Fischer
once said;
'sack, sack and mate' in describing how to win against a particular
chess defense; the Sicilian dragon.
Donald Trump has the challenge of finding a way to finish off the Ted
Cruz campaign in the 'consin primary election Tuesday.
Much
of Ted Cruz's support arises from two sources; fossil fuel job fans
and pre-tribulationist evangelicals that believe a rapture is
somewhere out there and if the world goes to hell in the meantime
well so what-its all pre-destined. There is an industry in churches
and politics of exploiting those fears especially of economically
troubled people for votes and/pr tithes-even sacrificial
tithes.
Full
disclosure; I am a Christian post-tribulationist who believes that
the book of the Revelation preponderantly described a first century
period of tribulation for the Jews primarily and of Jerusalem's
destruction. Following that a lengthy build up of Christianity
through evangelism until it reached a majority of the population
would develop lasting a minimum of a thousand years; and that number
is perhaps just a non-rigid designator of a long, long time (2000
years so far).
Donald
Trump needs to reach Wisconsin republicans, though the con-sinners
are presently tilting toward support for Cruz it is possible that
reason will prevail and they will vote not for a cultist oil cliché
Canadian citizen from Texas(though con-sinners have a lot of
French-Canadian influence and are known to be cheesy).
Trump
is all about economics and national security. Cruz is about
globalism, Bush-Chaney-Exxon-Halliburton-Tar Sands crude oil
interests and bad eschatology's cultishness. Trump is outspoken,
while Cruz seems like Zillary, a duplicitous career politician
generically saying what such think voters want to hear and doing what
they want under-the-table in dark pools that replaced those smoked
filled rooms of yore.
Of course
these days devilcrats and Judicial accomplices force politics on the
people from the top-down and then the media cooks polls for
supporting the foisted politics as supported by a majority. One must
believe Americans don't take issues seriously and change them as
willingly as a sailor changes tack or that the3media is
dissimulative. Politicians increasingly don't take voters
seriously-especially with Republicratic realpolitik being a support
service for corporatism. Cruz probably hasn't a fraction of Zillary
Clinton's skills at dissimulating- that are comparable only to
Bill's.
Trump's
recent Chris Matthews interview was in a Democrat Party media bias
outlet and therefor dangerous, yet Trump thrives in a controversial
environment. Quick executive actions aren't common any more though.
The Presidency is more of a glacial moderating speed than a fast
instant rule by decree whim sort of thing. Even Obama's greasing the
skids of homosexual marriage required years to develop. If a
President has a speech slip up, that indicates that he hasn't a
teleprompter more than anything else.
It is good
that Trump did not say that adult abortion services should be
legalized everywhere to support zero-population growth. Even
conservatives would find the one-shot Luger bullet to the brain for
those adults that should have been aborted yet slipped through too
Beria-ish, although Democrats enthusiastic about abortions might like
it.
Trump was
right though in having the opinion that if something is illegal there
ought to be some sort of objective legal penalty attached to it.
Otherwise laws would be rather meaningless, and then, adult
post-birth abortion services provided free to political opposition
might become common on a large scale.
No comments:
Post a Comment