Slapstick Comedy in Democrat Party Presidential Politics

Democrat Party Presidential election politics hasn't much that is funny about it this cycle. Most are waiting for the end of the Clinton era to evolve so new candidates with good ideas will be willing to throw away a few million dollars chasing a nomination. Al Gore of yore was good for a little humor in times past. Yet it is to the Republican party that one must look in hopes of discovering anything funny.

The Bush league entry in the sweepstakes for 2016 has the strength of the family history as a warrior clan able to defeat the family's enemies, however Jeb Bush isn't a veteran and seems rather wussified on the border security issue. If it weren't a serious failure that might contend for a humor ranking.

Senator Rubio believes that merit should determine who immigrate legally to America; those would be in his opinion persons that are rich or otherwise able to improve the economy. That idea merits consideration for slapstick comedy insofar as it ignores the loyalty trait in the dirty, tired and poor yearning to breathe free factor that was a premise for founding the nation and getting rid of the royalty.

Probably the U.S.A. should admit a half million legal immigrants annually from all nations of the world combined and the majority ought to be the poorest of the poor from every nation with only 25% of the slots reserved for those of 'merit'.

It seems like those best fitting Rubio meritocracy would be rich globalists with no sense of loyalty at all that would use the nation as a flag of convenience yet create jobs here as employers. The Chinese Communist Party would also be meritorious in that criterion if they bought more Long Beach dock facilities to develop factories outsourcing American technology and whatever else they can use.

Donald Trump is the life of the Republican Party this cycles it seems. Without the Trumpster the 2016 election campaign would be without color-something just black and white. One might look to the Canadian-American running for the job; Ted Cruz, hopefully for comedy, yet he has too sober and quality of ideas on immigration to qualify and set besides that if elected he would denounce loyalty to the Queen and burn the British and Canadian flags indicating that he is no more willing to be a British subject like the Clintons (note-this value added fiction content lately is done conservatively to enhance comedy potential and is limited to the last couple of sentences).

Traditionally Democrats wait until elected to prove their true potential for comedy with cigars and such while Republican have demonstrated humor right up front-even in the primaries. Comedy traits ought not disqualify candidates from serious consideration for election however-Jerry Ford and L.B.J. didn't perish from advanced Alzheimer's or Mad Cow disease. Ronald Reagan wasn't too well known for practical jokes, and Chevy Chase didn't seem very crazy most of the time.

What Bill Said About West Point

Bill said that he was offered a full scholarship to West Point or a partial denture at a discount  store yet can't remember his own phone number. What irony. He asked me to like Shila's audio facebook fart from Dehli. Said it is another shot heard round the world. 

God. Cosmology & Nothingness (free ebook)

Christianity in the United States as well of course as the rest of the world has many challenges today. The eschatology or study of end times views held by most is generally incorrect. The beginning times or creation theories of the Universe are also largely inaccurate-not scripturally speaking-the Bible is infallible, but in the interpretation of scripture and especially the book of Genesis. And the middle times or church structure is also largely incorrect for this era. Martin Luther's priesthood of believers paradigm is best. Because the feudal style separate class of priests or ministers addressing a passive laity is prevalent and out of phase with democracy and scripture for various reasons, and because the beginning and end times theories are lacking accuracy-especially harmful in the post-Darwinist age of scientific atheism, Christianity in the U.S.A. is in marked decline.

I address these issues in my book 'God, Cosmology and nothingness available now as a free e-book download from my author site at;

http://www.lulu.com/shop/garrison-clifford-gibson/god-cosmology-and-nothingness-theory-and-theology-in-a-scientific-era/ebook/product-22399175.html

Regarding Anti-Personnel Combat Drones

In the future anti-personnel combat drones may be stealthy and packed with more than explosives; they may be directed by artificial intelligence. Such spherical, invisible, baseball sized flying objects would be dropped from a carrier bomb or cruise missile drone into a combat region to search and destroy individual soldiers or marines. A single package of 500 to 1000 drones could take out a battalion. This is a serious defense issue since it changes the nature of war. Science fiction writers take note.

