American issues of Christianity, cosmology, politics, ecosphere, philosophy, contemporary history etc
12/13/20
Stimulus and the Corked Bat of Special Interests
Special interests have taken over the U.S.A. and
government of the nation. A special interest in regard to the founding
parameters of the United States could be regarded as an interest or organization limited to just some of the citizens
all of the time. Today virtually any corporation, church denomination, civic
and social organization, fort profit and non-profit business could rightly be
considered to be a special interest in regard to federal legislation. The
federal stimulus conundrum that cannot get passed because of partisan wrangling
about special interests rather than those of all U.S. citizens this year drew
my attention.
Free federal dollars flow to special interest citizens and aliens rather than to all citizens equally- that helps establish corporatism and its socialist junior partner.
Today is Sunday so I will write something
concerning church structure as an upgradable special interest (that doesn’t
require federal bail-outs). When the U.S.A. was founded there were no
corporations in the nation and far fewer special interests seeking to benefit
from preferred federal legislation transferring money to them. The Hudson Bay
Company and East India Company were the two entities that most closely
resembled corporations in North America and India respectively. The Catholic
Church in the U.S.A. might be thought of as the largest corporate structure in the
U.S.A. of that era. Church structures might be thought of as having ossified in
forms created during or before the reformation era circa 1500-1600 with church
pastors of Protestant churches shepherding ecclesiastic formations adapted to
village life of illiterate peasants. In the United States presently there
actually are few places like that. Another reform to place Christians on a
level ground sharing liturgical tasks in small groups within a Priesthood of
Believers would be more appropriate. A national work-credit and job bank with
attendance and participation records, referrals and sharing could keep all
Christians active, evangelical and free of certain emergency medical and
financial troubles.
Special
interest legislation and/or end-times theology along with anachronistic
clerical forms can take Christians fairly from meaningful participation in
Democracy and accurate Biblical hermeneutics. A wrong understanding of the
constitution of the U.S.A. and founding democratic principles can lead
politicians to seek legislation that benefits corporations and busy-ness as a
special interest prioritized above that of common citizens of the United
States. Legislators wrangle over how to benefit people that own corporations
and other busy-ness activity instead of all of the people of the United States
during the pandemic. Real shareholders own corporations hence the U.S.
Government has no legitimate right to transfer wealth to them instead of every
citizen of the United States equally if it chooses to give away money normally
or during an emergency for relief. Competition in a free enterprise environment
isn’t supposed to end when it becomes tough for the established whereat the
government will bail out the prosperous and/or filthy rich. Corporations are
special interests that politically incompetent legislators have learned to
worship. Actually citizen busyness and free enterprise could develop in
innumerable other forms; it wasn’t necessary to evolve Wall Street monopoly of
busyness and over government.
In Washington D.C. politicians and pundits
generally have forgotten that the people of the nation who own the nation
politically in a manner of speaking are everyone rather than special interests
named corporations. To send federal money as grants or loans to special
collectives of people; to favor select persons as special interests of congress
above that of the people of the United States is to support and ossify a
particular non-democratic approach to governance that does in effect changes
democracy into corporatism, oligarchy or plutonomy. Some socialist like the
corporate approach because it does annihilate the principle of individual
sovereignty and free enterprise in favor of corporate enterprise and other
forms of mass collective business that readily morphs into socialism through a
number of means. There is a false dialectic emitted from each side that has
corporatism vs. socialism rather than corporatism and socialism as collective
entities versus democracy, individualism and national sovereignty with secure
borders. Corporatists and socialists are globalists that run roughshod over national
boundaries.
In the
Internet era corporate hegemony allows self-tightening consolidation of wealth
and power to plutocrat-led corporations. Every written communication can be
scanned by insiders and a percent or all financial value harvested/skimmed from
the work of everyone utilizing the ubiquitous corporate internet sites. With
the U.S. Government ordinarily transferring wealth to large banks with zero or
very low interest loans that lets those banks owned by Plutocrats
electronically mint five times the amount loaned to loan out or invest
themselves ordinary citizen free enterprise become as laughably non-competitive
as laborers are to international dope traffickers who can afford to buy the
business they labor for. The sole advantage of under-the-table illegal alien
labor is that they can at least find work outside direct corporate employment
yet. Corporate networks can ban any individual inconvenient from their optimal
profit narratives they choose to.
Corporations
as special interests and their CEO’s attract a common kind of individual
worker-tool seeking money and power. Like herbivores attracted by thirst to a
water-hole along their own route, corporate leadership share the same goals and
exploit similar methods to subjugate and harvest profit from every empirical
facticity within their power- hence they expand their power and wealth with
insatiable drive. That has a very dampening effect upon individual citizen free
enterprise and liberty to express dissenting personal opinions on-line without
reprisal.
No comments:
Post a Comment