Stimulus and the Corked Bat of Special Interests

 Special interests have taken over the U.S.A. and government of the nation. A special interest in regard to the founding parameters of the United States could be regarded as an interest or  organization limited to just some of the citizens all of the time. Today virtually any corporation, church denomination, civic and social organization, fort profit and non-profit business could rightly be considered to be a special interest in regard to federal legislation. The federal stimulus conundrum that cannot get passed because of partisan wrangling about special interests rather than those of all U.S. citizens this year drew my attention.

Free federal dollars flow to special interest citizens and aliens rather than to all citizens equally- that helps establish corporatism and its socialist junior partner.

  Today is Sunday so I will write something concerning church structure as an upgradable special interest (that doesn’t require federal bail-outs). When the U.S.A. was founded there were no corporations in the nation and far fewer special interests seeking to benefit from preferred federal legislation transferring money to them. The Hudson Bay Company and East India Company were the two entities that most closely resembled corporations in North America and India respectively. The Catholic Church in the U.S.A. might be thought of as the largest corporate structure in the U.S.A. of that era. Church structures might be thought of as having ossified in forms created during or before the reformation era circa 1500-1600 with church pastors of Protestant churches shepherding ecclesiastic formations adapted to village life of illiterate peasants. In the United States presently there actually are few places like that. Another reform to place Christians on a level ground sharing liturgical tasks in small groups within a Priesthood of Believers would be more appropriate. A national work-credit and job bank with attendance and participation records, referrals and sharing could keep all Christians active, evangelical and free of certain emergency medical and financial troubles.

 Special interest legislation and/or end-times theology along with anachronistic clerical forms can take Christians fairly from meaningful participation in Democracy and accurate Biblical hermeneutics. A wrong understanding of the constitution of the U.S.A. and founding democratic principles can lead politicians to seek legislation that benefits corporations and busy-ness as a special interest prioritized above that of common citizens of the United States. Legislators wrangle over how to benefit people that own corporations and other busy-ness activity instead of all of the people of the United States during the pandemic. Real shareholders own corporations hence the U.S. Government has no legitimate right to transfer wealth to them instead of every citizen of the United States equally if it chooses to give away money normally or during an emergency for relief. Competition in a free enterprise environment isn’t supposed to end when it becomes tough for the established whereat the government will bail out the prosperous and/or filthy rich. Corporations are special interests that politically incompetent legislators have learned to worship. Actually citizen busyness and free enterprise could develop in innumerable other forms; it wasn’t necessary to evolve Wall Street monopoly of busyness and over government.

  In Washington D.C. politicians and pundits generally have forgotten that the people of the nation who own the nation politically in a manner of speaking are everyone rather than special interests named corporations. To send federal money as grants or loans to special collectives of people; to favor select persons as special interests of congress above that of the people of the United States is to support and ossify a particular non-democratic approach to governance that does in effect changes democracy into corporatism, oligarchy or plutonomy. Some socialist like the corporate approach because it does annihilate the principle of individual sovereignty and free enterprise in favor of corporate enterprise and other forms of mass collective business that readily morphs into socialism through a number of means. There is a false dialectic emitted from each side that has corporatism vs. socialism rather than corporatism and socialism as collective entities versus democracy, individualism and national sovereignty with secure borders. Corporatists and socialists are globalists that run roughshod over national boundaries.

 In the Internet era corporate hegemony allows self-tightening consolidation of wealth and power to plutocrat-led corporations. Every written communication can be scanned by insiders and a percent or all financial value harvested/skimmed from the work of everyone utilizing the ubiquitous corporate internet sites. With the U.S. Government ordinarily transferring wealth to large banks with zero or very low interest loans that lets those banks owned by Plutocrats electronically mint five times the amount loaned to loan out or invest themselves ordinary citizen free enterprise become as laughably non-competitive as laborers are to international dope traffickers who can afford to buy the business they labor for. The sole advantage of under-the-table illegal alien labor is that they can at least find work outside direct corporate employment yet. Corporate networks can ban any individual inconvenient from their optimal profit narratives they choose to.

