Jeff Sessions; Considering a 2020 Run for the White House?

Jeff Sessions; A 2020 Presidential Candidate?

With President Trump trying to ditch him for having the integrity to recuse himself and for not sending Hillary to Gitmo for questioning, the question arises about Jeff Sessions future plans. Would that include a 2020 independent campaign for the White House?

With at least half of a solid ticket it is possible that a good, populist, nationalist Republican running with Sessions could win a primary against the weak President that could not end sanctions on Russia, couldn’t get Obamacare repealed, who failed to protect wolves and critical Alaska habitat, who did not get solar panels on the wall with Mexico, and who hasn’t got any sort of firm program to build a moon base for permanent human scientific research habitation and who let Kim IL develop a smörgåsbord of nuclear weapons and ICBMs to erase Washington DC in the years ahead when America needs to clear house in Congress.

Jeff Sessions with the right green candidate could change the face of American politics. It’s interesting stuff to think about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amory_Lovins

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/07/25/trump-jeff-sessions-will-he-resign-240930

Voodoo Law; Pres. Election Loser Has Immunity from Prosecution

Former President G.W. Bush’s chief ethics lawyer; “Pressuring [attorney general] to prosecute the person who lost the election is an impeachable offense if we value free elections,”

It seems like a voodoo legal concept, yet an inference is that it should be illegal to prosecute the loser in a Presidential election about anything concerning politics.  Foreign contributions, classified emails on unsecure personal technology, meetings with burglars...Immunity for election losers creates some interesting opportunities for both parties.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/343588-ex-bush-ethics-lawyer-trump-calling-for-clinton-to-be

It is not necessary for winners and losers of Presidential elections to have immunity for any crimes they may have committed during the elections to have free and fair elections.

Voodoo Law; Presidential Election Losers Have Immunity from Prosecution

Former President G.W. Bush’s chief ethics lawyer; “Pressuring [attorney general] to prosecute the person who lost the election is an impeachable offense if we value free elections,”

It seems like a voodoo legal concept, yet an inference is that it should be illegal to prosecute the loser in a Presidential election about anything concerning politics.  Foreign contributions, classified emails on unsecure personal technology, meetings with burglars...Immunity for election losers creates some interesting opportunities for both parties.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/343588-ex-bush-ethics-lawyer-trump-calling-for-clinton-to-be

It is not necessary for winners and losers of Presidential elections to have immunity for any crimes they may have committed during the elections to have free and fair elections.

The Inefficient State of Incarceration in America

Incarcerations for criminal offenses are an existing yet standard procedure for addressing the problem of crime. Arrest and detention or incarceration is an historically common way to sequester those who were deemed to be enemies of civil order.

Incarceration is debatably an improvement over the way legal justice systems worked in ancient times. Incarceration is equivalent to time in the ice hockey penalty box, instead of having one hands cut off for theft as in Sharia.

Many government inefficiencies are not changed until something compels it. The U.S. government spendsn13 billion dollars apiece on Ford class aircraft carriers (aircraft carriers were invented by the Japanese who launched the first one in 1922)  instead of inventing a more modern way to launch fighter aircraft from the sea or wherever. 

Global warming concerns are pressurizing government to move away a little from producing greenhouse gassing and automobiles that burn gasoline, yet not fast enough. Few have any real interest in upgrading corrections systems. For-profit prisons are like for-profit Obamacare-health care for the poor. Expand instead of innovate and invent. It is easier to criticize it than to realistically fix it. And this is still the age of neo-romanticism, subjectivism and moral relativism.  Government people are left alone to be concerned about new tax cuts for the 1% they would like to make.

The ancient Germana-Francic Salic Law of King Clovis is an example of change in the west (from the way it is now).

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/medieval/salic.asp quote from the Salic law...

“Title XVII. Concerning Wounds.

1. If any one have wished to kill another person, and the blow have missed, he on whom it was proved shall be sentenced to 2500 denars, which make 63 shillings.

2. If any person have wished to strike another with a poisoned arrow, and the arrow have glanced aside, and it shall be proved on him; he shall be sentenced to 2500 denars, which make 63 shillings.

