The A.M.A. and Boston Cream Pie’d Plagiarism
A recent study pertaining to medical students discovered that 5% of the students essay exams were plagiarized. Some have suggested that select essay exams be discontinued from collegiate testing because of the ease with which elite college students may rip off Internet authors. Yet such a panic attack reaction isn’t needed, and America does want to have literate college alumni.
Next time a college paper on how one’s ancestors arrived in America begins with ‘four score and twenty years ago, my forefather and foremother stepped forth upon this continent to conceive a new life” etc a busy college professors need not just wonder if that one paper’s content doesn’t sound a little familiar. Instead he or she (not necessarily in that order) can upload a digitalized paper to the Universal Internet Plagiarism Check service.com
Whenever I write a new essay for publication at Triond.com a little time passes while they check to see if it has been published anywhere else on the Internet. Even if I published it myself first somewhere such as BestInternetwriters.com, Triond.com will let me know where it was published and reject it for being previously published. Such a service should be available for colleges routinely to use on all graduate and undergraduate essays, and could be for a very low cost per paper if they were all digitalized. Each college paper plagiarized should be caught for cheating and rejected like a body builder in competition using steroids and human growth hormones or an Olympic swimmer having stem cell modifications to grow webbed feet and hands.
While the Internet has made plagiarism easy, it has also made revealing plagiarism easy. The American Medical Association can profit from instant plagiarism check services probably available on line. I suppose that even a Google search for a string of words enclosed in quotes could turn up some plagiarized material for free.
Integrity can return to college classrooms if instant plagiarism checks become a routine part of undergraduate work. Students that write mediocre papers in comparison to those that plagiarize brilliant yet obscure philosophy papers should not be penalized for making a good effort that suffers in comparison to the unfairly copied paper on The One such as Plotinus described in The Enneads by The Eskimo Of the Unknown Ice Flow (if such an authored paper existed).
Nearly two decade ago I wrote a science fiction short story named Alaska Mag Accelerator (A.M.A.) that was about electro-magnetic accelerated transport modules across continents in tubes, it had no relationship to the Medical Society acronym, and such coincidences turn can turn up in essays too. Good essay examination software can produce a quality examination sufficient to determine if a paper is just coincidentally like another or actual plagiarism, for there are many levels of literary analysis available today.
If the United States is to graduate honest and capable college graduates it should have more plagiarism testing—even routine testing, just as college athletics should have far more doping tests. Society must know who the real meat-heads are as well as develop those with inadequate literary composition capabilities through remedial study into righteous if not radical writers with a discursive style that reaches effective if not persuasive levels of ink or crystal display, light emitting diode or electron language construction.
7/19/10
'Halliburton's Army' and 'The Three Trillion Dollar War'; 2010 Election/War Issues
Free Corporations from Slavery-End Buying of Stock Shares of These Fiction ‘Individuals’
If a corporation treated legally as an individual isn’t a collective then what is? Perhaps joint partnerships should be the largest communal business form to be legally allowed to exist, such that when people partners named A+B+C+D+E spill oil they are sued and go out of business because they have financially responsibility instead of individual collective Big A is sued for spilling oil yet the owners of a have no personal financial responsibility though the stock value may or may not suffer. Well, more of this subject later. The economic future of the United States is under assault from a number of directions including Mexico, the broadcast media and corporatism.
Reading Pratap Chatterjee ‘s 2009 book “Halliburton’s Army” on those tens of thousands of people working abroad in construction projects and providing services to fulfill U.S. Government contracts pertaining to war missions often of a protracted nature, I found new information to fill out some of the details of the more general work I had recently read; the ‘The Three Trillion Dollar War’ co-authored by a winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics (Stiglitz), on the Iraq and Afghanistan financial swamp devastating the U.S. economy. There are many historical evolutionary business elements involved in the private business contracting for each war, too many to review here (I suggest reading each book), yet certain points exist regarding the phenomena of globalism, corporatism and corruption that may be cited or considered briefly.
The Brown and Root Corporation owned for a while by Halliburton has been involved in vast military construction projects since the Vietnam War. They were part of a consortium that built 95% of large U.S. military bases in Vietnam. Halliburton/Brown and Root was the largest contractor in the Iraq-Afghanistan conflicts as well. From L.B.J. to Dick Cheney the Halliburton/KBR relationships were too cozy comprising a conflict of interest and possibly a draft toward war for the profit of private interests. My concern here is simply with the phenomena of corporatism upon U.S. employment and environmental interests rather than in recounting the history of corruption of Halliburton and Brown and Root, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, LOGCAP, the naval equivalent or so forth, Pentagon procurements or awarding of contracts etc.
Much of the employment by Halliburton/KBR contractors abroad goes to TCNs or Third Country Nationals. Even Guantanamo Bay was built by flown in Philippine workers paid 2.50 and hour and then sent back to Manila. U.S. taxpayers pay huge amounts of money to fund private contractor developments in support of military deployments abroad in areas of conflict and instead of Americans or locals getting the jobs, much of the time TCNs are hired because they are the cheapest or safest and produce the most profit for the ostensible U.S. contractor (Halliburton relocated its headquarters to Dubai).
The degree of corruption in granting military support contracts is substantial, and perhaps itself comprises a reason for war if not for assassinating Presidents who would not kick back so well to particular corporations.
These protracted war and nation rebuilding missions abroad kickback product purchases to several American food corporations as well as other suppliers, and the phenomena creates a political draft for continuity of the phenomenon.
Corporatism is something like socialism, yet it is not as fair regarding lower level distribution of wages. Corporatism in foreign war contracting may also supply start up foreign corporations that bribe contract-awarding officials with a percentage of future profits, and these foreign corporations later become influential over U.S. interests.
Large multinational corporations that influence U.S. politicians in a variety of ways conform to a phenomenon of corporatism. The poor and unemployed in the United States are lint for both major political parties as is the environment. Unfortunately simple human corruption and greed in and out of government are the heart of the problem.
With the primary broadcast media owned by powers of concentrated wealth the basic agency of propaganda is unchallenged; U.S. nationalism is degraded along with the environment.
Without a political rectification toward smaller business, ecologically renewable, free enterprise nationalism the future of the United States is that of being exploited by globalist concentrated wealth and power. The Democratic Party has lost interest in really supporting new private sector employment for the poor and those out of work for the longest time first. The Republican Party and right wing talk radio speak out against ‘big government’. When in political power some conservative politicians such as Dick Cheney acted as if they felt entitled to take out their contempt for big government by giving big contracts to corporate firms with special interests that have been friendly to their career interests in the past.
For some reason dumping huge multi-billion dollar contracts to the private sector on the public credit card is considered to be thumbing the nose at ‘big government’. Such conservatives divert investment capital abroad, create vast public debt and reduce social services to the poor in the United States.
There is another down side to this military-industrial-conservative deficit spending for protracted corrupt, inept nation rebuilding that is mostly unknown in the U.S.A.; there is a pervasive two-scale pay system for these contractors working on U.S. military projects abroad. Chatterjee writes on page 144 of ‘Halliburton’s Army’; “In fact salaries” (of TNC’) “were tied to country of origin. Thus a Bangladeshi cleaner would be paid less than a Pakistani, a Georgian truck driver more than a Fijian, and a white South African security guard would make more than an Indian for doing the very same job. The poorer the country of citizenship, the less the workers were paid, which is not unlike the caste system in India or the apartheid system in South Africa before the African National Congress came to power.” End quote.