 Corporations as special interests and their CEO’s attract a common kind of individual worker-tool seeking money and power. Like herbivores attracted by thirst to a water-hole along their own route, corporate leadership share the same goals and exploit similar methods to subjugate and harvest profit from every empirical facticity within their power- hence they expand their power and wealth with insatiable drive. That has a very dampening effect upon individual citizen free enterprise and liberty to express dissenting personal opinions on-line without reprisal.

US Senate Letting Covid Relief Bill Die

 The U.S. Senate is letting the 2^nd Covid emergency relief bill die for partisan reasons. The Senate leaders seek partisan advantages and cannot agree to let that go and simply pass a plain cash stimulus check to Americans to use presently.

 Senator McConnell wants to give blanket immunity too corporations from Covid 19 lawsuits. Instead of concern for cash-strapped citizens that need cash today he cares about corporations and corporate profits next year.

  

Senator Schumer and Speaker Pelosi care more for funding their vast left-wing state governments and funding deficits than for ordinary citizens of the U.S.A. even in their own states. The best simple compromise is to pass immediate $2400 cash relief stimulus checks for all Americans let Senate and House leaders clash over their special interests with mace, swords and shields of rhetoric after Christmas. A third Wilder-Fury fight or a Joshua-Fury or Wilder-Fury battle have been put off; what should not be put off is immediate cash relief for the poor and middle class that need pay rent, pay for classes or fund tooth extractions. I recently heard an elder gentleman trying to get a loan to pay for an elder brother’s covid 19 hospitalization; apparently he lacked free Bethesda hospitalization.

 What should matter now are the people of the United States. It’s their federal government; special interests can wait. New York can freeze rent payments for police and firemen. California can ditto that. State employees then can work for half-pay. Corporations can suck an egg on immunity from criminal action during the Covid 19 crisis...

Basic Police Reform- A Modern Primer

 Basically there are two kinds of people in the world; those that want power over others and those that don’t. Politicians tend to want power and reform is an issue that puts them in the spotlight for a term or two without actually needing to get anything meaningfully done. Police reform to protect the public from police as well as criminals  is growing  in popularity since the tradition of urban riots by blacks whose lives matter have discovered the police seem to serve the non-black  population more  so than themselves. Defunding police has been held to be an effective way to halt police interference with black sin cities, some of who are alleged to perpetrate crimes.

I believe there are numerous ways to regard and interpret history. Historical analysis that is accurate and useful as well as comprehensive is requisite for determining how to correctly address an issue and act upon it to bring it toward a desirable state of affairs. There is a fundamentally correct comprehensive analysis and several proprietary and fragmented and possible true perspectives that are insufficiently comprehensive for basic application to correct an issue.  Police it should be noted worked with some harshness in some cities before the era of large scale black neo-integration in schools and so forth. In somewhat segregated areas crimes did apparently exist that stimulated the non-black public desire for effective police. Police corruption in those circumstances tended to revolve around insider economic crimes when they occurred.

 It does seem that there is a conflation of race identity politics and economic concerns with police acting for-themselves inappropriately. Police force is regarded by some apparently as a de facto segregation mechanism and by others as a defense line of protection from young savage hordes. Obviously police have a civil function that has awkwardly discovered itself in the midst of historically evolving racial demographics and economics politics on the front line as it were. What can be done to allow traditional civil police functions to continue in cities where contentious political restiveness makes them appear as a political antagonist?

 Traditionally analysts have espoused racial integration of police as a remedy to racial enmity. Realistically though with the breakdown in trust in police and politics and rise of communication I would guess that technology and privatization augmenting police law enforcement as well as integration of internet broadband communication and public participation is likely to develop slowly. That is, drones, robots and public participatory oversight of police work will grow to enhancement and follow police tracking of criminal and suspected criminal activity. 

 I am not saying that contracts to the Interrogation and Death Corporation robotic division will clear the streets with Robocop; simply that Sally’s On-Line Security service will field insect drones to buzz around police cars and hives and follow criminals about dark city streets and into dens of iniquity when the lawful need arises. Something like that will comprise police reform as public participation in police work and evidence gathering in non-traditional technological ways arises.

