Border Patrol Has Hot Dirty, Thankless Job Chasing Fugitives

The United States is presently the best place on Earth for criminals from other nations to go to seek refuge. If they can steal enough from their own nation and make it to Mexico to cross illegally into the United States they find a welcome refuge from the Democrat Party- and even sanctuary cities to succor them. Foreign criminals that stay in the shadows can live in the U.S.A. for decades without concern of apprehension if they keep their criminal activities in the sanctuary nation to a minimum. Without any sort of documentation needed the illegal immigrant criminal has a new lease on life.

At a Gold Cup soccer match between the U.S.A. and Mexico in Chicago at Soldier field 85% of the fans supported Mexico. They were loyal to Mexico the foreign government; maybe they were illegal aliens. They cursed the Americans in mass chants at opportune times called the Americans faggots in the Mexican lingo. Thank you for that President Obama.

https://sports.yahoo.com/puto-chant-mexico-usa-gold-cup-final-012818325.html

The border patrol gets a lot of abuse from Democrats that hate them and their work defending the borders of the United States against illegal entry, drug traffickers, human traffickers and the scum of the Earth that hate doing anything legally regarding entry to the United States. The border patrol is accused of hate for not loving the sometimes abusive fugitives they apprehend. Sometimes the dangerous illegals are armed. They are at any rate a never-ending opposition force waging a war upon the border patrol in a sense.

The border patrol cadre is being treated as were Vietnam veterans returning home by Democrats. AOC is something like the new Jane Fonda although she is not alone. The primary difference is that the border patrol isn't fighting a foreign war, they are defending the United States directly.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-border-agents-southern-border

Border patrol agents may have to wrestle down the world's most active, aggressive trespassers. In one recent mass arrest 100 fugitives from all over the planet including Africa were caught. Some of those people are dangerous. A few have knives or guns, some know martial arts or carry disease. Stopping them isn't a wondrous task. It is not as if they are pampered U.S. Representatives having smoke blown up their ass by the left-wing media.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/451276-booker-vows-to-virtually-eliminate-immigration-detention-if-elected

Because illegal aliens  are not planned in the U.S. federal budget; that is their numbers vary, it is difficult to plan reception and processing facilities for those caught in advance. Senator Booker would catch and release the illegals at best guaranteeing they won't be returned to their own country. It would be better to find a few closed military bases capable of sheltering a half million illegal aliens if necessary and truck them there until they could be processed by on-site legal authorities for adjudication.

Of course the conspiracy theorists would say that the camps are being developed to put lawful citizen dissidents in by an Orwellian state. That urban legend would be supported by the 5th column democrats that would flood the nation with countless millions of illegal aliens to undermine and marginalize the ordinary working class republicans that experience displacement from the presence of millions of illegals as well as to provide cheap labor for Democrat home owners. The minimum wage might be $50 an hour if there were no illegal workers in the U.S.A. They are a real lever to keep the minimum wage low low while the luxury tax for signing Kevin Durant to a max contract extension would have been 400 million dollars for Golden State. There is a large difference between the political class and the poor worker class.

Einstein's Pantheism in Relation to Original Sin and Consequentialism

Einstein was something of a scientific pantheist in his idea of how God is. I cannot see a relationship between any sort of pantheism and utilitarianism or the popular current version of it named consequentialism. Pantheism is a religious belief or idea about the nature or being of God, and utilitarianism is an ethical system useful to a limited extent in making choices for political policy notably. 

Bentham and Mill were advocates of utilitarianism. It has nothing at all to do with one's religious beliefs or even deontology following one's religious ontology. Utilitarianism approximates what democratic governments generally might want to follow in pursuing the good of the people accentuated on the majority. One problem with it is the problem in defining or deciding what the good is in a particular circumstance; Plato's republic had guardians making those choices for people as they were supposed to be smarter and better educated.

I am just not a pantheist, though I find the Harris-Yale approach regarding utilitarianism incorrect. I actually believe in God for a number of reasons, rather than the idea that matter in its solid state form in the Universe is God at all. There is a difference between God created everything and God is everything that involves protocols. Actually I am a Christian and also believe in original sin. In my opinion the fall and original sin are the problem of entropy and thermodynamics. Organic beings input energy- often eating other living things- that accounts for the original sin-nature of mankind- The devil tricked Eve into biting the fruit and the original sin got rolling. Human governance is different than utilitarian ethics. I like the approach of fixing particular problems commonly faced yet letting people run their own lives with security. 

