Classical Economic Liberals and Theocrats Hand Cruz Wisconsin

Globalists like Cruz' classical economic liberalism. Goldman Sachs financed his Senate recognizing him as a cadre of classic capitalist liberalism. He also got support from Wisconsin's Theocratic party sub-unit of the Republican Party. The theocrats should form their own party and take 15% of the vote each Presidential election. Republicans could recover and not have the internal conflict each Presidential cycle.

Theocrats aren't aware that Reagan was a populist before being conservative. Reagan's populism gave him victories rather than his conservatism. Trump is a populist that theocrats and classical liberals disdain. Yet the people like him. If Republicans want to seem to support democracy the leadership should support Trump.

Barry Goldwater was soundly trounced because he wasn't a populist. G.W. Bush was elected only riding Reagan's coat tails. If Trump's populism is subverted the Republican prospects will dwindle.

Classical economic liberalism of capitalism regards all people as consumers, producers and market participants. Goldman Sachs might not finance a national conservative, yet Cruz was just fine for them.

There isn't anything fundamentally wrong with classical economic liberalism except that in a pure form for it regards the globe as one market and political boundaries as hindrances. That isn't good for nation conservators and properties of national political rights such as those of the U.S. Constitution at all.

The globalist managers of U.S. politics are happy with either the Clintons or Cruz as each are simply different product packaging of the same classical economic liberalism. That goes for Cruz' Canadian birth, Hispanic heritage and religious moral conservative characteristics selected to dupe American conservatives into supporting actual economic liberalism that has very different moral values that are scientifically, Skinerianish and detached from anything except abstract velocity of money concerns.

Trump Should Build a Border Desalinating Canal Instead of Wall

Border security can be accomplished with collateral ecological benefits killing two problems with one financial package. Trump's people need to start promoting a Mexican border fresh water condensing covered desalinating canal to bring new water supply to the parched southwest. The Rio Grande is a fairly pathetic looking creek even at Albuquerque and one doesn't need to mention how dry Arizona is along the border. Trump should find it easy to sell the people of the American southwest on construction of a new water making and security project.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Basin_Project

I grew up in the Columbia basin of Eastern Washington where the Grand Coulee dam brought irrigation water to create lush agriculture to the desert of the Quincy Valley via the Federal Columbia basin Project. Naturally I regard deserts as something of a challenge for irrigation and look to new methods for producing fresh water. The Pacific ocean and Sea of Cortez have a higher sea level than the Gulf of Mexico on the Texas side. Constructing a trans-border boundary canal zone to let salt water piped and partly siphoned up with a little solar power pump help evaporate and condense under a clear cover should let a very large volume of water (and salt) be produced. The canal should go all the way across the border. Nations that are independent and self-determinative need secure borders to avoid bimbofication to larger global powers.

The United State used to accomplish large projects and it still could if globalist greed did not prevail. The environmental temperature is increasing with global warming and a large southwest green water making, solar power collecting, electric patrol vehicle zone would be a rational response to help mitigate global warming desertification. Challenge and response are Toynbean concepts for societies in history as well as psychologists'. For a society to fail to adapt to contemporary challenges could make chaos and increasing desertification the the default evolution.

Ukraine's President Tied to Panamanian Tax Evading Speciality Firm

One hope's President Poroshenko hasn't been laundering Western political funds through his offshore accounts.  Yet with globalism being free to buy U.S. real estate and perhaps politicians too through Super PACs or hidden offshore specialty law firms and banks it is difficult to trust candidates financed by Goldman Sachs even if they were born in Canada or have support from Mexican anti-Trump protesters hanging Mexican flags from Trump Tower in Vancouver.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/watergate-real-estate-tangled-web-panama-papers-n550416

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-wp-blm-offshore-ukraine-3ca2b104-fa98-11e5-813a-90ab563f0dde-20160404-story.html

https://www.kyivpost.com/article/content/ukraine-politics/poroshenko-defers-to-lawyers-consultants-to-explain-his-offshore-firm-411324.html

Politics increasing are made for the benefit of foreign governments and investors rather than the majority of Americans. The Clinton foundation and the Hillary it-takes-a-village weltanshauung along with so many Wall Street supporters make the future of the nation look dim if Trump or Sanders aren't nominated.

