynasty especially growing with the warring states period and the Chin dynasty following. Chinese rulers until reaching natural boundaries and terminal growth were expansive. Tibet was a free society until recently when China invaded and subjugated it. Justice in a new expansion would require that mainland Chinville take upon itself the name of Taiwan if the people of Taiwan wanted to be saddled with the problems of the mainland regardless of who the ruling powers are.

There is however no logical need for the Chinese of Taiwan to merge politically with the people of the mainland. Neither is there a need for the United States to merge with England etc. Racial lines need not require some sort of unified racial governance by the race anyplace on Earth.

Chinese communist leadership needn’t be concerned too much about western wishes for it to be politically regressive regarding territories. Fundamentally ‘western’ nations recognize the cruel subjugation of Tibet and the threats to Taiwan. Besides those issues China might be regarded as a nation of such immense population with such vast problems and challenges that the west may be thankful they don’t have any political responsibility for it. Capitalists of course like to profit from the Chinese human resources and consumption through sales and joint production ventures.

The historical western powers are also always concerned about increasing human rights in China and conserving human political and spiritual liberties domestically. Those seem to be threatened by purely secular authoritarian government expansion and socialism tends to undermine free enterprise.

That is all part of the challenging global situation where all 7.7 billion souls live, about how progress materially can occur with sustainable development even wile the ecosphere requires restoration as it is being rapidly depleted.

Crazy Horse and MLK are not Senator Warren's Distant Relatives

Elizabeth Warren declared at an Iowa campaign prep that she is a person rather than woman or man and is not a colored one. That disappoints many potential voters who are looking for a colored person to vote for in 2020.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/05/politics/elizabeth-warren-iowa-campaign-native-american/index.html

Senator Warren has disappointed us before. It was proven that she is no more a red blooded American Indian any more than the average non-immigrant American whom has minuscule trace elements of that and European Jew in their blood. Now she is declaring that she is not a colored person either. Many had thought that she was a distant relative of Martin Luther King.

Why Not Triple the Number of Congressional Representatives

There have been quite a few republics in world history going back as far as 7^th century B.C. India. Republics have a lot of adjustable parameters of course, so the name isn’t as meaningful as the form and structure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_republics

Plato’s The Republic was nothing like a representational form of government. Instead two philosopher-kings trained since birth to serve the best interests of the people were made to rule society as dictators. The late philosopher Bertrand Russell called Plato a fascist. It is possible to have republics that are nothing more than claves of oligarchs.

Republics can be regarded as democracy with representatives overcoming the practical problems of distance and other factors that would prevent the majority of people from participating and voting. There is also the problem of occupational specialization such that ordinary citizens cannot spend the time to be well informed on every issue. In the early United States the distance from Washington D.C. of the states meant that all the citizens could not drop their plows off the horse and gallop to vote every day in D.C. before returning home to continue farming. Representative government was a practical adaptation to the challenges facing the designers of the constitution.

Representative government can be co-opted so the practical function is to represent special interests, just the rich or simply socialists in fact if not in law. Inflationary processes can hit a Congress of Representatives too with demographic growth driving up the cost of a campaign run at the office.

I wonder if the United States today has too few representatives per capita to adequately cover constituent opinions and to pay attention to political problems and challenges affecting the nation. Monetary currency is increased quantitatively by the treasury and Federal Reserve from the Bureau of Engraving when more money need be in circulation to serve the population.

https://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/fedpoint/fed01.html

The number of U.S. representatives probably should be tripled.

Unlimited Capitalism, Socialism and Corporatism are Wrong- One Remedy

The remedy to the over-concentration of wealth and all of the imperial problems that arise from that is a 90% tax on earnings of more than 1 million dollars annually and more than 50 million dollars in assets. Society requires people to have capital to start business ventures, invent and patent items and so forth, yet too much capital allows people to lever the market and end up buying businesses with capital that compounds and grows. Today one percent of the people have way too much wealth in the U.S.A. and control politics via the media and other means. It is as if the U.S.A. was taken over by Lord Fairfax, Lord Baltimore and peers.

The nation needs fresh free enterprise and politics as well as some of the old establishment in decent scale rather than as a scalar field that increases conquest and consolidation of national capital. Those out of work the longest should have tax credits given to employers for hiring them first. People should not be forced to poverty through networking of unemployment in a Las Vegas style gamed up Wall Street economy.

Networked capital is comparable to the gravitational field of a large star. People like stars and they serve a purpose. Yet too large and their gravitational attraction converts it into a black hole drawing in every planet and small object within a vast region into its orbit and event horizon. Too much concentrated capital snuffs independent political and free enterprise vectors. The Milky Way galaxy has a vast black hole at the center and the entire system orbits around it. The galaxy is a good thing yet because stars still remain moderately free and at a distance. The U.S.A. today is like that galaxy at a later yet not final stage were the black hole is much larger, the free planets fewer and more tightly bound in orbit around the black hole.

With a 90% tax rate on the most rich and the same rates as at present on everyone else the nation could go on a more creative and restorative path. It could pay off the public debt, provide fer high quality education for all citizens, better health care, restore the health of the ecosystem and finance new and different, more efficient yet less displacing transportation and living infrastructure. A fair minimum income for Americans would be innovated at about 6000 annually. A very large endowment to finance Eco-green patents and business start ups would be made to exist.

With people limited to owning shares in just three corporations the integrity of corporate development could resume. The military would continue to have solid financing at a slightly lower level; perhaps 20% off, and citizens would be required to perform 6 months of active reserve military training and eight years inactive reserve.

Socialism is wrong because it creates a low ceiling on individual independence of thought and business. Government should not run any business- free enterprise does that best and people should be allowed to help themselves to become rich, yet levering that wealth for further gain through Wall Street banks and business takeovers disrupts the integrity of the system. Democracy cannot survive vast concentration of wealth- it never has. Democracy requires that wealth so great as to intimidate, buy, corrupt and co-opt the system of political self-determination through an informed populace cannot be allowed to upsurge into existence as it has. One has evolved is corporatism- a political philosophy invented by the Italian Dictator Mussolini and used by Hitler in the Third Reich. In today’s political environment corporatism and authoritarian communism are likely to evolve a working relationship of rule over billions of poor and middle class subjects without any actual power for self-determination. The sad thing to me is that perhaps most will be happy with that.