Gary reads from his 2015 philosophy-theology-cosmology book. Voice over unrelated scenic images
American issues of Christianity, cosmology, politics, ecosphere, philosophy, contemporary history etc
3/15/16
3/13/16
Arguments 4 the Existence of God (video 2015)
Someone wondered about the covenant of works versus the covenant of redemption and where Jesus fits in; maybe the question is a categorical error, though it reminds me of Plotinus' query about why 'the One' or God would emanate or create anything to start with since He is perfect and one might infer that anything created would need to be less so. That is God transcends covenants-for-non-contingent beings, though He has stipulated them. Jesus is God and satisfies the covenant of works with the covenant of Grace-for-the-elect. Redemption is grace sine qua non. No one besides the Lord could satisfy the covenant of works, hence the covenant of Grace appeared with the Lord.
3/12/16
Trump Rally and Social Media Protest Organizing
Presidential candidate Donald Trump has experienced flash mob protest phenomena that is I suppose an inevitable outgrowth of the Twitter and Facebook social media mass organizational protest coordination of recent years. Special interest protest groups can plan disruptions at any targeted political meeting and get news coverage. Rival candidates will then exploit the action and blame the candidate for being victimized by political special interest attacks.
Chicago and St. Louis each had substantive crowd protests at Trump rallies. St. Louis has enjoyed a year of protests following the police shooting of a black giant youth walking in the middle of the road after a shoplifting mission who allegedly attacked a police in his car who had stopped to inquire what was up. Trump rallys are a good substitute for the St. Louis protests that have lost steam yet morphed into a black lives matter movement looking for any place to flash mob and protest. In Texas a police officer was shot and killed last week by a recently released felon that stole a gun from a house and waited for a police office to walk out of the station. Police lives matter too. In fact everyone's life matters.
I watched a youtube video of Muslim Minister Louis Farrakhan speaking out against that 'wicked woman' Hillary Clinton. Chicago has a lot of ethnic political organization these days and it is too easy to crank up a protest in that city. I tended to agree with Farrakhan about Clinton and Libya, even so his antipathy toward white people that demand to be 'bosses' seems a darker ethnic note that is an undercurrent to the 2016 Presidential campaign that is a racist demand that a non-white male be elected President.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cu41CPQw0hg wicked woman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cu41CPQw0hg wicked woman
Donald Trump is the lightening rod for mobs of attacking racist, sexist, anti-capitalist, anti-God, anti-straight-even anti-United States political opposition. It is an interesting post-cold war evolution. Maybe it is easier to attack the U.S.A. from within rather than from without and dismantle everything it was.
3/11/16
Lawyer Is Not A Good Presidential Occupation Now
Lawyer Presidents early in the nation's history weren't so bad; 24 Presidents have been lawyers, yet in the 20th century they have tended, like V.I. Lenin (a lawyer) to be too inclined to do with the executive post whatever they like or think they can get away with.
Consider the four lawyer-President; F.D.R., Bill Clinton, Barrack Obama and RIchard Nixon. Those guys tended to think of the country's institutions as putty for them to mold. They did not respect the nation's institutions much-not even marriage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_occupation
Ted Cruz is running as a natural born Canadian-he thinks he can get away with it and has no respect for the one thing-being a native born American citizen-that prevents Vladimir Putin from running if he were to get U.S. citizenship. The nation revolted against imperialism and Cruz just lacks the sensitivity to comprehend.
Marco Rubio wants to raise the minimum retirement age for social security to 70; about the average life expectancy of black working men and the poor. Raising the minimum age for those with solid retirement income and savings would be reasonable since some of those live to 100, yert the poor just struggle to reach 65 and many don't make it. Why make those suffering working people go on probably without work since few hire older people and groveling sleeping in ditches or wherever from 55 to 70.
Businessmen, scientists, educators and generals make substantive changes when Presidents rather than just stuffing the rich or burning down the nation';s institutions and houses as the Clinton mortgage lending deregulation restructuring did eventually.
Consider the four lawyer-President; F.D.R., Bill Clinton, Barrack Obama and RIchard Nixon. Those guys tended to think of the country's institutions as putty for them to mold. They did not respect the nation's institutions much-not even marriage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_occupation
Ted Cruz is running as a natural born Canadian-he thinks he can get away with it and has no respect for the one thing-being a native born American citizen-that prevents Vladimir Putin from running if he were to get U.S. citizenship. The nation revolted against imperialism and Cruz just lacks the sensitivity to comprehend.
