Scotus Leaker Urinates on Justice; Government Incompetence

 The recent leakage of an apparently genuine opinion contra-abortion by conservative Justice Alito in advance of the Court’s decision relating to the issue seems an obvious attempt to subvert the integrity of the high court for political purposes. That is, with public opinion running against Democrats keeping control of Congress in the November election the Democrat Party base needed to be motivated, and females for abortion are motivated by the immanent loss of the right to kill fetuses. It is another court case, a civil suit moving ahead against the government of Tulsa Oklahoma in regard to a near century old event that was an American pogrom against a black neighborhood, that brings up the interesting and rather philosophical question of government being usually competent and responsible enough to be held accountable for populist riots, mayhem and murders on a macro-social scale.

The first great subversion of a tentative Supreme Court decision occurred just after another Democrat female from Harvard reached the court. D.C. is so partisan these days that for Democrats at least, the Democrat agenda overcomes truth or law whenever needed to consolidate control. Some will associate the leak with the new justice though she is not likely to have been the agent of subversion. Instead, it is probable that a Democrat female minion chose the moment to subvert the conservative court and go over the heads of conservative justices directly in hope of changing the political landscape before the normal June issuance of SCOTUS decisions. I think it unlikely that a Republican perpetrated the crime unless he was a homosymp worried that the next great reversal after abortion would be homosexual marriage. Homosexual marriage enables the adoption of strait infants for queer socialization; Democrats will fight to keep that perversity the new normal American way, including the ostensibly Republican Chief Justice.

Chief Justice Roberts was the crucial, decisive swing vote for queer marriage. Since he has launched an investigation into the abortion leak the integrity of the investigation is dubious. If the retiring Justice; a liberal Democrat made a parting shot at the conservative court Chief Justice Roberts may bury the information anyway. The nation may never learn who the court’s five finger discount artist was. To find the truth the court might need to be relocated to GITMO for water-boarding members until someone spills. That outlaw location is tolerated by the court so objections should be quickly drowned.

In the era of quantum encryption the ability to control and censor, isolate or obfuscate information with partisan import will rise. Social media bloggers and readers may never encounter one another as exact control of data is implemented by Google and other social media giants via quantum computing. At any rate, only particular members of the public will encounter information decrypted for their eyes only. All social media data will be specifically addressed and restricted as artificial intelligence deems appropriate.

If courts are supposed to be neutral and honest decision makers concerning the legality of issues brought before them, the role of governments are somewhat vaguer. It is presumed they are responsible for public safety and utility services yet there are dissenters to the existence of government entirely known variously as libertarians or anarchists. Politicians elected to government may be shills for the rich and powerful or alternatively they may represent the will of the majority without concern for minority rights. As in the present era of blue-red extremism, being a politician on the fence may be a dangerous and precarious place to sit.

Issues of statutes of limitations aside, can city governments, state or federal governments too, be held accountable for their institutional actions decades into the future, when the political will and composition of the majority may differ from that when the actions or lack of actions by a government in question occurred? A broader question concerning government accountability rests on the expectation of government agents being normally competent; are they? Do people expect governments to be competent? Are the actions of the U.S. Government in regard to sponsoring wars internationally in the post World War Two era generally competent or effective, and are they, or were they expected to be?

During the Trump administration Black Lives Matter protests and riots were fairly usual. It is said that Antifah travelers and professional protest and riot coordination occurred. Those people were strongly anti-Trump agitators. Antifah listed its address on its internet site as the White House; 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, after the election of the Democrat Joe Biden. During the Trump administration the Federal Courthouse in Portland Oregon was besieged by BLM and Antifah protesters creating extra costs for federal defense personnel. Few people participating in the siege ever were charged or convicted and of course the city of Portland did not face legal actions to pay for their lack of action in permitting rioters and attackers to besiege the Federal Courthouse. The government of Portland was Democrat and the Biden administration was Democrat; no one expects legal actions to collect costs by the U.S. Government from the Portland Oregon city government therefore.

The city government of Seattle Washington could have taken stronger action against rioters that briefly seceded the Capitol Hill neighborhood from the city with barricades. It isn’t likely that many people that took part in that activity were charged by a left-leaning municipal government later. Harm to those that did not support the barricades did occur to those that lived in the neighborhood because of the restriction of their ability to safely go about their lives free of barricades. People may not expect the government to be held accountable for failing to swiftly remove the barricades and arrest rioters simply because the government and rioters were generally on the same side. That is what is commonly expected of government perhaps; that it is entirely partisan, biased and usually unfair trampling on the rights of minorities and individuals whenever they can get away with it.