  Some will be concerned about corporate takeover of law enforcement and the nation, and that is well taken. If the Department of Dense has a Four-star General who can upgrade to Dictator for a Year should need arise as did Roman Empire Consuls during time of war, who is able to return fire for fire and Sarin-dippitze foe nerve agent communicators, that would be keeping in line with the trend toward national corporatist governance aided and abetted by communist collectivist leadership and 1% plutocrats in the U.S.A. and ironically, in China. Godless atheist leadership in crowded demographics leads to certain forms of social interaction that are more or less problematic when people are unintellectual worker sex-tools and drones bereft of nuclear families developmentally speaking. Scientists at some point tend to find the one degree of elimination of surplus undesirable population for scientific reasons so the world may be saved. Less than a cuddly scenario of course, so Democrats may seek some other Draconian and repressive way to bring utopia to the world during the Anthropocene mass extinction phenomenon. Hell wasn’t built in a day, so effectively stupid governance takes many generations of politicians and broadcast slut-media-sewers to fructify hell on Earth before survivors can flee to Mars and elsewhere.

 There are innumerable political viewpoints in the U.S.A. today without comprehensiveness that are often in contradiction or conflict with others. Maybe 3% of political world-views are valid and would be effective if promoted, and the rest are simply varying degrees of incorrectness. Luckily for Americans political grading is done on the curve so even failing ideas and work can rise to the top as major party content platforms as they have with bi-partisan success. Police reform ineffectiveness is just one of many planks of contemporary political platforms with a good rate of disfunction.

Two models and goals for police structure seem to exist in the present context of reformed structure and traditional structure. ‘The Art of War’, I believe it was if I recall the book I read decades ago, mentions interior and exterior lines for attackers and defenders. ‘The Art of Reasoning’ informs us about classical and symbolic logic. Machiavelli’s ‘The Prince’ might have suggested, if the modern political environment and broadcast media had existed in his day, of the logical value of fast transition of exterior and exterior lines reversing roles of attackers and defenders, The reformed model of the Democrat Party and non-white ideal would end the perceived defense of white people as a majority party by police departments. Policing could be flip-flopped to change their role from one defending white controllers on interior lines to one of attacking dwindling whites from exterior lines of black and minority based community policing.

 A new reformed law enforcement agency would be community-based while the existing police departments would be defunded and eliminated largely. A similar paradigm for reform existed in pre-war nazifying Germany when under Hitler’s leadership the brown shirts of the national socialist party took over society. Local police department constables at some stage needed to stand aside to let the new political and social facticty of change take charge. Brown shirts or storm troopers could enforce the political will and decide in a fresh paradigm who the real public enemies are. The broadcast media would easily inform the public of what worked and what did not. The broadcast media has great offensive and defensive political power and returns periodically or partially to its role of enforcing political will to power.

Eliminating police departments in the United States so a more Democrat Party led law enforcement structure can take control would not exactly duplicate Hitler’s model although there are obvious similarities. Community based police models could include mafiosa enforcement agents and mass public disarmament to render political opponents easier to subjugate. As in the former Soviet Union criminal activity by non-state actors would be very low. The public internal security forces strengthen to such an extreme that dissent becomes unfeasible.

If two models for police structure exist in the United States today- traditional and Nazi, they would require a segregated civil structure if each were to exist simultaneously with traditionalists in white communities and tribal mafiosa-goon Democrat thugs under bosses in  non-white communities. Unfortunately, or luckily as one may regard it, the economy of the United States is not designed to be racially segregated. It is somewhat amusing to consider the impracticalities of segregating products and services along racial lines in America with Wal-mart using different personnel to deliver black soap to black neighborhoods and white soap to white neighborhood etc. Amazon could use drones to deliver to all areas of course since machines are racial only in a nuts and bolts sort of way, and it might be possible to stop taxing products purchased from the internet so local manufacture of high-tech products in rural Alaska for example won’t face unfair competition from products made in China or white neighborhood colleges like M.I.T. Basketball and football would require separate leagues and audiences only of appropriate race with television commercials directed to appropriate viewers. Federal oversight of Wall- Street would require special black and white law enforcement with community police mafia on one side and traditional law enforcement structure on the other with each working only to secure corporate behavior of the apposite race. It seems rather expensive and corrupt actually.