Marco Rubio wants to raise the minimum retirement age for social security to 70; about the average life expectancy of black working men and the poor. Raising the minimum age for those with solid retirement income and savings would be reasonable since some of those live to 100, yert the poor just struggle to reach 65 and many don't make it. Why make those suffering working people go on probably without work since few hire older people and groveling sleeping in ditches or wherever from 55 to 70.
Businessmen, scientists, educators and generals make substantive changes when Presidents rather than just stuffing the rich or burning down the nation';s institutions and houses as the Clinton mortgage lending deregulation restructuring did eventually.
3/9/16
Why Not More Ideas for Easier Earth to Orbit Launches?
Since
so many people are impatient with N.A.S.A. manned space Earth to
orbit methods I thought I would add another concept on the topic.
I
like electro-magnetic accelerators a lot. They can easily achieve
orbital escape velocity. Originally developed for the S.D.I. rail gun
they have been used by the Navy for artillery on ships and in the
metal-storm pistol manufactured by an Australian. It would be a
useful concept approach to put an e.m.a. aboard a very large
edge-of-the-atmosphere balloon launch platform and lift an orbital
capsule 'bullet' up to the rarefied air where it would then be fired
through the tube and into space.
That
would be stage one of the idea. The balloon itself might be a winged
delta shape and have rockets in it to fire when the e.m.a. sends of
the space capsule in an opposite direction from the balloon
delta-wing platform. The platform-launchers should be fairly cheap
and easy to reload with another capsule for launch.
Obviously
there are a zillion varieties and permutations for the shape and
composition of the high-altitude space-capsule lift and launching
platform. The balloons could be collapsible and the very large
delta/balloon object could glide down to Earth after use for
reloading perhaps landing in the ocean near Cape Canaveral Florida.
Less atmosphere less friction for the manned or cargo bullets. I
haven't time to write more about the idea presently.
3/8/16
Wiping Clean Vulgar Primary Issues
Much ado has been made by the pristine Republican elite about the infrequently rough language of Donald Trump as if Teddy Roosevelt or Andrew Jackson would have turned scarlet at such language. In the stratosphere of Republican PACs with lots of spare money to throw on campaign spots probably from zero-interest Federal Reserve loans to banks than are thereafter free to mint four e-dollars in new loans out of thin air for each buck from the Fed borrowed rough language is seldom used. On Wall Street behind the scenes the elites have prayer breakfasts each day before skimming billions in high-speed trading. The elite Republicans for ZIllary PAC financiers may use unkind words themselves behind golden doors.
I personally wouldn't mind a million bucks in order to experience some of the selflessness of consolidating wealth. If Donald Trump can return some manufacturing opportunities from China or coordinate a new easy-access print on demand industry that could make timely things like Presidential candidate toilet tissue and delivery them to retail outlets innovators might be able to just dial-in an idea and get the product made with a percentage of the profits eventually deposited in a friendly bank account.
Sht-if enough candidates remain until April to have a semblance of competition three or five different a-wipes could be big sellers to millions.
Sure it is good to carefully select one's language and exist in a non-pressured way wherein one may offer an appearance of saintliness and composure to the public. In my opinion though that is not always possible. A good candidate with rough language now and then may have the redeeming quality of good policy for the public. If elected he may use a teleprompter and not ad hoc so much, if he decides to remain an American citizen and not return home to Canada to run there. A candidate sometimes needs not only to tone down the rough edges although that may be something a reality-TV era public likes, sometimes he needs to wait and see if he gets the Presidential nomination before choosing to denounce any spare citizenships in foreign nations he or she may have.
I personally wouldn't mind a million bucks in order to experience some of the selflessness of consolidating wealth. If Donald Trump can return some manufacturing opportunities from China or coordinate a new easy-access print on demand industry that could make timely things like Presidential candidate toilet tissue and delivery them to retail outlets innovators might be able to just dial-in an idea and get the product made with a percentage of the profits eventually deposited in a friendly bank account.
Sht-if enough candidates remain until April to have a semblance of competition three or five different a-wipes could be big sellers to millions.