A theory of expectations for governments to be competent, honest and impartial in their administration of legally commissioned duties is a substantive one. Philosophically speaking it is one of the basic questions for free societies as opposed to non-free societies where the expectation is that government agencies reflect solely the will of the ruling power.

People might expect government to be competent and held accountable for material public works such as plumbing, roads, utilities etc yet to falter at the level of abstract political theory. The economist eminence gris of western civilization is of course Adam Smith; author of The Wealth of Nations. I believe that Adam Smith’s work is often misunderstood or misapplied. Modern politicians tend to regard the idea of pursuing narrow self-interests as good not only in economics, but also in governance. The Biden administration and Democrats so closely follow that interpretation as to be comprehensively partisan.

The Wealth of Nations provided the insight that individuals pursuing their narrow self-interests find the most efficient path to economic progress for themselves; better even than government. Concatenated, the net effect of a society of individuals pursuing their self-interests comprises the most efficient method for advancing economic interests of a nation; nationally and internationally. The method described in The Wealth of Nations was not intended to be the way government should work as an operating manual for it, or one might have something like Thomas Hobbes’ absolute monarch of The Leviathan developing as the monarch saw his narrow self-interest actualized in taking absolute power for-himself. Government was to support citizen empowerment for free trade and limit its role of concentrated power and wealth to that of maintaining necessary functions to support the public that the public or free trade and business could not do itself.

The role of a democratic government should be to reinforce equal protection of the law and to support the maximum good for the nation in compliance with the will of the citizens. To be consistent with the Wealth of Nations it should not act to interfere with free trade. Adam Smith sought for the English government to stop interfering with free trade. It should not decide what nation Brits could trade with putting sanctions on some and licensing other. President Biden should not put sanctions on foreign nations and interfere with free trade and people creating personal relations with foreigners including Russians, except perhaps in direct weapons sales. If free trade rather than sanctions prevail wars may be avoided as better human relationships would be the usual rather than the abstract and limited by government circumstance. U.S. government ought not act like the pre-Wealth of Nations England with overly concentrated wealth dictating business and foreign trade relationships. Adequately taxing the rich can keep free enterprise alive. Free trade need be allowed by the government rather than prevented by imperious decree. Politicians should not fear that free trade would curtail their ability to wage immoral war and/or religious wars. Lunatic monomaniacal aggression and religious wars, with media support, could continue concurrent with free trade, although traders might need to wear helmets, check their smart phones for bombing updates and finance extra insurance.

Obviously the Socratic paradigm for deciding what good is can arise. That aside, government’s basic task is to be a vigilant manager of the infrastructure tasks given to it within constitutional, lawful authority rather than an existential agent pursuing its narrow self-interest within an evolving social dialectic. Does any U.S. municipal government rise to that level of actualization, or can even the federal government accomplish that when it is of limited intelligence pursuing the narrow self-interests of majorities holding political power?

Individuals like Bradley/Chelsea Manning may take power into their own hands and leak classified information from government and receive rather light punishment from sympathetic fellow travelers in government in support of Democrat party platform planks. That seems to be the way of the world. It will be interesting to learn who the leaker of the Alito paper ion abortion turns out to be, if the document is genuine. It will be equally interesting to watch the course of events of the Tulsa race pogrom civil suit. A decision will be difficult in favor of the plaintiffs if there is not an actual smoking gun of government support for the pogrom as leaders of it in fact. In that era the city government may not have had the military ability to restrain an armed citizenry from taking action against a minority, especially if they were led by traveling riot coordinators. Who expects government to be competent or impartial any more rather than pretending to be? The very ability to revolt against government, against corrupt government, is a two edged sword, the alternative to which is submission to despotism, anarchy or authoritarianism.

Worst Case Democrats Nuclear Option

 Democrat Party history indicates they will find a way to develop/advance the worst case use of force in Ukraine. The Democrat Party became one of pure force after the bruising 2001 Presidential election loss. Their willingness to escalate the Ukraine tug-of-war is predictable. As in domestic politics the Democrat Party leadership uses force whenever lesser means won’t accomplish their goals without looking for intelligent alternatives. Force brings its own rationale and is the ultimate reason for Democratic lawyer Presidents domestically and internationally.

Democrats utilize the nuclear option in Congress when it feels good. It is quite possible that nuclear war may be the light at the end of the tunnel in Ukraine too. With President Joe Biden’s son being on Ukraine’s payroll for $10,000 per month when he was Vice President, and with the continuing expansion of N.A.T.O. to flank Russia’s security I would guess President Putin could see which way the wind blows. Eight years of Democrat leadership ahead in D.C. hostile to Russia with sanctions already in place, presenting no prospects for recovering Ukraine land lost to the Democrat Bill Clinton’s administration made war seem practical. President Putin may have thought he hadn’t much to lose invading Ukraine. Even so, Russian leadership may become recalcitrant to continue hostilities and order withdrawal of its military from Ukraine in order not to seem like bullies, confident that President Biden will treat them with dignity and respect and no Nightmare on Elm Street will follow what some would say was Russian weakness.

