The A.M.A. and Boston Cream Pie’d Plagiarism
A recent study pertaining to medical students discovered that 5% of the students essay exams were plagiarized. Some have suggested that select essay exams be discontinued from collegiate testing because of the ease with which elite college students may rip off Internet authors. Yet such a panic attack reaction isn’t needed, and America does want to have literate college alumni.
Next time a college paper on how one’s ancestors arrived in America begins with ‘four score and twenty years ago, my forefather and foremother stepped forth upon this continent to conceive a new life” etc a busy college professors need not just wonder if that one paper’s content doesn’t sound a little familiar. Instead he or she (not necessarily in that order) can upload a digitalized paper to the Universal Internet Plagiarism Check service.com
Whenever I write a new essay for publication at Triond.com a little time passes while they check to see if it has been published anywhere else on the Internet. Even if I published it myself first somewhere such as BestInternetwriters.com, Triond.com will let me know where it was published and reject it for being previously published. Such a service should be available for colleges routinely to use on all graduate and undergraduate essays, and could be for a very low cost per paper if they were all digitalized. Each college paper plagiarized should be caught for cheating and rejected like a body builder in competition using steroids and human growth hormones or an Olympic swimmer having stem cell modifications to grow webbed feet and hands.
While the Internet has made plagiarism easy, it has also made revealing plagiarism easy. The American Medical Association can profit from instant plagiarism check services probably available on line. I suppose that even a Google search for a string of words enclosed in quotes could turn up some plagiarized material for free.
Integrity can return to college classrooms if instant plagiarism checks become a routine part of undergraduate work. Students that write mediocre papers in comparison to those that plagiarize brilliant yet obscure philosophy papers should not be penalized for making a good effort that suffers in comparison to the unfairly copied paper on The One such as Plotinus described in The Enneads by The Eskimo Of the Unknown Ice Flow (if such an authored paper existed).
Nearly two decade ago I wrote a science fiction short story named Alaska Mag Accelerator (A.M.A.) that was about electro-magnetic accelerated transport modules across continents in tubes, it had no relationship to the Medical Society acronym, and such coincidences turn can turn up in essays too. Good essay examination software can produce a quality examination sufficient to determine if a paper is just coincidentally like another or actual plagiarism, for there are many levels of literary analysis available today.
If the United States is to graduate honest and capable college graduates it should have more plagiarism testing—even routine testing, just as college athletics should have far more doping tests. Society must know who the real meat-heads are as well as develop those with inadequate literary composition capabilities through remedial study into righteous if not radical writers with a discursive style that reaches effective if not persuasive levels of ink or crystal display, light emitting diode or electron language construction.
19 July 2010
'Halliburton's Army' and 'The Three Trillion Dollar War'; 2010 Election/War Issues
Free Corporations from Slavery-End Buying of Stock Shares of These Fiction ‘Individuals’
If a corporation treated legally as an individual isn’t a collective then what is? Perhaps joint partnerships should be the largest communal business form to be legally allowed to exist, such that when people partners named A+B+C+D+E spill oil they are sued and go out of business because they have financially responsibility instead of individual collective Big A is sued for spilling oil yet the owners of a have no personal financial responsibility though the stock value may or may not suffer. Well, more of this subject later. The economic future of the United States is under assault from a number of directions including Mexico, the broadcast media and corporatism.
Reading Pratap Chatterjee ‘s 2009 book “Halliburton’s Army” on those tens of thousands of people working abroad in construction projects and providing services to fulfill U.S. Government contracts pertaining to war missions often of a protracted nature, I found new information to fill out some of the details of the more general work I had recently read; the ‘The Three Trillion Dollar War’ co-authored by a winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics (Stiglitz), on the Iraq and Afghanistan financial swamp devastating the U.S. economy. There are many historical evolutionary business elements involved in the private business contracting for each war, too many to review here (I suggest reading each book), yet certain points exist regarding the phenomena of globalism, corporatism and corruption that may be cited or considered briefly.
The Brown and Root Corporation owned for a while by Halliburton has been involved in vast military construction projects since the Vietnam War. They were part of a consortium that built 95% of large U.S. military bases in Vietnam. Halliburton/Brown and Root was the largest contractor in the Iraq-Afghanistan conflicts as well. From L.B.J. to Dick Cheney the Halliburton/KBR relationships were too cozy comprising a conflict of interest and possibly a draft toward war for the profit of private interests. My concern here is simply with the phenomena of corporatism upon U.S. employment and environmental interests rather than in recounting the history of corruption of Halliburton and Brown and Root, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, LOGCAP, the naval equivalent or so forth, Pentagon procurements or awarding of contracts etc.
Much of the employment by Halliburton/KBR contractors abroad goes to TCNs or Third Country Nationals. Even Guantanamo Bay was built by flown in Philippine workers paid 2.50 and hour and then sent back to Manila. U.S. taxpayers pay huge amounts of money to fund private contractor developments in support of military deployments abroad in areas of conflict and instead of Americans or locals getting the jobs, much of the time TCNs are hired because they are the cheapest or safest and produce the most profit for the ostensible U.S. contractor (Halliburton relocated its headquarters to Dubai).
The degree of corruption in granting military support contracts is substantial, and perhaps itself comprises a reason for war if not for assassinating Presidents who would not kick back so well to particular corporations.
These protracted war and nation rebuilding missions abroad kickback product purchases to several American food corporations as well as other suppliers, and the phenomena creates a political draft for continuity of the phenomenon.
Corporatism is something like socialism, yet it is not as fair regarding lower level distribution of wages. Corporatism in foreign war contracting may also supply start up foreign corporations that bribe contract-awarding officials with a percentage of future profits, and these foreign corporations later become influential over U.S. interests.
Large multinational corporations that influence U.S. politicians in a variety of ways conform to a phenomenon of corporatism. The poor and unemployed in the United States are lint for both major political parties as is the environment. Unfortunately simple human corruption and greed in and out of government are the heart of the problem.
With the primary broadcast media owned by powers of concentrated wealth the basic agency of propaganda is unchallenged; U.S. nationalism is degraded along with the environment.
Without a political rectification toward smaller business, ecologically renewable, free enterprise nationalism the future of the United States is that of being exploited by globalist concentrated wealth and power. The Democratic Party has lost interest in really supporting new private sector employment for the poor and those out of work for the longest time first. The Republican Party and right wing talk radio speak out against ‘big government’. When in political power some conservative politicians such as Dick Cheney acted as if they felt entitled to take out their contempt for big government by giving big contracts to corporate firms with special interests that have been friendly to their career interests in the past.
For some reason dumping huge multi-billion dollar contracts to the private sector on the public credit card is considered to be thumbing the nose at ‘big government’. Such conservatives divert investment capital abroad, create vast public debt and reduce social services to the poor in the United States.
There is another down side to this military-industrial-conservative deficit spending for protracted corrupt, inept nation rebuilding that is mostly unknown in the U.S.A.; there is a pervasive two-scale pay system for these contractors working on U.S. military projects abroad. Chatterjee writes on page 144 of ‘Halliburton’s Army’; “In fact salaries” (of TNC’) “were tied to country of origin. Thus a Bangladeshi cleaner would be paid less than a Pakistani, a Georgian truck driver more than a Fijian, and a white South African security guard would make more than an Indian for doing the very same job. The poorer the country of citizenship, the less the workers were paid, which is not unlike the caste system in India or the apartheid system in South Africa before the African National Congress came to power.” End quote.
The practice of paying Third Country Nationals far less than U.S. workers to produce profit is of course at the heart of corporate capitalism of a Spenserian kind. Americans generally know that since the end of the cold war they face more laboring challenges from abroad. Americans working abroad may not be allowed to ‘dirty work’ because it might make the TNCs more restive for higher, equal wages in the right belief that the Americans are not superior doing equal work. That could lead to a reduction in corporate profit. In the long run such practices may lead to increased popular bias globally against U.S. citizens generally.
I believe that a new era of nationalism of an ecological economic nature is the direction the United States should go. For most of my life I have just done unskilled or semi-skilled manual labor such as house repainting, and I enjoy gardening and nature and would be too happy to transition to a less wasteful national economy and world trading regime in which the transfer of natural resources over international borders is done for reasons of comparative ecological interest rather than for temporal fiduciary advantage of exploitative individuals through trans-national corporations.
Corporations are not mentioned in the U.S. Declaration of Independence nor Constitution, and fundamentally there is no reason why they should be granted a legal fiction status as individuals of an immortal nature. They could at least be limited in size of employees to 3000, and citizens could be limited to investing in ownership of just three legal fiction individual corporations each in order to prevent legal fictions from the ownership of real American opportunities that through sheer financial and economic power exclude Americans from equal opportunity in free enterprise opportunities with other individuals in the United States of America. If corporations are even fiction individuals they should be protected from being bought and sold through stock offerings as if they were slaves anyway. Though it is a silly legal theory, the emancipation proclamation might be applied to the fiction individuals too, and corporations finally given their freedom with nobody owning them anymore.
The Democratic Party led by President Obama is continuing these foreign financial fiascos in Afghanistan and Iraq that will continue as they are so long as American taxpayers allow foreign and concentrated wealth loans to be borrowed I their name and spent abroad. The opportunity costs for diverting investment capital abroad are immense. The fundamental profiteers from these foreign expenditures are corrupt cadres of corporate contractors. The profits foreign and Muslim led corporations profiting from these oil sales and wars are also huge. Already some Muslim subcontractor of the U.S. Government may have slipped in a Pakistani nuclear device for burial in the New Mexico desert—who can say? From Mississippi River trans-ocean shippers to port security and U.S. rail the Muslim wealth has increased its power in the American economy. Just one nuclear device already in the nation and ready for use whenever times are deemed appropriate could vaporize the nation’s (The United States in this case) federal capitol. A more sober nationalism would make not only the poor and unemployed of America happy as they found good jobs and housing, but reduce the non-renewable wastage factor of those that believe that capitalism fundamentally means the advantage of the most corrupt in global economic slight of hand, fraud, corruption perfidy and treachery. Humanity may be able to continue progress with such activities forming a part of the economic facts of life, yet it really isn’t helpful. The United States and the world economy too can progress better with a more advantaged localism in politics with a global awareness of the vital importance of keeping a healthy environment and humanism ashore on the Earth on the threshold of realms of absolute spirit. The human destiny of reconciliation unto realms of absolute spirit may journey beyond an infinity of galaxies or Universes, yet begins with national rationalism and lunar development while we serve as a priesthood of believers in true compassion toward all.
If a corporation treated legally as an individual isn’t a collective then what is? Perhaps joint partnerships should be the largest communal business form to be legally allowed to exist, such that when people partners named A+B+C+D+E spill oil they are sued and go out of business because they have financially responsibility instead of individual collective Big A is sued for spilling oil yet the owners of a have no personal financial responsibility though the stock value may or may not suffer. Well, more of this subject later. The economic future of the United States is under assault from a number of directions including Mexico, the broadcast media and corporatism.
Reading Pratap Chatterjee ‘s 2009 book “Halliburton’s Army” on those tens of thousands of people working abroad in construction projects and providing services to fulfill U.S. Government contracts pertaining to war missions often of a protracted nature, I found new information to fill out some of the details of the more general work I had recently read; the ‘The Three Trillion Dollar War’ co-authored by a winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics (Stiglitz), on the Iraq and Afghanistan financial swamp devastating the U.S. economy. There are many historical evolutionary business elements involved in the private business contracting for each war, too many to review here (I suggest reading each book), yet certain points exist regarding the phenomena of globalism, corporatism and corruption that may be cited or considered briefly.
The Brown and Root Corporation owned for a while by Halliburton has been involved in vast military construction projects since the Vietnam War. They were part of a consortium that built 95% of large U.S. military bases in Vietnam. Halliburton/Brown and Root was the largest contractor in the Iraq-Afghanistan conflicts as well. From L.B.J. to Dick Cheney the Halliburton/KBR relationships were too cozy comprising a conflict of interest and possibly a draft toward war for the profit of private interests. My concern here is simply with the phenomena of corporatism upon U.S. employment and environmental interests rather than in recounting the history of corruption of Halliburton and Brown and Root, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, LOGCAP, the naval equivalent or so forth, Pentagon procurements or awarding of contracts etc.
Much of the employment by Halliburton/KBR contractors abroad goes to TCNs or Third Country Nationals. Even Guantanamo Bay was built by flown in Philippine workers paid 2.50 and hour and then sent back to Manila. U.S. taxpayers pay huge amounts of money to fund private contractor developments in support of military deployments abroad in areas of conflict and instead of Americans or locals getting the jobs, much of the time TCNs are hired because they are the cheapest or safest and produce the most profit for the ostensible U.S. contractor (Halliburton relocated its headquarters to Dubai).
The degree of corruption in granting military support contracts is substantial, and perhaps itself comprises a reason for war if not for assassinating Presidents who would not kick back so well to particular corporations.
These protracted war and nation rebuilding missions abroad kickback product purchases to several American food corporations as well as other suppliers, and the phenomena creates a political draft for continuity of the phenomenon.
Corporatism is something like socialism, yet it is not as fair regarding lower level distribution of wages. Corporatism in foreign war contracting may also supply start up foreign corporations that bribe contract-awarding officials with a percentage of future profits, and these foreign corporations later become influential over U.S. interests.
Large multinational corporations that influence U.S. politicians in a variety of ways conform to a phenomenon of corporatism. The poor and unemployed in the United States are lint for both major political parties as is the environment. Unfortunately simple human corruption and greed in and out of government are the heart of the problem.
With the primary broadcast media owned by powers of concentrated wealth the basic agency of propaganda is unchallenged; U.S. nationalism is degraded along with the environment.
Without a political rectification toward smaller business, ecologically renewable, free enterprise nationalism the future of the United States is that of being exploited by globalist concentrated wealth and power. The Democratic Party has lost interest in really supporting new private sector employment for the poor and those out of work for the longest time first. The Republican Party and right wing talk radio speak out against ‘big government’. When in political power some conservative politicians such as Dick Cheney acted as if they felt entitled to take out their contempt for big government by giving big contracts to corporate firms with special interests that have been friendly to their career interests in the past.
For some reason dumping huge multi-billion dollar contracts to the private sector on the public credit card is considered to be thumbing the nose at ‘big government’. Such conservatives divert investment capital abroad, create vast public debt and reduce social services to the poor in the United States.
There is another down side to this military-industrial-conservative deficit spending for protracted corrupt, inept nation rebuilding that is mostly unknown in the U.S.A.; there is a pervasive two-scale pay system for these contractors working on U.S. military projects abroad. Chatterjee writes on page 144 of ‘Halliburton’s Army’; “In fact salaries” (of TNC’) “were tied to country of origin. Thus a Bangladeshi cleaner would be paid less than a Pakistani, a Georgian truck driver more than a Fijian, and a white South African security guard would make more than an Indian for doing the very same job. The poorer the country of citizenship, the less the workers were paid, which is not unlike the caste system in India or the apartheid system in South Africa before the African National Congress came to power.” End quote.
The practice of paying Third Country Nationals far less than U.S. workers to produce profit is of course at the heart of corporate capitalism of a Spenserian kind. Americans generally know that since the end of the cold war they face more laboring challenges from abroad. Americans working abroad may not be allowed to ‘dirty work’ because it might make the TNCs more restive for higher, equal wages in the right belief that the Americans are not superior doing equal work. That could lead to a reduction in corporate profit. In the long run such practices may lead to increased popular bias globally against U.S. citizens generally.
I believe that a new era of nationalism of an ecological economic nature is the direction the United States should go. For most of my life I have just done unskilled or semi-skilled manual labor such as house repainting, and I enjoy gardening and nature and would be too happy to transition to a less wasteful national economy and world trading regime in which the transfer of natural resources over international borders is done for reasons of comparative ecological interest rather than for temporal fiduciary advantage of exploitative individuals through trans-national corporations.