Lincoln Didn't Include Baltimore in the Emancipation Proclamation

 President Lincoln didn't include Maryland and other border states in his Emancipation proclamation. It took a third Maryland constitution years later to free the slaves. That interesting fact is useful here because it is part of the problem of displaced former slaves after the war thrown into homelessness en mass usually without a legal right to inhabit their former plantations. As a northerner during school before college long ago learning technical details of mass black homelessness after the civil war didn't occur. There were few blacks in the Pacific Northwest until the Second World War. School kids learned generalities of U.S. history and state history (Washington state for my experience). I took a world civilization course too. Three history course at a high school level is pretty shallow actually.

William Grose was the first black businessman in Seattle. Yet it wasn't until the federal government needed military support personnel in the war with Japan that many blacks moved to the Pacific Northwest. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Grose_(black_Seattle_pioneer)

The two small cities I grew up in had no blacks not because of segregation-simply because none had moved in large numbers that far from the south, and race riots didn't exist even until after the Vietnam War by which time there was a substantial black population in large cities. Researching the black city migrations and rioting development as a topic would need to wait until opportunity arose for graduate research.

Since I am dead reckoning history here I will say that I am interested in the mass relocation of former slaves after the war. It is well known that many went on an exodus to northern cities creating the problem persisting to this time of mostly black urban ghettos and/or aka challenged neighborhoods and educational facilities, and in some a legacy of neo-apartheid with legally segregated housing such as in Baltimore that persisted for some time.

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipation_Proclamation

In my opinion the entire phenomenon could have been nipped in the bud immediately after the war if the vast plantations that formerly sheltered black slaves were cut up into chunks of a few acres and redistributed to the former slaves who certainly had a fair claim to own the land rather than their former masters- or at least equally. It is one of the sad missed opportunities of history that many slaves after the war were legally landless people. Homelessness can be very challenging to get out of.

Apparently some plantation owners did give some land to the former slaves. Some of that was sharecropping that wasn't too far removed from slavery. Yet much land did remain with the families of plantation slavers; and that stimulated movements such as the clan seeking to perpetuate race-based economic advantages across the south with logical inertia.

If all of the former slaves were given 5 acres of real estate to own at the in 1866 it is possible that development and race relations of the United States would have been quite different.

No Stimulus Check = Republican Loss

 With so much money going to Republicans and Republican businesses during the McConnell era domination of the U.S. Senate voters put down the Trump re-election since many of their pockets were empty. Repeating that mistake will likely result in the Republican loss of the Senate to Democrats in the Georgia run-off election in January.

Senator McConnell could more convincingly play the Christmas scrooge putting a lump of Kentucky coal into voter's stockings if he didn't give preponderantly Republican owned small business free grant money by the hundreds of billions. There is nothing constitutionally agreeable about giving free money to preferred special interests instead of to all citizens individually and equally more or less.

In a sense Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski and Maine Senator Susan Collins are already neo-crats that vote blue on most feminine issues and numerous other Democrat agenda items that reach the Senate.  Senator Murkowski does support the pirate team plunder of ANWR of course  while Senator Collins may demure. The loss of the two Georgia Senate seats in the runoff election will seal the deal of U.S. Senate control by the Democrat party for the better part of a decade. Early voting starts December 14th. https://georgia.gov/vote-2020-runoff-elections

The actual election day is 5 January 2021.

The U.S. Government for several decades has turned toward giving hundreds of billions and sometimes trillions of dollars to corporations and small businesses asymmetrically regarding equal allocation of government giveaways to all citizens. In a way it could be said that sucks. Voters may not need to wait until January to determine discern if Senators are pips or  pugs.

Truth and Gravity Theory

 I won’t delve into the critical issue of whether or not the President denied the election result because he is suffering from Covid 19 brain fog and hair loss; this post is instead about what gravity really is. Occasionally I speculate and write something about it. I have no idea about the extent of the Higgs Field yet it is popularly credited with doing marvelous things to energy and for mass these days. Blame it for creating the appearance of gravity too. So what is gravity? It could be an apparent effect caused by the shape or reshaping of the Higgs Field interacting with energy and mass. If the Higgs Field allows mass in three dimensions to be created from two dimensional energy slowing down in the Higgs Field, the Higgs itself might be morphed and reshaped making thereby the appearance of space being curved in relation to gravity.