A good plotting device for building a fiction novel is to sew interesting, inexplicable, anomalous events along a narrative that later are tied together. In this essay I considered several items that were far apart and put them together to present a paradigm for interpreting Ukraine developments better than that of the partisan U.S. media. I looked at Death Stranding recently, an interesting video game, and found some of the items difficult to explain metaphysically through the first half. Democrat policy in Ukraine has a public narrative of course (Russians are bullies and authoritarians are brutalizing an independent, democratic nation). The assurance of administration narrative statements and absence of public expressions of dissent or consideration for alternatives to escalation compel a search for the underlying supports for the smooth, steady administration escalation. I find administration narratives disingenuous and at very least, superficial. Paradoxically they are like cowboys driving a herd of cattle up a box canyon where they can’t escape without realizing they are the cattle as well as the cowboys having good fun stoned on imported designer dope.

The Ukraine is Russia’s breadbasket historically, and Europeans of the west have sought to wrest Ukraine away for centuries. Catholics have sought to expand their religion into orthodox regions of Russia including the Ukraine equally as long. The U.S.A. has Catholics leading Congress, the Executive branch and the Supreme Court, and British imperialists are too cozy with D.C. insiders, while Germany also sought to expropriate Ukraine since W.W. 1 and sent migrants to live there to make it more German. The line-up against Russia is formidable and insistent. In 1994 the Democratic party began the long, slow, methodical process of making Russia an enemy instead of an ally. With the Ukraine annexation and expansion of N.A.T.O. the plausibly deniable warpath was preferred to that of peace. Anglo-American imperialism united with Democrat Party Catholicism eventually emerging as part of a two-headed New World order leadership in partnership with Wall Street, aristocratic, plutocratic global corporatism. Russia’s vast resources of the busted Soviet Union seemed like prey. Easy pickings for Democratic lawyers full of themselves just needing to have a Boris Yeltsin signature. Possession was 9/10ths of the law and they could defend their paper with the full power of N.A.T.O. and the U.S. government and define social reality through broadcast media propaganda supporting forces owned by the rich. The new world order might look eventually like a religious and imperial battle against outmatched country bumpkins to the east, yet might is right as is said. Democrat Presidents were mighty in deed, even if on the dark side of the force.

Poland too, a Catholic nation, sought to conquer Russia at least since the end of Boris Godunov’s regime that followed that of Ivan III. In 1605 it sent a prince to conquer Moscow and who made it to the Kremlin’s walls with an army. Western forces to defeat Russia have returned numerous times and built up again when President Clinton betrayed the end of the Cold War with his and Sect Albright’s idiotically blind ignorance of history. The policy was so extremely duplicitous as to wrest away Ukraine from Russia and make it a western-dependent, independent entity. If Cuba took the Midwest from the U.S.A. when it was weak and made it a Cuba-dependent, independent nation full of Cuban immigrants, the Cubans should logically know that when the U.S.A. recovered enough strength it would war to get the Midwest back; that is why Russia is at war in Ukraine now.

In my opinion the historical trait of practice of war to conquer natural resource rich regions should be obsolete in the modern, post-Cold war global economy of free trade and efficiency. The exception might be small nations and those suffering grievous land loss as Russia has with Ukraine since the Clinton administration converted the Cold War conclusion into a simple tug-of-war between the strong N.A.T.O. Clinton led against the weak Russia of 1994. N.A.T.O. then began to expand its membership while leaving Russia out, unofficially identifying Russia the new worthy enemy turkey o replace the lost Soviet Union. Old Democrat Catholic politicians may tend to view Russia through 1980s era, blood colored glasses. If Russia could be conquered China would be easy pickings too, or so idiot logic might reason. It would be idiotic because waging a war to accomplish what could be done better through peaceful means, like conducting world trade, is idiotic in the real world today.

Old politicians tend towards automatic behavior. Like a chicken with its head cut off that keeps running about, old politicians too may run about with old policies after their creative thinking brain has been lost, cut off or died. President Biden and Speaker Pelosi may have ossified brains equivalent to that of headless chickens running about the barnyard. Old politicians may have been creative and environmentalists all of their lives and continue that constructive behavior in to old age usefully. Alternatively they may have bad or dull characteristics that continue into old age as uncreative machine, extremist ideologues that just can’t learn new tricks. Sometimes, yet rarely and inexplicably, old politicians like Ronald Reagan can surprise-even while suffering early Alzheimer’s, and invent new political policies like that of ending the Cold War and ridding the world of nuclear weapons that can be explained best by the intervening grace of God.