3. If any person strike another on the head so that the brain appears, and the three bones which lie above the brain shall project, he shall be sentenced to 1200 denars, which make 30 shillings.

4. But if it shall have been between the ribs or in the stomach, so that the wound appears and reaches to the entrails, he shall be sentenced to 1200 denars-which make 30 shillings-besides five shillings for the physician's pay.

5. If any one shall have struck a man so that blood falls to the floor, and it be proved on him, he shall be sentenced to 600 denars, which make 15 shillings.

6. But if a freeman strike a freeman with his fist so that blood does not flow, he shall be sentenced for each blow-up to 3 blows-to 120 denars, which make 3 shillings.

Title XVIII. Concerning him who, before the King, accuses an innocent Man.

If any one, before the king, accuse an innocent man who is absent, he shall be sentenced to 2500 denars, which make 63 shillings.”

-end quote

Three modern problems with incarceration are;

1) It costs too much- $30,000 to $40,000 annually per person

2) Incarceration as it is presently isn’t efficient at correcting with a 70% recidivism rate

3) Incarceration sends criminals to training academy for career criminals

The remedy for all three problems is in technology. Inmates should be physically isolated from other criminals, not concentrated, and subject to a rigorous body and mind training course using all the efficiencies of technology available today for instruction.

Being in prison should be like being in the Marine Corp regarding discipline, yet with inmates force-fed academic intelligence in isolation. There only social contacts should be with staff, councilors and those without a felony conviction including instructors.

One should be able to design individual training courses for individual inmates that would get corrections done in a third of the time of sentence as it is. If recidivism occurred a different approach might be warranted from the old play-book from the middle ages to make prison less desirable-such as the wind cage yet not until death.

Mass Incarceration 2; Reasons for Racial Percent Differences

Cultural and historical differences may be largely responsible for the variegated incarceration rate regarding race. White culture was a more or less secure majority culture with established roles. Except for the affect of increased national drug use, the percent of white people incarcerated should have stabilized decades ago. It should not have increased because the percent of non-whites of the U.S. population has increased, unless one thinks that increasing non-whites should catalyze increased white crime.

Hispanics were an external proletariat illegally in millions of cases entering the U.S.A. to form an internal proletariat. The cultural differences of non-established, less sedentary populations in criminal behavior compared to sedentary, established populations are notable. One might wonder too, why Mexico has a lower incarceration rate and a far higher murder rate, and if that may mean that the U.S.A. can afford to process more people through the criminal corrections systems than Mexico, whereat direct eye for an eye extra-judicial justice may be somewhat more frequent.

Black Americans had the social integration problems following the end of the Jim Crowe era. Then problems developed for all American men during the same period when the old-style industrial economy was outsourced overseas. High unemployment rates made a generation of black youth half unemployed or underemployed, while illegal alien workers watered down the value of wage labor in the U.S.A.

Real wages adjusted for inflation have not changed for white men since the early 1970s while affirmative action has changed the employment and social landscape in the U.S.A. There were far fewer good paying industrial or mens jobs as time rolled by for men of any race in the U.S.A. WIth a couple generations of white male babies aborted while far fewer black or Hispanic babies were aborted, there were social structural and composition differences between populations of the three races as well. Smaller families can invest more in education generally.

An unstable tends to settle down while the opposite case exist with immigrants regarding crime. Immigrants can bring bad as well as good to receiving nations. The modern influences of Islam, godless atheism and the decrease of Christian values in addition to financial sophistry and the over-concentration of wealth, as well as global stress on the ecosphere have changed the way people think of people. The value of human life may be transitioning to commodification. Politicians cannot think much beyond Wall Street and class electorate issues, much less comprehend corrections reform.

Families are an endangered item especially in a nation with legal homosexual marriage. One would wish that healthy nuclear families in a good community were the norm, yet that probably wouldn't be achieved by letting violent criminals and dope sellers live on the corner.

Some of the children may be better off with the gangster away from home ironically. With a better corrections systems it might be possible to restore criminals to their families who may have already divorced (more than 50% of marriages end in divorce).

If the criminal is away from home, he is also away from his victims (in his own family or down the block). That can be some comfort to the victims.

