The Trump Challenge; Overcome 'Consin Primary

Fischer once said; 'sack, sack and mate' in describing how to win against a particular chess defense; the Sicilian dragon.  Donald Trump has the challenge of finding a way to finish off the Ted Cruz campaign in the 'consin primary election Tuesday.

Much of Ted Cruz's support arises from two sources; fossil fuel job fans and pre-tribulationist evangelicals that believe a rapture is somewhere out there and if the world goes to hell in the meantime well so what-its all pre-destined. There is an industry in churches and politics of exploiting those fears especially of economically troubled people for votes and/pr tithes-even sacrificial tithes.

Full disclosure; I am a Christian post-tribulationist who believes that the book of the Revelation preponderantly described a first century period of tribulation for the Jews primarily and of Jerusalem's destruction. Following that a lengthy build up of Christianity through evangelism until it reached a majority of the population would develop lasting a minimum of a thousand years; and that number is perhaps just a non-rigid designator of a long, long time (2000 years so far).

Donald Trump needs to reach Wisconsin republicans, though the con-sinners are presently tilting toward support for Cruz it is possible that reason will prevail and they will vote not for a cultist oil cliché Canadian citizen from Texas(though con-sinners have a lot of French-Canadian influence and are known to be cheesy).

Trump is all about economics and national security. Cruz is about globalism, Bush-Chaney-Exxon-Halliburton-Tar Sands crude oil interests and bad eschatology's cultishness. Trump is outspoken, while Cruz seems like Zillary, a duplicitous career politician generically saying what such think voters want to hear and doing what they want under-the-table in dark pools that replaced those smoked filled rooms of yore.

Of course these days devilcrats and Judicial accomplices force politics on the people from the top-down and then the media cooks polls for supporting the foisted politics as supported by a majority. One must believe Americans don't take issues seriously and change them as willingly as a sailor changes tack or that the3media is dissimulative. Politicians increasingly don't take voters seriously-especially with Republicratic realpolitik being a support service for corporatism. Cruz probably hasn't a fraction of Zillary Clinton's skills at dissimulating- that are comparable only to Bill's.

Trump's recent Chris Matthews interview was in a Democrat Party media bias outlet and therefor dangerous, yet Trump thrives in a controversial environment. Quick executive actions aren't common any more though. The Presidency is more of a glacial moderating speed than a fast instant rule by decree whim sort of thing. Even Obama's greasing the skids of homosexual marriage required years to develop. If a President has a speech slip up, that indicates that he hasn't a teleprompter more than anything else.

It is good that Trump did not say that adult abortion services should be legalized everywhere to support zero-population growth. Even conservatives would find the one-shot Luger bullet to the brain for those adults that should have been aborted yet slipped through too Beria-ish, although Democrats enthusiastic about abortions might like it.

Trump was right though in having the opinion that if something is illegal there ought to be some sort of objective legal penalty attached to it. Otherwise laws would be rather meaningless, and then, adult post-birth abortion services provided free to political opposition might become common on a large scale.