If government and corporate financed Nazi Public Radio persecuted a poor U.S. citizen for a quarter century, violating his civil rights, coordinating ridicule, manufacturing false narratives, subverting his economics and job security while training listeners to use hate speech inimical to him so far as to make the market-place a programmed hostile environment; if such an unthinkably wrong development occurred, hiding in plain sight with plausible deniability, the Democrat Party and government sponsors of nazi public radio would deny it had ever happened and existed only in he mind of the victim. Modern Democrats are corporatist, atheist, moral relativists that believe truth is subjectively defined and fully variable as needed for utility. As utilitarians they seek what is good for the greatest number of Democrat politicians, and have made the party a Catholic party within a universal political stadium of deceit and expansion. President Biden is a universal egoist insider inertial form in-himself and for-others.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely, yet it is also absolutely hypocritical and oozes dissimulations. Hate works as a full partner of power s to define social reality. Institutional hate is as cold blooded as a slicing machine. Democrats respect human and civil rights only when it is their narrow self-interest to do so and ignore them when convenient, profitable or amusing. Volunteers in social media subverted political opposition and search engine listings long before the Biden administration created a Ministry of Truth and Propaganda in Homeland Security.

The modern military occupationally is the art of homicide. Humans sometimes encounter or experience social conditions they feel requires homicide for a remedy. Homicide is the ultimate consumer of another’s time and freedom. Homicide leaves zero time for the freedom of a victim to exist in the temporal. Democrats rely on homicide and the power to define and control mass temporal communications to force their will upon others. A lack of intellect chooses the certainty of annihilating the time and freedom of the temporal for political opponents to the risk of tolerating free expression, democracy and dissent as may occur in democracy. Democratic leadership chooses spiritual slavery and homicide over intelligence and freedom for others.

Democrats hate Russia. Russia generally s neither queer nor Catholic. Catholic Speaker Pelosi declared Russia a bully and said she will rush 33 billion dollars of lend-lease financial assistance to Ukraine to defeat Russia. Catholic President Biden will sign the bill. Two old Democrat, Catholic machine politicians fighting the Democrat Lawyer Holy War for Ukraine, the Pope, and Hunter Biden’s former financial pals, without a clue concerning Russian history, see no down side to their total war plan. There are some potential downsides though, that I will consider. Those are military and economic, political and existential concerns. Peaceful ways to solve the conflict could not occur to Democrat lawyers. Democrat lawyers do not negotiate, they force with force of law, war, media brainwash power, social media censorship and defining opposition language as hate speech. It is amazing that Democrats haven’t classified crimes against women as hate crimes yet so federal investigators could charge anyone male more easily. The principle of equal protection of law for Democrats means protection of Democrats and oppression of non-Democrat enemies of the state.

Democrats worst case situations for their political enemies whenever possible. Democrats are trying to get rid of the filibuster from Congress to grease one-party rule and stifle political dissent. Exfiltration of an opinion on abortion by Justice Alito ahead of a Supreme Court decision apparently was an unprecedented subversion of a conservative court that Democrats tire of and hate. The leaked document of 100 pages will give Democrats an extra couple of months to motivate their base before the November election, yet the integrity of the Supreme Court will be permanently subverted. Worst casing the court was inevitable for Democrats as it was the most ripe, low-hanging fruit that hadn’t yet been exploited.

Having confidence drinking party kool-aid, Democrats piled on every imaginable punitive measure they could against Russia and threatened innumerable more. The net effect of that was to put Russia into a survival situation something like that of a six-time convicted inmate on death row who has nothing to lose penalty-wise if he kills another inmate or three.

Democrats have said war crimes trials are ahead when “Russia is defeated” and “Europe’s breadbasket” is returned to it. Democrats have made sure there isn’t a way to deescalate the crisis and are ramping up the scale of the conflict by supplying arms and cash for Ukraine to hire foreign mercenaries to wage the battle for Russia an order of magnitude. The sixth round of sanctions strangles free trade and human relationships globally undermining fundamental principles of The Wealth of Nations.

The war in Ukraine is already, in effect, a war on Russia. It is something like a civil war as well. Civil wars tend to be emotional and vindictive kinds of conflicts with pent-up hate. One can expect war crimes and paybacks in kind. Yet Russia hasn’t used napalm in war on a large scale as has the United States. One wonders if Russia will roll out napalm and take the gloves off to deploy blood, blister and nerve agents broadly across Ukraine? The use of chemical weapons by the death row administration of Russia is somewhat foreseeable. Conventional military advantages turning to the west can be set back significantly with low budget, effective human bug spray and sticky goo that burns flesh and returns annually for the rest of one’s life, if one survives.