Children should have better education in the U.S.A. An equivelent of coursera for kids might be useful. Even google tranlator can translate spoken words into any foreign language. How cool is that?

In my opinion voting rights should be restored seven years after sentence is served if there are no more felony convictions. One should not lose voting rights forever for a felony conviction, yet the right to vote should fairly be suspended for seven years, as drunk driving can revoke driving rights for some time after sentence is served for example.

If people cannot obey the laws, the state has no interest in letting such individuals vote.

One in Ten Black Males are in Jail...consequences...

Maybe a reduction in crime happens when violent criminals and drug sellers are taken off the streets, yet also great cost to the states as the price for keeping one guy in jail costs $30,000 to $40,000 annually and what, 56 billion dollars per annum in total?

Obviously there should be a far better corrections system than presently exists that is less time consuming and that has less than a 10% recidivism rate.

Half of the federal prisoners are in for drug offenses. Those guys not only poison the people and corrupt society spreading rot and incompetence and even brain damage to their victims, they unfairly make a profit that mocks those honest and poor free enterprise tradesmen already being bumped out by illegal aliens.

Presumably half of the black males in jail are there for violent crimes. People that perp violent crimes are often repeat offenders.

The last 40 years is more or less the period of desegregation and affirmative action, increased and pervasive dope use and decline of quality math scores...trouble in social change in river city. One could let them all out to become Catholic priests and nuns of course, yet they might not.

Twenty million illegal aliens helped increase Hispanic crimes in the U.S.A. Cell phone and computers helped gangs organize crime across the border and in cities from Chicago to Mexico City. The Clinton and Obama administrations had a spike incriminal activities.

The widespread use of illegal drug caused alot of crime and minorities were traffickers and victims of that at the same time. THe degradation of social values due to moral relativism changed the way people think and behave, then a great deal of post Vietnam and post-Jim Crowe skepticism created a vast counterculture that was disruptive of traditions and stability domestically for reasons good and bad.

The lack of moral leadership (Al Gore- no presideing moral authority) encouraged certain kinds of crime and gang activity. The Mexican drug wars had some spillover into the U.S.A. as the U.S.A. is the primary buyer of dope for decadent Democrats.

The post-Cold war era of globalism made those that enjoy free e0dollars from the Federal Reserve more inclined to just lock up and forget the incarcerated rather than correct them. Congress can't even get Obamacare to reach the very poor and homelss interstate class of Americans while no sedentary, middle class kind of American missed out.

Law enforcement and evidence gathering has more camera videos of criminals that jurors are unsympathetic with. Hence long sentences and tough get release (especially if they proclaimed innocense).

I think peoplle discriminate as much or more against those labeled with a mental diagnosis. If one pleads mea culpa as a 'mintal' one may be employed, yet then tracked and pre-destined to be treated as a mental 'psych nigger' the remainder of one's life. Those unfortunate enough to be felons and mental would be received by society as 'the criminally insane'...a tough label to live with.

On Mass Incarceration post 1

First of all, I think there is no social contract amongst citizens in the U.S,A,. That's a more French, Rousseauian notion. The U.S.A. has a constitution and laws that one should obey. As a free citizen they may choose not to, and then should expect correction rather than punishment for violating those laws.

Mass incarcertaion is simply a concatenation of all of the individuals that have broken laws and should be undergoing correction rather than punishment. Those that cannot obey the laws of the United States, such as illegal entry, ought to expect correction and swiftly.

Justice is really a matter of accurate determination of the guilt or innocense of an individual in breaking a particular law. Injustice obviously would be to convict someone innocent and vice versa.. Justice is not about politics and quantification of race or gender regarding those convicted so long as the laws are just. If it were not so women could be regarded as unfairly advataged since they have such a low incarceration number in comparison to men.

If the correction system has failed and costs society a tremendous amount of money and needless human sufferring, and I think it has, then it should be changed. Putting criminals into a concentration facility together plainly is a silly way to go about training people not to be criminals. It is more of a filing and security approach for disposing of inconveniant items (people).