 It is interesting that some write as if election follows human determination of faith with retro-causality. One need disambiguate the logical incompatibility. Humans tend to want to believe they have free will and the spirit of God will enable them to be saved if they in some way have faith. I think for logical consistency, with God's omnipotence, one ought to believe God predestined everything. The question that should be rightfully asked is how may total predestination and contingent free will be compatible. Some people find it troubling to believe that God has pre-determined everything; I don't. Aleoretic elements (the process of chance in creation) in theology don't work well for me.

What is Thought

Thoughts are kept in the brain's neurons- conscious thought uses certain cognitive percept modes all the time, interprets them etc. There is depth in the brain. More neurons than stars in the galaxy (100 billion neurons, 99.999 billion stars) and capacity to store thoughts. Subconscious recalls thought as needed. Some thoughts are elicited form the nature and use of thoughts. Thoughts are comparable to chemical coded structures/ comparable to computer storage of data with better processing.

Conscious thought keeps just one verbal stream present at a time, so old thoughts fade out and are stored subconsciously, in the brain.

Is There a Slaughter of Innocents in the U.S.A?

Who are the innocents? The United States goes to great length to protect innocents with law enforcement. Never in human history have so many babies been treated so well, and youth too. Laws to protect women are promulgated so much as to fill legal libraries. I wonder what innocents are being slaughtered?

In history infanticide has been fairly common. Society has progressed over the millennia from the Roman era where deformed infants were tossed into the public garbage piles and to England with exploited child labor laws in factories that raised the minimum working age to the present where spanking is mostly illegal in schools.

 If the slaughtered innocents are those abortions made by the millions I would say that is a consequence of prosperity and empowerment of women. It is usually a female choice. Perhaps it requires faithlessness too.

China had strict abortion laws and they lacked many of the mal-attributes the United States has concerning sin (although they were atheist). IMO conflating sex issues with other violence such as murder is probably a mistake. Drugs, alcohol, gangs and poverty are likely the most common causal factors for the 17,000 annual homicides. Another factor is social anomie and chaos from mass illegal immigration. California is the murder capitol of the USA by far with the most illegal immigrants and lax law enforcement. 

https://knoema.com/.../United-States.../Number-of-homicides

I knew a doctor that informed me that some mammal species have spontaneous abortions when over-population happens. The world is very populated, and zero population growth has been a social virtue in some circles since the early 1960s. Because of Darwinianism that has been reinforced with mass loss and degradation of faith. Faithless people in an over-populated world with an ineffective ecclesiastical structure better suited to the pre-literate era experiencing prosperity, birth control and mass socialization by media haven't a godly, monogamous village society to live in. Women too much choose to avoid the 'mistake' of having kids. It is a complex situation not addressed by church or state, the media or many scholars with wholistic competence.

It is interesting to consider Augustine's theology of original sin, and that mankind is totally depraved in regards to God's perfection. Without pre-destination of the elect none could be saved for they are born in sin, and perhaps, condemned since conception- unless they were the elect. Pre-destination or election- God's work and the Holy Spirit-is what enables faith and regeneration. Faith and regeneration seem to be time-delayed in appearance for an individual usually, in conformity to God's schedule and will for each individual. The elect are saved and regenerated with faith as the Holy Spirit actualizes unto the soul.

 It is interesting that some write as if election follows human determination of faith with retro-causality. One need disambiguate the logical incompatibility. Humans tend to want to believe they have free will and the spirit of God will enable them to be saved if they in some way have faith. I think for logical consistency, with God's omnipotence, one ought to believe God predestined everything. The question that should be rightfully asked is how may total predestination and contingent free will be compatible. Some people find it troubling to believe that God has pre-determined everything; I don't. Aleoretic elements (the process of chance in creation) in theology don't work well for me.

Infinite Speed and Black Hole Terminal Velocity

A simple blog entry on infinite speed. People speculate that infinite speed may mean no time elapses in transit between point a and point b (regardless of the distance). That seems something like quantum superposition at all possible locations of wave-particles.

So it is interesting to speculate that black holes with event horizons that have material swirling about them near the speed of light have a terminal velocity of light speed instead of accelerating to infinite speed. In the general theory of relativity there are infinities spatially, yet not infinities of speed. That seems like an inconsistency. One might wonder if  super-position of mass that reached an infinite rotational velocity would occur and if it would be dimensions that are super-positioned as well as scale in 4-dimensional space-time.