Sure it is good to carefully select one's language and exist in a non-pressured way wherein one may offer an appearance of saintliness and composure to the public. In my opinion though that is not always possible. A good candidate with rough language now and then may have the redeeming quality of good policy for the public. If elected he may use a teleprompter and not ad hoc so much, if he decides to remain an American citizen and not return home to Canada to run there. A candidate sometimes needs not only to tone down the rough edges although that may be something a reality-TV era public likes, sometimes he needs to wait and see if he gets the Presidential nomination before choosing to denounce any spare citizenships in foreign nations he or she may have.
3/6/16
Economic Analysis Necessarily Is Political
Economic
policy analytic is necessarily political. Global economics isn't
democratic. The most rich are best able to exploit it. An economist
may be talking on American radio or television with comments that may
be completely anational and empirically global . The
economist may be irrelevant to national concerns of citizens.
It
is the poor and middle class that stand to benefit the most from
nationalist economics. Yet because of the Clinton's Yale-Oxford
Boston takeover of the Democrat party and the Bush-Romney ultra-elite
hegemony over the Republican Party the United States may be said to
have a no-party system with Donald Trump possibly trying to upset the
status quo.
Back
in the day when the U.S.A. was a somewhat isolated power economists could reasonably talk about economic policy without concern for the
globe except for matters of tariffs on trade goods and the
value of foreign currencies based on their gold holdings. Today of
course that has all changed and economists may default to planetary
economic criteria concerning labor available globally, planetary
transport costs of distal manufactured goods, tax rates in various
nations on currencies in other nations, etc. Manipulating
international politics and supporting various conflicts abroad directly effects economic criteria exploited by global
economists for the benefit of investors in international
markets comprising holdings of the plutonomy (the upper 5% of the
1%).
Economics
for the benefit of U.S. citizens differs from economics for the
benefit of plutonomy or economics for the benefit of the dar al
Islam. Economic policy for the benefit of Russians differs from
economic policies designed to benefit Argentinians or Mexicans.
National economic policies are the sole direct approach to
intentionally benefiting national citizens yet many may benefit
indirectly, sometimes from regional politics.
Presidential
candidate Ted Cruz is a natural Canadian citizen. If elected
President of the U.S.A. he would also technically be a subject of the
British Empire and complicate ancient ideas about the legality of the
American Revolution against the King. He might also enable the United
States to consider a legal annexation of Canada through a
consolidation procedure involving business transcendence of
boundaries. As a Canadian citizen and subject of the Queen Ted Cruz
could exploit NAFTA from both sides of the border and possibly get
elected President of Canada simultaneously and agitate to make Canada
the 51st
state. Economic policy necessarily is political.
Environmental
issues are another factor determining economic definition and
relevance to national citizens. There is an entire academic
discipline concerned with the objective state of natural resources
and human economic interaction with them that objectify the value of those
resources and the real cost to society of degrading and/or depleting
them. Environmental economics is not just a preference for green or
renewable resources that don't pollute.
An
economist may be global, regional or national, she may be an
environmental economist or not, she may be a socialist, a
corporatist, an unlimited existential capitalist or a reformer with a
preference for a new synthetic economic method of her own invention.
One could make a table to show some of the varieties or combinations
of economic viewpoints and recognize some of the confusion that goes
abroad through the broadcast media and publishing world when various
economic analysis and remedies are advanced to the public.
There
are many short-term existential economists it seems concerned with
short-term phenomenal changes to various disingenuous
government measured statistics of inflation, employment, value of
bonds, treasury notes, public debt, tax rate and so forth with
various theoretical filters for interpretation also based upon their
own choices for economic viewpoint. Many of those are what the public
gets in the U.S.A. today. It is a sort of possession is 9/10ths of
the law sort of economics, rather than one of cold, rational
objectivity for the good of the people and environment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Universal Basic Income Should be a Doge Priority
It might prevent a lot of crimes and costs of incarceration. It could replace unemployment compensation, food stamps, etc and enhance effici...
-
Here and there pointillist continua build rowing the skiff clambering over the road staying in shadows until spring insouciant compact snow ...
-
Alaskan officials have cut down or banned King Salmon fishing in much of Alaska because so few of the large fish are returning. The Ancho...
-
Why do F-22 pilots lose consciousness and let their planes crash and burn? The air superiority fighters are designed to survive oppositio...