A pronoun conundrum concerning what to call a deluxe eunuch

 In a time of increasing social demographic density a government may support population reduction via being agreeable to help pay for converting males into deluxe eunuchs with frills and chemical modification in addition to the surgery. Yet there is apparently a problem about what to title to use in reference to the former males; certainly they were men and did not become women by the conversion to deluxe eunuchs with some sort of artificial female receiving unit.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/pronouns-and-the-philosophy-professor-11617142536

One might refer to the former makes as Euns perhaps, or neo-fems yet sir is probably wrong as it is a derivative of sire or feudal lord stud. Eunuchs are not studs, and neither are they genetically female.

Genuine mixed gender people are the innocents in the mess created by those that are mentally confused and seek to convert their gender to upgrade their standard of living. People that really don't have xx or xy chromosomes probably have the right to decide for themselves what they want to be, although of course some of the complication of xyy or whatever would tend to be weighted toward the democracy of letters for a determination objectively.

It would be great if people could spell themselves as easily as they misspell term papers and become what they wrote instantly. It just doesn't seem to be the case that reality is willing to coincide with wishes in some cases.

Can Chinese insouciance in regard to US Gov nagging moderate Biden Admin policy?

 One might wonder if the years of U.S. government nagging about China's interminable violation of human rights would ever be of any meaningful effect since Wall Street investments in China tend to trump U.S. federal hand waving. Chinese unconcern rising to insouciance in the island archipelago it is building up in the South China Sea and stocking with ships and implements for battle can't be taken seriously when the Biden administration cannot even defend the southern U.S. border.

No one wants war of course for everyone is a loser with the excellence in weapons of mass destruction existing these days. I can even imagine a time when some oligarch will send drones to an inhabited planet to terminate the existence of potentially adverse biomass with photon torpedoes or some other unkind of particle beam device.

The Chinese victimize Muslim Uyghurs and Tibetans while trying to annex Taiwan into the eastern version of the evil empire; yet China has a two millennial old tradition of racial and territorial expansion that is difficult to counter without Mongols or some other kind of mechanized cavalry surging down from the high plains or serpents of war rising up from the sea. While great fiction dragons make wonderful stuff for movies practical political actions leading to an increase in democracy and individual human and social rights are more challenging to bring to China especially when the U.S.A. itself is finding new ways to censor free speech at social media sites and concentrate wealth in the  name of globalism.

Given the vast public debt the rich so kindly bestow upon the federal government it is no wonder U.S. government policy to chastise China for human rights violations is about as toothless as old people that fell through the cracks of dentistless Obamacare.

Wrapping up national women's month

 American women and homosexuals assuredly are more aggressive than they were in former times, although listening to the leader of the national Center for Disease Control say that she was frightened and had a sense of doom wasn't exactly inspiring to many. Sure results are more important than posing or superficialities yet a good leader should have qualities of good works and confidence-inspiring leadership.

Some day if the nation survives and is more than just a feminine subordinate employee of global plutocrats and socialist governments women may achieve real equality and dueling may return to legality in an over-populated world where everyone becomes unnecessary except for soteriological purposes. Networking and technology have made ad hoc organized petty crimes and collusion routine essential tools of the affirmative action set in their march to become a true dictatorship of the proletariat allegiant to global corporate. The natural feminine characteristic of gossip and networking socially serves the advance well. February was the month to commemorate George Washington and Abe Lincoln's births now forgotten and people realize that if the nation were being remade Martha Washington would be CEO of a cherry pie corporation and no slaves would be compelled to harvest cherries- just foreign guest workers.

Will Antifa build up an American fascist party to have something real to protest against?

There was an actual historical fascist movement in Europe that fructified in the Nazi war on Europe, yet it never had too much traction in the United States or Mexico especially after the end of the Second World war. Never in my experience as an American more than 65 years has there existed a fascist movement in America of any substance. That is why the anti-fascist movement named Antifa is disorienting; one wonders who or what they really are protesting. One recalls the Field of Dreams expression; 'if you build it they will come'.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/antifa-armed-rioters-descend-on-oregon-state-capitol

Antifa seems to attend any popular left-leaning cause in order to build it up to a more volatile level and piggyback the protest upwardly. They are an accelerant of crisis rather than a catalyst, although as a willing and ready go-to organization for conflict in a mercenary kind of way perhaps they may be in the call-list for any number of people looking to create civil disorder in support of a given cause.