The practice of paying Third Country Nationals far less than U.S. workers to produce profit is of course at the heart of corporate capitalism of a Spenserian kind. Americans generally know that since the end of the cold war they face more laboring challenges from abroad. Americans working abroad may not be allowed to ‘dirty work’ because it might make the TNCs more restive for higher, equal wages in the right belief that the Americans are not superior doing equal work. That could lead to a reduction in corporate profit. In the long run such practices may lead to increased popular bias globally against U.S. citizens generally.
I believe that a new era of nationalism of an ecological economic nature is the direction the United States should go. For most of my life I have just done unskilled or semi-skilled manual labor such as house repainting, and I enjoy gardening and nature and would be too happy to transition to a less wasteful national economy and world trading regime in which the transfer of natural resources over international borders is done for reasons of comparative ecological interest rather than for temporal fiduciary advantage of exploitative individuals through trans-national corporations.
Corporations are not mentioned in the U.S. Declaration of Independence nor Constitution, and fundamentally there is no reason why they should be granted a legal fiction status as individuals of an immortal nature. They could at least be limited in size of employees to 3000, and citizens could be limited to investing in ownership of just three legal fiction individual corporations each in order to prevent legal fictions from the ownership of real American opportunities that through sheer financial and economic power exclude Americans from equal opportunity in free enterprise opportunities with other individuals in the United States of America. If corporations are even fiction individuals they should be protected from being bought and sold through stock offerings as if they were slaves anyway. Though it is a silly legal theory, the emancipation proclamation might be applied to the fiction individuals too, and corporations finally given their freedom with nobody owning them anymore.
The Democratic Party led by President Obama is continuing these foreign financial fiascos in Afghanistan and Iraq that will continue as they are so long as American taxpayers allow foreign and concentrated wealth loans to be borrowed I their name and spent abroad. The opportunity costs for diverting investment capital abroad are immense. The fundamental profiteers from these foreign expenditures are corrupt cadres of corporate contractors. The profits foreign and Muslim led corporations profiting from these oil sales and wars are also huge. Already some Muslim subcontractor of the U.S. Government may have slipped in a Pakistani nuclear device for burial in the New Mexico desert—who can say? From Mississippi River trans-ocean shippers to port security and U.S. rail the Muslim wealth has increased its power in the American economy. Just one nuclear device already in the nation and ready for use whenever times are deemed appropriate could vaporize the nation’s (The United States in this case) federal capitol. A more sober nationalism would make not only the poor and unemployed of America happy as they found good jobs and housing, but reduce the non-renewable wastage factor of those that believe that capitalism fundamentally means the advantage of the most corrupt in global economic slight of hand, fraud, corruption perfidy and treachery. Humanity may be able to continue progress with such activities forming a part of the economic facts of life, yet it really isn’t helpful. The United States and the world economy too can progress better with a more advantaged localism in politics with a global awareness of the vital importance of keeping a healthy environment and humanism ashore on the Earth on the threshold of realms of absolute spirit. The human destiny of reconciliation unto realms of absolute spirit may journey beyond an infinity of galaxies or Universes, yet begins with national rationalism and lunar development while we serve as a priesthood of believers in true compassion toward all.
If a corporation treated legally as an individual isn’t a collective then what is? Perhaps joint partnerships should be the largest communal business form to be legally allowed to exist, such that when people partners named A+B+C+D+E spill oil they are sued and go out of business because they have financially responsibility instead of individual collective Big A is sued for spilling oil yet the owners of a have no personal financial responsibility though the stock value may or may not suffer. Well, more of this subject later. The economic future of the United States is under assault from a number of directions including Mexico, the broadcast media and corporatism.
Reading Pratap Chatterjee ‘s 2009 book “Halliburton’s Army” on those tens of thousands of people working abroad in construction projects and providing services to fulfill U.S. Government contracts pertaining to war missions often of a protracted nature, I found new information to fill out some of the details of the more general work I had recently read; the ‘The Three Trillion Dollar War’ co-authored by a winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics (Stiglitz), on the Iraq and Afghanistan financial swamp devastating the U.S. economy. There are many historical evolutionary business elements involved in the private business contracting for each war, too many to review here (I suggest reading each book), yet certain points exist regarding the phenomena of globalism, corporatism and corruption that may be cited or considered briefly.
The Brown and Root Corporation owned for a while by Halliburton has been involved in vast military construction projects since the Vietnam War. They were part of a consortium that built 95% of large U.S. military bases in Vietnam. Halliburton/Brown and Root was the largest contractor in the Iraq-Afghanistan conflicts as well. From L.B.J. to Dick Cheney the Halliburton/KBR relationships were too cozy comprising a conflict of interest and possibly a draft toward war for the profit of private interests. My concern here is simply with the phenomena of corporatism upon U.S. employment and environmental interests rather than in recounting the history of corruption of Halliburton and Brown and Root, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, LOGCAP, the naval equivalent or so forth, Pentagon procurements or awarding of contracts etc.
Much of the employment by Halliburton/KBR contractors abroad goes to TCNs or Third Country Nationals. Even Guantanamo Bay was built by flown in Philippine workers paid 2.50 and hour and then sent back to Manila. U.S. taxpayers pay huge amounts of money to fund private contractor developments in support of military deployments abroad in areas of conflict and instead of Americans or locals getting the jobs, much of the time TCNs are hired because they are the cheapest or safest and produce the most profit for the ostensible U.S. contractor (Halliburton relocated its headquarters to Dubai).
The degree of corruption in granting military support contracts is substantial, and perhaps itself comprises a reason for war if not for assassinating Presidents who would not kick back so well to particular corporations.
These protracted war and nation rebuilding missions abroad kickback product purchases to several American food corporations as well as other suppliers, and the phenomena creates a political draft for continuity of the phenomenon.
Corporatism is something like socialism, yet it is not as fair regarding lower level distribution of wages. Corporatism in foreign war contracting may also supply start up foreign corporations that bribe contract-awarding officials with a percentage of future profits, and these foreign corporations later become influential over U.S. interests.
Large multinational corporations that influence U.S. politicians in a variety of ways conform to a phenomenon of corporatism. The poor and unemployed in the United States are lint for both major political parties as is the environment. Unfortunately simple human corruption and greed in and out of government are the heart of the problem.
With the primary broadcast media owned by powers of concentrated wealth the basic agency of propaganda is unchallenged; U.S. nationalism is degraded along with the environment.
Without a political rectification toward smaller business, ecologically renewable, free enterprise nationalism the future of the United States is that of being exploited by globalist concentrated wealth and power. The Democratic Party has lost interest in really supporting new private sector employment for the poor and those out of work for the longest time first. The Republican Party and right wing talk radio speak out against ‘big government’. When in political power some conservative politicians such as Dick Cheney acted as if they felt entitled to take out their contempt for big government by giving big contracts to corporate firms with special interests that have been friendly to their career interests in the past.
For some reason dumping huge multi-billion dollar contracts to the private sector on the public credit card is considered to be thumbing the nose at ‘big government’. Such conservatives divert investment capital abroad, create vast public debt and reduce social services to the poor in the United States.
There is another down side to this military-industrial-conservative deficit spending for protracted corrupt, inept nation rebuilding that is mostly unknown in the U.S.A.; there is a pervasive two-scale pay system for these contractors working on U.S. military projects abroad. Chatterjee writes on page 144 of ‘Halliburton’s Army’; “In fact salaries” (of TNC’) “were tied to country of origin. Thus a Bangladeshi cleaner would be paid less than a Pakistani, a Georgian truck driver more than a Fijian, and a white South African security guard would make more than an Indian for doing the very same job. The poorer the country of citizenship, the less the workers were paid, which is not unlike the caste system in India or the apartheid system in South Africa before the African National Congress came to power.” End quote.