Speed is relative of course, so gravitational infinities of black holes with a rotational velocity spin approaching infinity may seem like nothing at all-especially if it were something like a black hole at time=0. Alternatively infinite rotational velocity might entail centrifugal force outwardly to strip content from a black hole before it has overall infinite gravitational power in-itself.

New Robot Dog Could Police Battlefield

A new robot dog made in Boston could serve to retrieve body parts from battlefields as well as dragging wounded soldiers back to safety. The robot dogs might serve as medal-of-honor task implements from rescues of the wounded to storming machine gun tests or tossing a grenade through an enemy pillbox window.

There Isn't an Economic System of Pure Capitalism

Capital is material or intellectual property. Capital is materialism in a sense- pure materialism and exclusive possession/use of matter. Adding an ‘ism’ suffix to capital does make it sound like something other than what it is. Yet capital-ism is nothing more than individuals and collectives going about acquiring capital.

There isn’t an exclusive method, procedure or system for acquiring capital such that it deserves to have an ism all of its own. Without any government existing, without any markets, a frontiersman may acquire capital with hunting and curing meat for the winter, for example. Building a cabin is capital acquisition.

Innumerable ways to allow individuals government facility for building capital (with equal opportunity) may be constructed, invented etc. A system where large banks and networks develop exclusive advantages to own capital in a society is just one bad method amidst zillions of potential systems that people might invent or field as a fundamental template for free market transactions, use of capital etc.

Pure or impure capitalism is thus something of a wrong idea about mankind’s relation to capital. The ownership of capital was a great debate between socialism and people of the free societies that thought of themselves as capitalists. Neither side was too bright regarding political and economic philosophy.

A good example of the destruction of ‘pure capitalism’- capitalism without government intervention- was the government interventions in 2008–2009 to bail out banks and the most rich. Even large automakers were propped up by President Obama instead of being allowed to fail through bankruptcy and liquidation as would occur in ‘pure’ capitalism.

Keeping fossil fuel automakers alive undoubtedly hurt Tesla’s opportunity to become the dominant American automaker with a nation buying Teslas as if they were Model T Fords in the electric field.  One day a national electric field may allow motorless ‘cars’ to shuttle about on superconducting lines.

Pure capitalism does not exist once government intervenes to ossify a system of protectionism for the most rich and advantaged players. Then democracy and free markets are ossified and made to serve the most rich without any semblance of an egalitarian economic allocation of resources remaining in existence.

Democrat Presidential Candidates are a Sorry Lot

Democrats traditionally increase debt. The exception was the 1999–2000 version of Bill Clinton who balanced the budget when the Republican Congress had him by the b__ls because of the Lewinsky lying crisis. They insisted on cutting government spending and he signed off on it.

President Obama created greater public debt than any other president, yet reduced the rate of increase of public debt his final three years. President Trump had solid debt increase his first two years and reduced the rate of increase his third year staying true to the modern form.

I did omit W from above- he did seem to accept public debt increase too well.

Democrat Presidential candidates are fairly uncreative, dull and the product of socialist pyramid approval structures. race, gender and perversion are more important issues for Democrats than substantial ideas about reform. They are generally happy with the economic system in its largest parameters and, except for AOC who would like to change it substantially (though not enough or correctly) adding 11 trillion dollars of public debt, the Democrat candidates are somewhat deaf to the idea of balancing the budget without increasing it too with vastly more taxes. Democrat leaders want to enrich themselves.

Few really creative and intelligent people enter politics to reach a high level these days-especially in the Democrat Party. There are so many reasons why they don’t.

One is that the Democrat Party isn’t one of ideas. They have a different idea of freedom than most Republicans perhaps. Democrats distrust strait white men and U.S. history because the history of the nation being one led mostly by strait white men. The Democrat assumption is that the whole constitutional paradigm and foundation of the nation by white men was bad because non-white men and women were not enfranchised. They fail to realize that white men revolted against white men over issues of freedom and rights with race having nothing to do with it generally.

To simply elect people that aren’t white, straight and male without good ideas won’t get good political work done for all citizens if the non-straight, white males are elected. Good ideas are totally separable from race, gender and perversion. Americans need to be more educated to expect good ideas for reform and actually encounter them through the media; lots of good ideas. people should want to elect the best ideas instead of the best skin color or gender.

Balancing the federal budget, reforming government, reducing public debt, restoring ecospheric health, stopping illegal immigration, creating a more egalitarian distribution of wealth without crass redistributionism, keeping Americans out of the dangerous scuppers and whirlpools endemic to dire poverty, building a moon base, safeguarding national defense and helping neighboring nations out of poverty with hope for all- these are ideas with possible content that work yet are not recognized by the race-card playing Democrat party.