Corporations are not mentioned in the U.S. Declaration of Independence nor Constitution, and fundamentally there is no reason why they should be granted a legal fiction status as individuals of an immortal nature. They could at least be limited in size of employees to 3000, and citizens could be limited to investing in ownership of just three legal fiction individual corporations each in order to prevent legal fictions from the ownership of real American opportunities that through sheer financial and economic power exclude Americans from equal opportunity in free enterprise opportunities with other individuals in the United States of America. If corporations are even fiction individuals they should be protected from being bought and sold through stock offerings as if they were slaves anyway. Though it is a silly legal theory, the emancipation proclamation might be applied to the fiction individuals too, and corporations finally given their freedom with nobody owning them anymore.
The Democratic Party led by President Obama is continuing these foreign financial fiascos in Afghanistan and Iraq that will continue as they are so long as American taxpayers allow foreign and concentrated wealth loans to be borrowed I their name and spent abroad. The opportunity costs for diverting investment capital abroad are immense. The fundamental profiteers from these foreign expenditures are corrupt cadres of corporate contractors. The profits foreign and Muslim led corporations profiting from these oil sales and wars are also huge. Already some Muslim subcontractor of the U.S. Government may have slipped in a Pakistani nuclear device for burial in the New Mexico desert—who can say? From Mississippi River trans-ocean shippers to port security and U.S. rail the Muslim wealth has increased its power in the American economy. Just one nuclear device already in the nation and ready for use whenever times are deemed appropriate could vaporize the nation’s (The United States in this case) federal capitol. A more sober nationalism would make not only the poor and unemployed of America happy as they found good jobs and housing, but reduce the non-renewable wastage factor of those that believe that capitalism fundamentally means the advantage of the most corrupt in global economic slight of hand, fraud, corruption perfidy and treachery. Humanity may be able to continue progress with such activities forming a part of the economic facts of life, yet it really isn’t helpful. The United States and the world economy too can progress better with a more advantaged localism in politics with a global awareness of the vital importance of keeping a healthy environment and humanism ashore on the Earth on the threshold of realms of absolute spirit. The human destiny of reconciliation unto realms of absolute spirit may journey beyond an infinity of galaxies or Universes, yet begins with national rationalism and lunar development while we serve as a priesthood of believers in true compassion toward all.
17 July 2010
President Obama's Core Supporters & The Axis of Oil and War Contractors
Considering the condition of the economy and the Presidential policies in reply, we experience a moribund, conservative stuffed suit approach to the incumbency. Happy enough to be the first black Presidency in U.S. History during difficult, complex time of commercial and public debt challenges, President Obama has few new ideas to offer and simply appeals to his core constituency—what is that?
Homosexuals, supporters of illegal alien sovereignty, democratic women for multi-culturalism meaning anything besides white men, and perhaps 99% of U.S. blacks including Colin Powell. The President has largely continued the commercial debt increase policies of the Bush global agenda while adding an effort to form a cadre of military homosexuals, assault on states efforts to arrest some of the millions of illegal aliens and remand them to federal custody and mildly correct some excesses of the financial fraud industry of Wall Street.
Harvard globalism and the Boston axis of Federal political power plays a strange tune for the nation to dance to like monkey's on strings. Perhaps Boston offers global empowering liberalism and Texas supplies Presidents to enrich K.B.R. and Halliburton. Sometimes these power centers converge.
The post-cold war militancy to gay up the military is part of the natural effort of homosexuals to flank heterosexual males of a perennial nature manifesting from Sodom and Gomorrah to the Nazi Party S.A. and flaring up in the Cult of Bacchus of Republican Rome. If Pat Buchanan was right in the 1992 Presidential election, Bush I was a closet supporter of homosexual politics. The Marlin Fitzwater was rumored to be of such a close relationship that it was scandalous under the table. At least the Florida marlins were created post Bush I and one the World Series in their first season.
Alice Cooper has returned to radio in this year in which the President has structured a plan to force the end of don’t ask, don’t tell upon the U.S. military. Hits from ‘Cooper’s closet’ remind us that the Elton John saturation of radio is out of season except for his blatant homosexual declaration and the British era of homosexual marriages. We believe the Bush I lead in the Gulf war and the steady movement toward global corporatism were about oil wealth and homosexual hard cores. Halliburton, the Corporation former Vice-President Dick Cheney led, received contracts leading to 25 billion dollars from the U.S. Government for food and logistics services. Bush II’s Sect. of Defense continues in the Obama administration, and the profits from protracted, incompetent war continue to flow to former Texas corporations such as K.B.R. and Halliburton. This seems to be an axis of oil and homosexual politics of a Bush-Clinton-Obama axis that is harmful to the interests of the United States.
The Vietnam War and the Iraq-Afghanistan wars may have had righteous premises, yet the implementation and protracted prosecution were perhaps corrupted and unnecessary. The Texas corporations K.B.R. built most of the military bases during the Vietnam conflict and Halliburton was rewarded with huge Iraq war base contracts. With a Texas President in the White House in each instance an obvious conflict of interest arose. It is not impossible that a homosexual-oil industry axis of interest arose to protract these wars in order to profit special interests.
Reaganomics was a one-time emergency spending by Ronald Reagan to lift the United States from a post-Vietnam economic slump and it worked. The trouble with that is that emulation of the Reagan emergency spending policy is nearly fatal for U.S. political economy, and badly considered protracted war to win nothing except oil contracts and military supply contracts is destructive for U.S. economic interests. In neither case was occupation of the country following the war required for further U.S. security against terrorism, and if a reconstruction effort was to be made it required a plan of a rational kind that was short, sharp and effective.
If a military-industrial homosexual continuum is the Obama policy as well as that of Bush I, Bush II and partly that of President Clinton with albeit, a personally antipathetic such symbolism though he too advocated a gayed military policy, the near majority of support of a cross-party dressing kind may be more numerous than that of the former Bush I Republican oil fundamental such as Philips described in ‘American Theocracy’
Homosexuals, supporters of illegal alien sovereignty, democratic women for multi-culturalism meaning anything besides white men, and perhaps 99% of U.S. blacks including Colin Powell. The President has largely continued the commercial debt increase policies of the Bush global agenda while adding an effort to form a cadre of military homosexuals, assault on states efforts to arrest some of the millions of illegal aliens and remand them to federal custody and mildly correct some excesses of the financial fraud industry of Wall Street.
Harvard globalism and the Boston axis of Federal political power plays a strange tune for the nation to dance to like monkey's on strings. Perhaps Boston offers global empowering liberalism and Texas supplies Presidents to enrich K.B.R. and Halliburton. Sometimes these power centers converge.
The post-cold war militancy to gay up the military is part of the natural effort of homosexuals to flank heterosexual males of a perennial nature manifesting from Sodom and Gomorrah to the Nazi Party S.A. and flaring up in the Cult of Bacchus of Republican Rome. If Pat Buchanan was right in the 1992 Presidential election, Bush I was a closet supporter of homosexual politics. The Marlin Fitzwater was rumored to be of such a close relationship that it was scandalous under the table. At least the Florida marlins were created post Bush I and one the World Series in their first season.
Alice Cooper has returned to radio in this year in which the President has structured a plan to force the end of don’t ask, don’t tell upon the U.S. military. Hits from ‘Cooper’s closet’ remind us that the Elton John saturation of radio is out of season except for his blatant homosexual declaration and the British era of homosexual marriages. We believe the Bush I lead in the Gulf war and the steady movement toward global corporatism were about oil wealth and homosexual hard cores. Halliburton, the Corporation former Vice-President Dick Cheney led, received contracts leading to 25 billion dollars from the U.S. Government for food and logistics services. Bush II’s Sect. of Defense continues in the Obama administration, and the profits from protracted, incompetent war continue to flow to former Texas corporations such as K.B.R. and Halliburton. This seems to be an axis of oil and homosexual politics of a Bush-Clinton-Obama axis that is harmful to the interests of the United States.
The Vietnam War and the Iraq-Afghanistan wars may have had righteous premises, yet the implementation and protracted prosecution were perhaps corrupted and unnecessary. The Texas corporations K.B.R. built most of the military bases during the Vietnam conflict and Halliburton was rewarded with huge Iraq war base contracts. With a Texas President in the White House in each instance an obvious conflict of interest arose. It is not impossible that a homosexual-oil industry axis of interest arose to protract these wars in order to profit special interests.
Reaganomics was a one-time emergency spending by Ronald Reagan to lift the United States from a post-Vietnam economic slump and it worked. The trouble with that is that emulation of the Reagan emergency spending policy is nearly fatal for U.S. political economy, and badly considered protracted war to win nothing except oil contracts and military supply contracts is destructive for U.S. economic interests. In neither case was occupation of the country following the war required for further U.S. security against terrorism, and if a reconstruction effort was to be made it required a plan of a rational kind that was short, sharp and effective.
If a military-industrial homosexual continuum is the Obama policy as well as that of Bush I, Bush II and partly that of President Clinton with albeit, a personally antipathetic such symbolism though he too advocated a gayed military policy, the near majority of support of a cross-party dressing kind may be more numerous than that of the former Bush I Republican oil fundamental such as Philips described in ‘American Theocracy’
16 July 2010
2010-2012 Election Cycle Ideas Contra-Corporatism U.S.A.
It should be quite reasonable that a democracy can set limits upon the size of organizations such as corporations. A democracy is centered upon individuals rather than collectives including those of business. In order to prevent the hostile takeover of social liberty, that is of individual liberty by clever organizations making a ceiling for organizational employee numbers such as 3000 people would be good enough.
Large organizations reduce invention and product development through neo-oligharchy and networking. Overly large organization socially reduce efficiency and create inertia for design stagnation. If one compares today's cars to those of 1960, it is easy to observe the the most significant difference in the auto systems infrastructure is that the speed limit where higher 50 years ago. In a half century America has not improved or radically upgraded and changed its personal transport infrastructure and of course it could.
For the Harvard M.B.A. gang abstract market control factors become more important than the well being and standard of living of ordinary individual American citizens. Citizen freedom to compete on a level free enterprise field is important to defend. Actual national citizens should not be plundered by globalists with deep pockets.
If the domination of the economic-political sphere was regulated through democratic action, if no individual could invest in more than three corporations, then innovation and competition, efficiency and adaptability would increase. On one branch is individualism, small business and ecological efficiency, and on the other road are the mega-social isms of communism, fascism and corporatism. Even libertarianism lies on the side of 'freedom for large organizations to rule the world as they desire.
The next President needs good ideas, an understanding of the political philosophy of corporatism, a textbook understanding of what actual ecological economics is, and a willingness to lead Americans to a new compassionate nationalism with an oars in the water approach to rectifying maladroit contemporary economics and security. Spending more money (maybe 5 trillion) to defend the nation from box-cutter wielding hijackers than we did on cold war defenses against ballistic nuclear missiles is absurd and the most gross incompetence and corruption. The Executive and Congressional branches of government seem corrupt, stupid or both, by logical inference.
Large organizations reduce invention and product development through neo-oligharchy and networking. Overly large organization socially reduce efficiency and create inertia for design stagnation. If one compares today's cars to those of 1960, it is easy to observe the the most significant difference in the auto systems infrastructure is that the speed limit where higher 50 years ago. In a half century America has not improved or radically upgraded and changed its personal transport infrastructure and of course it could.
For the Harvard M.B.A. gang abstract market control factors become more important than the well being and standard of living of ordinary individual American citizens. Citizen freedom to compete on a level free enterprise field is important to defend. Actual national citizens should not be plundered by globalists with deep pockets.
If the domination of the economic-political sphere was regulated through democratic action, if no individual could invest in more than three corporations, then innovation and competition, efficiency and adaptability would increase. On one branch is individualism, small business and ecological efficiency, and on the other road are the mega-social isms of communism, fascism and corporatism. Even libertarianism lies on the side of 'freedom for large organizations to rule the world as they desire.
The next President needs good ideas, an understanding of the political philosophy of corporatism, a textbook understanding of what actual ecological economics is, and a willingness to lead Americans to a new compassionate nationalism with an oars in the water approach to rectifying maladroit contemporary economics and security. Spending more money (maybe 5 trillion) to defend the nation from box-cutter wielding hijackers than we did on cold war defenses against ballistic nuclear missiles is absurd and the most gross incompetence and corruption. The Executive and Congressional branches of government seem corrupt, stupid or both, by logical inference.
09 July 2010
National Priorities Database Useful for Economic Understanding
The Nation has challenging political and economic times because of bad leadership. Perhaps Christians and Muslims in the U.S. military service will need to be given religious exemptions from service if they are compelled to be yoked with sinners as official government policy to welcome with open arms homosexual military personnel. The timing on the gay option for the U.S Military is maladroit in the midst of an economic downturn. Defense Secretary Gates remaining in the spend 14 billion dollars a day post is unfortunate too. He issued a questionaire via email concerning the question of gaying up the historically hetero-normal military...
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2010/07/military_dontask_survey_070710w/
If the nation can escape Federal sin of an economic kind, perhaps we can remove from the two illogical foreign boondoggles directly and consider something else to do. The Iraqis cannot even decide between Alawi and Maliki because they know how to keep a turkey in suspense. Maybe we have done enough for the Iraqis as it is, and should let Exxon-Mobil pay to defend its own oil fields in the future.
http://www.nationalpriorities.org/
In reading the book 'The Three Trillion Dollar War' co-authored by a Nobel prize winner in economics, I encountered the mention of the National Priorities project. If one wonders how the U.S. economy is going wrong for some of us, the database helps.
Remember back 'in the day' when a Bush neo-con supporter of the war in Iraq estimated the U.S. taxpayer cost for reconstruction at 1.7 billion? Now the cost is expected to be more than 3 trillion dollars and for what? Why are we still there any way?
The federal congress simply rolled over on budgeting the war---Democrats wouldn't vote against anything. Defense Secretary Gates has been a Bush protege continuity spender since 2007 and should be fired by the Harvard Alumni stuffed suit administration. Emergency budget bills and a zillion private contractors made this war for non-existing weapons of mass destruction (the publics reasoning if not my own) costlier than Vietnam and nearly as expensive as the second world war.
The administration knew how to get Sect Gates and Admiral Mullins the opportunity to ask the military (they just sent an email inquiry to 400,000 military personnel) if they would object to having gay pride parades and homosexuals sucking up to officers openly in their units--just attach the measure to a Defense spending bill. Evidently the Iraq and Afghanistan spending bills are excellent tools for port allocations to congressional districts.
The private military contractors acting as a private army were paid as much as 400,000 dollars per year. Congress was rolling over and having its belly scratched of course with patriotic speeches. Several years more of idiotic neo-war ahead perhaps.
The National Priorities Project does have some useful information.
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2010/07/military_dontask_survey_070710w/
If the nation can escape Federal sin of an economic kind, perhaps we can remove from the two illogical foreign boondoggles directly and consider something else to do. The Iraqis cannot even decide between Alawi and Maliki because they know how to keep a turkey in suspense. Maybe we have done enough for the Iraqis as it is, and should let Exxon-Mobil pay to defend its own oil fields in the future.
http://www.nationalpriorities.org/
In reading the book 'The Three Trillion Dollar War' co-authored by a Nobel prize winner in economics, I encountered the mention of the National Priorities project. If one wonders how the U.S. economy is going wrong for some of us, the database helps.
Remember back 'in the day' when a Bush neo-con supporter of the war in Iraq estimated the U.S. taxpayer cost for reconstruction at 1.7 billion? Now the cost is expected to be more than 3 trillion dollars and for what? Why are we still there any way?
The federal congress simply rolled over on budgeting the war---Democrats wouldn't vote against anything. Defense Secretary Gates has been a Bush protege continuity spender since 2007 and should be fired by the Harvard Alumni stuffed suit administration. Emergency budget bills and a zillion private contractors made this war for non-existing weapons of mass destruction (the publics reasoning if not my own) costlier than Vietnam and nearly as expensive as the second world war.
The administration knew how to get Sect Gates and Admiral Mullins the opportunity to ask the military (they just sent an email inquiry to 400,000 military personnel) if they would object to having gay pride parades and homosexuals sucking up to officers openly in their units--just attach the measure to a Defense spending bill. Evidently the Iraq and Afghanistan spending bills are excellent tools for port allocations to congressional districts.
The private military contractors acting as a private army were paid as much as 400,000 dollars per year. Congress was rolling over and having its belly scratched of course with patriotic speeches. Several years more of idiotic neo-war ahead perhaps.
The National Priorities Project does have some useful information.