So long as the civil disorders are someplace else, I suppose many people aren't too concerned with the interminable unrest and protest. With the election of 2020 over and decided mostly in favor of Democrats the continuing lunatic extreme activity of Antifa because even more of an enigma. Have they just named themselves Antifa to seem for public relations purposes to have a real opponent they need to fight against in order to promote a leftist-socialist-communist agenda? Do they receive international financial support from foreign intelligence organizations or rich individuals seeking to create strife in the United States?

My one concern is that Antifa in creating an imaginary enemy will draft the creation of a real fascist party in the United States. They seem to make the existence plausible and that plausibility supports normality as a worthy opponent to an organization of ill repute that supports communist-socialist causes.

My late father was a four-year veteran of the Second World war on the anti-fascist side, yet there is no way he in the world that he would have sympathized with Antifa.  He attended college in Salem Oregon. I attended a computer programming school in Portland Ore. I would be uncomfortable in that city if were inclined to go there with its inability to support a civil social environment that is peaceful, ordinarily.

Democrats have encouraged Antifa and other uncivil methods outside the usual political structures in normalizing disorder. Hillary Clinton sought to marginalize Trump supporters and the hatred of Trump and Republicans that voted for him continues to this day.

There are at least three kinds of Republican voters. One is the rich and the would be rich that support Wall Street programs and are globalists. Fundamentally they rule the party and, in many respects, share the same ideas as wealthy Democrats. Antifa protests don't affect those Republicans at all- their policy choices continue and wealth is concentrated.

The second kind of Republican voter is a traditional moral conservative. They are adamantly opposed to liberal Democrat policies such as abortion, homosexual marriage and atheist indoctrination. Those people are not fascist for having morally conservative thought.

Some of that second group overlaps with a third group of people sometimes sharing membership with the first two yet with distinctive, differentiating ideas for-themselves. One shared idea may be anti-social spending, one differentiating idea may be that cluster of ideas that are ill-founded scientifically including no regard for global warming problems or environmental decline, over-population and so forth. The third group also share ideas about national security with the prior two including border sovereignty. The third group is not implicitly fascist either.

A fourth element would comprise fewer than 5% of the Republican party I would guess and does have racist beliefs. They would support extremism yet usually are or were fairly quiet historically. Even with racist beliefs they do not necessarily support a fascist political agenda. Fascists were so marginalized in America before the rise of Antifa that they seem to be trying to create that political agenda themselves.

There was racism and segregation in the American south of course that slowly and methodically ended. By the 1970s blacks comprised as much as 30% of American unions and the integration of the United States was well under way. There wasn’t a Hispanic migration problem. With the radical changes in the post-Vietnam war economics and outsourcing of industry even before the end of the Cold war the political and economic policies of the United States were rapidly changing and as some have noted, splintering.

Union membership declined with the end of quality union jobs outside government unions generally. The peaceful social evolution of the United States racially transformed gradually into agitation with so many restive groups of females and minorities-even homosexuals seeking empowerment through affirmative action and unsatisfied with that, with legislation to make resistance to increasing legal and economic advantages futile. The problem was that real wages for American white men had been arrested at the 1970s level with jobs being outsourced and the influx of illegal migrant workers adding to the general average stagnation of the income of the middle class and poor as the rich simply divided new revenue among all the new workers as well as the old at the same level as formerly went to mostly white men- profits were just concentrated to the rich.

That is why the Antifa organization seems like a cargo cult of politics to me ,with its oars in the water perhaps- heading toward Niagara Falls. Increasing racial conflict tends to terminate the challenge of building non-emotional non racism. Racism develops along economic lines for economic reasons rather than rational ones. Ending racism that isn't legally structured or built in that make require civil disobedience to end requires non-hostile normal trade and commerce relations as people move about the nation and work.