Regular soldiers are fairly clumsy and inept at chemical weapons defense protocols and cannot survive too many days in contaminated environments. Air-bursts of human insect spray can depopulate urban centers with select wind and inversion conditions without damaging buildings. Will Russia have anything to lose when the U.S. is “seeking to weaken Russia” and the tide of war in taking East Ukraine changes direction?

Russia has numerous non-nuclear options to use that would seriously weaken the west and especially Europe, including obliterating a nuclear plant or two upwind from Europe. I believe that Democrat Party leadership is accomplishing the weakening of the west more than Russia presently as their escalation obsession is self-destructive to a degree. Of course it is possible that the Democrat party use of D.O.D. geniuses will thwart all Russian military efforts so effectively as to accomplish regime change in Russia followed by a Free Russia under Democrat Party supervision while vestigial resistance crushed, Putin werewolves captured and provided with free trials for their crimes against humanity and compassionately executed.

Nuclear war potential of Cold War 1.0 brought the idea of mutually assured destruction to the fore and a political reaction against it. President Reagan sought to eliminate all nuclear weapons; a policy not followed by the five bad Presidents and one neutral since Reagan. MAD policy is no longer the sole inevitable policy for a variety of reasons, yet the two ,most likely nuclear use scenarios are easy to mention.

One is a limited nuclear exchange between Russia and the U.S.A. with a couple of European targets thrown in. Perhaps a dozen cities all told would be vaporized. Russia has two or three thousand more nukes than the U.S.A. and can spare the use of a few.

Nuclear wars are spite wars as well as reorganization wars. If militarily bankrupt, nuclear war can change the criterion from defeat to post-apocalypse when used judiciously. For instance, instead of attacking all U.S. nuclear military installations to prevent counter-attack, Russians know that preventing a counter-attack is no longer possible because of the advances each side has made in building new technologies of nuclear delivery packages.

Russia for instance, in reaction to some Obama policy of sending missiles to Europe, getting former Soviet Republics to join N.A.T.O. or breaking the A.B.M. treaty or whatever it was decided to deploy SS-29 missile launching trucks around the country. Each truck carries a missile that can hit U.S targets with six MIRV nuclear fusion warheads of up to 300 megatons of explosive force. Of course cruise missiles can launch nukes too, and the world is saturated with those.

Because MAD war really does lose for everyone, spite atomic attacks from conventionally losing countries seem the most likely cause for nuclear war to occur. Say Russia is faring badly in Ukraine and Democrat hate rhetoric is high going off the rails about Russian bullying the peace-loving Ukrainian people and democracy everywhere is threatened. Russia has already tried napalming Ukrainian forces in East Ukraine with no luck. Then Russia tried using chemical weapons and making a pair of nuclear plant meltdown and President Biden has a conniption and Speaker Pelosi is hopping with fury; the U.S. launches a barrage of chemical and high explosive laden cruise missiles on Russia and predator drones with chemical warhead Hellfire missiles target Russian military leaders wherever it can find them. I believe at that point Russia launches 2000 nuclear missiles at Washington D.C., Boston and San Francisco to overwhelm any potential defense. Maybe the U.S.A. would retaliate. Most of Russia and the U.S.A. would survive yet the war probably would end unless Democrats safe in undisclosed bunkers sought to continue the war globally at any place it could find Russian military forces. I think the conflict’s outcome gets rather hazy then, so far as anticipating the course of development of battle.

A divided world politically and economically following the end of hostilities in Ukraine will reduce the prosperity of the west. China’s stock rises collaterally with the degree of western sanctions on Russia. With sanctions on Russia without end until the end of Russia or before Russia elects a women President for sale to western interests the divided world seems ready to be the new normal. The Catholic and Democratic head of the Corporate hydra may turn upon itself and within itself as Catholics conflict with atheists and the Catholic Church is divided over secularism, marriage, homosexuality and other issues of concern to partisan secular Democrats. Corporatists will continue to invest in China and inflationary prices for American will increase as imported goods from China are taxed by China and some U.S. corporate investments expropriated for alleged business irregularities. Corporate leadership; secular, atheist and moral relativists, will be leveraged by Chinese Communist party leaders and submit so long as profits continue. Apple for instance, may be banned from selling product outside China unless packaged with surveillance technology or without paying a large tax to China. Inflationary prices may continue as Americans import goods from China that may raise prices to increase its military spending or provide support to Russia’s defense.