Neanderthals to Be Genetically Resurrected After Aurocks?
Reading of the European plan to genetically resurrect the extinct Euro-bovine giant ox the Auroch that is in progress, other articles in the July 2010 issue of National Geographic stimulated my own ideas for logical resurrections of ancient human species.
How long will it be before someone suggests that Neaderthals be resurrected from teeth or other D.N.A. samples? There are also fossilized bones of ancient human forerunners or alternative branches that are now extinct that could be reconstructed with genetic engineering to create populations suitable for corporate employment or loyal party voters on the conservative side, or liberal if they born without discretion genes .
Neanderthals were stronger humanoids that could form a good front offensive line for pro football teams without the need for steroids. Other potential D.N.A. reconstructions abound for use in attacking Chinese carp leaping their way toward the great lakes. There is potential for science fiction anthropological genetic research business growth in California that could create jobs and food on the table. Workers in that field may wear a plastic glock to assure that they do not themselves become the food on the table.
How long will it be before someone suggests that Neaderthals be resurrected from teeth or other D.N.A. samples? There are also fossilized bones of ancient human forerunners or alternative branches that are now extinct that could be reconstructed with genetic engineering to create populations suitable for corporate employment or loyal party voters on the conservative side, or liberal if they born without discretion genes .
Neanderthals were stronger humanoids that could form a good front offensive line for pro football teams without the need for steroids. Other potential D.N.A. reconstructions abound for use in attacking Chinese carp leaping their way toward the great lakes. There is potential for science fiction anthropological genetic research business growth in California that could create jobs and food on the table. Workers in that field may wear a plastic glock to assure that they do not themselves become the food on the table.
07 July 2010
Obama D.O.J. Sues Arizona to Force Illegal Alien 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Policy
President Obama Sides With Globalists Against Arizona/U.S. Sovereignty- wants a ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Policy' for illegal aliens before amnesty and fast track take over the congress..
The Obama D.O.J. has filed suit against the state of Arizona and its law to check the legal status of people its law enforcement officials encounter. Rationally, law enforcement officials should make a general check of individuals it encounters to determine if they have broken local, state or federals. The Obama administration seeks to protect the illegal status of Mexican and other nationals in the United States illegally with a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ principle for illegal aliens encountering Arizona police.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100706/ap_on_re_us/us_immigration_enforcement_lawsuit
Citing the well known legal principle ‘adverse possession is 9/10ths of the law, the Obama Department of Justice has said in a legal opinion that it’s immigration control powers extend beyond the border and entry into the United States all the way to Flagstaff and Sioux Falls. Apparently, wherever illegals are located in the United States they are still immigrating here, and will be so until given the top Executive jobs as remedial anti-discriminatory corrections by the Obama administration.
The Obama legal alumni team from Harvard also extends to the Harvard Medical School in advocacy of the Boston-Harvard global axis of accentuating the positive economic effects for concentrating wealth of illegal immigration. In a rather vague legal theory, state law officials may not support the federal Government’s laws because the several states are not materially part of the United States, which is instead a transcendent, amorphous legal entity of global stature. The Obama pro-illegal alien team offers this advice to Arizona legal officials; “keepa yo fingers off these illegals or we breaka dose fingas”.
It may seem reasonable to state governments that have modeled their own constitutions upon the federal in many cases, to pass state laws reflecting U.S. Federal laws, and to confirm the legal residence status of all individuals encountered by law enforcement. In fact the best way to reinforce U.S. border security is to deputize or otherwise empower all U.S. law enforcement officials to arrest illegal aliens and remand them to federal custody for deportation.
Thus far the Obama administration has been utterly incompetent at enforcing U.S. border security. One might summarize the Obama Executive opinion as "I made it easily to the best opportunities in the U.S.A., and see how this nation has benefited. Why shouldn't illegal aliens become citizens and race to the top like myself? There is no compelling reason why citizens born in the 48 states should have any legal rights to secure their borders or to control immigration much less restrict it to a quarter million foreign immigrants every year. Neither domestic law enforcement persons of interest or citizens should feel they have any right whatsoever to determine through a democratic process who may enter this nation. That is the prerogative of globalists with dual citizenship such as your's truly. Besides, the illegals make good cheap laborers and keep down wages for the native drudges" security.
The Obama D.O.J. has filed suit against the state of Arizona and its law to check the legal status of people its law enforcement officials encounter. Rationally, law enforcement officials should make a general check of individuals it encounters to determine if they have broken local, state or federals. The Obama administration seeks to protect the illegal status of Mexican and other nationals in the United States illegally with a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ principle for illegal aliens encountering Arizona police.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100706/ap_on_re_us/us_immigration_enforcement_lawsuit
Citing the well known legal principle ‘adverse possession is 9/10ths of the law, the Obama Department of Justice has said in a legal opinion that it’s immigration control powers extend beyond the border and entry into the United States all the way to Flagstaff and Sioux Falls. Apparently, wherever illegals are located in the United States they are still immigrating here, and will be so until given the top Executive jobs as remedial anti-discriminatory corrections by the Obama administration.
The Obama legal alumni team from Harvard also extends to the Harvard Medical School in advocacy of the Boston-Harvard global axis of accentuating the positive economic effects for concentrating wealth of illegal immigration. In a rather vague legal theory, state law officials may not support the federal Government’s laws because the several states are not materially part of the United States, which is instead a transcendent, amorphous legal entity of global stature. The Obama pro-illegal alien team offers this advice to Arizona legal officials; “keepa yo fingers off these illegals or we breaka dose fingas”.
It may seem reasonable to state governments that have modeled their own constitutions upon the federal in many cases, to pass state laws reflecting U.S. Federal laws, and to confirm the legal residence status of all individuals encountered by law enforcement. In fact the best way to reinforce U.S. border security is to deputize or otherwise empower all U.S. law enforcement officials to arrest illegal aliens and remand them to federal custody for deportation.
Thus far the Obama administration has been utterly incompetent at enforcing U.S. border security. One might summarize the Obama Executive opinion as "I made it easily to the best opportunities in the U.S.A., and see how this nation has benefited. Why shouldn't illegal aliens become citizens and race to the top like myself? There is no compelling reason why citizens born in the 48 states should have any legal rights to secure their borders or to control immigration much less restrict it to a quarter million foreign immigrants every year. Neither domestic law enforcement persons of interest or citizens should feel they have any right whatsoever to determine through a democratic process who may enter this nation. That is the prerogative of globalists with dual citizenship such as your's truly. Besides, the illegals make good cheap laborers and keep down wages for the native drudges" security.
04 July 2010
General Petraeus and Winning ‘Counter-Insurgency’ Strategy for Afghanistan
General Petraeus has said that the Taliban ‘insurgency’ is a ‘test of wills’ for control of the country. Afghanistan is unlike Iraq economically and politically though, the General’s presumptions may not be effective equally well in each nation.
Counter-insurgency strategy for El Salvador could confront an alien, Marxist political paradigm like it might a virus unnaturally introduced into the body. The Marxist leadership of the rebels could be attacked as a hierarchical and insular organization and reduced. The populist Muslim powers of central Asia are not alien though, and are instead popular without an elite cadre of leadership to decimate or co-opt into the powers of the dark side of the force of Spenserian capitalism.
U.S. military efforts have prowess and personnel equivalent to the 800-pound guerrilla of Afghan myth. We make employ predator drones to kill remote trans-border resistance leaders in Pakistan yet fail to develop a high monthly body count of insurgents. Instead, several suicide bombers perish each month along with the elites abroad, and a squad or two attacks sensationally and symbolically some powerful, well defended U.S. garrison in Afghanistan now and then. In comparison to the Afghan war to expel the Red Army of the former Soviet Union, the Afghanistan resistance to establishment of a U.S. puppet state tolerant of homosexuality and global business domination suffers comparatively few casualties. Instead of a test of wills, the Taliban seems to be waging a test of I.Q. and winning; they could have 250 suicide bombers and leaders killed annually for decades perhaps, and not have even one year’s worth of casualties incurred fighting the Red Army in the 1980s.
There are many compelling economic reasons for The Fundamentalist Muslim world to wage a protracted counter-U.S. insurgency in Afghanistan that will support al Qa’eda goals of economically reducing the United States. They may perceive themselves as a righteous power of the poor combating the decadent rich, international nation (the U.S.A.) that sponsors their local dictator, monarch or despot. Because of U.S. budget tactics in responding to al Qa’eda and Taliban tactics, the strategy is viable n drawing the U.S. to spend asymmetrically abroad. The Taliban know that as soon as they stop the suicide bombing and general resistance, the U.S.A. can begin slow withdrawal and financial recover over decades of course, of its own house affairs.
Following a U.S. economic withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan the usual local conflicts and contentions will return. New local and regional balances of power would emerge; the United States should not put itself in the position of being a remembered anathema to whoever emerges to rule from the chaos as it may. There are many tactics to interact with a popular Muslim vox populi in Central Asia and Iraq that are better cognizant of the lack of hierarchical ecclesiastical tradition in the Muslim world. That imam and populist neo-priesthood of believers phenomenality is well suited for a volunteer emanation of resistance movement fighters periodically against a foreign business-military hierarchy searching for ways to control the masses. In selecting its particular methods of reply to the decade old attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the leadership of the United States has continued to financially endanger the security of the United States as well as the physical security and well being of the people of the United States. The book of proverbs indicates that the borrowers end up being ruled by the lenders. General Petraeus and President Obama would do well to read the book of proverbs regularly.
The United States ought to develop a better, more thoughtful method of reply to challenges set by fundamentalist Muslims to U.S. and European security. A powerful minority with superior military weapons systems has dubious prospects of permanently subjugating billions of poor Asians; we should have learned that lesson in Vietnam. Neither must a Muslim nation necessarily be permanently antipathetic to U.S. national interests if the United States were to develop a better policy of ecological economic technical development at home and for support abroad. Because war for the United States today has become a form of economics through other means, a rectification of policy would require a rational economic foundational paradigm as a political philosophy appropriate for sustainable economic development of Afghanistan regardless of who is actually running the government there.
As it is, the United States has created a non-sustainable military enterprise that is of a phenomenal nature that later can be explained away with apologetics and PR for national political purposes. One hates to consider that sort of rhetoric tat will arise the next two or three decades as other, important challenges are set aside. Some sort of military assurance of non-belligerency and benevolent neutrality is required of Afghanistan because it allowed al Qa’eda to train there as well as in South Florida and Arizona, Minnesota and elsewhere before the 9-11-2001 suicide hijackings. The method to accomplish that requires a few more I.Q. points and a hundred thousand fewer soldiers and marines.
Counter-insurgency strategy for El Salvador could confront an alien, Marxist political paradigm like it might a virus unnaturally introduced into the body. The Marxist leadership of the rebels could be attacked as a hierarchical and insular organization and reduced. The populist Muslim powers of central Asia are not alien though, and are instead popular without an elite cadre of leadership to decimate or co-opt into the powers of the dark side of the force of Spenserian capitalism.
U.S. military efforts have prowess and personnel equivalent to the 800-pound guerrilla of Afghan myth. We make employ predator drones to kill remote trans-border resistance leaders in Pakistan yet fail to develop a high monthly body count of insurgents. Instead, several suicide bombers perish each month along with the elites abroad, and a squad or two attacks sensationally and symbolically some powerful, well defended U.S. garrison in Afghanistan now and then. In comparison to the Afghan war to expel the Red Army of the former Soviet Union, the Afghanistan resistance to establishment of a U.S. puppet state tolerant of homosexuality and global business domination suffers comparatively few casualties. Instead of a test of wills, the Taliban seems to be waging a test of I.Q. and winning; they could have 250 suicide bombers and leaders killed annually for decades perhaps, and not have even one year’s worth of casualties incurred fighting the Red Army in the 1980s.
There are many compelling economic reasons for The Fundamentalist Muslim world to wage a protracted counter-U.S. insurgency in Afghanistan that will support al Qa’eda goals of economically reducing the United States. They may perceive themselves as a righteous power of the poor combating the decadent rich, international nation (the U.S.A.) that sponsors their local dictator, monarch or despot. Because of U.S. budget tactics in responding to al Qa’eda and Taliban tactics, the strategy is viable n drawing the U.S. to spend asymmetrically abroad. The Taliban know that as soon as they stop the suicide bombing and general resistance, the U.S.A. can begin slow withdrawal and financial recover over decades of course, of its own house affairs.
Following a U.S. economic withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan the usual local conflicts and contentions will return. New local and regional balances of power would emerge; the United States should not put itself in the position of being a remembered anathema to whoever emerges to rule from the chaos as it may. There are many tactics to interact with a popular Muslim vox populi in Central Asia and Iraq that are better cognizant of the lack of hierarchical ecclesiastical tradition in the Muslim world. That imam and populist neo-priesthood of believers phenomenality is well suited for a volunteer emanation of resistance movement fighters periodically against a foreign business-military hierarchy searching for ways to control the masses. In selecting its particular methods of reply to the decade old attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the leadership of the United States has continued to financially endanger the security of the United States as well as the physical security and well being of the people of the United States. The book of proverbs indicates that the borrowers end up being ruled by the lenders. General Petraeus and President Obama would do well to read the book of proverbs regularly.
The United States ought to develop a better, more thoughtful method of reply to challenges set by fundamentalist Muslims to U.S. and European security. A powerful minority with superior military weapons systems has dubious prospects of permanently subjugating billions of poor Asians; we should have learned that lesson in Vietnam. Neither must a Muslim nation necessarily be permanently antipathetic to U.S. national interests if the United States were to develop a better policy of ecological economic technical development at home and for support abroad. Because war for the United States today has become a form of economics through other means, a rectification of policy would require a rational economic foundational paradigm as a political philosophy appropriate for sustainable economic development of Afghanistan regardless of who is actually running the government there.
As it is, the United States has created a non-sustainable military enterprise that is of a phenomenal nature that later can be explained away with apologetics and PR for national political purposes. One hates to consider that sort of rhetoric tat will arise the next two or three decades as other, important challenges are set aside. Some sort of military assurance of non-belligerency and benevolent neutrality is required of Afghanistan because it allowed al Qa’eda to train there as well as in South Florida and Arizona, Minnesota and elsewhere before the 9-11-2001 suicide hijackings. The method to accomplish that requires a few more I.Q. points and a hundred thousand fewer soldiers and marines.
Selections from the Book of Proverbs and the Revelation for the 4th of July
Here are a several verses from the books of Proverbs and from the Revelation I thought I would share on the 4th of July.
Proverbs (King James Version)
“8:22-36 22The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old.
23I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was.
24When there were no depths, I was brought forth; when there were no fountains abounding with water.
25Before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth:
26While as yet he had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world.
27When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth:
28When he established the clouds above: when he strengthened the fountains of the deep:
29When he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of the earth:
30Then I was by him, as one brought up with him: and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him;
31Rejoicing in the habitable part of his earth; and my delights were with the sons of men.
32Now therefore hearken unto me, O ye children: for blessed are they that keep my ways.
33Hear instruction, and be wise, and refuse it not.
34Blessed is the man that heareth me, watching daily at my gates, waiting at the posts of my doors.
35For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favour of the LORD.
36But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death
10:15 The rich man's wealth is his strong city: the destruction of the poor is their poverty.
11:28 28He that trusteth in his riches shall fall; but the righteous shall flourish as a branch.
13:14 14The law of the wise is a fountain of life, to depart from the snares of death
13:20 20He that walketh with wise men shall be wise: but a companion of fools shall be destroyed.
14:12 12There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.
14:25 25A true witness delivereth souls: but a deceitful witness speaketh lies.
15:7 7The lips of the wise disperse knowledge: but the heart of the foolish doeth not so.
15:17 17Better is a dinner of herbs where love is, than a stalled ox and hatred therewith
15:21 21Folly is joy to him that is destitute of wisdom: but a man of understanding walketh uprightly.
16:22-23 22Understanding is a wellspring of life unto him that hath it: but the instruction of fools is folly. 23The heart of the wise teacheth his mouth, and addeth learning to his lips.
19:1 1Better is the poor that walketh in his integrity, than he that is perverse in his lips, and is a fool.
22:7 7The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.