 

Side by side sleeping configs for President's child captives in El Paso reinforces disease transmission

 President Biden is apparently failing to adequately manage the surge of child captives arrested while illegal infiltrating to the U.S.A. from Mexico. The problem is not simply that his policy encouraged development of the crisis, it also exposes the children to risky airborne viral contact from being packed in too close in captivity.

Children are some of the worst virus vectors in the U.S.A. Schools are incubators for the flu and other diseases that spread like wildfire typically so packing kids in side by side for sleeping on a floor while in captivity is an especially egregious way to prepare to infect all those kids with whatever is going around, on release to 'relatives' in the U.S.A. they will take their viral contagions with them.

I had some experience with sleeping side by side on the floor at a homeless shelter in Anchorage one December a decade ago with several people that experienced frostbite. I caught the flu and then pneumonia that stayed with me for the better part of the next ten years providing residual symptomatic reminders that very, very slowly faded away. It was said that everybody catches something at the over-crowded shelter. Who knows what kind of exotic viruses exist in Central America from whence the kids have travelled; they all share it like rem among themselves in their corral before being sent infected to sites across the U.S.A.

Why the United States is so slow at innovating domestic solutions to problems in a timely way is a mystery to me. Although I don't support illegal migration to the U.S.A. nor providing thousands of teenage girls to the tender mercies of San Diego, developing and implementing competent, compassionate conservative processing of migrants should be a fundamental skill of governance.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ted-cruz-biden-dhs-staffer-video-donna-migrants

Which global ad hoc alliance has its oars in the water?

 China and Iran recently signed a 25 agreement for cooperation with technology and economics. Russia and China have in recent years drawn closer together on economics and other works. Russia and Turkey have developed select military sales and cooperation. The relationships together seem to add up to being an informal international economic and military alliance in basic competition with the United States and whatever other nations are part of the western, N.A.T.O. and G-12 economic alliance.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/27/iran-china-agreement-478236

The eastern alliance (I will call it that for lack of a better term easy to find) is a new world order politically speaking. The western new world order boiled down to being one dedicated to making the world homosexual and bisexually normalized and that in part reinforced the development of the counter-alliance.

The post-war new world order to the west was one of concentrated wealth and power gravitationally attracted to plutocrats reinforced by legions of minions from both major American parties, Europeans and others chasing after corporate jobs. The new world order of the west had accelerating micro-transistor gadgets driving networking, technology and economics. Atheism evolutionary doctrines reinforced the movement of traditional immorality toward the political center, yet extremism is difficult to make a new normal for natural reasons, and the effort unbalanced political sensibilities- a political rift energized in the west

The west’s judgment after-the-fact that winning the cold war meant that greed was o.k. dispensed with trying to build economic ties with Russia while it sanctioned Russian leaders for trying to keep lands that had been part of Russia from 250 to 1000 years part of Russia. Greed and the wish to put down Russian government resistance the homosexual agenda drove Russians to find alliance with China though carefully for China has long presented an implicit military threat of attacking and annexing the vast Siberian lands of the east. Russia, Turkey and Iran all tend towards substantial opposition to the western agenda of homosexuality, middle eastern policies including war while China is seeking to expand its sphere of influence in Africa, Central Asia, the Middle East, Pacific and elsewhere.

The unexpected new ad hic eastern alliance of course reminds one of Orwell’s novel 1984 with its interminable war between vast yet vague planetary states. One of the key differences is that the United States built up China’s economy, along with others, by investing there to produce items sent to the U.S.A. with a great markup to enrich Wall Street. China has become such an important part of the U.S. economy that it is too big to fail and can wield its economic power in forming planetary alliances with those countries the United State’s government policy has left to the tender mercies of international economics, sanctioned or ben at loggerheads with.