If the Higgs Field is more or less than three dimensions, the field may allow quantum entanglement information to be saved or relocated from three dimensions and disseminated faster than light-itself an apparent phenomena in three dimensions- through the non-three dimensional field and return to three dimensional locations with something like a waveform collapse.

Gravity occurs at light speed, and that would be natural if light speed is the norm for massless particle-waves or energy not slowed down to three dimensions. When energy becomes entangled from two dimensions to three and becomes embedded in a steady state in the Higgs Field, the aggregation of mass in the field reshapes the field and draws other mass toward it in field curvature. The field itself may act at the speed of light and create the appearance of gravity acting at the speed of light. If the field is expanding or is something is acting upon the field that isn’t of the three dimensional mass the Higgs Field could seem to be causing space to expand. There is an obvious way to regard that condition though; aggregation of mass that causes the Field to warp and attract mass may reciprocally expand space of the field bereft of elements of the field drawn in the Higgs Field and mass interactive aggregation situation.

Gravity is a marvelous thing. If it is an appearance because people see through a glass darkly embedded in the mass of particle-waves slowed down to sub-light speed in the Higgs Field, humans at least have the promise of discovering how it arises some day. Like the time when Abraham was asked to sacrifice his son Isaac by God, and Abraham showed he had such faith in God existing so as to be regarded as worthy of the promise, the appearance of gravity on this side of the cloud of unknowing may someday be rewarded by the saving grace of truth appearing; as when God sacrificed His Son Jesus Christ to save all of those of faith. The truth will set gravity theorists free.

No Stimulus Money Except for the Well-Off?

 I.M.O. the U.S. has a history of bailing out the rich in recent years more so than the poor. The poor would benefit most from a second stimulus check thus it has a low priority to politicians that are millionaires and billionaires and entirely sold out to the Federal purpose of concentrating wealth.

For some reason I believe that the Federal Government should be fair and balanced in giving free money away to citizens and not just work to benefit the well to do and those that already have money, or had it over history. Trillions of zero interest loans have gone to rich banks, and corporations like Chrysler and GM and numerous other businesses have been bailed out by the government. I am more for letting troubled businesses bite it when they fall on hard times and instead support the process of getting basic jobs and income for all citizens from the bottom up. Those businesses that are failing should just crash and burn in the free market.

I feel that way about federal programs to build new homes for Americans that lose their homes to hurricanes and tornadoes, forest fires and so forth. There are homeless Americans the country doesn’t care about at all. Just because people have become accustomed to driving a nice car and living in a nice home I know of no just reason why the government should replace those after a natural disaster. What happened to the idea of risk? Why should the government always prop up the prosperous when they have hard times as if they were a royal class entitled to a certain standard of living while the poor and lower middle class can eat it?

I believe that the poor and middle class as well as other inventive individuals can create new businesses when the field is leveled by natural disaster and pandemics if the government does not leap in to restore them with grants as if the Bourbon restoration was the better example of political conduct and if the poor. lower middle class and unfinanced competitors to the established have equal amounts of free federal cash.

About Photons

 Photons are massless or nearly massless particle/waves (bosons) force carriers of an electromagnetic field. Their speed seems fairly certain. Relativity and the problem of simultaneity of measurements in different location present issues for calculating times apparently. Sub-atomic particle-waves are slowed down to less than light speed in the Higgs field and thus have a third dimension of mass. Without the Higgs field mass would not exist, and energy like photons I believe would be two-dimensional and flat like a communion wafer. It is all interesting stuff to learn about- especially as regards relativity and uncertainty. The books 'What is Real'  by Adam Becker and 'Mass' by Jim Baggot are good easy to read works that go pretty deep into quantum topics. There is another book that I read a few years ago named 'Faster Than the Speed of Light' by Joao Magueijo that was an interesting speculation on variable speed of light theory. I liked that book and for a while thought it might be so. If space expands quickly it might be possible for a field to expand with it including an electromagnetic field or a Higgs Field or unified field and then if particle-waves existed in it they too might be travelling faster than light usually does. I guess though that speed is simply relative to other objects or particle-waves while in-themselves they are motionless.