18:11 11The rich man's wealth is his strong city, and as an high wall in his own conceit.
23:1-7 1When thou sittest to eat with a ruler, consider diligently what is before thee:
2And put a knife to thy throat, if thou be a man given to appetite.
3Be not desirous of his dainties: for they are deceitful meat.
4Labour not to be rich: cease from thine own wisdom.
5Wilt thou set thine eyes upon that which is not? for riches certainly make themselves wings; they fly away as an eagle toward heaven.
6Eat thou not the bread of him that hath an evil eye, neither desire thou his dainty meats:
7For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he: Eat and drink, saith he to thee; but his heart is not with thee
23:23 23Buy the truth, and sell it not; also wisdom, and instruction, and understanding.
24:1-2 1Be not thou envious against evil men, neither desire to be with them.
2For their heart studieth destruction, and their lips talk of mischief.
24:30-34 30I went by the field of the slothful, and by the vineyard of the man void of understanding;
31And, lo, it was all grown over with thorns, and nettles had covered the face thereof, and the stone wall thereof was broken down.
32Then I saw, and considered it well: I looked upon it, and received instruction.
33Yet a little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to sleep:
34So shall thy poverty come as one that travelleth; and thy want as an armed man.
25:4 4Take away the dross from the silver, and there shall come forth a vessel for the finer.
28:11 11The rich man is wise in his own conceit; but the poor that hath understanding searcheth him out.
28:6 6Better is the poor that walketh in his uprightness, than he that is perverse in his ways, though he be rich.
29:2 2When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.”
Revelation 10:1-4 (King James Version)
“ 1And I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his head, and his face was as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire:
2And he had in his hand a little book open: and he set his right foot upon the sea, and his left foot on the earth,
3And cried with a loud voice, as when a lion roareth: and when he had cried, seven thunders uttered their voices.
4And when the seven thunders had uttered their voices, I was about to write: and I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Seal up those things which the seven thunders uttered, and write them not.”
Proverbs (King James Version)
“8:22-36 22The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old.
23I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was.
24When there were no depths, I was brought forth; when there were no fountains abounding with water.
25Before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth:
26While as yet he had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world.
27When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth:
28When he established the clouds above: when he strengthened the fountains of the deep:
29When he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of the earth:
30Then I was by him, as one brought up with him: and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him;
31Rejoicing in the habitable part of his earth; and my delights were with the sons of men.
32Now therefore hearken unto me, O ye children: for blessed are they that keep my ways.
33Hear instruction, and be wise, and refuse it not.
34Blessed is the man that heareth me, watching daily at my gates, waiting at the posts of my doors.
35For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favour of the LORD.
36But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death
10:15 The rich man's wealth is his strong city: the destruction of the poor is their poverty.
11:28 28He that trusteth in his riches shall fall; but the righteous shall flourish as a branch.
13:14 14The law of the wise is a fountain of life, to depart from the snares of death
13:20 20He that walketh with wise men shall be wise: but a companion of fools shall be destroyed.
14:12 12There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.
14:25 25A true witness delivereth souls: but a deceitful witness speaketh lies.
15:7 7The lips of the wise disperse knowledge: but the heart of the foolish doeth not so.
15:17 17Better is a dinner of herbs where love is, than a stalled ox and hatred therewith
15:21 21Folly is joy to him that is destitute of wisdom: but a man of understanding walketh uprightly.
16:22-23 22Understanding is a wellspring of life unto him that hath it: but the instruction of fools is folly. 23The heart of the wise teacheth his mouth, and addeth learning to his lips.
19:1 1Better is the poor that walketh in his integrity, than he that is perverse in his lips, and is a fool.
22:7 7The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.
18:11 11The rich man's wealth is his strong city, and as an high wall in his own conceit.
23:1-7 1When thou sittest to eat with a ruler, consider diligently what is before thee:
2And put a knife to thy throat, if thou be a man given to appetite.
3Be not desirous of his dainties: for they are deceitful meat.
4Labour not to be rich: cease from thine own wisdom.
5Wilt thou set thine eyes upon that which is not? for riches certainly make themselves wings; they fly away as an eagle toward heaven.
6Eat thou not the bread of him that hath an evil eye, neither desire thou his dainty meats:
7For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he: Eat and drink, saith he to thee; but his heart is not with thee
23:23 23Buy the truth, and sell it not; also wisdom, and instruction, and understanding.
24:1-2 1Be not thou envious against evil men, neither desire to be with them.
2For their heart studieth destruction, and their lips talk of mischief.
24:30-34 30I went by the field of the slothful, and by the vineyard of the man void of understanding;
31And, lo, it was all grown over with thorns, and nettles had covered the face thereof, and the stone wall thereof was broken down.
32Then I saw, and considered it well: I looked upon it, and received instruction.
33Yet a little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to sleep:
34So shall thy poverty come as one that travelleth; and thy want as an armed man.
25:4 4Take away the dross from the silver, and there shall come forth a vessel for the finer.
28:11 11The rich man is wise in his own conceit; but the poor that hath understanding searcheth him out.
28:6 6Better is the poor that walketh in his uprightness, than he that is perverse in his ways, though he be rich.
29:2 2When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.”
Revelation 10:1-4 (King James Version)
“ 1And I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his head, and his face was as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire:
2And he had in his hand a little book open: and he set his right foot upon the sea, and his left foot on the earth,
3And cried with a loud voice, as when a lion roareth: and when he had cried, seven thunders uttered their voices.
4And when the seven thunders had uttered their voices, I was about to write: and I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Seal up those things which the seven thunders uttered, and write them not.”
03 July 2010
President Obama to Shore-Up Coast Guard for Afghanistan? (Humor rating: L (light))
As a multi-service Department of Defense investment the ‘war’ of nation building in Afghanistan to create a ‘democratic’ government like that of the Shah of Iran is dedicated to the capitalist ideal of spending money and bullets to promote civic virtue.
The foreign policy adventure is presently under the supervision of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullins-an advocate for a gay friendly military affording servicemen a political incorrect opportunity for happy dating of Afghanistan’s Taliban warriors, blowing kisses and so forth. Admiral Mullins has the military and political skill set needed to bring the Democratic Party vision of a brave new world to the high Asian barbarians. Afghanistan needs a Coast Guard like the U.S. Government needs an Admiral to coordinate military security for the Karzai Government. Admiral Mullins knows all about running ships in excellent patterns at sea.
With job losses in the United States putting millions out of work the synthetic government-building project in Afghanistan is another federal jobs stimulus program for-itself. Admiral Mullins is the right guy to create a Coast Guard for Afghanistan following along with the logic of the endeavor.
How many Afghanis have been matriculated into the Naval Academy one might ask, for that could be the reason the Taliban homicide-suicide bombers have been destroying fossil fuel powered vehicles without right proper interdiction instead of being arrested by an Afghan Department of Homeland Security.
Making an economically efficient government in Afghanistan following the role model of the U.S. Government is challenging for the administration; Afghanistan has few resources to waste as extravagantly as does the United States, and hasn’t got as high of a credit rating to borrow money for expensive machines and other pollution producing devices to stimulate economic development.
Republican Party Chairman Steele rightly called this ‘Obama’s war. President Obama could really make it so by directing a supplemental appropriations bill that would create an Afghanistan Coast Guard and simulated ocean shoreline. Coast Guardsman from the U.S. East Coast could be relocated to Afghanistan to man-woman the new potential fleet in shoreline bunkers until the ships arrive, and replaced offshore with former Louisiana oil skimming civilians once their oil clean-up job details are completed.
The cost for an Afghanistan Coast Guard fleet of fourteen efficient aluminum gas turbine powered dreadnaught turbo interceptor-destroyers should be just $199 billion dollars borrowed from China at 10% interest to taxpayers—a steal at the price. One can never be patriotic enough about national defense and keeping Afghanistan free of the Taliban so Americans can be free to be unemployed and afford their own tents in reasonable security.
The foreign policy adventure is presently under the supervision of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullins-an advocate for a gay friendly military affording servicemen a political incorrect opportunity for happy dating of Afghanistan’s Taliban warriors, blowing kisses and so forth. Admiral Mullins has the military and political skill set needed to bring the Democratic Party vision of a brave new world to the high Asian barbarians. Afghanistan needs a Coast Guard like the U.S. Government needs an Admiral to coordinate military security for the Karzai Government. Admiral Mullins knows all about running ships in excellent patterns at sea.
With job losses in the United States putting millions out of work the synthetic government-building project in Afghanistan is another federal jobs stimulus program for-itself. Admiral Mullins is the right guy to create a Coast Guard for Afghanistan following along with the logic of the endeavor.
How many Afghanis have been matriculated into the Naval Academy one might ask, for that could be the reason the Taliban homicide-suicide bombers have been destroying fossil fuel powered vehicles without right proper interdiction instead of being arrested by an Afghan Department of Homeland Security.
Making an economically efficient government in Afghanistan following the role model of the U.S. Government is challenging for the administration; Afghanistan has few resources to waste as extravagantly as does the United States, and hasn’t got as high of a credit rating to borrow money for expensive machines and other pollution producing devices to stimulate economic development.
Republican Party Chairman Steele rightly called this ‘Obama’s war. President Obama could really make it so by directing a supplemental appropriations bill that would create an Afghanistan Coast Guard and simulated ocean shoreline. Coast Guardsman from the U.S. East Coast could be relocated to Afghanistan to man-woman the new potential fleet in shoreline bunkers until the ships arrive, and replaced offshore with former Louisiana oil skimming civilians once their oil clean-up job details are completed.
The cost for an Afghanistan Coast Guard fleet of fourteen efficient aluminum gas turbine powered dreadnaught turbo interceptor-destroyers should be just $199 billion dollars borrowed from China at 10% interest to taxpayers—a steal at the price. One can never be patriotic enough about national defense and keeping Afghanistan free of the Taliban so Americans can be free to be unemployed and afford their own tents in reasonable security.
01 July 2010
The 4th of July, The Russian October Revolution, and Dr. Guillotin's Efficient Economic Reform
An essay briefly considering elements of the U.S. revolution in comparison to others past and contemporary including speculation about the future has quite a substantial quantity of political history to consider. As this is a brief essay it will in no way attempt a comprehensive review.
Dr. Guillotin invented an expeditious technology for chopping off the heads of the old regime in the aftermath of the French revolution, and the 150 or whatever that piled compiled in peach baskets latter perhaps was not an inspiration for the inventor of basketball (originally fruit baskets nailed up high for boys to toss a pumpkin sized ball in), yet the effort of the inventors was considerable inn each instance.
The French decimated their ranks of nobility though not well enough to preclude their survival as a class, yet the French had more bourgeois that mitigated the social exclusivity of royalty such as existed in Russian during the period following Peter the Great until the October revolution of 1917. In the west, in the United States in particular, our tradition of egalitarianism may not have grown from a stunted condition in the hierarchical churches-a priesthood of believers never formed and the clergy largely reflect the exclusive values set by concentrated wealth globally, yet it did dampen and politically enfeeble the existence of the British nobility in early history of the United States. Americans thus regard revolution abroad from the position of the bourgeois, and have been trained Pavolianishly to support the rich politically whom are considered not as nobility but instead as something like themselves in origin, and whom they can reasonably aspire to be like.
The antinomy of bourgeois egalitarianism is, in the United States of America--communism as espoused by Marx and Lenin. Americans celebrate their own 4th of July in commemoration of social revolution; yet hate the Marxist-Leninist revolution of Russia. All right-fair enough, yet lets consider the social background of Russian during its final 200 years before the 1917 revolution.
Nobles owed a lifetime of service to the Tsar. They were thus granted the right to possess serfs-white slaves generally of Slavic origin (not all were white) to work the land and serve as military troops. The nobility eventually emancipated themselves, yet they increased their power over the serfs who were basically enslaved, bought and sold--they also had to pay taxes. That condition persisted until about 1862 when the serfs were technically emancipated, yet the royal advantage continued for the nobility.
Ninety-Five percent of Russians had been enslaved as serfs. Consider what the United States would have been like in 1862 if ninety-five percent of white people as well as black had been slaves. Though the Tsar technically liberated them the nobility retained nearly complete economic power until 1917. The wonder is that a larger Jacobean reaction did not follow the October Revolution.
Yet Russia did purge it's nobility murdering the royal family so far as possible and removing vestiges of the class social and economic supremacy. Americans today with their prosperous history and natural, national freedom outside of the former slaves and an institution largely inherited from the British that was defended by the powers of concentrated wealth owning slaves, have little comprehension of class oppression by powers of concentrated wealth that comprise a de facto nobility.
Networks of a global nature supporting concentration of wealth and the oppression of U.S. citizens economically and ecologically are today’s American nobility. This 4th of July Americans continue letting their ecology, economy and political liberty slip away into the powers of concentrated wealth and they have no theory about how to change that.
Today the U.S.A. requires an ecological economic renewable policy of egalitarian democracy with limited power to concentrate wealth--with no citizens excluded from at least a reasonable minimum income, in order that a vicious natural selection of the rich and narcissistic value class--from sports to fashion and finance, does not simply reproduce itself and sanction others to extermination in the expansive family economic labyrinth of the United States today. The United States needs a revolution to purge itself of social economic iniquity, and has virtually no prospect for attaining that. Its recent history is not revolutionary at all, but an evolutionary one of Toynbean historical cycles.
The Soviet Union continued the policy of denying freedom to its citizens. Yet it had at least the virtue of purging the nobility from its society effectively. When such powers persist the insider-trading sort of social advantages corrupt social progress inevitably. Yet the political methods required for the change toward a secure egalitarian society for all were bloody and of the less than optimal menu of political evolutionary possibilities.
This 4th of July we may be mostly, or preponderantly thankful that a modern automatic guillotine has not been deployed in Washington D.C. and Boston to deplete the rich in America--even those just visiting, for being nobility of a sort.
We should be cautious about extending out failure to comprehend the nature of reasons for revolution abroad in foreign policy errors. Will we make of Afghanistan another Iran with a Shah as a dictator oppressing fundamentalists eventually? Will the popular Egyptian, Saudi and Yemeni movements to end themselves of royalty or neo-authoritarian leadership bring them to attack America further for supporting the corrupting powers of concentrated wealth and neo-nobility actualized through corporatism?
Our political choices should be laden with intelligence and understanding as well as rhetoric if we are to prosper through legitimate and ecological renewable means rather than through exploitation.
Dr. Guillotin invented an expeditious technology for chopping off the heads of the old regime in the aftermath of the French revolution, and the 150 or whatever that piled compiled in peach baskets latter perhaps was not an inspiration for the inventor of basketball (originally fruit baskets nailed up high for boys to toss a pumpkin sized ball in), yet the effort of the inventors was considerable inn each instance.
The French decimated their ranks of nobility though not well enough to preclude their survival as a class, yet the French had more bourgeois that mitigated the social exclusivity of royalty such as existed in Russian during the period following Peter the Great until the October revolution of 1917. In the west, in the United States in particular, our tradition of egalitarianism may not have grown from a stunted condition in the hierarchical churches-a priesthood of believers never formed and the clergy largely reflect the exclusive values set by concentrated wealth globally, yet it did dampen and politically enfeeble the existence of the British nobility in early history of the United States. Americans thus regard revolution abroad from the position of the bourgeois, and have been trained Pavolianishly to support the rich politically whom are considered not as nobility but instead as something like themselves in origin, and whom they can reasonably aspire to be like.
The antinomy of bourgeois egalitarianism is, in the United States of America--communism as espoused by Marx and Lenin. Americans celebrate their own 4th of July in commemoration of social revolution; yet hate the Marxist-Leninist revolution of Russia. All right-fair enough, yet lets consider the social background of Russian during its final 200 years before the 1917 revolution.
Nobles owed a lifetime of service to the Tsar. They were thus granted the right to possess serfs-white slaves generally of Slavic origin (not all were white) to work the land and serve as military troops. The nobility eventually emancipated themselves, yet they increased their power over the serfs who were basically enslaved, bought and sold--they also had to pay taxes. That condition persisted until about 1862 when the serfs were technically emancipated, yet the royal advantage continued for the nobility.