Inflation may skyrocket if the dollar collapses. Europe though may seek rapprochement with Russia informally and continue to trade with it. During the Cold War 1.0 there was substantial European interest in keeping some friendly relationships with Russia and the Soviets in order to lessen the prospects for nuclear war that was believed at the time to be to be bad for human health. Though Russia is no longer communist and is a free market developing society some Europeans will seek to develop profitable relations with their neighbor and have antipathy for American opponents to normalizing Euro-Russian relations. That will harm U.S. economic interests of the poor somewhat less than is the case with China.

Thirty-Three Billion for Ukraine is Wrong

 The President’s request for 33 billion dollars in war money for Ukraine is just about crazy. Buying everything including victory in restarting Cold War v 2.0 and charging it simply isn’t responsible government. Spending 33 billion on a lunar base, or providing 33 billion for small checks to homeless people, spending 33 billion on a project to reduce the cost of EVs from the GM Hummer EV's  $109,000.000 to something the poor could afford; maybe a soap box derby style EV for urban transport in special lanes for very light vehicles, might be a good enough reason to pile up more national debt. Funding a foreign war that rightly should have been avoided with competent government from Democrats for a change as if that were possible, is wrong.

 Ukraine’s investment in Hunter Biden really is paying off.

 The Obama administration stimulated wars in the Middle East that resulted in hundreds of thousands of casualties and that sort of approach for Europe is wicked and perhaps stimulates arms sales for U.S. businesses yet has great opportunity costs, should not be the Biden policy too.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/04/28/russia-ukraine-live-updates.html

https://www.wsj.com/articles/us-economy-gdp-growth-q1-11651108351

The first quarter of this year was one of recession (1.4%).  Dividing the world along Cold War 2.0 lines is harmful to the economy, implicitly has potential to stimulate the collapse of the dollar as investors perceive better growth prospects in Asia, and that threatens social security that is barely enough for some to afford food at inflated prices and a fair tent and bed roll for homeless winters. Stimulating intelligent ecospherically green growth is more important than making protracted war in Europe or forcing a nuclear conflict.

I have a different point of view about the administration's investment in Ukraine; I beliueve the Democrat Presidents since Bill Clinton are the aggressors that victimized Russia to steal Ukraine in 1994 after President Bush 41 eschewed doing that. Thus the Ukraine conflict is about Democrats trying to reward aggressors (themselves) by keeping 100% of Ukraine from its historically legitimate owners - Russia. The conflict should and could be settled asap without leaving anyone besides the physical casualties inhumanly worse off.

 Russia presently has a pretty good chunk of useful waterfront property and farmland in south and east Ukraine that it could keep in return for a lasting peace and an end to sanctions by the administration. Then world business could try to return to normal and Europe could get its natural gas and learn to recognize historical Russia. I believe Russia should stay out of Moldavia and at most advance no farther than its border where it could have an informal aqmicable and supportive relation with ethnic Russians and others.

President Biden is a litigious, combative lawyer perfectly willing to fund a war to reinforce the aggression of cutting out Russia 100% from Ukraine as some sort of a Cold War victory celebration for the west that Republicans were not rash enough, nor ignorant enough to take. President Bush 41 might have known that taking Ukraine while Russia was very weak would make a future war to take it back inevitable, while the Democrat lawyers would have been clueless or willing enough to spenbd lives and treasure to expand the global reach of their power.

Russia ought to be satisfied with its present area of recover and agree to end the war and sanctions in-place if the U.S. Congress can pressure the President into making peace rather than war. The world has too many serious problems presently to continue a renewed hot conflict and protracted Cold War 2.0. Someone should regenerate some brain cells and get out of the bureaucratic- lawyer loopiness of battle.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAVs1-HH5Mw war map

Florida's Sovereign Power of Mickey Mouse

 Learning that Florida’s Disney-world was established as a kind of semi-sovereign governing authority in Florida several decades ago provided the remarkable information that Mickey Mouse was able to tax those within its demesne. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis moved to take away the sovereign powers of Disney-world and that may throw Mickey unto hard times or worse, life as a commoner.

 Government usually is regarded as the sole authority able to legally tax subjects or pile up trillions of dollars of debt. Mickey apparently was the exception to that with a sort of royal prerogative to put its will-to-power into action for-itself. Corporatism is the present form of government in the United States; democracy is its front for plausible deniability, yet the plain power of Mickey Mouse to tax or run private prisons, censor dissident expression to its jungle theme park rides or provide unequal access to those wishing to climb the mountain to see the promised land made one pause to consider all things. The revelation for a moment brought sunshine to the dark cave where Mickey, Goofy, Snow White and the gang of dwarves gang live when not taking a break in Havana. People could plainly see the power rodent super-heroes have over the masses.