In a godless atheist society that scoffs at Christian values, and with the black prison population having a large number of Muslims it is likely that the religious criterion should be restrained and applied only moderately. Christianity itself is under attack and slow takeover by secular values. If mercy for the incarcerated means to not provide correction, that is consistent with a corrupt society.

What About Racial Disparities in Incarceration Rates?

Maybe the evidence gathering technology progress allows more accurate determination of guilt or innocense. It is possible that with the extreme mobility of people in America today incarceration is regarded as a way to assure that perpetrators don't just travel somewhere else to find new opportunitiy for crime.

With more female judges they may want to send more males to jail. Statistics would determine if that speculation has validity.

Maybe a disposable consumer-oriented society wants to dispose of criminals quickly and take them out of circulation, as one might remove counterfeit currency. Of course the Federal Reserve issues a lot of free money to big banks, and some regard that as a moral equivelent of counterfeiting for the benefit of the 1%. So that line of speculation may be inaccurate.

Some might think that whites have lower crime rates because they are more established and sedentary than immigrants from Latin America, many of whom are illegal aliens or first-generation native born with dual citizenship. Also, white women aborted a couple generations of healthy white male boys, so the white population is older and less wild than Hispanics whom have more new-culture socialization issues.

Whites just don't have the gangs that they used to many decades ago while Hispanics have a rich gang culture, and blacks invented modern gangsta rap culture (I don't know about the socialization relationship of that to criminal behavior, yet it isn't a bar mitzvah sort of approach to things).

If there are racial disparities in incarceration rates one might wonder why. One might ask if the temporal rate of incarceratation should be the same among any races normally, when the cultural origins of the races differ historically.

Should an established race in a given society that comproses a majority historically, that has worked through its social structure evolution reasonably well have a higher or lower incacertation or social disconformity rate than an emergent race that was previously not established in the majority culture?

One might wonder about abstract explanations for historical and cultural evolution and the phenomenon of mass incaceration without considering the geographic and population density factors.

SInce Rowe vs Wade white women have aborted two or three generations; tens of millions, of young white males (and females) whom might have committed more crimes while Hispanics-especially immigrants, and blacks, have had far fewer abortions. New white females judges may not be so reluctant to sentence males of any race before the bench to prison.

One might wonder, if in a different social configuration, if wimen might not have equal incarceration rates as males such that there were no disparity. If the U.S. Supreme Court has three justices that are female, while incarcerated females are 123 per 100,000 and males 1352 per 100,000 can that be regarded as efficient judicial gender representation?

Incarceration rates may more or less parallel high school graduation rates as well as actual learning, I don't know. Culture matters, and a less intellectual culture in an era where good non-college educated jobs not designed for more passive, sedentary female workers are in decline creates a possibility of more idle and unemployed time for young males who may perpetrate crimes. Dope use also affects people in inner cities and they may more readily commit crimes because of the high population density that they could avoid if they were living in a less populous society and could be degenerate without troubling anyone.

Blacks in the post-Jim Crowe era had more challenges for evolving into new and independent economic ventures for a variety of reason, while immigrant Hispanics also shared the characteristic I am considering here; the lack of social stability.

In the Vietnam conflict there was a great difference in the performance and unit cohesiveness to discipline under stress among various units during different periods of the conflict.

The mostly volunteer army that existed during the early 1960s had entered service during the Eisenhower era of the 50s and were highly disciplined and performed well. The later conscript army that followed their discharge had more discipline and performance problems, the worst being the Americal division formed just for the war.

It had no unit military history and had great discipline problems including the Me Lai massacre of Lt. Calley's unit. Units with military tradition jave more discipline, new units, especially gueriila units and new militias like those of Serbia and ISIS tend toward war crimes.

Schumer and the Democrat’s Obamanomics Repackaged

Sen. Chuck Schumer published an article in the N.Y. Times describing how they can repackage the same old Obama economics and act as if it is new and something other than of benefit to the rich. Nothing about raising taxes on the rich, nothing about paying off the public debt, something about spending a trillion dollars on obsolete infrastructure paradigms instead of encouraging the private sector to develop new ways of transport, sewer and infrastructures that don’t need water or roads.