The practice of paying Third Country Nationals far less than U.S. workers to produce profit is of course at the heart of corporate capitalism of a Spenserian kind. Americans generally know that since the end of the cold war they face more laboring challenges from abroad. Americans working abroad may not be allowed to ‘dirty work’ because it might make the TNCs more restive for higher, equal wages in the right belief that the Americans are not superior doing equal work. That could lead to a reduction in corporate profit. In the long run such practices may lead to increased popular bias globally against U.S. citizens generally.
I believe that a new era of nationalism of an ecological economic nature is the direction the United States should go. For most of my life I have just done unskilled or semi-skilled manual labor such as house repainting, and I enjoy gardening and nature and would be too happy to transition to a less wasteful national economy and world trading regime in which the transfer of natural resources over international borders is done for reasons of comparative ecological interest rather than for temporal fiduciary advantage of exploitative individuals through trans-national corporations.
Corporations are not mentioned in the U.S. Declaration of Independence nor Constitution, and fundamentally there is no reason why they should be granted a legal fiction status as individuals of an immortal nature. They could at least be limited in size of employees to 3000, and citizens could be limited to investing in ownership of just three legal fiction individual corporations each in order to prevent legal fictions from the ownership of real American opportunities that through sheer financial and economic power exclude Americans from equal opportunity in free enterprise opportunities with other individuals in the United States of America. If corporations are even fiction individuals they should be protected from being bought and sold through stock offerings as if they were slaves anyway. Though it is a silly legal theory, the emancipation proclamation might be applied to the fiction individuals too, and corporations finally given their freedom with nobody owning them anymore.
The Democratic Party led by President Obama is continuing these foreign financial fiascos in Afghanistan and Iraq that will continue as they are so long as American taxpayers allow foreign and concentrated wealth loans to be borrowed I their name and spent abroad. The opportunity costs for diverting investment capital abroad are immense. The fundamental profiteers from these foreign expenditures are corrupt cadres of corporate contractors. The profits foreign and Muslim led corporations profiting from these oil sales and wars are also huge. Already some Muslim subcontractor of the U.S. Government may have slipped in a Pakistani nuclear device for burial in the New Mexico desert—who can say? From Mississippi River trans-ocean shippers to port security and U.S. rail the Muslim wealth has increased its power in the American economy. Just one nuclear device already in the nation and ready for use whenever times are deemed appropriate could vaporize the nation’s (The United States in this case) federal capitol. A more sober nationalism would make not only the poor and unemployed of America happy as they found good jobs and housing, but reduce the non-renewable wastage factor of those that believe that capitalism fundamentally means the advantage of the most corrupt in global economic slight of hand, fraud, corruption perfidy and treachery. Humanity may be able to continue progress with such activities forming a part of the economic facts of life, yet it really isn’t helpful. The United States and the world economy too can progress better with a more advantaged localism in politics with a global awareness of the vital importance of keeping a healthy environment and humanism ashore on the Earth on the threshold of realms of absolute spirit. The human destiny of reconciliation unto realms of absolute spirit may journey beyond an infinity of galaxies or Universes, yet begins with national rationalism and lunar development while we serve as a priesthood of believers in true compassion toward all.
7/17/10
President Obama's Core Supporters & The Axis of Oil and War Contractors
Considering the condition of the economy and the Presidential policies in reply, we experience a moribund, conservative stuffed suit approach to the incumbency. Happy enough to be the first black Presidency in U.S. History during difficult, complex time of commercial and public debt challenges, President Obama has few new ideas to offer and simply appeals to his core constituency—what is that?
Homosexuals, supporters of illegal alien sovereignty, democratic women for multi-culturalism meaning anything besides white men, and perhaps 99% of U.S. blacks including Colin Powell. The President has largely continued the commercial debt increase policies of the Bush global agenda while adding an effort to form a cadre of military homosexuals, assault on states efforts to arrest some of the millions of illegal aliens and remand them to federal custody and mildly correct some excesses of the financial fraud industry of Wall Street.
Harvard globalism and the Boston axis of Federal political power plays a strange tune for the nation to dance to like monkey's on strings. Perhaps Boston offers global empowering liberalism and Texas supplies Presidents to enrich K.B.R. and Halliburton. Sometimes these power centers converge.
The post-cold war militancy to gay up the military is part of the natural effort of homosexuals to flank heterosexual males of a perennial nature manifesting from Sodom and Gomorrah to the Nazi Party S.A. and flaring up in the Cult of Bacchus of Republican Rome. If Pat Buchanan was right in the 1992 Presidential election, Bush I was a closet supporter of homosexual politics. The Marlin Fitzwater was rumored to be of such a close relationship that it was scandalous under the table. At least the Florida marlins were created post Bush I and one the World Series in their first season.
Alice Cooper has returned to radio in this year in which the President has structured a plan to force the end of don’t ask, don’t tell upon the U.S. military. Hits from ‘Cooper’s closet’ remind us that the Elton John saturation of radio is out of season except for his blatant homosexual declaration and the British era of homosexual marriages. We believe the Bush I lead in the Gulf war and the steady movement toward global corporatism were about oil wealth and homosexual hard cores. Halliburton, the Corporation former Vice-President Dick Cheney led, received contracts leading to 25 billion dollars from the U.S. Government for food and logistics services. Bush II’s Sect. of Defense continues in the Obama administration, and the profits from protracted, incompetent war continue to flow to former Texas corporations such as K.B.R. and Halliburton. This seems to be an axis of oil and homosexual politics of a Bush-Clinton-Obama axis that is harmful to the interests of the United States.
The Vietnam War and the Iraq-Afghanistan wars may have had righteous premises, yet the implementation and protracted prosecution were perhaps corrupted and unnecessary. The Texas corporations K.B.R. built most of the military bases during the Vietnam conflict and Halliburton was rewarded with huge Iraq war base contracts. With a Texas President in the White House in each instance an obvious conflict of interest arose. It is not impossible that a homosexual-oil industry axis of interest arose to protract these wars in order to profit special interests.
Reaganomics was a one-time emergency spending by Ronald Reagan to lift the United States from a post-Vietnam economic slump and it worked. The trouble with that is that emulation of the Reagan emergency spending policy is nearly fatal for U.S. political economy, and badly considered protracted war to win nothing except oil contracts and military supply contracts is destructive for U.S. economic interests. In neither case was occupation of the country following the war required for further U.S. security against terrorism, and if a reconstruction effort was to be made it required a plan of a rational kind that was short, sharp and effective.
If a military-industrial homosexual continuum is the Obama policy as well as that of Bush I, Bush II and partly that of President Clinton with albeit, a personally antipathetic such symbolism though he too advocated a gayed military policy, the near majority of support of a cross-party dressing kind may be more numerous than that of the former Bush I Republican oil fundamental such as Philips described in ‘American Theocracy’
Homosexuals, supporters of illegal alien sovereignty, democratic women for multi-culturalism meaning anything besides white men, and perhaps 99% of U.S. blacks including Colin Powell. The President has largely continued the commercial debt increase policies of the Bush global agenda while adding an effort to form a cadre of military homosexuals, assault on states efforts to arrest some of the millions of illegal aliens and remand them to federal custody and mildly correct some excesses of the financial fraud industry of Wall Street.