 One wonders if Mickey will take over operations of Guantanamo Bay to reeducate dissidents to its social media, search engine listings and defense policies or if President Biden will have a seat at the table, become a stake-holder or receive an appointment as master of cliches.

https://theweek.com/ron-desantis/1012997/florida-cant-actually-dissolve-disney-worlds-self-governance-district-disney

The Logic of Fields (a poem)

 

The logic of field
vectors flowing one direction
bi-polar input, throughput, output
circle unto themselves
opposites attracting to consolidate
connecting fields better
would gravity be an opposite
of mass drawing unto itself
the steady state of entanglement
comprising reality?

Tightened the vector of opposites
know lines of energy flow
transferring potential
from some point
to another point

A same-pole field
black hole of input
without leakage
need have gravity to pack it in
breaking down other field vectors
or expand fatter and farther
biggest belly of being
digesting reality
until Universal input is exhausted
excreting nothing

Gravity as a normal bipolar field
may circle through other dimensions
stitching itself to rhyme
- a dimension without space
or time.

A Comment on Cold War 2.0

The Biden administration’s Cold War 2.0 strategy apparently includes a time paradigm lasting a decade, and with sanctions on Russia continuing after some sort of conflict saturation stability and political division demarcation lines mature in Ukraine. Some U.S. political partisan tacticians have mentioned a decade of Cold War 2.0 ahead. 

 So I wonder about North Korea and its missile and nuclear weapons development continuing during Cold War 2.0. until it has perhaps 1000 nuclear warheads with sufficient missiles to join the ranks of nations able to incinerate the United States. In a decade Iran too should have developed an off-the-shelf missile program able to reach Europe and the United States with nuclear warheads when those finally appear in their inventory. Russia and China are likely to upgrade their nuclear arsenals, super-cavitation torpedoes with nuclear warheads, hyper-ballistic missiles with nukes and stealthy drones with tactical nuclear weapons. With a hostile relationship with Russia and a frosty one with China I fail to see where U.S. national security would be improved  since the end of Cold War 1.0 when the movement was toward inclusion rather than exclusion.

In my opinion reaching a stable and permanent East and West Ukraine configuration ending sanctions on Russia ought to be prioritized in order to move in a positive direction toward an undivided free market economic amicability for the planet. Unlike Cold War 1.0, Cold War 2.0 hasn’t a communist vs free enterprise foundation as Russia and China moved toward free market economics quite substantially. Claiming that the issue is nothing more than authoritarianism vs democracy is quite disingenuous for a number of reasons including yet not limited to the rise of corporatism and demographic facts of life. At some point competence in the U.S. government would be useful, especially if it included people with comprehension of environmental economics, the academic disciple.

The west lacks the moral footings it had that brought support to its side in Cold War 1.0. That is, the west has become the godless entity itself seeking to impose Darwinian evolutionary cultural values on the world, rather than being a nation with leadership like Ronald Reagan’s respectful of God, freedom of worship an family. That is a very large change- since most of the people of the world have some degree of belief in God instead of belief in godlessness with its amoral evolutionary stratagems of personal egoism, avarice and advantage to the end of concentrating wealth and power.

Cold War 2.0 and Conservatives; The New, the Old and the Ugly

During Cold War 1.0 popular conservatives and aristocratic conservatives had common cause against Communism atheism. Today that relationship is dysfunctional for popular conservatives and practical for elitist 1% conservatives. The white middle class from which popular conservatism built its base were beneficiaries of President Roosevelt’s (F.D.R.) progressive taxation policy that continued until the end of Cold War 1.0 in reasonably good form. When Cold War 1.0 ended in December 1989 they failed to adapt and adjust their political relationship to the rich conservatives they were loyal to.

 Capital increases faster than wages. Capital in the 21st Century by Dr. Thomas Piketty- a French economist, examined that facticity historically.  All things being equal, wealth concentrates as capital compounds and increases faster than the rise of wages. For example, if capital rises 7% a year, wages simultaneously average increases of 2 or 3% a year. If one inherits a couple million dollars and invests it in a market index fund the value rises faster than worker wages, So one may never need to work, and if one does work in a good-paying job and invests capital in an indexed stock fund, the capital increase beats average worker wages in a landslide fiscal levitation updraft. The largest capitalists tend to buy up the lesser with the pace of wealth increasing faster with greater concentration of capital. In other words, modern popular conservatives are sold out by their rich political patrons.

 During Cold War 1.0  when the entire principle of free enterprise was being defended by most people in the west, as well as traditional, non-communist-atheist social values, popular conservatives could find political support from elites who in turn were paying higher progressive tax rates that kept the differences between the rich and middle class more or less in check.