'Consin Votes Tuesday- Chance to End nation's Losing Streak

'Consin votes tomorrow. many evangelicals vote for those pandering to wrong eschatological beliefs best, and too many Christians are misled to vote for those that cannot win thus throwing an election to the far left. Since 1988 Americans have elected losers for the nation and if Trump isn't elected that probably won't change. Politics is about secular pragmatism, while pursuing symbolism may just spoil an election and put the worst possible in office as usual. Theologians are great at theology, yet does that make them competent politically? Should Christians pursuing ideals help realpolitik put the worst secularists in office unintentionally yet avoidably? The U.S.A. will be a nation of sinners regardless of how the elect vote.

Scientists have confirmed Donald trump's observation that "the American dream is dead".

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/genes-and-the-american-dream/

Envisioning the Trump Team in the White House

Trump probably should reward Chris Christie with Sect. of Transportation and Ben Carson with the VP post while selecting Alaskan former Federal Judge, Army officer, bronze star winner, Yale  and University of Alaska economics graduate Joe Miller for SecDef; beyond those easy choices he should find someone like Amory Lovins for Sect. of the Interior to perform a kind of ecological reformation of the way the U.S.A. treats the environment like an anti-James Watt. Trump could deal with that-radical ecological economic change.

The voters of the U.S.A. haven]t elected a winner that did any good for the U.S.A. since 1984. That's a long losing streak it ought to reverse sometime in the nation isn't just sold out to globalists as it present is in the process of.

Trump vs. Foreign Owned U.S. Real Estate

Donald Trump as a real estate magnate pragmatically understands what has happened to the U.S. real estate market since the first Clinton royal global era of redistributing the U.S.A. to globalists.

Evolution theory in national development will not assure progress. Directed evolution is required to replace and compensate for the loss of natural boundary security do to transportation and communication changes. While the corrupt and thoughtless believe life is a phenomenal bowl of cherries and that they and the nation too are doomed to success, they are wrong. Intelligence is required to direct a nation toward a good course for development and progress. Not only was America a nation of immigrants, it was a nation with borders secure from foreign invasion and the corrupting influence of direct foreign ownership and influence upon its political system.

https://www.irs.gov/Individuals/International-Taxpayers/Foreign-Persons-Receiving-Rental-Income-from-U.S.-Real-Property

Sixteen percent of Maine farmland is foreign owned.  http://modernfarmer.com/2013/09/owns-us-agricultural-land/
http://www.cfr.org/united-states/quarterly-update-foreign-ownership-us-assets/p25685

Thirty-five percent of Americans are on welfare or means tested federal programs. Fifty percent receive government benefits or payments. About 150 million Americans share just 1% of the nation's annual income. With the increasing foreign owned real estate and business sectors, along with illegal migrant labor, the majority of Americans will become poor and politically powerless; exploited by the media and plutonomy to hush up and dumb down.

http://economyincrisis.org/content/percentage-of-americans-now-on-welfare-paints-a-disturbing-picture-of-the-state-of-our-economy

President Obama Worried About Clinton's Nukes for Food History?

During the first Clinton administration Bill cut a deal with Dictator Kim to stop making nuclear weapons materials in exchange for food. So the food was provided and it turned out that North Korea kept building nukular weapons in its hidden reactor. That is proof that even if a Secretary of State dances before the Dictator it is no proof of the Dictator's love for the Clinton's rep.