Photons and other massless particles seem to have a basic speed of just being. That initial, basic speed of just existing-in-themselves is faster than particles with mass that are all slower than light and massless particles because they are all slowed by the Higgs Field to sub-light speed picking up that third dimension characteristic of mass that massless particles of two-dimensions may not have.

Plainly there appears to be faster than light sharing of information among entangled particle waves. That apparent phenomenon could be an endemic characteristic of waves and the  Schrödinger equation or wave function. Maybe it is also related to dimensional shortcuts. Interestingly gravity also travels at the speed of light. Perhaps that is a property related to the fact of nothing traveling faster than massless particles like photons and neutrinos just being.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211379719330943

The Supreme Court Destroyed the Structure of Marriage

 When Chief Justice Roberts weighed in to destroy the structure of marriage he joined with the pervading social zeitgeist of unreality of the era that was redefining names to mean flavors of evolution rather than Platonic realist things-in-themselves. Marriage had a structure that was written in common law and tradition that referred to the institution protecting women and children’s rights’ family rights in the process of creating humans. Creating or birthing humans was always accomplished exclusively with two people heterosexually sharing the task. Chief Justice Roberts and court secularists decided it was convenient to destroy the meaning of the structure of marriage and change it to something else that would thereby permit homosexuals to redistribute the rights given by law to marriage unto themselves as well.

 Redefining structure as a method for redistributing the properties of legal rights is an interesting way to render laws and meanings malleable to corrupt interests seeking to expropriate established properties of rights. If structure is explicitly redefined it should be acknowledged publicly rather than in passing fate accompli. In the case of marriage it would have been a better choice to leave the integrity of the meaning of the word in its historical and sane context and create a new establishment for homosexuals to legally entangle themselves together in instead of corrupting plain and simple truth.

 The criterion's conundrum was the rise of nominalism over neo-realism in linguistics. Kripke's version failed to a nominalism so extreme that falsehood became as good as truth.  Courts regarded morphing structures as fair dinkum in reconstructing political correctness for the New World Order favoring billionaires and scientist-atheists.

One of the problems with erasing truth from law and legal structures that are well established and replacing them with operative fiction is in the new methods of defense of hostile takeovers that attack defenders as bigots. In the case of abortion women in support of abortion did not generally accuse men and women that opposed abortion as bigots as did homosexuals to those defending the real structure of marriage. There is a great difference between taking sides in a legitimate political dispute in a democratic society and bigotry or persecution of individuals personally for having an antipathetic political opinion publicly expressed. In the modern social media environment many subtle ways exist to harm conservatives defending traditional values- and here I refer to moral values rather than interests of the rich and wealth classes seeking to concentrate wealth that paradoxically is quite predominant amidst homosexuals and Wall Street equally with moral conservatives.

 Truth is a useful item to adhere to even when it requires philosophical thought instead of simple unthinking acceptance of a given social inertia. Evolution theory seems to eliminate the requirement for truth in politics as the end and methods are deemed for-themselves neither good nor bad except as they are desired by the powerful. Evolution theory is just a phenomenon in a deeper Universe or Multiverse that may exist as math ideas in the mind of God. The entire Universe may be pre-determined structurally inclusive of evolution in a mysterious eternally existing process sustained by the will of God. Modern cosmology offers a field of deep ideas that aren’t antipathetic to the concept that Jesus Christ is the Word of God who created the Universe. The shallow leap to the conclusion that if evolution exists then Bible cosmology is wrong and that idea is itself wrong. Legal issue need also seek to keep the truth of structures intact in respect of laws promulgated by a Democratic, representative government. Instead of corrupting the meaning of structures it should allow legislatures to put new vinegar into new wine skins.

 Consider the idea of the structure of what makes a church for tax exempt status purposes. In theory there isn’t much reason why the Supreme Court couldn’t hear a case and decide that the Dow Jones establishment is a church where people worship money and should therefore be given tax exempt status for all the members. If the court did that it would be recognizable that the meaning of the structure of a church had changed or been corrupted to benefit a special interest as it was in the case of homosexuals and marriage.

