Unemployment and Obamacare; the unemployment situation is
still very bad. More than 40% of the unemployed are long-term
unemployed.
The Obama D.O.L. revised jobs created upward 86,000
jobs for July and August in a revision of their first reports. They
had to get that unemployment rate below 8%. I suspected they would. Its a
lawyer's administration and they may think its like a legal argument
for publicity purposes they can win re-election with.
For the
long term unemployed and for those without good health care who are
injured or sick and have lost their retirement property to pay for
medical and can't find work the Obamacare paper-improvements are of
little consolation. One wants a healthy economy and not one moribund,
sick and trying to stagger over the election day finish line before
collapsing into recession.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57527161/job-numbers-up-but-recession-unemployment-persists
Forty-seven
% is a number many can remember yet there are other employment and
taxed statistics. Ones the unemployed are concerned about differ from
those of Mandarin Obamanites.
According to the Depart. of Labor
employment summaries released today the participation of non-institution
Americans in the work force is just 63.9%-in other words 47% of
non-institutionalized aren't employed and hence aren't paying taxes on
work-that is a remarkable number.
Sure some of those people don't
need to work, some can't find a job or aren't welcome to work facing
discrimination against age or geographic origin or unpopularity with NPR
(maybe), plainly though the Obama administration hasn't prioritized
getting jobs for the poor and has failed to take adequate measures to
assure that the poorest and out of work longest go to the front of the
hiring line through tax incentives.
Good government supports
realistic opportunity for all people to work at least part-time so
citizens can have cash earnings instead of food stamps. Obama programs
tend to work against free enterprise for the poor . Obamacare functions
as a middle class bureaucratic dream scenario foisted on the poor to
burden them with impossible to satisfy bureaucratic work on-line. There
are many working age Americans that cannot use a computer and they will
have to buy one, buy Internet service or libraries will need to have
free computer numbers increase a lot as well as free instructors to
train the semi-literate migrant farm workers how to use them as they go
from state to state and need an exchange for insurance that isn't really
located in Nigeria or Eastern Russia.
I cannot imagine what
nightmarish difficulties a traveling, poor, journeyman painter or
laborer will experience with Obamacare moving from state to state
frequently in pursuit of work on a bicycle or motorbike. The lazy that
will not travel are rewarded more than those that struggle to find work
anywhere it is hiding in America. Bureaucrats expect citizens to be
happy locals that move only with a Mayflower Truck and negotiations with
the state department of the state they are relocating to.
Each state where he was will deny that he has a 'domicile' there because he sleeps under the stars without a pillow.
A
good politician would support free walk-in public medical care for the
poor in expanded VA hospitals and let the middle class pay for their own
insurance from their sufficient prosperity.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
"In 2012,
employment growth has averaged 146,000 per month, compared with an average
monthly gain of 153,000 in 2011."
"Employment in financial activities edged up in September (+13,000), reflecting
modest job growth in credit intermediation (+6,000) and real estate (+7,000).
Manufacturing employment edged down in September (-16,000)"
The majority of people favor repeal of Obamacare...
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law
In
engineering, technology, economics and social sciences constructing
models of systems structures is generally a better way to go than to
simply build a system willy nilly. In aircraft and ship design one make
construct a model to fulfill the best way of achieving particular goals.
Obviously my mention of a health care system for the poor that would
expand the existing V.A. system and treat all poor citizens for free is a
model of a structure that would create simultaneously better health
care for veterans, the poor and create a larger emergency preparedness
infrastructure for national emergency. I believe it would be the most
cost effective as well.
I am not the best social scientist. I got
a score of 99% on the CLEP General Social Sciences and History Exam and
have followed U.S. politics about 50 years so my perspective on how the
U.S.A. might develop a functional, practical medical infrastructure to
treat the poor and veterans while keeping taxpayer costs as low as
possible while delivering effective treatment is made less expertise
than some. Even so the Obamcare system seems particularly onerous and
patched together with vast potential cost overruns. In fact its purpose
may really be to create jobs and profits for Americans that don't
manufacture anything. In the September DOL report financial sector jobs
went up while manufacturing dropped by more than 10,000. The same old
trends are returning.
The Obamacare program is something like
Richard M. Nixon's medical program as you may know. It followed
Romneycare in Massachusetts (that state wanted it) and I would think
that since Mitt's father was a 68 presidential candidate as well as
Nixon that the source of Obamacare actually is Richard Nixon.
Nixon
was a forward thinking guy. He didn't envision an America transformed
by networking and financial schemes with computers and fiber optics,
quantitative trading in Dark Pools and so forth-I think the plain
practical approach of physical hospitals and clinics for the poor and
veterans would be far cheaper than the convoluted vast potential for
corruption of Obamacare.