Harvard globalism and the Boston axis of Federal political power plays a strange tune for the nation to dance to like monkey's on strings. Perhaps Boston offers global empowering liberalism and Texas supplies Presidents to enrich K.B.R. and Halliburton. Sometimes these power centers converge.
The post-cold war militancy to gay up the military is part of the natural effort of homosexuals to flank heterosexual males of a perennial nature manifesting from Sodom and Gomorrah to the Nazi Party S.A. and flaring up in the Cult of Bacchus of Republican Rome. If Pat Buchanan was right in the 1992 Presidential election, Bush I was a closet supporter of homosexual politics. The Marlin Fitzwater was rumored to be of such a close relationship that it was scandalous under the table. At least the Florida marlins were created post Bush I and one the World Series in their first season.
Alice Cooper has returned to radio in this year in which the President has structured a plan to force the end of don’t ask, don’t tell upon the U.S. military. Hits from ‘Cooper’s closet’ remind us that the Elton John saturation of radio is out of season except for his blatant homosexual declaration and the British era of homosexual marriages. We believe the Bush I lead in the Gulf war and the steady movement toward global corporatism were about oil wealth and homosexual hard cores. Halliburton, the Corporation former Vice-President Dick Cheney led, received contracts leading to 25 billion dollars from the U.S. Government for food and logistics services. Bush II’s Sect. of Defense continues in the Obama administration, and the profits from protracted, incompetent war continue to flow to former Texas corporations such as K.B.R. and Halliburton. This seems to be an axis of oil and homosexual politics of a Bush-Clinton-Obama axis that is harmful to the interests of the United States.
The Vietnam War and the Iraq-Afghanistan wars may have had righteous premises, yet the implementation and protracted prosecution were perhaps corrupted and unnecessary. The Texas corporations K.B.R. built most of the military bases during the Vietnam conflict and Halliburton was rewarded with huge Iraq war base contracts. With a Texas President in the White House in each instance an obvious conflict of interest arose. It is not impossible that a homosexual-oil industry axis of interest arose to protract these wars in order to profit special interests.
Reaganomics was a one-time emergency spending by Ronald Reagan to lift the United States from a post-Vietnam economic slump and it worked. The trouble with that is that emulation of the Reagan emergency spending policy is nearly fatal for U.S. political economy, and badly considered protracted war to win nothing except oil contracts and military supply contracts is destructive for U.S. economic interests. In neither case was occupation of the country following the war required for further U.S. security against terrorism, and if a reconstruction effort was to be made it required a plan of a rational kind that was short, sharp and effective.
If a military-industrial homosexual continuum is the Obama policy as well as that of Bush I, Bush II and partly that of President Clinton with albeit, a personally antipathetic such symbolism though he too advocated a gayed military policy, the near majority of support of a cross-party dressing kind may be more numerous than that of the former Bush I Republican oil fundamental such as Philips described in ‘American Theocracy’
7/16/10
2010-2012 Election Cycle Ideas Contra-Corporatism U.S.A.
It should be quite reasonable that a democracy can set limits upon the size of organizations such as corporations. A democracy is centered upon individuals rather than collectives including those of business. In order to prevent the hostile takeover of social liberty, that is of individual liberty by clever organizations making a ceiling for organizational employee numbers such as 3000 people would be good enough.
Large organizations reduce invention and product development through neo-oligharchy and networking. Overly large organization socially reduce efficiency and create inertia for design stagnation. If one compares today's cars to those of 1960, it is easy to observe the the most significant difference in the auto systems infrastructure is that the speed limit where higher 50 years ago. In a half century America has not improved or radically upgraded and changed its personal transport infrastructure and of course it could.
For the Harvard M.B.A. gang abstract market control factors become more important than the well being and standard of living of ordinary individual American citizens. Citizen freedom to compete on a level free enterprise field is important to defend. Actual national citizens should not be plundered by globalists with deep pockets.
If the domination of the economic-political sphere was regulated through democratic action, if no individual could invest in more than three corporations, then innovation and competition, efficiency and adaptability would increase. On one branch is individualism, small business and ecological efficiency, and on the other road are the mega-social isms of communism, fascism and corporatism. Even libertarianism lies on the side of 'freedom for large organizations to rule the world as they desire.
The next President needs good ideas, an understanding of the political philosophy of corporatism, a textbook understanding of what actual ecological economics is, and a willingness to lead Americans to a new compassionate nationalism with an oars in the water approach to rectifying maladroit contemporary economics and security. Spending more money (maybe 5 trillion) to defend the nation from box-cutter wielding hijackers than we did on cold war defenses against ballistic nuclear missiles is absurd and the most gross incompetence and corruption. The Executive and Congressional branches of government seem corrupt, stupid or both, by logical inference.
Large organizations reduce invention and product development through neo-oligharchy and networking. Overly large organization socially reduce efficiency and create inertia for design stagnation. If one compares today's cars to those of 1960, it is easy to observe the the most significant difference in the auto systems infrastructure is that the speed limit where higher 50 years ago. In a half century America has not improved or radically upgraded and changed its personal transport infrastructure and of course it could.
For the Harvard M.B.A. gang abstract market control factors become more important than the well being and standard of living of ordinary individual American citizens. Citizen freedom to compete on a level free enterprise field is important to defend. Actual national citizens should not be plundered by globalists with deep pockets.
If the domination of the economic-political sphere was regulated through democratic action, if no individual could invest in more than three corporations, then innovation and competition, efficiency and adaptability would increase. On one branch is individualism, small business and ecological efficiency, and on the other road are the mega-social isms of communism, fascism and corporatism. Even libertarianism lies on the side of 'freedom for large organizations to rule the world as they desire.
The next President needs good ideas, an understanding of the political philosophy of corporatism, a textbook understanding of what actual ecological economics is, and a willingness to lead Americans to a new compassionate nationalism with an oars in the water approach to rectifying maladroit contemporary economics and security. Spending more money (maybe 5 trillion) to defend the nation from box-cutter wielding hijackers than we did on cold war defenses against ballistic nuclear missiles is absurd and the most gross incompetence and corruption. The Executive and Congressional branches of government seem corrupt, stupid or both, by logical inference.
7/9/10
National Priorities Database Useful for Economic Understanding
The Nation has challenging political and economic times because of bad leadership. Perhaps Christians and Muslims in the U.S. military service will need to be given religious exemptions from service if they are compelled to be yoked with sinners as official government policy to welcome with open arms homosexual military personnel. The timing on the gay option for the U.S Military is maladroit in the midst of an economic downturn. Defense Secretary Gates remaining in the spend 14 billion dollars a day post is unfortunate too. He issued a questionaire via email concerning the question of gaying up the historically hetero-normal military...
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2010/07/military_dontask_survey_070710w/
If the nation can escape Federal sin of an economic kind, perhaps we can remove from the two illogical foreign boondoggles directly and consider something else to do. The Iraqis cannot even decide between Alawi and Maliki because they know how to keep a turkey in suspense. Maybe we have done enough for the Iraqis as it is, and should let Exxon-Mobil pay to defend its own oil fields in the future.
http://www.nationalpriorities.org/
In reading the book 'The Three Trillion Dollar War' co-authored by a Nobel prize winner in economics, I encountered the mention of the National Priorities project. If one wonders how the U.S. economy is going wrong for some of us, the database helps.