The Chinese-Iran 25-year partnerships seems to be a direct response to the Trump administration’s withdrawal from the Obama era arms control for cash agreement that gave a pathway to nuclear weapons development fructifying in 25 years. Maladroit U.S. policy that dropped the ball on developing good relations with post-Cold war Russia because of the comparative and short-sided lust for land in Ukraine, the Crimea and to exclude Russia from trade relations in Europe that would compete with American business coupled with the inability to return to good relations with Iran as swiftly as possible supported the rise of the present state of affairs that U.S. leadership isn’t likely to be able to quickly recognized, resolve in its favor or efficiently ignore. A policy of greed works against abstract thought and goals that are intelligent and just, necessary and utilitarian.

U.S. leadership isn’t too likely to reform its foreign or domestic policies enough to well keep the U.S.A. leading rather than following in the future. Concentrated wealth and loose border security, social media owned by the rich allowing free speech primarily only if it reinforces corporate power and an attitude that the U.S.A. does not make foreign policy errors prevails to arrest intelligent design of god policy formation. For some reason Ronald Regan got away with his goal of tearing down the wall and reducing nuclear weapons, yet subsequents have ditched the spirit of that part of Reagan policy except as it was the foundation for an expansion of greed.

A more powerful China and Iran in the Middle East does not mean that the incorrect hermeneutical work of eschatology that has Armageddon and Kittim is gathering strength. The post-millenniaist rather than the pre or amillennialist interpretation is correct; yet that does not preclude wars or planetary suicide through stupid international relations policies.

A more powerful China and Iran present more challenges to the Sunni kingdom and Sunni states from the Shi’a-Chinese Atheist axis that is somewhat ponderous. The U.S.A. is also working to alienate the Saudis presently because it hasn’t got female taxi drivers and its leader apparently order a journalist critic to be lured into the Turkish embassy, killed and hacked down into nice, easy-to-pack pieces. The King, sultan or whatever he is called may be sorry though he is recalcitrant about expressing his sorrow publicly.

Basically, the United States should establish a basic minimum income for its citizen of $10,000, secure its borders and allow zero illegal immigration and begin the graduation towards a 99% ecologically sustainable economic infrastructure and make political priorities that reinforce business with high eco-efficiency. As the world leader at sustainable economic the United States would have an alibi for existing at a higher standard of living than much of the rest of the world; it would help other nations to rise to a high standard of sustainable ecospheric compatible living.

The U.S.A. would need to have polices and laws that limit the size of corporations and the concentration of wealth in order to keep free enterprise and democracy vital. Patents would need to be limited to three years with 10% royalties to inventors after exclusivity expires to accelerate the infusion of technological change into economic actualization.

Corporations limited to 5000 workers would be free to make temporary relationships with other corporations to produce items that need more hands. No citizen could own shares of more than three corporations- economics need be about productivity rather than abstract financial skimming.

The United States should aggressively work to normalize relations with Russia and employ Reagan’s policy of constructive engagement that preceded the end of apartheid.

 To continue the adverse relations with Russia very long while continuing to enrich China and transfer technology to it will further weaken American standing in the world though it is flooded with illegal aliens providing cheap labor for Democrats

. Even if more women and minorities get government jobs at good pay with benefits and godless and immoral corporate policies make entertaining video, though there are select risks of war with the United States military becoming increasingly irrelevant with no one to fight with for political reasons. There is no guarantee that bad policy to destroy the environment will stop. There is no certainty that social security will not stop as one vote majorities decide to end the Roosevelt era program in order to afford to defeat the eastern alliance with 100 trillion dollars of public debt holding them back, or even that the dollar will not collapse because most of the money fled to bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies.

If the United States had fought the Cold War alone against Russia and China while heavily investing in the Chinese economy it might have fared better and wrapped up the conflict quicker- or is that idea the wrong one?

Hate crimes and race strife will help form the news cycle the next few years as may gun bans in order to buy more time for politicians to focus on concentrating wealth and making America a better airport for globalists while providing good jobs and housing for illegal arrivals; nothing like good distractions to help implement the new world order.

 

Sweetie's instant evolution accelerator for just five easy payments

 The idea occurred to me of the comedy product named Sweetie's instant evolution accelerator. I can imagine the surfeit of political applications and sales pitches that could arise to help politicians 'evolve' their thought platforms from what they were to something else that is more suitable for increasing proplits.

I will let you imagine some of those for-yourself.