The Democrat Party's Sadamite Evolution

It is challenging to accurately discern the shape and nature of emergent hybrid political modalities on occasion. A political philosopher may consider a host of usual political forms such as Aristotle described in The Politics about 2500 years ago. In a way not much new has changed since then. Socialism, communism and corporatism have evolved to join tyranny, monarchy and democracy as varieties of theoretical political organization. Yet if one compares theoretical forms of political organization to elements of the periodic table with characteristics of numbers of electrons, neutrons and protons quantified it is easy to recognize that political forms too may vary quite far from simple plain-Jane norms. It is ironic that the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein's political form of Baathism that he adopted from a Syrian political inventor named Aflaq is in essence the modus vivendi of today's American democrat party that is a kind of trans-gender treasonous sedition accelerated by the media comprising an ad hoc state within a state in the U.S.A.

Saddam Hussein's neo-socialist Baath part of course has a strong man-a dictator at the top of the organization. The Executive was above the law as well a being the law and the cult object of all citizens. If he wasn't quite as powerful as the Absolute Dictator of Thomas Hobbes Leviathan. He or she is a Bill Clinton or Barrack Obama exercising executive rule by fiat of power unilateral policies aided and abetted by sycophant party apparachiks.

The U.S. Demo-Sodomite Party is of course atheist and beyond good and evil in regard to their recognition of sin. They believe that change is normal, natural and even the sole virtue while in the process of redistributing power. Power that compiles for the Sodomite Party is a goal and end in-itself. This is not an equal protection of the law party for all citizens-it is a use-the-law to benefit the Sodomite party pragmatism.

There is another irony about the Sodomite Party worthy of note. It is the anti-intellectual nature of the Party that has over-reliance on Darwin's discoveries and advancement of evolution theory paradigmata as an atheist theology for-itself. Consider however Darwin's fore-running and exceedingly influential philosophical peer G.W.F. Hegel who designed the evolution paradigm regarding spirit actualizing itself through matter in history. That philosophical paradigm is still valid. Spirit and reason are emerging in history and humanity has the highest expression if it so far. Mind is not simple matter though it is comprised of it. Abnegation of reason; a Sodomite Party preference in order to support mindless atheist materialism, is manifestly not supported by the facts of the emergence of reason and spirit through matter.

Matter is a cooled down and locked in form of energized sub-atomic quanta. The fundamental quanta seems to be some sort of entanglement of relativistic energy vectors in a greater field. A few theorists have suggested that the field at the most fundamental level may be nothing more than mathematical monads (infinitesimally small point-numbers). The Sodomite party needs to think and not be content with hedonistic enjoyment of embodiment in a mass-energy field even if it titillates.

The Sodomite political criterion is a critical distraction and subversion of normal political progress. It is a dead end blind cul de sac of doom that is not even accountable in any usual political process. While the social environment of the nation requires a new political economic value theory based on minimal entropy added to the ecosphere, the Democratic Party that should speak for the people instead is a sycophantic self-serving sedition that reinforces old economic values and advances global terrorism through support for foreign insurrection ostensibly to encourage a non-existent democracy. That Democratic Sodomite Party is a spoiler killing off Green Party development that ought to replace it. It also works to destroy spiritual awareness and faith in God; those are serious things especially as unreasoning stupid trust in elite Sodomite Power is supposed to (rising inflection) replace it.

One should not underestimate the power of the broadcast media to subvert local and national political organization and promote corrupt elites (exclusive and duplicitous) to rule vicariously for others in a Sodomite context. The modern broadcast media is a fundamental opponent of democracy. Select international Sodomite values are their measuring standard for national politics. Their primary purpose is to redistribute wealth and power to the Sodomite clan. It is their belief that objective social and economic change is accomplished by redistributing and concentrating wealth and power; not in changing and adapting political economy, value theory and means to regulate capitalism such that it is applied optimally to solve clear and present environmental and demographic challenges to human survival on Earth while keeping people fundamentally happy, prosperous and secure.