Remember back 'in the day' when a Bush neo-con supporter of the war in Iraq estimated the U.S. taxpayer cost for reconstruction at 1.7 billion? Now the cost is expected to be more than 3 trillion dollars and for what? Why are we still there any way?
The federal congress simply rolled over on budgeting the war---Democrats wouldn't vote against anything. Defense Secretary Gates has been a Bush protege continuity spender since 2007 and should be fired by the Harvard Alumni stuffed suit administration. Emergency budget bills and a zillion private contractors made this war for non-existing weapons of mass destruction (the publics reasoning if not my own) costlier than Vietnam and nearly as expensive as the second world war.
The administration knew how to get Sect Gates and Admiral Mullins the opportunity to ask the military (they just sent an email inquiry to 400,000 military personnel) if they would object to having gay pride parades and homosexuals sucking up to officers openly in their units--just attach the measure to a Defense spending bill. Evidently the Iraq and Afghanistan spending bills are excellent tools for port allocations to congressional districts.
The private military contractors acting as a private army were paid as much as 400,000 dollars per year. Congress was rolling over and having its belly scratched of course with patriotic speeches. Several years more of idiotic neo-war ahead perhaps.
The National Priorities Project does have some useful information.
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2010/07/military_dontask_survey_070710w/
If the nation can escape Federal sin of an economic kind, perhaps we can remove from the two illogical foreign boondoggles directly and consider something else to do. The Iraqis cannot even decide between Alawi and Maliki because they know how to keep a turkey in suspense. Maybe we have done enough for the Iraqis as it is, and should let Exxon-Mobil pay to defend its own oil fields in the future.
http://www.nationalpriorities.org/
In reading the book 'The Three Trillion Dollar War' co-authored by a Nobel prize winner in economics, I encountered the mention of the National Priorities project. If one wonders how the U.S. economy is going wrong for some of us, the database helps.
Remember back 'in the day' when a Bush neo-con supporter of the war in Iraq estimated the U.S. taxpayer cost for reconstruction at 1.7 billion? Now the cost is expected to be more than 3 trillion dollars and for what? Why are we still there any way?
The federal congress simply rolled over on budgeting the war---Democrats wouldn't vote against anything. Defense Secretary Gates has been a Bush protege continuity spender since 2007 and should be fired by the Harvard Alumni stuffed suit administration. Emergency budget bills and a zillion private contractors made this war for non-existing weapons of mass destruction (the publics reasoning if not my own) costlier than Vietnam and nearly as expensive as the second world war.
The administration knew how to get Sect Gates and Admiral Mullins the opportunity to ask the military (they just sent an email inquiry to 400,000 military personnel) if they would object to having gay pride parades and homosexuals sucking up to officers openly in their units--just attach the measure to a Defense spending bill. Evidently the Iraq and Afghanistan spending bills are excellent tools for port allocations to congressional districts.
The private military contractors acting as a private army were paid as much as 400,000 dollars per year. Congress was rolling over and having its belly scratched of course with patriotic speeches. Several years more of idiotic neo-war ahead perhaps.
The National Priorities Project does have some useful information.
Neanderthals to Be Genetically Resurrected After Aurocks?
Reading of the European plan to genetically resurrect the extinct Euro-bovine giant ox the Auroch that is in progress, other articles in the July 2010 issue of National Geographic stimulated my own ideas for logical resurrections of ancient human species.
How long will it be before someone suggests that Neaderthals be resurrected from teeth or other D.N.A. samples? There are also fossilized bones of ancient human forerunners or alternative branches that are now extinct that could be reconstructed with genetic engineering to create populations suitable for corporate employment or loyal party voters on the conservative side, or liberal if they born without discretion genes .
Neanderthals were stronger humanoids that could form a good front offensive line for pro football teams without the need for steroids. Other potential D.N.A. reconstructions abound for use in attacking Chinese carp leaping their way toward the great lakes. There is potential for science fiction anthropological genetic research business growth in California that could create jobs and food on the table. Workers in that field may wear a plastic glock to assure that they do not themselves become the food on the table.
How long will it be before someone suggests that Neaderthals be resurrected from teeth or other D.N.A. samples? There are also fossilized bones of ancient human forerunners or alternative branches that are now extinct that could be reconstructed with genetic engineering to create populations suitable for corporate employment or loyal party voters on the conservative side, or liberal if they born without discretion genes .
Neanderthals were stronger humanoids that could form a good front offensive line for pro football teams without the need for steroids. Other potential D.N.A. reconstructions abound for use in attacking Chinese carp leaping their way toward the great lakes. There is potential for science fiction anthropological genetic research business growth in California that could create jobs and food on the table. Workers in that field may wear a plastic glock to assure that they do not themselves become the food on the table.
7/7/10
Obama D.O.J. Sues Arizona to Force Illegal Alien 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Policy
President Obama Sides With Globalists Against Arizona/U.S. Sovereignty- wants a ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Policy' for illegal aliens before amnesty and fast track take over the congress..
The Obama D.O.J. has filed suit against the state of Arizona and its law to check the legal status of people its law enforcement officials encounter. Rationally, law enforcement officials should make a general check of individuals it encounters to determine if they have broken local, state or federals. The Obama administration seeks to protect the illegal status of Mexican and other nationals in the United States illegally with a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ principle for illegal aliens encountering Arizona police.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100706/ap_on_re_us/us_immigration_enforcement_lawsuit
Citing the well known legal principle ‘adverse possession is 9/10ths of the law, the Obama Department of Justice has said in a legal opinion that it’s immigration control powers extend beyond the border and entry into the United States all the way to Flagstaff and Sioux Falls. Apparently, wherever illegals are located in the United States they are still immigrating here, and will be so until given the top Executive jobs as remedial anti-discriminatory corrections by the Obama administration.
The Obama legal alumni team from Harvard also extends to the Harvard Medical School in advocacy of the Boston-Harvard global axis of accentuating the positive economic effects for concentrating wealth of illegal immigration. In a rather vague legal theory, state law officials may not support the federal Government’s laws because the several states are not materially part of the United States, which is instead a transcendent, amorphous legal entity of global stature. The Obama pro-illegal alien team offers this advice to Arizona legal officials; “keepa yo fingers off these illegals or we breaka dose fingas”.
It may seem reasonable to state governments that have modeled their own constitutions upon the federal in many cases, to pass state laws reflecting U.S. Federal laws, and to confirm the legal residence status of all individuals encountered by law enforcement. In fact the best way to reinforce U.S. border security is to deputize or otherwise empower all U.S. law enforcement officials to arrest illegal aliens and remand them to federal custody for deportation.
Thus far the Obama administration has been utterly incompetent at enforcing U.S. border security. One might summarize the Obama Executive opinion as "I made it easily to the best opportunities in the U.S.A., and see how this nation has benefited. Why shouldn't illegal aliens become citizens and race to the top like myself? There is no compelling reason why citizens born in the 48 states should have any legal rights to secure their borders or to control immigration much less restrict it to a quarter million foreign immigrants every year. Neither domestic law enforcement persons of interest or citizens should feel they have any right whatsoever to determine through a democratic process who may enter this nation. That is the prerogative of globalists with dual citizenship such as your's truly. Besides, the illegals make good cheap laborers and keep down wages for the native drudges" security.