Ninety-Five percent of Russians had been enslaved as serfs. Consider what the United States would have been like in 1862 if ninety-five percent of white people as well as black had been slaves. Though the Tsar technically liberated them the nobility retained nearly complete economic power until 1917. The wonder is that a larger Jacobean reaction did not follow the October Revolution.
Yet Russia did purge it's nobility murdering the royal family so far as possible and removing vestiges of the class social and economic supremacy. Americans today with their prosperous history and natural, national freedom outside of the former slaves and an institution largely inherited from the British that was defended by the powers of concentrated wealth owning slaves, have little comprehension of class oppression by powers of concentrated wealth that comprise a de facto nobility.
Networks of a global nature supporting concentration of wealth and the oppression of U.S. citizens economically and ecologically are today’s American nobility. This 4th of July Americans continue letting their ecology, economy and political liberty slip away into the powers of concentrated wealth and they have no theory about how to change that.
Today the U.S.A. requires an ecological economic renewable policy of egalitarian democracy with limited power to concentrate wealth--with no citizens excluded from at least a reasonable minimum income, in order that a vicious natural selection of the rich and narcissistic value class--from sports to fashion and finance, does not simply reproduce itself and sanction others to extermination in the expansive family economic labyrinth of the United States today. The United States needs a revolution to purge itself of social economic iniquity, and has virtually no prospect for attaining that. Its recent history is not revolutionary at all, but an evolutionary one of Toynbean historical cycles.
The Soviet Union continued the policy of denying freedom to its citizens. Yet it had at least the virtue of purging the nobility from its society effectively. When such powers persist the insider-trading sort of social advantages corrupt social progress inevitably. Yet the political methods required for the change toward a secure egalitarian society for all were bloody and of the less than optimal menu of political evolutionary possibilities.
This 4th of July we may be mostly, or preponderantly thankful that a modern automatic guillotine has not been deployed in Washington D.C. and Boston to deplete the rich in America--even those just visiting, for being nobility of a sort.
We should be cautious about extending out failure to comprehend the nature of reasons for revolution abroad in foreign policy errors. Will we make of Afghanistan another Iran with a Shah as a dictator oppressing fundamentalists eventually? Will the popular Egyptian, Saudi and Yemeni movements to end themselves of royalty or neo-authoritarian leadership bring them to attack America further for supporting the corrupting powers of concentrated wealth and neo-nobility actualized through corporatism?
Our political choices should be laden with intelligence and understanding as well as rhetoric if we are to prosper through legitimate and ecological renewable means rather than through exploitation.
President Obama, British Petroleum vs the Tea Party Movement; The Opponents on the 4th of Julye 4th of July
The original tea party revolted against the British tax on tea by throwing a ship load into Boston Harbor. Today British Petroleum is spilliing oil into the Gulf of Mexico 'harbor' to indicate the futility of U.S. energy independence efforts. President Obama has allowed the oil to flow 50,000 barrels each day for two months in a tepid response to the crisis. When he is voted out of office in two years, his legacy will have been failure to ram bangalore torpedoes down the avenue of egress and detonate and seal the monster demonstration of crude political power. The United States will continue to be dependent upon global fossil fuel corporations for automotive energy.
Today's Tea Party branch of the Republican Party is led by the 'drill baby drill' offshore and onshore oil advocate Sarah Palin, the personable former Alaska Governor. The Tea Party is for defense of U.S. borders against illegal immigration unlike the Obama administration which seeks to reward illegal aliens with citizenship while flooding the labor market with more cheap labor to stimulate economic expansion of quantity and profit for those concentrating wealth The Tea Party is not vocal enough in support of electric cars and intelligent design of a new electrified national transportation infrastructure,and it must if it is to differ from the Republicratic transportation and energy policies of Presidents Bush II and Obama
Today's Tea Party branch of the Republican Party is led by the 'drill baby drill' offshore and onshore oil advocate Sarah Palin, the personable former Alaska Governor. The Tea Party is for defense of U.S. borders against illegal immigration unlike the Obama administration which seeks to reward illegal aliens with citizenship while flooding the labor market with more cheap labor to stimulate economic expansion of quantity and profit for those concentrating wealth The Tea Party is not vocal enough in support of electric cars and intelligent design of a new electrified national transportation infrastructure,and it must if it is to differ from the Republicratic transportation and energy policies of Presidents Bush II and Obama
4th of July: Obama Supports Illegal Alien Citizenship and Poverty for Unemployed Born in the U.S.A.
Is Support for Illegal Immigration; Crazed Sex Poodles of Political D.C. Bling?
Purple prose in political writing isn’t desirable unless it more accurately represents political circumstances of wildly and inexplicably wrong concepts. President Obama’s support for illegal alien immigration as a way to achieve citizenship and good jobs deserves purple prose. I shall however, employ plain and honest language. President Obama needs political support from homosexuals and symps of illegal aliens to stand a chance for re-election 2012. The President’s policies are unaffordable and continue the parting-out of U.S. well being of his predecessor.
There has been demonstrated no human genomic factors thus far indicating a predisposition for support of illegal alien immigration into the United States by federal politicians, nor for simpatico posturing toward the nation sheltering the primary route for cocaine importation into the United States of America. Human genome mapping is still a primitive science. We do not know why President Obama used cocaine as a youth, nor how much; what we know is that he is against deporting illegal aliens-saying it would be ‘wildly expensive’. Of course he is dead wrong.
The fourth of July is a celebration of American political independence from the British. It is a time when a nation of laws regarding all citizens as equal before the law is celebrated. Today, America’s political, economic and environmental destiny is being determined more by illegal aliens and foreign symp political pimps of globalism than rational and enlightened election by the electorate. President Obama supports radically subversion of the integrity of the electorate through support of illegal alien immigration-as have all U.S. Presidents since the end of the cold war. President Obama has not stopped the British Petroleum oil effusion despoiling of the Gulf of Mexico. The President served in concert with the rejection of the Tea Party more than given real support to the effort for U.S. energy independence and independence form illegal alien, extra-territorial determination.
Rectification of U.S. border security requires building in triplicate a Mexican berm and barrier control zone—creating many jobs in the process. Attrition of illegals voluntarily returning home and unable to return will deplete their numbers without cost to taxpayers—if they aren’t replaced by new arrivals.
The U.S. Government is incompetent and deporting legal aliens overstaying their visas that become illegal. The President unwillingness to deport such people comprising about half of the illegals is an abandonment of the duties of the office of President. New and better legal alien turned rogue illegal alien needs to be developed. Some of those people are worse than federal politicians using cocaine or tobacco occasionally who have developed obsessive minds turned toward bling for-itself.
In the United States, the high unemployment rate is supported by illegal immigration swelling the labor market. The wealthy like such human bling. Poor, unemployed Americans would like the bling to return to Mexico so that labor-side wage advantaging conditions regarding supply could arise.
President Obama has said he wants the U.S. economy to grow at 5% or 6% annually, yet he adds growth-retarding public debt by the trillions. Besides, if the growth isn’t in quality instead of quantity; if the economic growth is not on an ecologically renewable economic basis, the future of the U.S. economy is doomed to cheap tricks progressively deceiving the people of the United States into loss of their political and economic heritage, environmental health, and hope for a better life for native born U.S. citizens not amongst the ranks of the privileged.
President Obama’s Harvard axis of globalism is of a milieu creating concentrated wealth for the wealthy. In a low-intelligence economic paradigm of unconcern for depletion of non-renewable resources, the corporate world tends to increase its wealth by increasing the quantity of consumers-including illegal aliens. Though the U.S. economy may expand eventually at a five or six percent rate, the national quality of life for the poor and middle class will be stagnant and the economic improvement will go to concentrated wealth and profits for the rich. Gross national product increase will be founded on disposable resources and a flood of cheap foreign workers. Such a quantity rather than quality national economic improvement is the same old politics that also supports financial fraud profit schemes by global corporations and public debt for the U.S.A.
Purple prose in political writing isn’t desirable unless it more accurately represents political circumstances of wildly and inexplicably wrong concepts. President Obama’s support for illegal alien immigration as a way to achieve citizenship and good jobs deserves purple prose. I shall however, employ plain and honest language. President Obama needs political support from homosexuals and symps of illegal aliens to stand a chance for re-election 2012. The President’s policies are unaffordable and continue the parting-out of U.S. well being of his predecessor.
There has been demonstrated no human genomic factors thus far indicating a predisposition for support of illegal alien immigration into the United States by federal politicians, nor for simpatico posturing toward the nation sheltering the primary route for cocaine importation into the United States of America. Human genome mapping is still a primitive science. We do not know why President Obama used cocaine as a youth, nor how much; what we know is that he is against deporting illegal aliens-saying it would be ‘wildly expensive’. Of course he is dead wrong.
The fourth of July is a celebration of American political independence from the British. It is a time when a nation of laws regarding all citizens as equal before the law is celebrated. Today, America’s political, economic and environmental destiny is being determined more by illegal aliens and foreign symp political pimps of globalism than rational and enlightened election by the electorate. President Obama supports radically subversion of the integrity of the electorate through support of illegal alien immigration-as have all U.S. Presidents since the end of the cold war. President Obama has not stopped the British Petroleum oil effusion despoiling of the Gulf of Mexico. The President served in concert with the rejection of the Tea Party more than given real support to the effort for U.S. energy independence and independence form illegal alien, extra-territorial determination.
Rectification of U.S. border security requires building in triplicate a Mexican berm and barrier control zone—creating many jobs in the process. Attrition of illegals voluntarily returning home and unable to return will deplete their numbers without cost to taxpayers—if they aren’t replaced by new arrivals.
The U.S. Government is incompetent and deporting legal aliens overstaying their visas that become illegal. The President unwillingness to deport such people comprising about half of the illegals is an abandonment of the duties of the office of President. New and better legal alien turned rogue illegal alien needs to be developed. Some of those people are worse than federal politicians using cocaine or tobacco occasionally who have developed obsessive minds turned toward bling for-itself.
In the United States, the high unemployment rate is supported by illegal immigration swelling the labor market. The wealthy like such human bling. Poor, unemployed Americans would like the bling to return to Mexico so that labor-side wage advantaging conditions regarding supply could arise.
President Obama has said he wants the U.S. economy to grow at 5% or 6% annually, yet he adds growth-retarding public debt by the trillions. Besides, if the growth isn’t in quality instead of quantity; if the economic growth is not on an ecologically renewable economic basis, the future of the U.S. economy is doomed to cheap tricks progressively deceiving the people of the United States into loss of their political and economic heritage, environmental health, and hope for a better life for native born U.S. citizens not amongst the ranks of the privileged.
President Obama’s Harvard axis of globalism is of a milieu creating concentrated wealth for the wealthy. In a low-intelligence economic paradigm of unconcern for depletion of non-renewable resources, the corporate world tends to increase its wealth by increasing the quantity of consumers-including illegal aliens. Though the U.S. economy may expand eventually at a five or six percent rate, the national quality of life for the poor and middle class will be stagnant and the economic improvement will go to concentrated wealth and profits for the rich. Gross national product increase will be founded on disposable resources and a flood of cheap foreign workers. Such a quantity rather than quality national economic improvement is the same old politics that also supports financial fraud profit schemes by global corporations and public debt for the U.S.A.
28 June 2010
President Obama Is Bush II Light
President Obama's first two years in office have been a Bush II light verisimilitude, except of course for seeking to gay up the military in order to keep na campaign promise to his favored, hard-core supporters besides those that simply detest Hillary Clinton for President. Firing General McCrystal was inevitable after forcing through the gay military plan to further a Bi (den) sexual agenda in government. McCrystal is a straight soldier aware that a Obama's official U.S. Government policy of support for homosexual sin would stimulate resistance in Afghanistan amongst the mujahideen rather than bring about reconciliation.
President Obama has said the U.S. military will be in Afghanistan at least five years--hardly less than a Bush II policy of extreme military spending to compensate for extreme political cognitive deficits. President Obama plans to deficit spend at least until 20 trillion dollars of debt exists--if he is re-elected. Now that is a definite Bush II 'spend my political capital' way of thinking. President Obama may be a good Harvard alumni stuffed suit, yet he seems to have little awareness of what real, material work is, and instead plans abstract deficit spending at placing Harvard alumni on the Supreme Court in order to enslave the people of the United States to a servitude something like Russian serfdom to foreign owners of home mortgages and U.S. bonds.
President Obama has stale Clinton era economic advisers without a concept of what actual ecological economic and nationalist principles are; they need to be synthetically joined and entropy slowed in material production through intelligent design. The recurrent Harvard-advantage communalization of government for the rich is quite disadvantageous for the prospects of a healthy U.S.A. or U.S. eccology.
Without a competent and forthright, bold leadership that rectifies and recovers AMerican political determination for a manifest prosperous and healthy destiny within our own borders with compassion for other,disadvantaged nations, the U.S.A. will build toward a catastrophic depression some time ahead--even if it floods the nation with illegal aliens and makes them citizens with an inheritance of vast left and right wing national debt around their necks.
President Obama has failed to close Guantanamo Bay and transfer the terrorists to Johnson Island. President Obama has failed to limit spending outlays for Afghanistan and Iraq to a combined 20 billion dollars annually post haste. President Obama has failed to build in triplicate a comprehensive Mexican border bounry barrier of a bern and raised road configuration for electric patrol vehicles. President Obama has failed to limit social security qualification to those earning less in retirement than the pay of average American workers. President Obama has failed to bring a health care service for the poor only into existence. Presdent Obama has failed to construct nation-wide bicycle only expressways north-south, east and west. President Obama has failed to detonate and close the leaking BP gusher the past couple of months.
These few mentioned failures continue Bush II policies. Like Clinton term I President Obama has put his foot on the fatal for re-election of congress third rail of gaying up the military.Its a clever flank congressional re-election tactic by pre-approving the plan such that if Republicans take over the Mullins-Gates Madonna-Spears eyeballing one another admirably on stage support for the gay advance bill will be sufficient--yet even that pair may back down if the Republicans win a landslide in November 2010.
If the gay military policy goes through, even American support for Israel will move into murky waters for those that believe in Israel as the favored nation of God. The U.S.A. as an official agent for the sin policies of Satan will be harder to defend philosophically or politically, and Jehovah may look askance at the gay U.S. military policy and entanglement with Israel. Will some future U.S. President eventually want to be worshipped in a reconstructed Temple?
President Obama has said the U.S. military will be in Afghanistan at least five years--hardly less than a Bush II policy of extreme military spending to compensate for extreme political cognitive deficits. President Obama plans to deficit spend at least until 20 trillion dollars of debt exists--if he is re-elected. Now that is a definite Bush II 'spend my political capital' way of thinking. President Obama may be a good Harvard alumni stuffed suit, yet he seems to have little awareness of what real, material work is, and instead plans abstract deficit spending at placing Harvard alumni on the Supreme Court in order to enslave the people of the United States to a servitude something like Russian serfdom to foreign owners of home mortgages and U.S. bonds.
President Obama has stale Clinton era economic advisers without a concept of what actual ecological economic and nationalist principles are; they need to be synthetically joined and entropy slowed in material production through intelligent design. The recurrent Harvard-advantage communalization of government for the rich is quite disadvantageous for the prospects of a healthy U.S.A. or U.S. eccology.
Without a competent and forthright, bold leadership that rectifies and recovers AMerican political determination for a manifest prosperous and healthy destiny within our own borders with compassion for other,disadvantaged nations, the U.S.A. will build toward a catastrophic depression some time ahead--even if it floods the nation with illegal aliens and makes them citizens with an inheritance of vast left and right wing national debt around their necks.
President Obama has failed to close Guantanamo Bay and transfer the terrorists to Johnson Island. President Obama has failed to limit spending outlays for Afghanistan and Iraq to a combined 20 billion dollars annually post haste. President Obama has failed to build in triplicate a comprehensive Mexican border bounry barrier of a bern and raised road configuration for electric patrol vehicles. President Obama has failed to limit social security qualification to those earning less in retirement than the pay of average American workers. President Obama has failed to bring a health care service for the poor only into existence. Presdent Obama has failed to construct nation-wide bicycle only expressways north-south, east and west. President Obama has failed to detonate and close the leaking BP gusher the past couple of months.