Arctic American Russian Defense Policy Common Interests

Complete disclosure; I think the people that create U.S. foreign policy are fundamentally idiots. Since I have disclosed that bias I will proceed to outline my thoughts regarding the need for cooperative U.S. and Russian Arctic security policy that is cognizant of environmental and historical-cultural concerns for all parties.

Firstly the U.S. should not overburden Russian concerns about security on a broad front since it is not in U.S. nor European interest to do so. Each underestimate the significant role Russia has played for a thousand years in deflecting Asian aggression from Europe and via trickle down to the U.S. Today Russia is also a main block of security for the west regarding Muslim expansionism. If the west weakens Russia to much radical Islamic powers may swell to take much of that nation for themselves and intimidate the remainder into submission.

If Russia were to weak it might also allow greater Chinese expansion in northwest Asia and the North Pacific and that would not be good for Alaska. SecDef Carter visits Alaska this week or next to confer with Senator Sullivan on the need for an Arctic security policy-yet neither understand U.S. security interests well enough to formulate a rational policy.

Political leaders tend to be assertive and aggressive rather than intellectual and thoughtful. They make irrational and uninformed decisions that affect the interests of the nation and national security badly. In the case of an Arctic policy, solving the situation in order to maintain peace and security effectively at lowest cost while factoring in the need for environmental security is desirable. That means recognizing real Russian interests.

Russia is basically the primary Arctic nation. It has a legitimate claim on a 200 mile natural resources exclusivity zone along its coast and islands except where it overlaps with shared borders. The United States has a comparatively small Arctic coast; Russia has more than 5000 miles while the U.S. has just Alaska. Canada, Greenland, Norway, Finland, Iceland, Nunavut, Sweden and Svalbard have concerns too. No one else essentially is involved, and the middle oceanic region beyond 200 miles of a coast should be permanently undeveloped and left for world environmental security. That makes boundary issues very simple.

Russia has a comparatively small population and sufficient resources to not need to develop anything offshore at any rate, for that matter neither does the U.S.A. have a pressing need to develop the Arctic. With peaceful relations established and perhaps an Arctic American Russian Cooperation policy (AARCO) in effect security needs would be lower militarily speaking and environmental security could be accentuated.

The United States should build three icebreakers and several Arctic winter hovercraft for all around participation. Maybe it could schedule building a new icebreaker one a decade. Russia and the U.S.A. as well as Canada should construct several seasonally submersible beneath the ice scientific and environmental habitats for walrus and polar bear haul outs.

Billy Mitchell said that Alaska is the crossroads of the world regarding aviation. Military aircraft in Alaska including drones based here can serve U.S. interests globally rather than just regionally. If peace and cooperation is firm with Russia then military needs would be less and useful elsewhere in the world.

I should comment that military tactical victories in battle that the United States military has some proficiency with-or did before the gaying of the military, cannot achieve victory politically or comprehensively in the modern era. Politicians need to deploy forces rationally with cognizance of the entire political and territorial circumstances of deployment and with awareness that protracted terrorism and resistance reinforced by global jihadists will probably follow. The military isn’t designed to substitute for intelligent political leadership.

In the ancient world military forces were happy enough to kill civilians too if they resisted and sometimes not so terrorists had nowhere to hide. That is not acceptable policy in today's social environment. Yet the people in D.C. never seem to calculate correctly what the limitations are for the military in achieving victory amidst people that have fundamentally different values. Unlike the Japanese or Germans following world war II that just became westernized, jihadists have religious values antipathetic to submission to full western values. With the Supreme Court decision to allow homosexual marriage and the decades ahead of public school saturation with homosexual educators with homosexual values corrupting youth, even Americans are somewhat antipathetic to federal cultural values forced from above.

World civilization is something that politicians often do not learn while calculating their personal rise to power. They make bad decisions that create poverty and strife for decades, and are happy with that.