The Obama D.O.J. has filed suit against the state of Arizona and its law to check the legal status of people its law enforcement officials encounter. Rationally, law enforcement officials should make a general check of individuals it encounters to determine if they have broken local, state or federals. The Obama administration seeks to protect the illegal status of Mexican and other nationals in the United States illegally with a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ principle for illegal aliens encountering Arizona police.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100706/ap_on_re_us/us_immigration_enforcement_lawsuit
Citing the well known legal principle ‘adverse possession is 9/10ths of the law, the Obama Department of Justice has said in a legal opinion that it’s immigration control powers extend beyond the border and entry into the United States all the way to Flagstaff and Sioux Falls. Apparently, wherever illegals are located in the United States they are still immigrating here, and will be so until given the top Executive jobs as remedial anti-discriminatory corrections by the Obama administration.
The Obama legal alumni team from Harvard also extends to the Harvard Medical School in advocacy of the Boston-Harvard global axis of accentuating the positive economic effects for concentrating wealth of illegal immigration. In a rather vague legal theory, state law officials may not support the federal Government’s laws because the several states are not materially part of the United States, which is instead a transcendent, amorphous legal entity of global stature. The Obama pro-illegal alien team offers this advice to Arizona legal officials; “keepa yo fingers off these illegals or we breaka dose fingas”.
It may seem reasonable to state governments that have modeled their own constitutions upon the federal in many cases, to pass state laws reflecting U.S. Federal laws, and to confirm the legal residence status of all individuals encountered by law enforcement. In fact the best way to reinforce U.S. border security is to deputize or otherwise empower all U.S. law enforcement officials to arrest illegal aliens and remand them to federal custody for deportation.
Thus far the Obama administration has been utterly incompetent at enforcing U.S. border security. One might summarize the Obama Executive opinion as "I made it easily to the best opportunities in the U.S.A., and see how this nation has benefited. Why shouldn't illegal aliens become citizens and race to the top like myself? There is no compelling reason why citizens born in the 48 states should have any legal rights to secure their borders or to control immigration much less restrict it to a quarter million foreign immigrants every year. Neither domestic law enforcement persons of interest or citizens should feel they have any right whatsoever to determine through a democratic process who may enter this nation. That is the prerogative of globalists with dual citizenship such as your's truly. Besides, the illegals make good cheap laborers and keep down wages for the native drudges" security.
7/4/10
General Petraeus and Winning ‘Counter-Insurgency’ Strategy for Afghanistan
General Petraeus has said that the Taliban ‘insurgency’ is a ‘test of wills’ for control of the country. Afghanistan is unlike Iraq economically and politically though, the General’s presumptions may not be effective equally well in each nation.
Counter-insurgency strategy for El Salvador could confront an alien, Marxist political paradigm like it might a virus unnaturally introduced into the body. The Marxist leadership of the rebels could be attacked as a hierarchical and insular organization and reduced. The populist Muslim powers of central Asia are not alien though, and are instead popular without an elite cadre of leadership to decimate or co-opt into the powers of the dark side of the force of Spenserian capitalism.
U.S. military efforts have prowess and personnel equivalent to the 800-pound guerrilla of Afghan myth. We make employ predator drones to kill remote trans-border resistance leaders in Pakistan yet fail to develop a high monthly body count of insurgents. Instead, several suicide bombers perish each month along with the elites abroad, and a squad or two attacks sensationally and symbolically some powerful, well defended U.S. garrison in Afghanistan now and then. In comparison to the Afghan war to expel the Red Army of the former Soviet Union, the Afghanistan resistance to establishment of a U.S. puppet state tolerant of homosexuality and global business domination suffers comparatively few casualties. Instead of a test of wills, the Taliban seems to be waging a test of I.Q. and winning; they could have 250 suicide bombers and leaders killed annually for decades perhaps, and not have even one year’s worth of casualties incurred fighting the Red Army in the 1980s.
There are many compelling economic reasons for The Fundamentalist Muslim world to wage a protracted counter-U.S. insurgency in Afghanistan that will support al Qa’eda goals of economically reducing the United States. They may perceive themselves as a righteous power of the poor combating the decadent rich, international nation (the U.S.A.) that sponsors their local dictator, monarch or despot. Because of U.S. budget tactics in responding to al Qa’eda and Taliban tactics, the strategy is viable n drawing the U.S. to spend asymmetrically abroad. The Taliban know that as soon as they stop the suicide bombing and general resistance, the U.S.A. can begin slow withdrawal and financial recover over decades of course, of its own house affairs.
Following a U.S. economic withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan the usual local conflicts and contentions will return. New local and regional balances of power would emerge; the United States should not put itself in the position of being a remembered anathema to whoever emerges to rule from the chaos as it may. There are many tactics to interact with a popular Muslim vox populi in Central Asia and Iraq that are better cognizant of the lack of hierarchical ecclesiastical tradition in the Muslim world. That imam and populist neo-priesthood of believers phenomenality is well suited for a volunteer emanation of resistance movement fighters periodically against a foreign business-military hierarchy searching for ways to control the masses. In selecting its particular methods of reply to the decade old attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the leadership of the United States has continued to financially endanger the security of the United States as well as the physical security and well being of the people of the United States. The book of proverbs indicates that the borrowers end up being ruled by the lenders. General Petraeus and President Obama would do well to read the book of proverbs regularly.
The United States ought to develop a better, more thoughtful method of reply to challenges set by fundamentalist Muslims to U.S. and European security. A powerful minority with superior military weapons systems has dubious prospects of permanently subjugating billions of poor Asians; we should have learned that lesson in Vietnam. Neither must a Muslim nation necessarily be permanently antipathetic to U.S. national interests if the United States were to develop a better policy of ecological economic technical development at home and for support abroad. Because war for the United States today has become a form of economics through other means, a rectification of policy would require a rational economic foundational paradigm as a political philosophy appropriate for sustainable economic development of Afghanistan regardless of who is actually running the government there.
As it is, the United States has created a non-sustainable military enterprise that is of a phenomenal nature that later can be explained away with apologetics and PR for national political purposes. One hates to consider that sort of rhetoric tat will arise the next two or three decades as other, important challenges are set aside. Some sort of military assurance of non-belligerency and benevolent neutrality is required of Afghanistan because it allowed al Qa’eda to train there as well as in South Florida and Arizona, Minnesota and elsewhere before the 9-11-2001 suicide hijackings. The method to accomplish that requires a few more I.Q. points and a hundred thousand fewer soldiers and marines.
Counter-insurgency strategy for El Salvador could confront an alien, Marxist political paradigm like it might a virus unnaturally introduced into the body. The Marxist leadership of the rebels could be attacked as a hierarchical and insular organization and reduced. The populist Muslim powers of central Asia are not alien though, and are instead popular without an elite cadre of leadership to decimate or co-opt into the powers of the dark side of the force of Spenserian capitalism.
U.S. military efforts have prowess and personnel equivalent to the 800-pound guerrilla of Afghan myth. We make employ predator drones to kill remote trans-border resistance leaders in Pakistan yet fail to develop a high monthly body count of insurgents. Instead, several suicide bombers perish each month along with the elites abroad, and a squad or two attacks sensationally and symbolically some powerful, well defended U.S. garrison in Afghanistan now and then. In comparison to the Afghan war to expel the Red Army of the former Soviet Union, the Afghanistan resistance to establishment of a U.S. puppet state tolerant of homosexuality and global business domination suffers comparatively few casualties. Instead of a test of wills, the Taliban seems to be waging a test of I.Q. and winning; they could have 250 suicide bombers and leaders killed annually for decades perhaps, and not have even one year’s worth of casualties incurred fighting the Red Army in the 1980s.
