President Obama's Next Link in the Economic Segregation Plan

The official U.S. unemployment rate is 9%, yet the true figure is much higher, perhaps 20%. Forty-three percent of working age U.S. citizens aren't employed. The terrible state of the economy is a result of financial and government corruption the past twenty years that has concentrated wealth through globalism and corporatism building a new structure of economic segregation and subversion of social equality.

President Obama recently suggested that ten million illegal aliens mostly from Mexico become U.S. citizens (a cynic might wonder if that is after paying a fine to his re-election committee) so they can take jobs legally. Naturalizing Mexican and Canadian citizens creates geographically superior super-citizens for whom there are no legal boundaries in North America.

Promoting illegal aliens to citizens during a high unemployment era will increase the number of unemployed, legal job seekers in the U.S.A. Eight million jobs were lost after the 2008 Wall Street/banking/mortgage crisis. Do the math. Besides, the border patrol only catches one of every three illegal worker migrants at the border so if they vacate ten million illegal jobs another ten million will soon arrive to replace them.

Although the founders were of the opinion that an American president should be native born, they neglected to consider the problem of potential Presidents with dual citizenship because of the nature of travel back in the day. Who would have imagined that immigrants could be on the phone back home all the way to America and forever after getting off a plane, bus or under the wire? Dual citizenship is a key factor for building social inequality in the U.S.A.

Immigration to the U.S. today is more of a remote control channel change than an entry to a new world and the rest of one's life with new values. Immigrants may easily keep foreign and or dual allegiance and business contacts better than just plain native born Americans without even a passport to get to Alaska through Canada to be unemployed and freeze in a tent for several months.

Dual citizenship is an avenue of potential treason. Even native born offspring of immigrants are open to a world of dual allegiances, challenges and conflicts of interest, for they too have citizenship in the real foreign political realm of their parent’s home country.

While a Governor Jindal living in Louisiana may not be a relation of an Abu Jindal Pakistani or Kashmiri terrorist organizational cadre, such first generations may have relatives that are. The odds on a politician with dual citizenship being subject to foreign influence is greater than that of the second generation born in the U.S.A. and raised by non-immigrant U.S. parents. It is less likely a second generation will have economic values betraying U.S. economic through politics unless perhaps they attend foreign schools and colleges or Oxford University.

Minimally, dual citizenship creates a plague of conflicts of interests especially when a U.S. Presidential candidate could be running for the same office in another country if they choose. The citizenship of one's parents is generally conferred upon children regardless of where they are born. Socialization of Presidential candidates matters to the voters, or at least should.

President Obama's probable Kenyan citizenship doesn't present too much of a problem since the nation has a fairly small population and hasn't a lot of millionaires or billionaires to peddle influence. Governor Jindal of Louisiana possible Indian citizenship is a problem as India is the most populous nation in the world and the Governor probably has most of his relatives living in that nation.

President Obama has sought to make a path for illegal aliens to become dual citizens of the U.S.A. and whatever nation they escaped or are vacationing from. Making dual citizens of Mexican-Americans or Canadian-Americans without reciprocal conferring of dual citizenship upon all U.S. citizens simultaneously creates a legal segregation of U.S. citizens from enjoying full legal right as peers in Mexico and Canada. Allowing a dual citizen to be an American politician establishes a new legal segregation of legal rights and opportunities threatening to the preservation of social and economic liberty. No new citizenship should be given to anyone that is a citizen of another nation.

Politicians have a tradition of being more than occasionally corrupt. Even Presidents are not immune from bribes, threats, kickbacks to and from foreign nations in which they are citizens and have many relatives living. While private citizens may reasonably pursue international interests to suit their pleasure, public elected officials radically dis-serve the public if doing so, and with such unavoidable conflicts of interests a responsible candidate would recues himself from ever seeking the office of the Presidency. As Groucho Marx once said "I wouldn't belong to any club that was willing to have me."

U.S. politicians cannot serve two masters. They must choose one nation and give up their citizenship in any others. Keeping U.S. sovereignty intact and free of Indian and Chinese influence will be difficult in the years ahead. Those two nations have about two and a half billion souls and the United States just a fraction of that.

Neither the British Oxford Rhodes scholarship selection committee nor the Chinese Communist Party or Indian élites should be enabled to offer any of its nation's citizens for potential U.S. political office. Neither should they be so advantaged as to groom U.S. citizens for political office. Keeping U.S. politicians free from the control of foreign governments will be increasingly difficult in the years ahead. Politicians may be grafted off during or after office and provide compromised information and opportunities of advantage to a foreign nation in political polygamy with the clear conscience of a bin Laden with three wives.

The United States is not yet obsolete as a nation. Increasing the number of dual citizens it has will help to make it so. National interests will move toward decoherence as the nation is torn by political center of effort moving offshore.

It doesn't take that much to rectify some of the problems created by an inflation of dual citizenship Americans. Since migration here may be effortless these days, to prove at least a modicum of actual allegiance a prospective citizen ought to be required to give up his foreign citizenship and denounce his former country at the time of the swearing in proceedings. Becoming a citizen of the United States should not be like adding another supermarket discount card to your wallet or purse.

In days of yore that voyage across the ocean was generally one-way. Now, the prospective dual citizen may be never off the phone back home with Skype or just a cheap disposable phone. He can check his facebook friends in Asia or the Fatherland-or even the arid desert for coded words from the pages of the present prophet with words to sustain resistance amidst those enthralled by the whore of Babylon, while she can also find girlfriend support for building a Lesbian utopia globally with men relegated to zoos in the heart of London kept for occasional rentals for CEO sport. The gender role confused can discuss the Celtic meanings of bussaton intimately to their significant atheist cellular composite evolving to a government approved happiness in nihilistic power with beefeaters and chic mirrors. The question is what government any of these dual citizens are really subject to-the simple just one country people can never really know.

Emerging political changes making international communications instant for nearly all can have devastating effects on democracy and the security of U.S. citizens on the road ahead if all sense is thrown to the wind in the lemming rush to the post popular edge of the minute. Populism controlled by unrepresentative economic elites can be a tool used to concentrate wealth and destroy independence.

.