A Universal Widget chapter one (video)

Gary reads from chapter one of his science fiction novel

Better Than Tachyon Beams-Radiowave Mind Control

Scientists might just be able to use micro and radio waves to control brain wave frequencies evidently. A novel I read recently had such a scenario so I looked up the subject a little.One could do-it-yourself with internet research and possibly get some news items-I just looked into it briefly. Apparently it isn't just clever hoakem...

http://psychophysical-torture.de.tl/Dr-.--Jos-e2---Delgado.htm

Considering that Dr. Delgado worked on his brain-stim control the bull tech at Yale as early as the 1940's there is likely to have been a substantial degree of progress in developing weapons of individual and mass mind control. Those Yale new-world-order people may have meant something beyond the routine imperial and or fascist gangnam style. Controlling what people think and remember, making the Supreme court gay robot political servo-units of evil-who can imagine the possibilities?

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/mind-control-by-cell/

So what does this mean for Mexican prospects? Perhaps not much immediately. The Mexicans didn't revolt against the Hapsburgs and subsequent practical dictators until 1911 and were never allowed to own guns I think. As a result the elites had   royal death grip on -power until recently, and with the loosening gangs and siccarros took over with narcocracy.; Mind Control.

http://www.targetedinamerica.com/mindcont.html

Consider that if the little senorita doesn't have a 20 rounds per second MAC10 in her purse to contradict the siccarro option of oppression the drug kings simply rule. Thus death cults develop instead of gun clubs and the culture of defeatist violence is exported to the U.S.A. and accellerated by Democrat denials of their culture of corruption. The peons of interest without guns will be malleable targets for the new world ordering by micro and radio wave brain wave control, if it should occur.

Maybe this cultural tech possibility is a good opportunity to invest in a tin-foil lined hats for brainwave security (along with better, flip down earplugs. They might sell on ebay.

Sect Clinton's Management of Ambassador Steven's Killing Under Scrutiny

There have been numerous questions about why the Obama administration supported moderate rebels in Libya to overthrow a government the Bush administration had made peace with. The questions arise because many of those rebels seem to have evolved into ISIS troops in a Libya moving toward fundamental radical Islam. They also occur because of the way the state department let the Ambassador be captured, tortured and killed seemingly in order to show trust in the good intentions of the locals. One also wonders why the rescue team was bureaucratically fragged possibly in order to let the slaughter go ahead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Christopher_Stevens

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/congress/hillary-clinton-testimony-at-house-benghazi-panel

It is true that many Ambassadors are rich appointees from the 1% that want some glory and connections and hence are not good for democracy, yet democracy in the Middle East is a joke anyway that makes leftists in Democrat administrations feel good about themselves. So one must tolerate the political incompetence that may occur as it is likely to be on par with that of the State Department and administration.

Sect. Clinton said she did not use e-mail as her primary communication in office, and so that seems to explain why she had all of her emails on a private email account where anything embarrassing would not be become part of the public government record. Lawyers know better than to let the public seem their private business or that of their clients. Except Sect Clinton was working for the public, and the public interest was in an open source kind of freedom of information approach to email communications that would normally graduate to public review when suffient time had allowed.

Sect. Clinton might not have trusted the emails accounts of the State Department though and was perhaps a mind reader about the Chelsea Manning thing that would release thousands or millions of government emails via wikipedia-wise choice. The Red Army may know more about what goes on behind closed doors of the State Department than the average American citizen.

Too many questions, too little time. Syria seems to be raising the same sort of malfeasances, so one can’t just dump all the blame on the next Chicago lawyer running for the White House.

J.F.K.- When the tide comes in...

John F. Kennedy said about the economy that 'when the tide comes in, all of the ships in the harbor rise'. While some may not regard N.P.R. as America's Al Qaeda, the broadcast media has become the national elector substantively promoting their favorites to the Presidency so far as possible. That fact and the media concentration on promoting foreign over national interests accomplishes what even King Canute could not in keeping the tide from rising.

Government ought not be organized crime enthralling the citizens with debt. Reform of the economy to an ecological economic foundation of sustainability, full employment and new value theory cannot be done with either unrepentent sinner political leadership nor with corruption that thrives on the fascist ethic of victimizing others.