There are many compelling economic reasons for The Fundamentalist Muslim world to wage a protracted counter-U.S. insurgency in Afghanistan that will support al Qa’eda goals of economically reducing the United States. They may perceive themselves as a righteous power of the poor combating the decadent rich, international nation (the U.S.A.) that sponsors their local dictator, monarch or despot. Because of U.S. budget tactics in responding to al Qa’eda and Taliban tactics, the strategy is viable n drawing the U.S. to spend asymmetrically abroad. The Taliban know that as soon as they stop the suicide bombing and general resistance, the U.S.A. can begin slow withdrawal and financial recover over decades of course, of its own house affairs.
Following a U.S. economic withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan the usual local conflicts and contentions will return. New local and regional balances of power would emerge; the United States should not put itself in the position of being a remembered anathema to whoever emerges to rule from the chaos as it may. There are many tactics to interact with a popular Muslim vox populi in Central Asia and Iraq that are better cognizant of the lack of hierarchical ecclesiastical tradition in the Muslim world. That imam and populist neo-priesthood of believers phenomenality is well suited for a volunteer emanation of resistance movement fighters periodically against a foreign business-military hierarchy searching for ways to control the masses. In selecting its particular methods of reply to the decade old attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the leadership of the United States has continued to financially endanger the security of the United States as well as the physical security and well being of the people of the United States. The book of proverbs indicates that the borrowers end up being ruled by the lenders. General Petraeus and President Obama would do well to read the book of proverbs regularly.
The United States ought to develop a better, more thoughtful method of reply to challenges set by fundamentalist Muslims to U.S. and European security. A powerful minority with superior military weapons systems has dubious prospects of permanently subjugating billions of poor Asians; we should have learned that lesson in Vietnam. Neither must a Muslim nation necessarily be permanently antipathetic to U.S. national interests if the United States were to develop a better policy of ecological economic technical development at home and for support abroad. Because war for the United States today has become a form of economics through other means, a rectification of policy would require a rational economic foundational paradigm as a political philosophy appropriate for sustainable economic development of Afghanistan regardless of who is actually running the government there.
As it is, the United States has created a non-sustainable military enterprise that is of a phenomenal nature that later can be explained away with apologetics and PR for national political purposes. One hates to consider that sort of rhetoric tat will arise the next two or three decades as other, important challenges are set aside. Some sort of military assurance of non-belligerency and benevolent neutrality is required of Afghanistan because it allowed al Qa’eda to train there as well as in South Florida and Arizona, Minnesota and elsewhere before the 9-11-2001 suicide hijackings. The method to accomplish that requires a few more I.Q. points and a hundred thousand fewer soldiers and marines.
Selections from the Book of Proverbs and the Revelation for the 4th of July
Here are a several verses from the books of Proverbs and from the Revelation I thought I would share on the 4th of July.
Proverbs (King James Version)
“8:22-36 22The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old.
23I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was.
24When there were no depths, I was brought forth; when there were no fountains abounding with water.
25Before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth:
26While as yet he had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world.
27When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth:
28When he established the clouds above: when he strengthened the fountains of the deep:
29When he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of the earth:
30Then I was by him, as one brought up with him: and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him;
31Rejoicing in the habitable part of his earth; and my delights were with the sons of men.
32Now therefore hearken unto me, O ye children: for blessed are they that keep my ways.
33Hear instruction, and be wise, and refuse it not.
34Blessed is the man that heareth me, watching daily at my gates, waiting at the posts of my doors.
35For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favour of the LORD.
36But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death
10:15 The rich man's wealth is his strong city: the destruction of the poor is their poverty.
11:28 28He that trusteth in his riches shall fall; but the righteous shall flourish as a branch.
13:14 14The law of the wise is a fountain of life, to depart from the snares of death
13:20 20He that walketh with wise men shall be wise: but a companion of fools shall be destroyed.
14:12 12There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.
14:25 25A true witness delivereth souls: but a deceitful witness speaketh lies.
15:7 7The lips of the wise disperse knowledge: but the heart of the foolish doeth not so.
15:17 17Better is a dinner of herbs where love is, than a stalled ox and hatred therewith
15:21 21Folly is joy to him that is destitute of wisdom: but a man of understanding walketh uprightly.
16:22-23 22Understanding is a wellspring of life unto him that hath it: but the instruction of fools is folly. 23The heart of the wise teacheth his mouth, and addeth learning to his lips.
19:1 1Better is the poor that walketh in his integrity, than he that is perverse in his lips, and is a fool.
22:7 7The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.
18:11 11The rich man's wealth is his strong city, and as an high wall in his own conceit.
23:1-7 1When thou sittest to eat with a ruler, consider diligently what is before thee:
2And put a knife to thy throat, if thou be a man given to appetite.
3Be not desirous of his dainties: for they are deceitful meat.
4Labour not to be rich: cease from thine own wisdom.
5Wilt thou set thine eyes upon that which is not? for riches certainly make themselves wings; they fly away as an eagle toward heaven.
6Eat thou not the bread of him that hath an evil eye, neither desire thou his dainty meats:
7For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he: Eat and drink, saith he to thee; but his heart is not with thee
23:23 23Buy the truth, and sell it not; also wisdom, and instruction, and understanding.
24:1-2 1Be not thou envious against evil men, neither desire to be with them.
2For their heart studieth destruction, and their lips talk of mischief.
24:30-34 30I went by the field of the slothful, and by the vineyard of the man void of understanding;
31And, lo, it was all grown over with thorns, and nettles had covered the face thereof, and the stone wall thereof was broken down.
32Then I saw, and considered it well: I looked upon it, and received instruction.
33Yet a little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to sleep:
34So shall thy poverty come as one that travelleth; and thy want as an armed man.
25:4 4Take away the dross from the silver, and there shall come forth a vessel for the finer.
28:11 11The rich man is wise in his own conceit; but the poor that hath understanding searcheth him out.
28:6 6Better is the poor that walketh in his uprightness, than he that is perverse in his ways, though he be rich.
29:2 2When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.”
Revelation 10:1-4 (King James Version)
“ 1And I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his head, and his face was as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire:
2And he had in his hand a little book open: and he set his right foot upon the sea, and his left foot on the earth,
3And cried with a loud voice, as when a lion roareth: and when he had cried, seven thunders uttered their voices.
4And when the seven thunders had uttered their voices, I was about to write: and I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Seal up those things which the seven thunders uttered, and write them not.”
Proverbs (King James Version)
“8:22-36 22The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old.
23I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was.
24When there were no depths, I was brought forth; when there were no fountains abounding with water.
25Before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth:
26While as yet he had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world.
27When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth:
28When he established the clouds above: when he strengthened the fountains of the deep:
29When he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of the earth:
30Then I was by him, as one brought up with him: and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him;
31Rejoicing in the habitable part of his earth; and my delights were with the sons of men.
32Now therefore hearken unto me, O ye children: for blessed are they that keep my ways.
33Hear instruction, and be wise, and refuse it not.
34Blessed is the man that heareth me, watching daily at my gates, waiting at the posts of my doors.
35For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favour of the LORD.
36But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death
10:15 The rich man's wealth is his strong city: the destruction of the poor is their poverty.
11:28 28He that trusteth in his riches shall fall; but the righteous shall flourish as a branch.
13:14 14The law of the wise is a fountain of life, to depart from the snares of death
13:20 20He that walketh with wise men shall be wise: but a companion of fools shall be destroyed.