So President Obama has expressed concern about nukular terrorism since the ISIS Euro crew was casing a nuclear facility. Holland provided Pakistan with plans on how to build nukular bombs so the security is somewhat lax now and then. It has improved so far as Interpol checking the Euro Craig's list for ads soliciting nuclear materials at least. However President Obama needn't worry too much, since North Korea eventually may be a source for nuclear materials to terrorists in exchange for oil or whatever.

http://www.voanews.com/content/obama-hails-summit-accord-but-says-nuclear-terrorism-still-a-risk/3266075.html

Another round of Clintons in the White House would not only stimulate student intern job security, it might also bring fine speeches and accelerated nuclear weapons development to North Korea, and that in turn could bring better food to more bureaucrats in North Korea. I would bet the people of the Rhodes scholarship committee never foresaw that their choice of Bill would bring decades of benefits to the U.K.

http://www.economist.com/news/international/21696178-muted-last-hurrah-nobel-peace-prizewinning-president-barack-obamas-final

More nations have developed scientific infrastructure enabling the proliferation of nuke weapons know-how and rocket delivery systems. Drone aircraft will increase and multiply nuke package vectors for budget-minded nihilists one would think down the airfield ahead.

Iranian and Saudi nuclear technology along with that of Pakistan present a Muslim punch potential to join that of left over and hidden Soviet fissile materials caches in Muslim spin off states from the U.S.S.R. and even Ukraine. One cannot trust that everyone really returned every last bomb when they have a lot of potential value-and is Chernyobyl really secure or can suicide miners excavate some pounds of uranium?

Wouldn't Trump Rattle Cages Better in the Next Recession?

Select analysts have noted the weakness of the Obama recovery that presently has just 1.5% annual growth. Some of course believe a no-growth economy quantitatively that just grows qualitatively and transitions to ecological economic refoundations is better than traditional material economic growth yet that isn't what the Obama administration was about-it simply had a 'puny' rate of recovery that was deficit and fiction Fed Reserve printing press cash financed.

The workforce nationally hasn't grown or recovered from the vast layoffs and job losses of 2008 and isn't likely to. The public debt soon will hit 20 trillion dollars with the budget deficit running about a half-trillion dollars. The world's poor still look to surge into the United States to take any available jobs and reduce wages for ordinary Americans that already are stagnant. Media globalists mock 'white rage' about the way things are as if the problem is unique as a racial phenomenon. it is worth recollecting though that hate crimes don't really exist as class issues-they really are economic crimes. People and classes that adversely impact one's class economic security tend to be hated.

Regard the slavery era of the south. Negroes weren't hated; they were considered commodities and many were satisfied with that economic circumstance while blacks probably hated many white people for economically oppressing them. The Nat Turner rebellion was bloody awful to the victims. It wasn't the first edition of the Ike and Tina Turner band.

The federal government reasonably should have made class economic crimes the subject to federal interdiction category. That would have been of value to far more people and largely would have covered the same victims.

The next recession may become a depression turning the globe into a challenging place with many suffering in economic and environmental turmoil. One analyst at Forbes (I will post a link) wrote an article noting that the Obama recovery is the second longest running in U.S. history. As weak as it is the prospect for a new recession is really a concerning.

When it does happen it will need an executive used to rattling cages and innovating to get the nation out of it. The usual methods of pump priming with deficit financed growth probably won't be available since that hasn't stopped since the Reagan era and in fact the dollar may even collapse.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnmauldin/2016/04/01/these-2-charts-show-the-next-recession-will-blow-out-the-us-budget/#3025fa9f43aa

The Trump Challenge; Overcome 'Consin Primary

Fischer once said; 'sack, sack and mate' in describing how to win against a particular chess defense; the Sicilian dragon.  Donald Trump has the challenge of finding a way to finish off the Ted Cruz campaign in the 'consin primary election Tuesday.

Much of Ted Cruz's support arises from two sources; fossil fuel job fans and pre-tribulationist evangelicals that believe a rapture is somewhere out there and if the world goes to hell in the meantime well so what-its all pre-destined. There is an industry in churches and politics of exploiting those fears especially of economically troubled people for votes and/pr tithes-even sacrificial tithes.

Full disclosure; I am a Christian post-tribulationist who believes that the book of the Revelation preponderantly described a first century period of tribulation for the Jews primarily and of Jerusalem's destruction. Following that a lengthy build up of Christianity through evangelism until it reached a majority of the population would develop lasting a minimum of a thousand years; and that number is perhaps just a non-rigid designator of a long, long time (2000 years so far).