Would Demos Really Vote for a Candidate Descended From Slave Plantation Owners?

When Kamala Harris said she was descended from prominent Jamaican slave owners that presented a conundrum for the party faithless; wouldn't they seem like step-n-fetch-its if they chose a leader descended from slave owners?

Democrats are such a racist party without good ideas that skin coloration alone is a qualifier for the top job. Female and homo are additional points for the party of perversion.

I cannot imagine voting for anyone descended from slave owners intentionally. The United States is about democracy and resistance to slavery- maybe Democrats can nominate people descended from Klan leaders as well and, of course, Robert E. Lee.

With hundreds of millions of native-born Americans it should be possible for the Democrat Party to find candidates that have a lineage of freedom rather than the slave-owning side to put up for their top jobs.

https://www.jamaicaglobalonline.com/kamala-harris-jamaican-heritage/

https://www.nj.com/news/2019/06/cory-booker-says-kamala-harris-doesnt-have-sh-t-to-prove-after-donald-trump-jr-shares-racist-tweet-likened-to-birtherism.html

Competent people in a nation give wide birth to select historical currents, persons, symbols and directions in order to avoid conflicts of interest. There is no need to cut the corners as if there were few potential candidates with middle of the road qualifications free of conflict of interest.

An example would be German electors that run a candidate with ancestors that were high in the Nazi Party or cousins of Adolph Hitler; there must be a few competent Germans without that heritage to run for the top job. If China ever became a free market social democracy should it run heirs of Chairman Mao for the Presidency? What about Benedict Arnold- surely he must have some fully qualified descendants that could run for the White House?

The Democrat Party could at least look to the United States instead of Jamaica for a candidate with ancestors that were proud and prominent owners of slaves. Since Democrats want to make slaves of Americans socially to the very rich through real politik, it behooves them to find candidates with ancestors experienced owning slaves in the United States.

Simplified Intellectual Properties International Court for China Trade War?

Wouldn’t a simplified intellectual properties adjudication process in an international court make it easier to defend against and find compensation for theft of intellectual properties? China with its communist background has a different attitude toward ownership of intellectual properties. 

Intellectual and technical transfer from the west with its intellectual properties rights have built China up substantially in the intellectual vacuum created by pervasive government repression of individual intellectual and spiritual freedom.

Communism represses individual creativity. It strips individual creators of the fruit of their labor (no reference to Elton John at all). Communism kills motivation for invention, and with liberalization Chinese inventiveness increases, yet the dark specter of communist authoritarianism remains to guide the invisible hand of Adam Smith's invisible half-brother; Shady Smith; Pickpocket Extraordinaire.

The trade war should be resolved reasonably soon in order to facilitate orderly business processes that should be guided to an ecologically sustainable direction. China with its history of over-population has required severe birth control measures for national viability. Communism may be the best form of government for state repression of population growth beyond the Nazi concentration-liquidation camp methodology.

In my opinion humanity is best at expansion and least competent at social design. Governments are good at repression but virtually incapable of intelligent ecologically sustainable design. The U.S. Democrat Party is a good present example of that; it seeks to flood the United States with illegal aliens by the tens of millions to swell the domestic population closer toward the 400 million level that radically over-stresses the national ecosphere. In some way intellectual creativity need accompany ecological and demographic sustainability or the usual human social structure of expansion in unplanned sprawl followed by mass war casualties to destroy the structure when it becomes untenable recurs.

Some kind of international court and process for compensating victims of intellectual properties theft need be made between China and the world. fair hearings and just compensation for victims along with protection against frivolous lawsuits need be made. China and other governments should pay into the fund from business profits. Hearing officers would decide the legitimacy of claims and scheduled, standardized payments that are structurally scheduled would be made. National governments basing the convicted perpetrators would be free to seek pay-back from their perps.

In addition to the Intellectual Properties Court it would be useful to reform the patent process globally and reduce the exclusivity period to three years in order to accelerate human technological development. After three years anyone could produce the patented item legally if they pay 10% royalty to the patent holder.

Technology transfer in some ways is a separable items. The phenomenon is a result of weak national governance and policy. It is a result of capitalists seeking after cheap foreign labor and foreign markets. Nations including the U.S.A. could require foreign companies to transfer technology too in order to do business in their country. Trade agreements and equalize and yet so may national policy.