He talks about raising the minimum wage to $15 dollars and doesn’t say why employers would pay that instead of outsourcing jobs. He doesn’t say anything about sealing the Mexican border to keep illegal workers out whom would flood in to work for democrats of the middle class that want to pay $3 dollars an hour under the table instead of $15 with no benefits.

Democrats pile up public debt, make the nation as queer and dopey as they possibly can, flood the country with illegal aliens and cut taxes on the rich. With all that public debt the poor will have their benefits that presently exist cut the most under the way of Democrats. Its all bunk; King Canute style with money no object and the Federal Reserve just issuing e-dollars to Big Banks and buying up T-bills. Obamacare actually left the interstate poor out of coverage; those traveling to find work with lots of opportunity for injury. They can't stay still enough to get bureaucratically papered.

Sen. Schumer didn't address the big issue reaching global media from his own electorate; a squirrel has been terrorizing New York and even Homeland Security hasn't stopped it or its terrorist cell. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40703611 Probably he thinks he can do better with a special task force formed up.

Of course Sen. Schumer wrote about campaign spending. Getting elected so Democrat politicians can get richer is what the political system is really all about. Democrats want federal sinecures so they can resume doing nothing just like the Republican Congress presently is. Democrat Party leadership seems to want to ape the golden Obama years with unlimited Federal Reserve free money to the rich and Dept. of the Treasury. Most of that goes to the upper class and middle class. Democrat leadership monkey-do aping the Federal Reserve largess of the Obama years have no need for oars in the water. Their ideas sort of float above reality in a political social-reality of its own.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/24/opinion/chuck-schumer-employment-democrats.html

Blitz Chess (3m) Sicilian Defense; Grand Prix Attack

                                                             I played white.

Cavs Should Trade Lebron to Golden State

Cleveland ought to finally get rid of Lebron James to have more space on its salary cap. Its not too late to look to the future and finish last in its division next season to secure the number one draft pick that it can trade away.

Kyrie Irving should go to the Lakers; he is a Laker sort of player, Golden State needs to have another star to assure its victory over Cleveland should they make it back to the finals.

Congress Passes Russian Sanction Bill to Harm US Interests

The Congress passed another Russian sanctions bill to further damage U.S. financial interests. Americans would be better off with normalized bi-lateral relations and extensive American travel in Russia and vice versa.
 
In addition to passing a vast corporate health care bill that wrenched everything up good and left out millions of the poor from any realistic free medical provisioning, the Congress can't pay off the public debt, spends tens of billions on Ford aircraft carriers that a variety of next-gen drones will be able to put down, and can't get along with Russia after the cold war ended.

Aircraft carriers are the modern equivelent of dreadnauts-good in their day yet of decreasing survivability today. The Japanese launched the first aircraft carrier, the Hosho,  in 1922 and the Brits followed in 1924 with the Hermes. I saw an aircraft carrier at sea on the horizon once and it was huge. It was a vast, metal box target sinkable from above and below; the maritime equivelent of helicopters for soldiers with shoulder-fired missilles. If I was a naval weapons designer with modern tools aircraft carriers would be my ideal work assignment to create attack weapons for. If the U.S. Government invest to many tens of billions in aircraft carriers (the recently commissioned one cost 13 billion) they may allow a quick win by globalist with a few state-of-the-art weapons removing the15 U.S. carriers from existence.

Maybe one could invent something like large, disposable hollow super-cavtating torpeodoes each with an F-35 inside to launch a jet and some sort of new in air or on-the-water retreaval/catch system. There must be thousands of presently unknown methods for launching individual aircraft from oceans.

If the United States government could get along with the Chinese and Russians much better it might be possible to better spend tsome of the billions of dollars wasted on military items that should go to extra-terrestrial development of human and agri-cultural pioneering.

They let North Korea develop the ability to nuke Anchorage with ICBMs, can't get a man to set foot on the moon much less a woman or raven, destory the environment, marginalize Alaskan wolves, sponsor greenhouse gas increase and are basically minimalists on efficiency. The U.S. Congress is something like a cult of special interests.

Congress is good at enriching the rich and themselves and that's the bottom line.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/07/22/bipartisan-deal-curb-trumps-ability-ease-russia-sanctions/502032001/