  With the end of Cold War 1.0 popular conservatives continued to support political causes of elite conservatives such as tax cuts for the rich while the elite conservatives tended to move toward formerly communist moral values (not economic values) such as abortion, homosexuality, equality of women in the workforce in regard to wages, dope use for the masses. Promiscuous sex (communists had tolerated the concept of the commonality of women for sexual use outside of the parameters of marriage). Popular conservatives did not understand the function of capital increasing faster than wages concentrating wealth to the elites and continued to support the Republican party platform of tax cuts.

  Democrats like President Biden and President Obama permitted tax cuts for the rich and were in agreement with most moral paradigms of the formerly elite conservatives that became known in some respects, as Rhinos (Republicans in name only). For example, while popular conservatives might be strongly in opposition to illegal migration to the United States, Democrats and 1% Elite Republicans tended to support it for different reasons; Democrats because it brought in support for an anti-white conservative voter base, and the rich because it brought in cheap labor that increased  corporate profit while undermining popular conservative ability to have political influence that might  keep wages for conservatives high and rising proportionately as they were in the golden post-World War 2 era economies with high Roosevelt tax rates on the rich.

 Democrats were able to characterize popular conservatives as racists and fascists after Cold War 1.0 concluded and bringing more political power to masses they could mobilize to support their political agendas that included race rights, expropriation of marriage from heterosexuals to homosexuals and bi-sexuals and lately, efforts to re-unionize the corporate world. During the initial modern era of integrating the national economy labor unions had been in decline. With the availability of a world of cheap labor after the Cold War 1.0 the logic of unions competing against foreign cheap labor where formerly American made products where relocated for production to became even less. Unions took over most U.S. Government operations for their primary residence, and apparently media broadcasting and Hollywood too that in turn served as platforms to promote a leftist agenda that also was an agenda useful for elitist conservative economic ideas concerning American labor and political power control of the mass electorate.

 Interestingly the seeds for starting Cold War 2.0 were sewn by a Democrat President Bill Clinton when he supported seizing the traditional Russian Ukrainian homeland as a settlement with Boris Yeltsin to end the former Soviet Union. Russians would never accept the loss of their homeland to the west even as an independent nation.  Soviet President Boris Yeltsin, like Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, gave up land for peace to end hostilities and buy time for his nation to reorganize, kicking the can down the road. The recent war in Ukraine formalized ossification of Cold War 2.0 that had pre-started with Russian annexation of Crimea. I never anticipated that a line up of Clinton-Obama and Clinton would be on the same sheet of music regarding Ukraine as the Kaiser, Molotov and Hitler. History does have its ironies; in Hebrew the transliterated word ‘ha’ means ‘the’. Tripling that for the Ukraine conflict fails to make anything funny about it, though the Ukrainian President is a comedian.

In dividing up the world economies between East and West, union labor will experience diminished foreign competition and possibly factories relocating to the United States from abroad as the U.S. and European Unions sanctions regimes compel nations to choose to align with east or west and to not remain neutral and trade with both sides. Overall though, a unified world economic system with careful checks on the over-concentration of wealth through progressive taxation and investment in public goods such as ecology and atmospheric restorative mediation and basic welfare programs eliminating poverty, providing free public education through graduate school is a better bet.

 Popular conservatives in the developing Cold War 2.0 zeitgeist may find it easy to align with the elite conservatives that share leftist moral values such as anti-Christian atheism, illegal migration to the U.S.A., tax cuts for the rich and so forth. Democrats will continue to excoriate popular conservatives as racists, dinosaurs with anachronistic ideas about fossil fuels and God (lumping God in with fossil fuels is a notable enormity for evolutionists) and find tacit support from the elites that continue to draw on declining popular conservatism for political support. Because the social media and broadcast media are controlled by leftists and financial elites too happy to demonetize (demonize) and censor or delete antipathetic authorship expressions, a phenomenon of political software programming the masses in closed, limited, finite loops of political development is a dark polluting mists enshrouding national American democracy. Free and new political directions or reforms are precluded from the stank cloud of control.

 The historical problem with political labels and their use in controlling mass opinions and ideas is present today stronger than ever. Hitler’s 3rdRreich Storm Troopers were comprised initially mostly of former socialists. National Socialism of which Hitler became the leader is regarded today as the most conservative of organizations of the modern era to which national populist conservatives are forever compared. The Germany the 3rd Reich developed in was a Weimar Republic with weak moral values that followed a popular German revolution to end the first world war that forced the Kaiser to abdicate and ended the German royal aristocracy. The former aristocrats sought to recover lost ground in alliance with Hitler-led national socialists that used Mussolini's new political economy of corporatism. Those political elements are present today in the United States in many ways though the comparison is no ,more than 50% accurate. New technology and demographics have made the old labels fairly dysfunctional and serve more to antagonize the labeled, motivate opposition to keep the masses politically stupid than anything else.