Donald Trump needs to reach Wisconsin republicans, though the con-sinners are presently tilting toward support for Cruz it is possible that reason will prevail and they will vote not for a cultist oil cliché Canadian citizen from Texas(though con-sinners have a lot of French-Canadian influence and are known to be cheesy).

Trump is all about economics and national security. Cruz is about globalism, Bush-Chaney-Exxon-Halliburton-Tar Sands crude oil interests and bad eschatology's cultishness. Trump is outspoken, while Cruz seems like Zillary, a duplicitous career politician generically saying what such think voters want to hear and doing what they want under-the-table in dark pools that replaced those smoked filled rooms of yore.

Of course these days devilcrats and Judicial accomplices force politics on the people from the top-down and then the media cooks polls for supporting the foisted politics as supported by a majority. One must believe Americans don't take issues seriously and change them as willingly as a sailor changes tack or that the3media is dissimulative. Politicians increasingly don't take voters seriously-especially with Republicratic realpolitik being a support service for corporatism. Cruz probably hasn't a fraction of Zillary Clinton's skills at dissimulating- that are comparable only to Bill's.

Trump's recent Chris Matthews interview was in a Democrat Party media bias outlet and therefor dangerous, yet Trump thrives in a controversial environment. Quick executive actions aren't common any more though. The Presidency is more of a glacial moderating speed than a fast instant rule by decree whim sort of thing. Even Obama's greasing the skids of homosexual marriage required years to develop. If a President has a speech slip up, that indicates that he hasn't a teleprompter more than anything else.

It is good that Trump did not say that adult abortion services should be legalized everywhere to support zero-population growth. Even conservatives would find the one-shot Luger bullet to the brain for those adults that should have been aborted yet slipped through too Beria-ish, although Democrats enthusiastic about abortions might like it.

Trump was right though in having the opinion that if something is illegal there ought to be some sort of objective legal penalty attached to it. Otherwise laws would be rather meaningless, and then, adult post-birth abortion services provided free to political opposition might become common on a large scale.

Thoughts on Karjakan Whumpin Caruana

Russian chess star Sergey Karjakin took the candidate's Tournament victory after check mating Fabiano Caruana in the final round. Caruana -an American sometimes Italian, needed the win to play for the world championship in November. He seemed to lack the aggression needed to whump Karjakin rather than vice versa.

At the super-GM plus 2700 rating of contemporary chess draws are usual the majority of the time. Style and position tend to be first rather than clever classical Mikhail Tal-like check mates. Karjakin in an earlier match against Veselin Topolov had a similar classical-looking sacrifice and straightforward checkmate as he had against Caruana. Those who forget the lessons of the past are doomed to repeat them in chess, politics, economics and habitat loss.

Caruana had unlearned aggressive, sacking chess so far as to fail to methodically advance his A pawn along with the B and sack them in order to enfilade Karjakin's king position that should have been a naked singularity. Shorn of defenders a Caruana check mate rather than vice versa was possible. Caruana instead allowed too many moves to pass without removing the king's proximal defenders and letting Karjakin have time and tempo sufficient to break through Caruana's own center pawns plodding forward. One wonders when Tal advanced his pawns in the center in order to lead a checkmating attack? Tal wasn't Vladimir Kramnik.

A fair and balanced approach does work for positional and clever victories for Super GMs of course. Yet the direct crash and thrash checkmate wrecking a king's defenders is also useful to remember. Karjakin seemed to remember the lesson a little better than Caruana.

In two years Caruana will  be older and wiser in chess and perhaps better prepared to win the Candidate's tournament against some very skilled chess players including perhaps the rising Chinese chess star Wei Yi who just narrowly missed qualifying at the 2015 World Cup.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GDViK2w2wY the Karjakin-Caruana struggle

Robert Fischer said; 'sack, sack and mate' (along the A file) in describing how to win against a particular chess defense; the Sicilian dragon. Robert James Fischer vs Fridrik Olafsson (1961). Caruana also needed to find a way to obliterate the king's defenses on the a,b,c files.

http://www.newsinenglish.no/2016/03/29/carlsen-keen-to-take-on-karjakin/