These few mentioned failures continue Bush II policies. Like Clinton term I President Obama has put his foot on the fatal for re-election of congress third rail of gaying up the military.Its a clever flank congressional re-election tactic by pre-approving the plan such that if Republicans take over the Mullins-Gates Madonna-Spears eyeballing one another admirably on stage support for the gay advance bill will be sufficient--yet even that pair may back down if the Republicans win a landslide in November 2010.
If the gay military policy goes through, even American support for Israel will move into murky waters for those that believe in Israel as the favored nation of God. The U.S.A. as an official agent for the sin policies of Satan will be harder to defend philosophically or politically, and Jehovah may look askance at the gay U.S. military policy and entanglement with Israel. Will some future U.S. President eventually want to be worshipped in a reconstructed Temple?
No Extra-Terrestrial Life in This Universe: The Reasons Why
Super-string theorists exploit the anthropic principle to explain why the fine physical constants are 'just so'that this universe can support life amidst an infinite number of configurations that could not. The anthropic principle may also be used to explain why human life is the only life in this universe.
Cynics against salvation by God often point out that this universe is not perfect and has evil in it. Of course we reply. All of the intelligent life that might have been in this universe has left for other universes of the mutli-verse, and we humans are the only ones remaining here.
This universe could be one designed specifically for corrections; a 'held-back' universe for creatures dumb enough to fail the exit exam of conformity to the will of God in the ex-temporal Garden of Eden. I will post some of the physical, cosmological details that might be inferred non the topic as found in my recent science fiction book (a philosophical one) 'St. Novilistricka; Dimensions'.
"Lush was my own bright star in space-time these months. Her color changing compu-dress changed with her moods and reflected a prevailing environment of syntegration. It was an artwork of tensor calculus and aesthetics with constellations of a non-recognizable pattern.
A bizarre alien form landed suddenly on the platform in a squishy rush to Lush. In a fraction of a struggling second they fell off the platform toward the energy grid hundreds of feet below.
My reaction time was fast but not pre-emptively lethal. I did not laze the creature at first sight, yet its entanglement with Lush was immediate and decisively altered her compresence. The failure to shoot instantly at first sight was costly. If my peripheral vision where better I might have lazed the alien on the way down. When I arrived at the platform myself they weren’t visible.
I stared over the edge into the sea of electrons swelling in matrices pulsing with streams of input. It was a cold battery of Einsteinium plus reminding me of electride oceans of transcendent octonion ions. Cold drafts up-welled from the matrix. Lush of Gush, who I had shared many poems with, was existentially depleted. Neither was a form displacement outline evident.
In my thoughts simultaneous symmetries of tensor geometry groups with alternate futures flipping from identity to identity visually appeared in my subconscious sought to reach out for Lush. So many alternate dimensions might exist to enable dimension symmetry violating illegal aliens entry to our Universe. Had one exfiltrated Lush to one of an infinite number of other Universes for purposes unknown? I would attach my hook-up to the magnetic transport slide and descend to the closest approach of the Einsteinium for a view of the abduction or murder-suicide of Lush and the unknown X-normal agent.
In the history of mathematics it was demonstrated that many unsolvable equations emerged in the attempt to conform quantities and the solutions for the discovery of unknowns in self-consistent proportional systems. Irrational numbers, the square root of minus one, quintics and M and D-brane Theory generated countless investigations for the reconciliation of logical representation of unknowns to conformal systems in such a way that computational powers produced by known roots would be accurate, meaningful and functional. The process of dimension surplus inter-space addition allowed simultaneous solutions of Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries, and eventually algebras and more.
The reconciliation of inconsistent arguments such as the sum of the interior angles of an equilateral triangle adding up to one hundred eighty degrees in the former and a greater number in the later could each be true with the difference located in an inter-geometric dimensional renormalization field. I employed the method in my own logic in order to relate known facts, or at least apparently known
facts to the unknown.
I descended the mag-tie toward the energy field. Platforms crackling with immense energy confined generally to the Einsteinium electrons were bound as an electride matrix under cold plasma. The possible locations of Lush raced through my thoughts like permutations and probabilities of monadic qualities in a high degree of configurations and relationships. She left this compresence so quickly.
Reaching the observation deck over the electride field, I saw the horizons painted artificially to resemble infinite perspectives through the arrangements of receding and concentrating channels of energy matrices. Green and roil-some, the distance was surreal in all directions and undetermined. I saw inward and outward through the weather systems clashing through spontaneous chasms of normal world beyond the library to the field of green energy within forming the core of the structure.
Rotating one hundred eighty degrees on the deck, the perspective changed suddenly with an anti-symmetrical symmetry breaking of vision. This was my first clue to what had happened to Lush.
This portion of the galaxy is trisected by a standing wave of gravity and relativity field effects making a seven hundred twenty-degree spin vector of the four normal dimensions. It is an open door to abnormal space-time, and it had intruded here. Lush and I had talked before of the access potential of spin matrices to extra copies of this universe formed as probability actualization of macro-structural formalities. It was only a theory.
Macro-quantum rotational symmetry breaking may have left the 180-degree trace in this space-time coordinate of a transformational spin matrix to open dimensions and universes.
Even now the residual spin superposition of dimensions was beginning to fade away to leave just a local, normal four-dimensional appearance of space-time and it’s variously eleven dimensional, or two hundred thirty dimensional neo-structure of nominal compresence.
Might this universe have tagents sewn through its hypo-loop extrusion placed by a higher intelligence? As space-time concentrates with speed of travel near light speed anisotropic ally, in a symmetry with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle of indeterminacy of knowledge of either energy and time or location and momentum, could the universe have a memory in some way of where each discrete particle and relational loop was in order to sustain the invariance of uniform application of physical laws?
Dimensions may be arbitrary constructions contingent upon given configurations of the shapes of pre-big bang minimal article conditions. Particular configuration of a particle-wave assembly duplicated en mass produces its own dimensional requirements of logic conformal to its intrinsic structure. An eleven dimensional object requires eleven dimensions of existence. The extension of adimension is in accord with the characteristic requirements for existence of the particle-wave forces within it. The infinite apparent destiny of extension of a four dimensional universe is a product of the forces of infinite expansion within it such as momentum and thermodynamic process.
Quantum super-positioning could be defeated and energy re-directed along the intergalactic nuclear forced artery to form N dimensional calculating engines of change. I had the suspicion that some Alien power passing through the infinite sequences of exponential dimensional constructions may have abducted Lush from the library of this Subductor world of stone souls.
Staring into the green field of electrons stretching into apparent infinity in warped dimensional wrappings of light the vortexes carried memories of Lush along with the transitioning moments of shapes of past and present ever living as corridors of power flow. I leaned on the alto-rail and felt the cold sweat of the loss of Lush.
http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/st-novilistricka-dimensions/11259900
Cynics against salvation by God often point out that this universe is not perfect and has evil in it. Of course we reply. All of the intelligent life that might have been in this universe has left for other universes of the mutli-verse, and we humans are the only ones remaining here.
This universe could be one designed specifically for corrections; a 'held-back' universe for creatures dumb enough to fail the exit exam of conformity to the will of God in the ex-temporal Garden of Eden. I will post some of the physical, cosmological details that might be inferred non the topic as found in my recent science fiction book (a philosophical one) 'St. Novilistricka; Dimensions'.
"Lush was my own bright star in space-time these months. Her color changing compu-dress changed with her moods and reflected a prevailing environment of syntegration. It was an artwork of tensor calculus and aesthetics with constellations of a non-recognizable pattern.
A bizarre alien form landed suddenly on the platform in a squishy rush to Lush. In a fraction of a struggling second they fell off the platform toward the energy grid hundreds of feet below.
My reaction time was fast but not pre-emptively lethal. I did not laze the creature at first sight, yet its entanglement with Lush was immediate and decisively altered her compresence. The failure to shoot instantly at first sight was costly. If my peripheral vision where better I might have lazed the alien on the way down. When I arrived at the platform myself they weren’t visible.
I stared over the edge into the sea of electrons swelling in matrices pulsing with streams of input. It was a cold battery of Einsteinium plus reminding me of electride oceans of transcendent octonion ions. Cold drafts up-welled from the matrix. Lush of Gush, who I had shared many poems with, was existentially depleted. Neither was a form displacement outline evident.
In my thoughts simultaneous symmetries of tensor geometry groups with alternate futures flipping from identity to identity visually appeared in my subconscious sought to reach out for Lush. So many alternate dimensions might exist to enable dimension symmetry violating illegal aliens entry to our Universe. Had one exfiltrated Lush to one of an infinite number of other Universes for purposes unknown? I would attach my hook-up to the magnetic transport slide and descend to the closest approach of the Einsteinium for a view of the abduction or murder-suicide of Lush and the unknown X-normal agent.
In the history of mathematics it was demonstrated that many unsolvable equations emerged in the attempt to conform quantities and the solutions for the discovery of unknowns in self-consistent proportional systems. Irrational numbers, the square root of minus one, quintics and M and D-brane Theory generated countless investigations for the reconciliation of logical representation of unknowns to conformal systems in such a way that computational powers produced by known roots would be accurate, meaningful and functional. The process of dimension surplus inter-space addition allowed simultaneous solutions of Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries, and eventually algebras and more.
The reconciliation of inconsistent arguments such as the sum of the interior angles of an equilateral triangle adding up to one hundred eighty degrees in the former and a greater number in the later could each be true with the difference located in an inter-geometric dimensional renormalization field. I employed the method in my own logic in order to relate known facts, or at least apparently known
facts to the unknown.
I descended the mag-tie toward the energy field. Platforms crackling with immense energy confined generally to the Einsteinium electrons were bound as an electride matrix under cold plasma. The possible locations of Lush raced through my thoughts like permutations and probabilities of monadic qualities in a high degree of configurations and relationships. She left this compresence so quickly.
Reaching the observation deck over the electride field, I saw the horizons painted artificially to resemble infinite perspectives through the arrangements of receding and concentrating channels of energy matrices. Green and roil-some, the distance was surreal in all directions and undetermined. I saw inward and outward through the weather systems clashing through spontaneous chasms of normal world beyond the library to the field of green energy within forming the core of the structure.
Rotating one hundred eighty degrees on the deck, the perspective changed suddenly with an anti-symmetrical symmetry breaking of vision. This was my first clue to what had happened to Lush.
This portion of the galaxy is trisected by a standing wave of gravity and relativity field effects making a seven hundred twenty-degree spin vector of the four normal dimensions. It is an open door to abnormal space-time, and it had intruded here. Lush and I had talked before of the access potential of spin matrices to extra copies of this universe formed as probability actualization of macro-structural formalities. It was only a theory.
Macro-quantum rotational symmetry breaking may have left the 180-degree trace in this space-time coordinate of a transformational spin matrix to open dimensions and universes.
Even now the residual spin superposition of dimensions was beginning to fade away to leave just a local, normal four-dimensional appearance of space-time and it’s variously eleven dimensional, or two hundred thirty dimensional neo-structure of nominal compresence.
Might this universe have tagents sewn through its hypo-loop extrusion placed by a higher intelligence? As space-time concentrates with speed of travel near light speed anisotropic ally, in a symmetry with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle of indeterminacy of knowledge of either energy and time or location and momentum, could the universe have a memory in some way of where each discrete particle and relational loop was in order to sustain the invariance of uniform application of physical laws?
Dimensions may be arbitrary constructions contingent upon given configurations of the shapes of pre-big bang minimal article conditions. Particular configuration of a particle-wave assembly duplicated en mass produces its own dimensional requirements of logic conformal to its intrinsic structure. An eleven dimensional object requires eleven dimensions of existence. The extension of adimension is in accord with the characteristic requirements for existence of the particle-wave forces within it. The infinite apparent destiny of extension of a four dimensional universe is a product of the forces of infinite expansion within it such as momentum and thermodynamic process.
Quantum super-positioning could be defeated and energy re-directed along the intergalactic nuclear forced artery to form N dimensional calculating engines of change. I had the suspicion that some Alien power passing through the infinite sequences of exponential dimensional constructions may have abducted Lush from the library of this Subductor world of stone souls.
Staring into the green field of electrons stretching into apparent infinity in warped dimensional wrappings of light the vortexes carried memories of Lush along with the transitioning moments of shapes of past and present ever living as corridors of power flow. I leaned on the alto-rail and felt the cold sweat of the loss of Lush.
http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/st-novilistricka-dimensions/11259900
23 June 2010
President Obama Fires Gen. McCrystal & Plans to Waste Billions and Billions More in Afghanistan
President Obama fired his top General in Afghanistan, General McCrystal. Gen. McCrystal's approach was military vestment heavy. The alternate approach is that of V.P. Biden. President Obama ignores Vice President Biden's advice on how to reduce U.S. costs in the Afghan rebuilding effort. Biden's less-is-better approach is better for U.S. financial continuity. President Obama for some reason believes that U.S. security is better defended by borrowing trillions from abroad and spending it on ineffective military efforts. President Obama hasn't sufficient reason or conviction to know what to do with the security issue evidently. He believes a moderate approach is good, yet there is no real moderate course.
Border security should be increased with berms, barriers and elevated patrol highways along the Mexican border. Better tracking methods of legal aliens that overstay their visa should be innovated. A U.S. special black ops force should be created with 150,000 special forces to quickly reply to adverse, threatening situations, and the conventional military buildup should be reduced by 25% across the board.
Afghanistan's newly found mineral wealth should be given to the people of that nation in a public corporation in which they are issued shares as any other corporation listed on stock exchanges. The people must own real equity if they are to support democracy and a particular government representation of it.
Central Asia has one lessons for foreign invaders and militarists; they will be outlasted by the resistance of millions and millions of people that don't have much else to do in the long run. If the United States has no plans to make Afghanistan the 51st states and populate it with illegal Mexican aliens to solve two problems at once, then it should fall back into a less financially damaging de frappe policy of just reply to with condign force to threatening, particular opposition force arrays in Afghanistan if they form. The U.S. financial outlays for military occupation and nation building are a victory for Al Qa'eda as the Obama administration ineptly throws good, borrowed, hundreds of billions of dollars after bad
Border security should be increased with berms, barriers and elevated patrol highways along the Mexican border. Better tracking methods of legal aliens that overstay their visa should be innovated. A U.S. special black ops force should be created with 150,000 special forces to quickly reply to adverse, threatening situations, and the conventional military buildup should be reduced by 25% across the board.
Afghanistan's newly found mineral wealth should be given to the people of that nation in a public corporation in which they are issued shares as any other corporation listed on stock exchanges. The people must own real equity if they are to support democracy and a particular government representation of it.
Central Asia has one lessons for foreign invaders and militarists; they will be outlasted by the resistance of millions and millions of people that don't have much else to do in the long run. If the United States has no plans to make Afghanistan the 51st states and populate it with illegal Mexican aliens to solve two problems at once, then it should fall back into a less financially damaging de frappe policy of just reply to with condign force to threatening, particular opposition force arrays in Afghanistan if they form. The U.S. financial outlays for military occupation and nation building are a victory for Al Qa'eda as the Obama administration ineptly throws good, borrowed, hundreds of billions of dollars after bad
21 June 2010
Second and Third World Nations Should Have Resources Owned by the Citizens in Private Stock Issuance
The Alaska Permanent Fund is a bad model for a second and third world nation to follow. It is simply an investment fund that the state legislature puts some oil royalties into occassionally for the people. The people are thus at the mercy of the politicians perennially.
Although Senator Biden supported an Alaska Permanent Fund style policy for Iraq several years ago, I was then advocating that the people own the oil fields directly, and that the Iraqi government have just a ten percent share of the oil stock in order to fund itself. The Alaska Permanent Fund model is used to deceive the people about owning their own oil or natural resources.
Afghanistan should create a public corporation to own all of the oil fields oil resources and have a board operate it like BP or Exxon, or instead of BP and Exxon in the case of oil. Their would be an initial stock issuance to all Afghan citizens, and they could buy, sell or trade the stock after a decade or two. The Afghan mineral resources would be privately held, and popular support for the government that issued the stock would result--its very, very simple and necessary if second and third world countries are not to be run by dictators, corrupt politicians and global resource extraction corporate bribing as in Nigeria perhaps, or maybe Venezuela before the dubiously progress Chavez government took over.
