A Comment on 'The Greatest Day in History'

In reading the book on the last week of World War One by Nicholas Best named 'The Greatest Day in History' (The London Daily Express called Armistice Day-November 11, 1918 that) I am reminded a little of significant historical events such as the recent trophy hunt of the most wanted terrorist in the world Osama Bin Laden and how they effect public perceptions.

History experienced by many different participants in the final week of the war including soldiers, politicians and civilians from sveral sides remind one of the mini-bird-god's eye view of how so many politicians, soldiers, civilians and other thought at one time, diventegratively, wholistically, fractiously and/or phenomenally the great events of the week.

Contemporary historical events in Pakistan and Afghanistan also afforrd disintegrative social powers and individuals asymmetrically asserting political powers and economic power, or subverting political and economic power, or subverting power in a simultaneous nexus of contemporary history.

Pakistan has myriad parties and terrorist organizations devoted to driving India from Kashmir. Its military and intelligence forces have factions and groups not at all on the same sheet of music necessarily-that is, some of the players support individual initiatives with plausble deniability or even complete covert activty that others in government, military and intelligence know nothing about. An effort to impose a uniform, cookie cutter politcal conformity upon the region by the Unted States that would eliminate formation of terrorism is unlikely for several reasons including but not limited to the fact that the U.S.A. seems like such a rich yet stupid nation that can be defeated or reduced in power simply by forcing it to spend on defese against terrorism. It is also questionable that the U.S. administration and establishement financial elites have a monistic view of Central Asian efforts in the new hyper-dimensional 'great game' already a decade old.

The U.S.A. should dedicate itself to the propositions that all people are created equal unto God, and that the U.S. economy should resolutely improve toward full employment and eological health with home security and justice for all Americans. Many hope that the U.S.A. begins a positive cultural contribution of Afghanistan and Pakistan with transferable steady-state economic packages operable in a hostile social environment and discontinues the military approaches as an ineffective means to bring cultural progress. It create a temporal displacement of power that resumes because of an inconclusive resolution of underlying reasons for conflict in Afghanistan as in Europe in 1918. World War Two-the bigger brawl-was the second round of the first world war.

American demands on Afghans and Pakistanis for conformal political organization absent of terrorists to a certain extent disregard the tactical issues of the region that drive Pakistan to support terrorism in Kashmir and Afghanistan as a way to de frappe Indian hegemony, and Pakistan's constitution requires Shria law.

The ongoing idiomatic logic of Washington politicians to prosecute wars of cultural transformation for decades can lead as readily to the destruction of U.S. cultural health as it can repress and radicalize civil life of people abroad that have zero prospect for affording the expensive American way of life to the satisfaction of the financial service and banking sector that led the mortgage default crisis.