14:12 12There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.
14:25 25A true witness delivereth souls: but a deceitful witness speaketh lies.
15:7 7The lips of the wise disperse knowledge: but the heart of the foolish doeth not so.
15:17 17Better is a dinner of herbs where love is, than a stalled ox and hatred therewith
15:21 21Folly is joy to him that is destitute of wisdom: but a man of understanding walketh uprightly.
16:22-23 22Understanding is a wellspring of life unto him that hath it: but the instruction of fools is folly. 23The heart of the wise teacheth his mouth, and addeth learning to his lips.
19:1 1Better is the poor that walketh in his integrity, than he that is perverse in his lips, and is a fool.
22:7 7The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.
18:11 11The rich man's wealth is his strong city, and as an high wall in his own conceit.
23:1-7 1When thou sittest to eat with a ruler, consider diligently what is before thee:
2And put a knife to thy throat, if thou be a man given to appetite.
3Be not desirous of his dainties: for they are deceitful meat.
4Labour not to be rich: cease from thine own wisdom.
5Wilt thou set thine eyes upon that which is not? for riches certainly make themselves wings; they fly away as an eagle toward heaven.
6Eat thou not the bread of him that hath an evil eye, neither desire thou his dainty meats:
7For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he: Eat and drink, saith he to thee; but his heart is not with thee
23:23 23Buy the truth, and sell it not; also wisdom, and instruction, and understanding.
24:1-2 1Be not thou envious against evil men, neither desire to be with them.
2For their heart studieth destruction, and their lips talk of mischief.
24:30-34 30I went by the field of the slothful, and by the vineyard of the man void of understanding;
31And, lo, it was all grown over with thorns, and nettles had covered the face thereof, and the stone wall thereof was broken down.
32Then I saw, and considered it well: I looked upon it, and received instruction.
33Yet a little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to sleep:
34So shall thy poverty come as one that travelleth; and thy want as an armed man.
25:4 4Take away the dross from the silver, and there shall come forth a vessel for the finer.
28:11 11The rich man is wise in his own conceit; but the poor that hath understanding searcheth him out.
28:6 6Better is the poor that walketh in his uprightness, than he that is perverse in his ways, though he be rich.
29:2 2When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.”
Revelation 10:1-4 (King James Version)
“ 1And I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his head, and his face was as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire:
2And he had in his hand a little book open: and he set his right foot upon the sea, and his left foot on the earth,
3And cried with a loud voice, as when a lion roareth: and when he had cried, seven thunders uttered their voices.
4And when the seven thunders had uttered their voices, I was about to write: and I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Seal up those things which the seven thunders uttered, and write them not.”
7/3/10
President Obama to Shore-Up Coast Guard for Afghanistan? (Humor rating: L (light))
As a multi-service Department of Defense investment the ‘war’ of nation building in Afghanistan to create a ‘democratic’ government like that of the Shah of Iran is dedicated to the capitalist ideal of spending money and bullets to promote civic virtue.
The foreign policy adventure is presently under the supervision of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullins-an advocate for a gay friendly military affording servicemen a political incorrect opportunity for happy dating of Afghanistan’s Taliban warriors, blowing kisses and so forth. Admiral Mullins has the military and political skill set needed to bring the Democratic Party vision of a brave new world to the high Asian barbarians. Afghanistan needs a Coast Guard like the U.S. Government needs an Admiral to coordinate military security for the Karzai Government. Admiral Mullins knows all about running ships in excellent patterns at sea.
With job losses in the United States putting millions out of work the synthetic government-building project in Afghanistan is another federal jobs stimulus program for-itself. Admiral Mullins is the right guy to create a Coast Guard for Afghanistan following along with the logic of the endeavor.
How many Afghanis have been matriculated into the Naval Academy one might ask, for that could be the reason the Taliban homicide-suicide bombers have been destroying fossil fuel powered vehicles without right proper interdiction instead of being arrested by an Afghan Department of Homeland Security.
Making an economically efficient government in Afghanistan following the role model of the U.S. Government is challenging for the administration; Afghanistan has few resources to waste as extravagantly as does the United States, and hasn’t got as high of a credit rating to borrow money for expensive machines and other pollution producing devices to stimulate economic development.
Republican Party Chairman Steele rightly called this ‘Obama’s war. President Obama could really make it so by directing a supplemental appropriations bill that would create an Afghanistan Coast Guard and simulated ocean shoreline. Coast Guardsman from the U.S. East Coast could be relocated to Afghanistan to man-woman the new potential fleet in shoreline bunkers until the ships arrive, and replaced offshore with former Louisiana oil skimming civilians once their oil clean-up job details are completed.
The cost for an Afghanistan Coast Guard fleet of fourteen efficient aluminum gas turbine powered dreadnaught turbo interceptor-destroyers should be just $199 billion dollars borrowed from China at 10% interest to taxpayers—a steal at the price. One can never be patriotic enough about national defense and keeping Afghanistan free of the Taliban so Americans can be free to be unemployed and afford their own tents in reasonable security.
The foreign policy adventure is presently under the supervision of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullins-an advocate for a gay friendly military affording servicemen a political incorrect opportunity for happy dating of Afghanistan’s Taliban warriors, blowing kisses and so forth. Admiral Mullins has the military and political skill set needed to bring the Democratic Party vision of a brave new world to the high Asian barbarians. Afghanistan needs a Coast Guard like the U.S. Government needs an Admiral to coordinate military security for the Karzai Government. Admiral Mullins knows all about running ships in excellent patterns at sea.
With job losses in the United States putting millions out of work the synthetic government-building project in Afghanistan is another federal jobs stimulus program for-itself. Admiral Mullins is the right guy to create a Coast Guard for Afghanistan following along with the logic of the endeavor.
How many Afghanis have been matriculated into the Naval Academy one might ask, for that could be the reason the Taliban homicide-suicide bombers have been destroying fossil fuel powered vehicles without right proper interdiction instead of being arrested by an Afghan Department of Homeland Security.
Making an economically efficient government in Afghanistan following the role model of the U.S. Government is challenging for the administration; Afghanistan has few resources to waste as extravagantly as does the United States, and hasn’t got as high of a credit rating to borrow money for expensive machines and other pollution producing devices to stimulate economic development.
Republican Party Chairman Steele rightly called this ‘Obama’s war. President Obama could really make it so by directing a supplemental appropriations bill that would create an Afghanistan Coast Guard and simulated ocean shoreline. Coast Guardsman from the U.S. East Coast could be relocated to Afghanistan to man-woman the new potential fleet in shoreline bunkers until the ships arrive, and replaced offshore with former Louisiana oil skimming civilians once their oil clean-up job details are completed.
The cost for an Afghanistan Coast Guard fleet of fourteen efficient aluminum gas turbine powered dreadnaught turbo interceptor-destroyers should be just $199 billion dollars borrowed from China at 10% interest to taxpayers—a steal at the price. One can never be patriotic enough about national defense and keeping Afghanistan free of the Taliban so Americans can be free to be unemployed and afford their own tents in reasonable security.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Here and there pointillist continua build rowing the skiff clambering over the road staying in shadows until spring insouciant compact snow ...
-
Alaskan officials have cut down or banned King Salmon fishing in much of Alaska because so few of the large fish are returning. The Ancho...
-
Why do F-22 pilots lose consciousness and let their planes crash and burn? The air superiority fighters are designed to survive oppositio...