Even Mexico would be a better place if the oil resources of PEMEX were reallocated to being owned by the people of Iraq--they might be able to resist drug traffickers better. Russia is another country that needs to have the public directly own all of its oil through a one-time stock issue to all Russian citizens.
Although Senator Biden supported an Alaska Permanent Fund style policy for Iraq several years ago, I was then advocating that the people own the oil fields directly, and that the Iraqi government have just a ten percent share of the oil stock in order to fund itself. The Alaska Permanent Fund model is used to deceive the people about owning their own oil or natural resources.
Afghanistan should create a public corporation to own all of the oil fields oil resources and have a board operate it like BP or Exxon, or instead of BP and Exxon in the case of oil. Their would be an initial stock issuance to all Afghan citizens, and they could buy, sell or trade the stock after a decade or two. The Afghan mineral resources would be privately held, and popular support for the government that issued the stock would result--its very, very simple and necessary if second and third world countries are not to be run by dictators, corrupt politicians and global resource extraction corporate bribing as in Nigeria perhaps, or maybe Venezuela before the dubiously progress Chavez government took over.
Even Mexico would be a better place if the oil resources of PEMEX were reallocated to being owned by the people of Iraq--they might be able to resist drug traffickers better. Russia is another country that needs to have the public directly own all of its oil through a one-time stock issue to all Russian citizens.
Gravity; Comments About That Mysterious Force
Gravity is a mysterious, wonderful force that seems to cross the universe even if the space-time of the universe is expanding. Experimenters from Galileo to Newton and Einstein and pondered the nature of gravity, how it works and what it is. Modern theorists continue to search for its elusive definition.I will provide my own unscientific ideas about gravity here.
Some scientists seek to explain gravity's power through inclusive of it as a particle-wave in the standard model of physics. A quantum field theory with gravity would be like an electro-magnetic field theory and bring the explanation of how gravity can act at a distance as the weakest of the four basic forces of nature.
I wonder about gravity too. The anthropic principle is a recurring phenomenon of contemporary physical cosmology; how is it that in this universe everything just happens to be fine-tuned to produce a field enabling life? The Universe easily could have different fine adjustments that would deny even the existence of matter much less life. The anthropic principle also applies to history in a way (of course it does because its about people)--Because so many philosophers, physicists and experimenters have thought about gravity and written about it, so can I although with the technical rigor of a scientist. So I have several questions about gravity created by recent reading.
1) If a graviton-particle exists, would it have nearly zero mass like a photon in order to travel intergalactic distances?
2) Wouldn't the graviton be subject to the conservation of mass and energy such that it is neither created or destroyed in the universe (in a finite structure)?
3) If gravitons are formed as a product of mass-energy, or are implicit qualities of mass-energy, when gravitational concentrations arise would the proportionately remove 'brakes' on the acceleration of space-time as mass=energy and gravity is concentrated unequally in the volume of space-time?
4) If a faster than light inflation of the Universe occurred, was it something like the collision produced in a particle accelerator with the mass-energy of the visible universe being the after-effect eventually coalescing with gravity?
5) If a gravitational field exists universally inclusive of the entire universe something like that of an electro-magnetic field, what would be its meta-universal power source? Would the field characteristics determine the rate of allocation of mass-energy in the universe? Could the field be predetermined in space-time?
6) Must hyper-dimensional shape of a universe expanding outward necessarily have no limit in time, as time limits would need to coincide with spatial limits? Must a space-time boundary necessarily have a smaller or confining shape such as the point at the end of a cone approached from inside the larger, open end? Would the cone travelled from the small end to the large end in a static field increase speed of apparent expansion as it moved toward the open end in a progressive yet proportionate series rate of increase?
7) Space-time may expand at an increasing rate like a drop of water in a calm sea produced a wave that increases area at a faster apparent pace viewed from the point of space-time origin in the water-field because its wavefront continually increase in area.
The wavefront is a structure started at a small scale with fore that increase progressively in area and volume because it expresses itself within the medium of water or space-time such as exist. That reasoning produced the aether theories of a background medium for the universe. Space-time might be regarded as something like an aether in which mass-energy and gravitons might express themselves. Yet if space-time exists apart from mass-energy then it must have some kind of a field-energy itself. Space-time could be regarded as previously existing as a background independent space-time field into which mass-energy were thrown. That does not seem like a very scientific approach though. Cosmology today enjoys something more of an existential criterion for the standard model and a unified quantum theory of gravity I believe.
8) One wonders why gravitons ever left their point of origin associated with mass? Why would they journey over space-time at all to contact other mass-energy?
9) if gravitons have any mass, why don't they form their own clumps of matter midway between larger object far apart--such as a new clump of mass midway between the Milky Way and the Andromeda Galaxies?
Maybe that is the best argument for gravity as a macro-field--gravitons seem like neutrinos just to flow through everything of space-time except space-itself that they seem to warp or curve in proportion to their number. They seem to function at the speed of light in warping space around a clump of mass-energy, and have a finite area of application diminishing in power in accord with Newton's law something like an expanding wave increasing its area yet diminishing in height or proximal size.
10) If gravity is a field that might be described eventually by scientists with a quantum field theory, would the gravitational field be local or part of one unified gravitational field with local variations of space-time?
11) So one may wonder what the binding power of a graviton is? Does it cohere to any form of mass or energy just some? If its field is one-directional; why?
When the moon circles around the Earth perpetually bound by the gravitational field of the mass of the Earth even though it tries to go in a straight line away (and vice versa to a lesser extent), what is the factor giving the 'curve' to space time?
Do gravitons occupy quantum states like those of the valence shells of atoms that only permit simultaneous occupation of so many? With the information of the gravitons of the larger mass filling all those valence states of the local space time is that how the 'curvature' of space-time is selected locally in favor of a slope toward the larger mass (because it has more numbers of valence state shell positions of space-time filled than a smaller Local mass?)? Perhaps space-time itself has intervals and spacing characteristics like those of quantum field theory. This would be a democratic theory of gravitational selection.
Well, so much for my thoughts about gravity this morning. I will perhaps continue these observations another time.
Some scientists seek to explain gravity's power through inclusive of it as a particle-wave in the standard model of physics. A quantum field theory with gravity would be like an electro-magnetic field theory and bring the explanation of how gravity can act at a distance as the weakest of the four basic forces of nature.
I wonder about gravity too. The anthropic principle is a recurring phenomenon of contemporary physical cosmology; how is it that in this universe everything just happens to be fine-tuned to produce a field enabling life? The Universe easily could have different fine adjustments that would deny even the existence of matter much less life. The anthropic principle also applies to history in a way (of course it does because its about people)--Because so many philosophers, physicists and experimenters have thought about gravity and written about it, so can I although with the technical rigor of a scientist. So I have several questions about gravity created by recent reading.
1) If a graviton-particle exists, would it have nearly zero mass like a photon in order to travel intergalactic distances?
2) Wouldn't the graviton be subject to the conservation of mass and energy such that it is neither created or destroyed in the universe (in a finite structure)?
3) If gravitons are formed as a product of mass-energy, or are implicit qualities of mass-energy, when gravitational concentrations arise would the proportionately remove 'brakes' on the acceleration of space-time as mass=energy and gravity is concentrated unequally in the volume of space-time?
4) If a faster than light inflation of the Universe occurred, was it something like the collision produced in a particle accelerator with the mass-energy of the visible universe being the after-effect eventually coalescing with gravity?
5) If a gravitational field exists universally inclusive of the entire universe something like that of an electro-magnetic field, what would be its meta-universal power source? Would the field characteristics determine the rate of allocation of mass-energy in the universe? Could the field be predetermined in space-time?
6) Must hyper-dimensional shape of a universe expanding outward necessarily have no limit in time, as time limits would need to coincide with spatial limits? Must a space-time boundary necessarily have a smaller or confining shape such as the point at the end of a cone approached from inside the larger, open end? Would the cone travelled from the small end to the large end in a static field increase speed of apparent expansion as it moved toward the open end in a progressive yet proportionate series rate of increase?
7) Space-time may expand at an increasing rate like a drop of water in a calm sea produced a wave that increases area at a faster apparent pace viewed from the point of space-time origin in the water-field because its wavefront continually increase in area.
The wavefront is a structure started at a small scale with fore that increase progressively in area and volume because it expresses itself within the medium of water or space-time such as exist. That reasoning produced the aether theories of a background medium for the universe. Space-time might be regarded as something like an aether in which mass-energy and gravitons might express themselves. Yet if space-time exists apart from mass-energy then it must have some kind of a field-energy itself. Space-time could be regarded as previously existing as a background independent space-time field into which mass-energy were thrown. That does not seem like a very scientific approach though. Cosmology today enjoys something more of an existential criterion for the standard model and a unified quantum theory of gravity I believe.
8) One wonders why gravitons ever left their point of origin associated with mass? Why would they journey over space-time at all to contact other mass-energy?
9) if gravitons have any mass, why don't they form their own clumps of matter midway between larger object far apart--such as a new clump of mass midway between the Milky Way and the Andromeda Galaxies?
Maybe that is the best argument for gravity as a macro-field--gravitons seem like neutrinos just to flow through everything of space-time except space-itself that they seem to warp or curve in proportion to their number. They seem to function at the speed of light in warping space around a clump of mass-energy, and have a finite area of application diminishing in power in accord with Newton's law something like an expanding wave increasing its area yet diminishing in height or proximal size.
10) If gravity is a field that might be described eventually by scientists with a quantum field theory, would the gravitational field be local or part of one unified gravitational field with local variations of space-time?
11) So one may wonder what the binding power of a graviton is? Does it cohere to any form of mass or energy just some? If its field is one-directional; why?
When the moon circles around the Earth perpetually bound by the gravitational field of the mass of the Earth even though it tries to go in a straight line away (and vice versa to a lesser extent), what is the factor giving the 'curve' to space time?
Do gravitons occupy quantum states like those of the valence shells of atoms that only permit simultaneous occupation of so many? With the information of the gravitons of the larger mass filling all those valence states of the local space time is that how the 'curvature' of space-time is selected locally in favor of a slope toward the larger mass (because it has more numbers of valence state shell positions of space-time filled than a smaller Local mass?)? Perhaps space-time itself has intervals and spacing characteristics like those of quantum field theory. This would be a democratic theory of gravitational selection.
Well, so much for my thoughts about gravity this morning. I will perhaps continue these observations another time.
To Stabilize Democracy; Give Afghanistan's Mineral Wealth to the Citizens in A Public Stock Issuance
The Obama administration has an opportunity in Afghanistan to direct that the recently announced mineral wealth of that nation be owned directly by the people of Afghanistan in a public company with all shares owned by the people. The Bush administration passed such an opportunity in Iraq with Iraqi oil dooming the United States to seven more years of nation rebuilding more expensive than most wars. Without public ownership of mineral wealth or oil in second and third world nations inevitably corrupt, exclusive government owning elites dominate the natural resource wealth and are opposed by low-level popular insurgencies.
When a new government is created along democratic lines a rational concern is who will own the natural resource wealth of that nation. If the people own it in private shares that are tradable after several years like any other publicly listed corporate stock, then the government will have popular support and the equally important denial of resource control by exclusive and corrupt elites will occur.
The Obama administration of course will most likely fail to insure that the minerals of Afghanistan will be quickly given to the citizens of Afghanistan through a general stock issuance in The Afghanistan Mining Company. The Afghanistan Mining Company would be managed in the interim by an initial board comprised of N.A.T.O. member nations and Afghanis. One of its duties would be to put out to bid for development the natural mineral resources of Afghanistan. The Afghan citizen shareholders of would receive a 70% royalty of all wealth extracted by the winning developing corporation who would receive thirty percent of the profit from sale of the resource.
If the Iraqi’s had formed a similar public corporation for the initial ownership of Iraq’s oil fields it is likely that peace through broad popular support for the stock issuing government would have occurred by 2004 or 2005 permitting the U.S. to withdraw more military forces earlier. It would be a doubly stupid error for the Obama administration to repeat the Bush II administration’s mistake.
President Obama does have the leverage over the Karzai Government to bring about the populist stock issuance of an Afghanistan Mining Company and he should. The United States and N.A.T.O. countries cannot afford to have continuing protracted incompetence in military financial outlays that could be avoided through implementation of foreign policy in support of democracy and democratic values instead of those of corporatism and corrupting global extraction industry corporations. If democracy is not supported through plain fair public ownership of natural resources in second and third world countries, domestic and international terrorism forms to revolt against those governments. The United States in support of global corporations operating in second and third world nations then intervenes to reinforce corrupt dictatorships. That is a wrong policy side to be on.
From British Petroleum and its history as the British Iranian Oil Company and C.I.A. support for the overthrow of the Iranian Government to bring in the Shah so The forerunner of today’s BP could keep their oil from being nationalized, to Anglo-American Mining with plans to develop a Pebble Mine in Alaska on the headwaters of the Bristol Bay salmon fishery with their history in South African Diamond mining global extraction industries have in such a way that they are often conflict with local populist political concerns. President Obama should support democracy in Afghanistan instead of protracted defenses of corruption and foreign corporate mining interests if he ants a reasonable opportunity for a stable Afghanistan to form such that the taxpayers of the United States will not need to have more trillions wrested from them to spend in central Asian military boondoggles.
When a new government is created along democratic lines a rational concern is who will own the natural resource wealth of that nation. If the people own it in private shares that are tradable after several years like any other publicly listed corporate stock, then the government will have popular support and the equally important denial of resource control by exclusive and corrupt elites will occur.
The Obama administration of course will most likely fail to insure that the minerals of Afghanistan will be quickly given to the citizens of Afghanistan through a general stock issuance in The Afghanistan Mining Company. The Afghanistan Mining Company would be managed in the interim by an initial board comprised of N.A.T.O. member nations and Afghanis. One of its duties would be to put out to bid for development the natural mineral resources of Afghanistan. The Afghan citizen shareholders of would receive a 70% royalty of all wealth extracted by the winning developing corporation who would receive thirty percent of the profit from sale of the resource.
If the Iraqi’s had formed a similar public corporation for the initial ownership of Iraq’s oil fields it is likely that peace through broad popular support for the stock issuing government would have occurred by 2004 or 2005 permitting the U.S. to withdraw more military forces earlier. It would be a doubly stupid error for the Obama administration to repeat the Bush II administration’s mistake.
President Obama does have the leverage over the Karzai Government to bring about the populist stock issuance of an Afghanistan Mining Company and he should. The United States and N.A.T.O. countries cannot afford to have continuing protracted incompetence in military financial outlays that could be avoided through implementation of foreign policy in support of democracy and democratic values instead of those of corporatism and corrupting global extraction industry corporations. If democracy is not supported through plain fair public ownership of natural resources in second and third world countries, domestic and international terrorism forms to revolt against those governments. The United States in support of global corporations operating in second and third world nations then intervenes to reinforce corrupt dictatorships. That is a wrong policy side to be on.
From British Petroleum and its history as the British Iranian Oil Company and C.I.A. support for the overthrow of the Iranian Government to bring in the Shah so The forerunner of today’s BP could keep their oil from being nationalized, to Anglo-American Mining with plans to develop a Pebble Mine in Alaska on the headwaters of the Bristol Bay salmon fishery with their history in South African Diamond mining global extraction industries have in such a way that they are often conflict with local populist political concerns. President Obama should support democracy in Afghanistan instead of protracted defenses of corruption and foreign corporate mining interests if he ants a reasonable opportunity for a stable Afghanistan to form such that the taxpayers of the United States will not need to have more trillions wrested from them to spend in central Asian military boondoggles.
19 June 2010
Science, Christianity and Faith Issues
Truth theories may be variable, and need to cohere with present definitions of what truth is. Christians believe the sole constant valid meta-truth is Jesus Christ as the Word of God. Some super-string theorists may find variability of constants as a fact, that is time and the laws of nature are not eternally static.
One may develop an infinite number of theories about anything, including of course, history and historical writing.
Regarding the numerous aspects of any ancient material such as the Bible, it is common that many offer opinions upon it from the basis of ignorance complete or partial. Such faulty reasoning is excusable generally only when guesswork is all that is possible. That is not the case with much of the Biblical discussion and content.
