In
the age of the machine and advanced technology (comparatively) women
became empowered with birth control and automation. While men had
learned for generations that political and economic differences in
leaders and movements were independent of gender, with the Clintons
that lesson seemed to be lost as feminists believed to a certain
extent, such as former Sect. of State Madeleine Albright, that gender
was all important and a political-economic mode in-itself.
Feminism
politically has been led to support a global economic war against
men. First world feminist leaders have failed to realize that the
enhanced status of first world females requires first world economic
and technological infrastructure that isn’t present in second and
third world economies generally. Though feminists have supported
outsourcing male manufacturing and production jobs to second and
third world nations having the effect of increasing their economic
status the lead time is slow. Second and third world nations lack the
general negotiating positions that existed in the United States for
workers seeking enhanced status in the 20th
century before the end of the Cold War.
Plainly
the U.S. national economy of post-WWII growth is over. In that
economy with fewer than 140 million citizens initially white men were
fully employed and the differences between rich and poor weren’t
nearly so great. The tax rate was progressive and the rich paid more
than 70% income tax. The population steadily increased and life was
good for that class. Segregation still existed in the south though,
and women were resentful to a certain extent of their role as
self-regarded social economic inferiors (to a certain extent).
Unionization also decayed with the union remnant being strongest in
government comprising an insulating layer of common people for the
rich who pay for politicians. Government union workers in effect work
for and are loyal to the rich, largely mirroring global corporate
wishes.
After
the cold war ended most industrial jobs for men were outsourced to
China or elsewhere with an abundance of cheap labor. Technological
efficiency increases also undermined the value of male labor and
there were additional factors. Women didn’t want men to have
greater pay and sought and egalitarian earnings environment.
Feminists tended to support illegal alien migrant labor too that also
contributed to the devaluation of male labor domestically.
For
many Americans the Clinton-Obama economy seemed to be one designed to
enrich the 1% and concentrate wealth rather than to better the middle
class and poor. Taxes by the second Obama term were made incredibly
low and wealth had concentrated through Wall Street networking and
zero-interest loans to big banks. Hillary Clinton planned to continue
Obamanomics and much of the electorate didn’t care for that
including 45% of female voters.
Nevertheless
the changes brought by technology comprise a new economy albeit one
not at all designed along sustainable economic lines. Feminists in
the new economy have made power of equal value with economic progress
for women. Yet like chess grandmasters that learn the game from
childhood and never work at physical labor, sharing criticism of the
white male economic infrastructure (that hasn’t made real economic
progress since the mid 1970s) and resisting individuals in the game
of inter-social communication, wealth has continued to concentrate
and the middle class overall has been in decline though women have a
bigger piece of the economic pie within the class.
Chess
is a highly skilled game wherein game-boys grown up may function
with economic blinders on. They produce nothing consumable except
perhaps entertainment and are as highly paid as similarly
non-productive commercial athletes that profess nothing and
manufacture nothing consumable 9except entertainment). Chess is a
good retirement skill that keeps the mind active, and a relaxation
tool for intellectuals. Real economics require particular attention
to particular national goals and relationships however. A nation
enthralled with gaming may find it difficult to discern the woods or
the trees.
Donald
Trump the candidate promised to benefit the nation and restore a
sense of great nationhood to the U.S.A. Replacing the corporatist
Obamacare with an expanded V.A. Hospital system serving the civilian
public too that are poor, and coordinating that structure with
community clinics for the poor would be the most cost effective way.
The de facto one-party system in Congress probably wouldn’t produce
anything practical like that.
Female
voters have in effect signed aboard the globalist agenda forwarded by
the Clinton-Obama-Harvard axis of economic evil designed to create a
global village of idiots owned largely by a plutocracy of 1%ers
working with communist party elites to keep the village idiots happy
in a non-sustainable economy. An eleatic social moral renormalization
where the village idiots are amoral and doped appears to be the basic
policy in order to have all people treated equally as no more than
plankton. Religious ideas regardless of being Christian or Moslem are
undesirable for the godless plutocratic atheist world order.
Feminists
like the idea of a non-physical labor work force with a heavily
governed social order dominated by biggest bitch political bosses
lording it over drone male and female worker-doped-pacified village
citizenry permitted sex like swine that by homes with veritable
lifetime mortgages. With the left being so supportive of a bifurcated
immoral citizenry under capitalist, globalist plutocrats, the need to
persuade business leaders like President trump of the economic value
of the ecosphere for the sustainable goods and services that it
supplies to all like receives little support.
President
Trump is a businessman. Business leaders don’t let highly placed
executives like Vice President Pence sit around and cut blue ribbons.
While pure politicians might pick symbolic Vice Presidents and keep
them out of the way lest they be rivals for attention and glory,
business minded Presidents want to get some work out of them.
President Trump recently sent V.P. Pence on an Asian mission perhaps
to coordinate a response to North Korean nuclear weapons and missile
delivery expansion.
President
Trump is probably not only for sovereignty for the U.S.A., he also
has a habit of making a profit. Ecological economist could show trump
the advantage and potential profits of ecological economics and if he
were convinced he likely would support it; especially if it is
synergistic with existing economic structures and amenable to
evolutionary transformation from old to new without radical
displacement. If the profit is there, capitalists and business will
follow.
A
healthy U.S. economy with strong border control and stable
immigration policies that won’t disrupt American lives should be
the foundation for an America policy able to guide other nations
toward similar ecological economic business free enterprise
structures that are sustainable. That is a concern that American
feminist should develop before the next election rather than playing
social reality as some sort of chess game they can win with incessant
attacks on their fellow citizens that just need to earn a living too.
It
may be that abstract business zoning criteria should be devised and
made into law to which any new business would need to cohere in order
to exist. There might be a cap on employee total such as 5000 to
prevent monopoly. Taxation on individuals earning more than a million
dollars annually might be set at 51% in order to defend the
sovereignty of democracy from the power of plutocracy. Business
should have responsibility for environmental externalities and have
taxation in relation to their environmental efficiency at low
entropy. Patents should be limited to 7 years with 10% royalties to
inventors after that from any business using the patented idea. None
should be allowed to own stock shares in more than three
corporations.
Because
one year in prison at $40,000 for a convict could have paid for food
stamps for 20 people for a year, and for other reasons in a similar
way, it is desirable to provide minimum income and physical storage
facilities for the poor to lower economic pressure for crime. Crime
has numerous indirect social costs that should be reduced in a fully
democratic, environmentally sustainable free enterprise economy in
the United States.
Numerous
factors work against employment for U.S. individuals that are out of
the work force for any length of time. Women as men should be given
the real opportunity and have the social expectation to be
independent citizens able to earn a living without being exploited or
experiencing onerous conditions. Relationship should be consensual
rather than circumstantially coercive. Illegal migration,
environmental exploitation, a too powerful broadcast media,
concentration of wealth and more reinforce social anomie and
degradation rather than a good national equilibrium. It doesn’t
take a village; it takes a nation.