 There was no compelling reason to corrupt one working structure by redefining and thereby destroying it to protect a minority or to assure equal rights or protection of the law; all men and women in the U.S.A. had equal opportunity to participate in marriage. Now that the structure of marriage has been destroyed, none have the opportunity. What supplanted marriage and took its name is something else that is likely to have long-range deleterious effects upon society equal to that of the corruption by the Supreme Courts choice.

 Conflation of a host of issues pertaining to discrimination against homosexuals led to the wrong decision to annihilate the structure of marriage, although a secondary reason was that certain influential, effete intellectuals felt that global demographics and the limits of population growth deemed the need to end marriage as a normal practice. Truth and information were better ways to address the problems of population growth and decreasing ecosystem extent and health with finite natural resources. All citizens including homosexuals should have security in work and culture; that wasn’t ever much of an issue. If people wish to sin that is their right so far as it isn’t a crime in this world. Homosexuals, Wall Street, social media and the left have tried to ban opposition to homosexual marriage and have employed subtle and some ham-fisted methods to proscribe expression of opposition. So much the worse for democracy and empowerment of Plutocrats and their minions.

 A final point for the edification of certain broadcast media wise-guys on what the meaning is of the Christian Church being the bride of Christ. It is nothing about homosexuality that is roundly proscribed in the Bible in New and Old Testaments. It is simply and expression, a kind of literal metaphor about the love that the creator of the Universe has for the souls that are the elect and saved eternally to worship God. Keep in mind that the Christian belief is that God created the Universe and every soul in it, and that the Universe is replete with original sin (that to me is exemplified in the thermodynamic facts of life and energy consumption and pro-creative urges) and therefore people are unfit for eternal life with God. Just through the atoning gift of God in the saving grace and crucifixion and substitution of the Lord Jesus for payment-unto death of sin owed by all can any of humanity be saved, rather than go to eternal hell.

 A human soul is a vaporous thing in a manner of speaking. It is a phenomenal, effervescent self-aware person existing for a moment in temporal being. It was created in a Universe created by God through the Son as the Word of God. God loves those saved souls and that is the meaning of the church as the bride of Christ; he really does care about the elect saved through the grace of the Spirit of God enabling faith in individual souls. The swell broadcast media and others might need a little humility to comprehend that. Too much prosperity and power may dull spiritual sensibility as well as good political sense to understand the value f keeping integrity concerning structure and legal meanings rather than melting down non-legislatively as if they were wax forms to be recast in the zeitgeist-world spirit of political correctness.

Politicians Consider Stimulus Plans to Motivate 1%

 Federal politicians are considering a stimulus plan to help get the economy going through the Covid 19 era that would in some way accelerate the concentration of wealth upwardly. Thus the concept of just providing another $1200 payment to all Americans earning fewer than $40,000 annually was thrown out because those Americans would probably spend the money right away and buy things that would make life easier. Instead large checks to and loans that needn't be repaid will go to small businesses like the L.A. Lakers and others struggling to make it to another NBA final later this month. Personally I hope the Lakers win another championship and a Covid 19 relief check and zero interest loans might help them rehab Boogie Cousins or sign a 9th round draft choice.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/02/mcconnell-schumer-far-apart-on-unemployment-benefits-stimulus-plans.html

It is important to take another few months to find a way to send a stimulus plan that is just perfect because there won't be any time to fix anything wrong with it the next four years. Especially since Democrats may take the Senate and find a way to send help to government union workers that have the worst jobs in the U.S.A. with terrible retirement benefits, Speaker Pelosi needs to get that right.  

Especially since no one really understands what the Federal Public Debt means since it has no real material basis anymore like gold, and trillions have been given  to the rich banks along with zero interest rates since the 2008 financial crisis taking several more months to craft a splendid bill works. It is possible that some special pens will be designed to sign the bill into law when the final t's are crossed and i's dotted and the public can read about what's in it. People that have become homeless during the crisis or that were denied unemployment compensation for one reason or another might prefer that those that were prosperous before the crisis receive the most and fasted relief money from the U.S. Government being patriotic and all as they are  confident that the rich are looking out for them.