If one cares little about error philosophically, one should be inclined to promote ideas perhaps for political reasons or for receiving particular rewards rather than discovery of truth. Truth has a pervasive meaning of referring to accuracy between subject and predicate, or confirmation of a predication as accurate. Fundamentally it posits the coordinate relation of an internal or external object and verifies the relation as existing or not.
Truth theory itself of course has numerous forms in philosophy that I won't detail here. In physics and math there are numerous methods of discovery of various relations and representations in quantum mechanics I have been reading recently, that may present several courses for transformations about real and imaginary axes. What coordinate in a representational system is true except in a reference to it regarding something else?
One may formulate various verbal or conceptual descriptions of God, or the Creator of all that exists , yet one generally does not posit an internal, subjective idea as corresponding to any external object or being directly. Representation of exterior or transcending objects or material or spiritual facts may be made with ideas, or even necessarily are made with ideas and words or other abstract symbols, yet few would mistake those representations for the things-in-themselves. God obviously would not be mistaken for a subjective idea,or even a subconscious idea, any more than one would posit Mt. Everest to be just an idea within one's mind.
Epistemological interpretation of real objects make occur within Kant's noumenal phenomenology of mind. Quantum mechanics can describe incompletely various representations of eigenstates of particles without requisite that one visualize the states of quantum field elements. What Mt. Everest is for-itself without human cognitive interpretation or transformation into a realizable object is difficult to say. We would tend to regard Mt. Everest as a quantum field of certain characteristics, and might relate those to other reference structures in space-time abstractly, and with complexity. God would be far more complex, and really impossible, to describe with in terms of particular quantum field states--he is bigger than that, and more uncertain or undefinable regarding particular characteristics that might be quantified.
Germs have not always existed.They are said to be an evolutionary development of an historical nature. Bacteria and viruses developed at different times. Eukaryote and prokaryote evolved dissimultaneously it is thought--yet who can be certain? The soft tissues don't fossilize well at all.
http://www.mansfield.ohio-state.edu/~sabedon/biol2007.htm
To define the meaning of germs linguisticaly is to construct parameters in which germs have then potential to be said to exist. When germs were discovered and named,linguistically they might be said to exist thereafter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germ_theory_of_disease
In biological history, the existence of germs may again be contingent upon a definition and function of their relationships to biological life forms. Microbes are another term for germs. Micro-organisms are pervasive and earliest hypothesized things to live on Earth commonly. The wikipedia article link describes some of the history of micro-organisms.
It has little relevance to the veracity of a Biblical theory of life though, since Adam and Eve were interpolated from an extra-dimensional space-time or pre-space-time environment onto the Earth at the Garden of Eden (guarded by four cherubim possibly representing the dimensions of space-time (4). If the fated pair of fallen were translated into a fallen temporal Earth already in an advanced state of evolution, or if the entire universe were created at that point as if it had evolved, it makes little difference to the veracity of either science or religion. As in super-string theory there are lots of possible forumulae or structure to theorize with. We thank God for not providing Adam and Eve with advanced physics and biological data in the garden of Eden period, for their descendants might have blown up the world and even caused more offshore oil spills earlier in human history.
The Bible is not a book about science. The Old Testament may be considered a brilliant historical work and the New Testament a group of epistes or letters. The 66 books of the Bible each differ and yet have similarities. One might read...
'http://www.amazon.com/Cosmic-Codes-Hidden-Messages-Eternity/dp/1578212553
by Chuck Missler for interesting ideas about it. Many authors have sought to learn more and deeper meanings from the Bible.
Many since the enlightenment have sought to make categorical denunciations of Biblical veracity-yet that isn't a very valid approach to reasoning about it. Following is one obvious equivalence of Biblical literals to American normal time literals--keep in mind that in real modern physics there are quite a few ways to refer to space-time, mass, energy and so forth that are very surprising to us not accustomed to thinking in terms of quantum mechanics. God's power to transform reality or even to create the present Universe exceeds whatever we might think about it as contingent, temporal beings. U1,SU2 and transformations of multi-axis coordinate maths extrapolated to infinite dimensions are probably trivialities to the Creator of all possible universes. We can admire Abelian and non-Abelian guage theories anyway. Or use simple math and Peter's multiple.
Methusela 187 Lamech 969
Lamech 182 Noah 777 years
Noah 500 Shem, Ham,
Jephath
950 years
1,556 overlap subtotal 8,575 years
overlap minus 1,556 years
Adam’s birth to Noah’s death total 7,019 years
Noah’s time after the flood minus 300 years
Adams birth to the end of the flood 6,719 years
One Day to God as a thousand to man literal value
One year to God is for man 365,000 years
Patriarch’s before flood literal conversion x 6,719 years
Time with Petrine literal conversion 2,453, 235,000 years
2,453,235,000 years before Christ’s human birth is rather close to the geological, scientific time scale hypothesis of the creation of life on Earth in the Proterozoic era. The oldest life on Earth was considered by evolutionary biologists perhaps to
be cyanobacteria.
All (u)'whoman' knowledge is contained within the Universe that is contained within God. Some may to put up and knock down straw man arguments, or use ad hominems and other logical fallacies in order to attack the realms of absolute spirit and so forth. If one wishes to give them credit for good intentions and speculate that they art misled by other worldly or wrong ideas about the Bible and of God, one may do so though risking extending social credit too far possibly.
Good science is a process of learning. C.S. Peirce, inventor of pragmatism, believed scientific thought needed to have practical value. Some such as Smolin have written at length about the problems with the scientific method in super-string theory, in that testable, falsifiable hypotheses seldom arise. I think that engineering of scientific and mathematical knowledge has the potential for much malleability, of innumerable transformations of structural relations of mass and energy. Philosophically however the rash application of technique can be viewed as potential harmful.
Seldom are scientific ideas adequately reviewed by society before their application. We experience the complete incompetence of drilling offshore for oil in what is essentially a vulnerable food production area of the planet comprising 7/10ths of the planetary surface area, of Minimata chemical tragedies along with those of Bhopal.
Christians may fairly be skeptical about worldliness, yet J. Vernon McGee (I believe) said that the worldliness Christians are warned of is that of the cosmos, or the cosmopolitan community of mankind that is as inflammatory and unstable, oppressive and cruel simultaneously as all of the worst extremes of human history from Sodom and Gomorrah to Auschwitz and the Killing Fields of Cambodia, Rwanda, and so forth.
Christians hope to follow the Word of God and pursue enlightenment and salvation through the grace of the Spirit. Some wonder what the spirit is, or believe paradoxically in nothing except the formation of present quarks, dimensional strings and their changing forms.
One must be reserved in speculating about the meaning or meaninglessness of concatenations of strings of one dimension struck from a unified all dimensions phenomenality such that after a reduction into light speed and physical law parameters the dimensions create myriad different particles, atomic, chemical and spatio-temporal configurations inclusive of the living process we call life.
Life and spirit are things of God. One's poverty of faith and reasoning may bring one to find various mutually exclusive and exhaustive relationships where none exist including that of scientific inquiry and faith in God. I think that is a tragedy since the phenomenal nature and temporal phase-form of life viewed perhaps by those well--educated in quantum mechanical cosmology may have much in common with the Biblical point of view regarding the brevity of life expressed by Solomon and in Ecclesiastes.
-from the King James version
"13Happy is the man that findeth wisdom, and the man that getteth understanding.
14For the merchandise of it is better than the merchandise of silver, and the gain thereof than fine gold.
15She is more precious than rubies: and all the things thou canst desire are not to be compared unto her.
16Length of days is in her right hand; and in her left hand riches and honour.
17Her ways are ways of pleasantness, and all her paths are peace.
18She is a tree of life to them that lay hold upon her: and happy is every one that retaineth her.
19The LORD by wisdom hath founded the earth; by understanding hath he established the heavens.
20By his knowledge the depths are broken up, and the clouds drop down the dew."
One may develop an infinite number of theories about anything, including of course, history and historical writing.
Regarding the numerous aspects of any ancient material such as the Bible, it is common that many offer opinions upon it from the basis of ignorance complete or partial. Such faulty reasoning is excusable generally only when guesswork is all that is possible. That is not the case with much of the Biblical discussion and content.
If one cares little about error philosophically, one should be inclined to promote ideas perhaps for political reasons or for receiving particular rewards rather than discovery of truth. Truth has a pervasive meaning of referring to accuracy between subject and predicate, or confirmation of a predication as accurate. Fundamentally it posits the coordinate relation of an internal or external object and verifies the relation as existing or not.
Truth theory itself of course has numerous forms in philosophy that I won't detail here. In physics and math there are numerous methods of discovery of various relations and representations in quantum mechanics I have been reading recently, that may present several courses for transformations about real and imaginary axes. What coordinate in a representational system is true except in a reference to it regarding something else?
One may formulate various verbal or conceptual descriptions of God, or the Creator of all that exists , yet one generally does not posit an internal, subjective idea as corresponding to any external object or being directly. Representation of exterior or transcending objects or material or spiritual facts may be made with ideas, or even necessarily are made with ideas and words or other abstract symbols, yet few would mistake those representations for the things-in-themselves. God obviously would not be mistaken for a subjective idea,or even a subconscious idea, any more than one would posit Mt. Everest to be just an idea within one's mind.
Epistemological interpretation of real objects make occur within Kant's noumenal phenomenology of mind. Quantum mechanics can describe incompletely various representations of eigenstates of particles without requisite that one visualize the states of quantum field elements. What Mt. Everest is for-itself without human cognitive interpretation or transformation into a realizable object is difficult to say. We would tend to regard Mt. Everest as a quantum field of certain characteristics, and might relate those to other reference structures in space-time abstractly, and with complexity. God would be far more complex, and really impossible, to describe with in terms of particular quantum field states--he is bigger than that, and more uncertain or undefinable regarding particular characteristics that might be quantified.
Germs have not always existed.They are said to be an evolutionary development of an historical nature. Bacteria and viruses developed at different times. Eukaryote and prokaryote evolved dissimultaneously it is thought--yet who can be certain? The soft tissues don't fossilize well at all.
http://www.mansfield.ohio-state.edu/~sabedon/biol2007.htm
To define the meaning of germs linguisticaly is to construct parameters in which germs have then potential to be said to exist. When germs were discovered and named,linguistically they might be said to exist thereafter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germ_theory_of_disease
In biological history, the existence of germs may again be contingent upon a definition and function of their relationships to biological life forms. Microbes are another term for germs. Micro-organisms are pervasive and earliest hypothesized things to live on Earth commonly. The wikipedia article link describes some of the history of micro-organisms.
It has little relevance to the veracity of a Biblical theory of life though, since Adam and Eve were interpolated from an extra-dimensional space-time or pre-space-time environment onto the Earth at the Garden of Eden (guarded by four cherubim possibly representing the dimensions of space-time (4). If the fated pair of fallen were translated into a fallen temporal Earth already in an advanced state of evolution, or if the entire universe were created at that point as if it had evolved, it makes little difference to the veracity of either science or religion. As in super-string theory there are lots of possible forumulae or structure to theorize with. We thank God for not providing Adam and Eve with advanced physics and biological data in the garden of Eden period, for their descendants might have blown up the world and even caused more offshore oil spills earlier in human history.
The Bible is not a book about science. The Old Testament may be considered a brilliant historical work and the New Testament a group of epistes or letters. The 66 books of the Bible each differ and yet have similarities. One might read...
'http://www.amazon.com/Cosmic-Codes-Hidden-Messages-Eternity/dp/1578212553
by Chuck Missler for interesting ideas about it. Many authors have sought to learn more and deeper meanings from the Bible.
Many since the enlightenment have sought to make categorical denunciations of Biblical veracity-yet that isn't a very valid approach to reasoning about it. Following is one obvious equivalence of Biblical literals to American normal time literals--keep in mind that in real modern physics there are quite a few ways to refer to space-time, mass, energy and so forth that are very surprising to us not accustomed to thinking in terms of quantum mechanics. God's power to transform reality or even to create the present Universe exceeds whatever we might think about it as contingent, temporal beings. U1,SU2 and transformations of multi-axis coordinate maths extrapolated to infinite dimensions are probably trivialities to the Creator of all possible universes. We can admire Abelian and non-Abelian guage theories anyway. Or use simple math and Peter's multiple.
Methusela 187 Lamech 969
Lamech 182 Noah 777 years
Noah 500 Shem, Ham,
Jephath
950 years
1,556 overlap subtotal 8,575 years
overlap minus 1,556 years
Adam’s birth to Noah’s death total 7,019 years
Noah’s time after the flood minus 300 years
Adams birth to the end of the flood 6,719 years
One Day to God as a thousand to man literal value
One year to God is for man 365,000 years
Patriarch’s before flood literal conversion x 6,719 years
Time with Petrine literal conversion 2,453, 235,000 years
2,453,235,000 years before Christ’s human birth is rather close to the geological, scientific time scale hypothesis of the creation of life on Earth in the Proterozoic era. The oldest life on Earth was considered by evolutionary biologists perhaps to
be cyanobacteria.
All (u)'whoman' knowledge is contained within the Universe that is contained within God. Some may to put up and knock down straw man arguments, or use ad hominems and other logical fallacies in order to attack the realms of absolute spirit and so forth. If one wishes to give them credit for good intentions and speculate that they art misled by other worldly or wrong ideas about the Bible and of God, one may do so though risking extending social credit too far possibly.
Good science is a process of learning. C.S. Peirce, inventor of pragmatism, believed scientific thought needed to have practical value. Some such as Smolin have written at length about the problems with the scientific method in super-string theory, in that testable, falsifiable hypotheses seldom arise. I think that engineering of scientific and mathematical knowledge has the potential for much malleability, of innumerable transformations of structural relations of mass and energy. Philosophically however the rash application of technique can be viewed as potential harmful.
Seldom are scientific ideas adequately reviewed by society before their application. We experience the complete incompetence of drilling offshore for oil in what is essentially a vulnerable food production area of the planet comprising 7/10ths of the planetary surface area, of Minimata chemical tragedies along with those of Bhopal.
Christians may fairly be skeptical about worldliness, yet J. Vernon McGee (I believe) said that the worldliness Christians are warned of is that of the cosmos, or the cosmopolitan community of mankind that is as inflammatory and unstable, oppressive and cruel simultaneously as all of the worst extremes of human history from Sodom and Gomorrah to Auschwitz and the Killing Fields of Cambodia, Rwanda, and so forth.
Christians hope to follow the Word of God and pursue enlightenment and salvation through the grace of the Spirit. Some wonder what the spirit is, or believe paradoxically in nothing except the formation of present quarks, dimensional strings and their changing forms.
One must be reserved in speculating about the meaning or meaninglessness of concatenations of strings of one dimension struck from a unified all dimensions phenomenality such that after a reduction into light speed and physical law parameters the dimensions create myriad different particles, atomic, chemical and spatio-temporal configurations inclusive of the living process we call life.
Life and spirit are things of God. One's poverty of faith and reasoning may bring one to find various mutually exclusive and exhaustive relationships where none exist including that of scientific inquiry and faith in God. I think that is a tragedy since the phenomenal nature and temporal phase-form of life viewed perhaps by those well--educated in quantum mechanical cosmology may have much in common with the Biblical point of view regarding the brevity of life expressed by Solomon and in Ecclesiastes.
-from the King James version
"13Happy is the man that findeth wisdom, and the man that getteth understanding.
14For the merchandise of it is better than the merchandise of silver, and the gain thereof than fine gold.
15She is more precious than rubies: and all the things thou canst desire are not to be compared unto her.
16Length of days is in her right hand; and in her left hand riches and honour.
17Her ways are ways of pleasantness, and all her paths are peace.
18She is a tree of life to them that lay hold upon her: and happy is every one that retaineth her.
19The LORD by wisdom hath founded the earth; by understanding hath he established the heavens.
20By his knowledge the depths are broken up, and the clouds drop down the dew."
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
-
Here and there pointillist continua build rowing the skiff clambering over the road staying in shadows until spring insouciant compact snow ...
-
Upgrading standard hard-plastic Halloween masks with eye covering and nose and mouth filters probably would substantially reduce the odds of...
-
President Trump made a statement today that Ukraine can't win just being defensive. He said offense is necessary to win a war. He also...
