One wonders about destiny and if the future is simply set
yet generally unknown for every individual. Then the worm in the apple arises
of evolution. The question that follows is; can destiny be compatible with
evolution?
Is it possible for life on Earth or in the Democrat Party to
evolve if they already have a destiny? Can blind, random chance govern the
Democrat Party or life on Earth? Plainly it is easy to see that institutions
have inertia as solid as that Of President Joe Biden following along destined
courses that are a result of preceding courses. Destiny may perhaps be
conditional and partial and set by the possible range of human behaviors or
patterns of being inherent in material objects. Rocks for instance tumble down
a talus slope rather than floating against gravity uphill.
The matter of degrees of motion appears in question
concerning destiny. I am giving the quality of pre-destination to the
definition of destiny in order not to have the term be nothing more than an
after-the-fact historical description of what occurred. In some cases destiny
could apply to particular circumstances yet not generally to everything. It is
also possible that everything is pre-determined except for a few special
exceptions. If humans have original sin and are destined to eternal hell for
instance, it might be that being saved by the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ is
the sole exception to that pervasive species-wide destiny.
Prima facia the entire Universe that is matter appears to be
pre-determined by the thermodynamic characteristics of matter. Matter evolves
through thermodynamics from a low state of entry or disorganization to a high
state of entropy; the most disorganized. Cosmology today has the initial state
of energy/mass (they need to be regard as equal or convertible states) being
highly organized and maybe with just a tiny sliver or no entropy at all in a
super-compact singularity containing everything that would ever exist or help
to exist the matter and energy of the Universe *(Some of the initial matter was
annihilated by antimatter leaving just a tiny fraction of what started to exist
in existence. That CP invariance and annihilated stuff could be accountable for
odd and unexplained things of interest to theoretical physicists such as dark
matter, dark energy and the accelerating rate of expansion of space yet maybe
not of time *(if space expands at an increasing space and space-time comprise
one phenomenon a common sense, easy
assumption would be that time expands too). Human intelligence would be the
most indeterministic phenomenon to occur in a deterministic Universe wherein
everything except sentience is pre-destined. The concept of a Universe or
Multiverse being predestined because of the physics yet being subverted by
sentience and evolved to an undetermined state presents and interesting
implicit contradiction of states of being.
Global warming is a good example of a pre-destined physical
system of the Earth and Solar system being subverted by sentient or
semi-sentient human action. The Earth was on track for a healthy multi-billion
year life span able to support non-sentient life yet sentience appeared and is
making the atmosphere unsuitable for sustaining much life. Humans may be
included as non-innocent victims within their warming assault weapons attack on
the ecosphere. Human politicians can claim innocence of the global warming and
Anthropocene era mass extinction activities and do. That shows that dumb
sentience and false sentience can also subvert destined physical structures
like an ecosphere. Evolution theory is a good excuse for disregarding
subversion of physical systems as it provides a que sera, sera; whatever will
be will be logic of destiny latent in nature to global warming deniers as well
as the denial of environmental reality opportunity, though humans as
non-destined beings because of sentience as exempt from the destiny of the
solar system to a great extent.
Destiny in nature may be hotly denied by Democrats in
preference of a blind, random chance, natural selection,
Darwinized/Heisenbergian uncertainty with all values and perceptions subjective
and relativistic. Truth is a matter of opinion and unrelated to material facts
except as the artist as a young Democrat choose to construct a narrative on the
canvas of free expression. Some of those paradigms are mutually exclusive or at
least reciprocally antipathetic; yiu may choose to decide which if determined
to do so. It appears to me that matter and energy are destined and
predetermined and that the forms quantum particles take are limited and
determined. One may speculate that the variables of boundary conditions for
forms of possible Universes are infinite, yet each universe that arose should
have thereafter a destiny in determined physical values. In each Universe
sentience would be the indeterministic element that could reset all of the
physical values of a Universe theoretically. That is a good reason for belief
that the possibility of just this one universe existing is solid.
Adam and Eve were thrown out of a garden in Eden that
apparently was quite phenomenal with each of the pair being without
thermodynamic aging. Eve didn’t give birth and Adam didn’t need to work the
book of Genesis relates through strict inference. They were relocated somewhere
beyond an Eden guarded by four angels that appear suspiciously like four
dimensions of space-time. They had eaten of the tree of knowledge (sentience
and intelligent philosophical thought) and barred from eating more from the
tree of life (everlasting). The paradigm seems something like an omniscient
Being preventing willfully disobedient, somewhat blunder-prone programming
neophytes from messing around with html code on internet web sites. Such site
messing unintended to be malware or viruses can take down web sites. If Adam
and Eve in the garden had access to the html code or programming structure of
destined structures of existing, past or future universes and wrenched their
physical values that might be very bad indeed for the health of creatures
living in them.
It might be the case that physical constants and variables
for the boundary conditions of universes are pre-determined one the values are
set, unless sentient beings within them change the natural course of evolving
events. Original sin means that sentient beings (at least humans) are included
for divine accounting purposes perhaps, with the destined mass of the universe
to some eternal hell just below absolute zero. Scientists have speculated that
the temperature just below absolute zero is infinitely hot-however that could
be and be consistent with the paradigm even of a singularity or containment of
temperature and mass to limited areas. Boyles law regarding the expansion and
temperature of gas (or was that Boltzman?) would seem to preclude infinite high
temperature except within a limited area. Infinite heat should also require
infinite energy and that appears even more improbable outside of a structure
for containment like that of a singularity of zero-dimension and zero-size at
which point it should have no destiny for it has no time or space and has
already arrived at a terminal destination.