Gary C. Gibson

7/26/19

Shouldn’t There Be National Freeways Just for Electric Vehicles?

Electric vehicles are clean. Zero emissions to add to global warming. President Eisenhower began the federal interstate system for defense purposes. A modern President could justify construction of a few Interstate dedicated solely to the use of electric vehicles. Electric power lines for recharging would be embedded in the highways.

Global warming is truly a problem. Humanity puts 37 billion tons of Co2 into the atmosphere every year. Last year- 201, was the worst ever. Making sure that state-of-the-art electric vehicle technology is prioritized would help reduce the expansion of one of the most grave threats to human life; the fossil fuel powered vehicle.

Thee north-south and three east-west freeways designed for electric vehicles would get the new infrastructure started. The highways might be designed to have a high albedo reflecting sunlight back into space. The highways might also convert sunlight into electricity, and even superconductors in liquid hydrogen filled pipes might store electricity not being used.

Electric vehicles including self-driving cars and trucks, should have a system enabling the use of the best features of electric powered platforms including rapid acceleration and cool running high speed.

Both major US political parties present bad choices to voters. Democrats are lunatic globalist neo-treasonous, quasi-socialist queer developer feminists and Republicans appeal to an electorate that is supposed to be stupid as stone, ignorant hillbilly yippies that believe fossil fuel Co2 damage that anyone with a lick of sense knows to be a huge human-caused problem is a fiction made up by Democrats. So the choice voters have is between ignorance or stupidity and corruption. Americans can do better than that, and should. Building a few green highways for electric cars is practical and difficult to f..-up. for pork and odd political derivative spending.

Economic development can be intelligent and not use fossil fuels and greenhouse gases generally. That requires economic leadership rather than government spending, except where government spending on useful programs are just adapted to a purely green ergonomic foundation efficiently. The free market with some direction is the best tool for reforming the economic infrastructure of the United States. Build it and others will follow.

Why Not Open Artemis Moon Program to Outside Investors

I am all for U.S. nationalism generally. On the return to the moon program and build a base I have a different take; allow outside investors including China and Russia, Saudi Arabia etc. to buy into the program to a level that at any time would comprise 49% of the cost.

The United States has a history of hot and cold on manned space missions, as well as converting basically good programs into union pork that go on forever without producing much after the start. A manned lunar research and relaunch base could use input from other nations from the start. It makes little sense for redundant Russia and Chinese programs for the moon with all three nations ending up with smaller bases not well enough funded.

Human efforts to establish permanent and productive manned space colonies within ecologically rational criteria will cost a lot of money, though with the potential of returning orders of magnitude more than the investment over time. A lunar port near the base should be planned for landing commercial spaceships. Maybe it should be named the Trump Space Facility. https://gizmodo.com/spacex-s-starhopper-makes-its-first-free-flying-leap-1836727226

The Democrat Party is likely to cut the guts out of the U.S. Space program in order to have higher wages, Medicare and drivers training for illegal aliens on the Pelosi vineyards plantation and so forth. Investment from Europe, India and etc would keep the moon base sustainable economically.

If the Nadler hearings and impeachment services could redirect some of its work to the new lunar base, in 2024 the first Lunar inquiry into impeaching the President could transpire with exciting video for all on Earth with Rep Nadler starring again.

Democrat's Goon Squad Does Seem Racist

The House of Representatives' Democrat Majority Goon Squad of Four does seem consistently racist. As self-described 'colored women' they represent an external proletariat of Muslims and non-whites that hate the straight white male President for being white and male. The Goon Squad belligerence represents the face of the world to come as a result of Democrat Party politics. The interests of women seeking to expropriate male wages in the United States, the interests of global proletariats and the interests of the most rich that wanted to cap and degrade middle class male wages in the U.S.A. since women got birth control pills and entered the work force in larger numbers have aligned. Saul Alinsky had some theory that has inspired the Democrat party too-

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/why-%E2%80%98-squad%E2%80%99-screams-%E2%80%98racism%E2%80%99-69042

With the Democrace solid in its existential will to sprawl, expropriate, redistribute and empower the future for a few generations probably will be more Orwellian with vague elites of 1%ers in communist and capitalist casheconomic infrastructures manipulating their daily haters from afar with technology.

Space exploration is at least becoming a bright spot once again, with hope not yet occluded even by Muslims of the Goon Squad.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/25/nancy-pelosi-said-squad-was-just-four-people-heres-why-they-might-succeed/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.44181a905e89

It is funny about the latter. Muslim civilization was the primary rival of western civilization. It was contained in the Iberian Peninsula and driven out in 1492- the same year Columbus discovered America and aboriginals living there. Through the sheer Democrace existential hate of straight white males and global redistributionist theory the Muslim society is being imported into what was founded as a Christian nation of western civilization to become an implicit threat after 500 years. The kind of incompetence that required to get done is breathtaking.

https://msmagazine.com/2019/07/19/feminist-faves-instagram-gets-in-formation-behind-the-squad/

7/25/19

Philosophical Issues With Darwin's Theory

Philosophical problems with Darwin’s theory might be taken to mean generally that people don’t support the evolution paradigm. Some believe the Bible and Genesis especially are in opposition to evolution. I don’t see it that way having learned science and Christianity together from early youth.

So one might want to explain more fully to people why one can find everything natural- not created by humans, as created by God, in default. God, after all, has lots of time. All of eternity is a lot of time to create a Multiverse or Universe and set it working. If every last atom and quark was foreknown by God, and planned, that would include evolution too.

Really it's quite an interesting topic and the better one is informed of the Bible and of Cosmology the more interesting it becomes. God is a lot smarter than humans. It's good he left the Bible for a guide and sent His Son to the world to help out.

I wrote a lot of brief essays on the topic and published two books- free to download with those essays. They are here…

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/god-cosmology-and-nothingness-theory-and-theology-in-a-scientific-era-garrison-clifford-gibson/1122557877?ean=9781365539107

http://www.lulu.com/shop/garrison-clifford-gibson/creation-and-cosmos-the-literal-values-of-genesis/ebook/product-23246271.html

I have learned more and thought more about cosmology and creation since I wrote those. Maybe sometime I will add a third collection.

I have read the KJV more than a half century and believe God evolved the world, and the apocalypse occurred in the first century A.D. when Jerusalem was destroyed, Christians scattered and martyred, and the building of the Kingdom of God was then new for the passing generation of the old era. Some believe it wise to repeat the pre-tribulation philosophy and to believe their own interpretation of Genesis is infallible.

I would say that evolution theory is natural, and God created all natural things. Scientific atheists and some reactionary Christians are just wrong about things. Making a dialectical opposition of evolution and the Bible is wrong- it misleads many souls and government decisions.

A fine-tuned Multiverse is implicitly a little contradictory- every possible Universe that could exist does exist in some form is the theory. Each Universe should be fine-tuned for it to be what it is. That's nearly a principle of identity. The Universe has a built-in Occam's razor compelling it to lack a surfeit of alternative variables and constants. Yet God is spirit and the constants and variables of any given Universe aren't really germaine. They are downstream in a manner of speaking.

G.W.F. Hegel believed the Universe was the world spirit trying to realize itself through history (paraphrase of someone- I cannot recall). He thought the German state of his time was the highest evolution of the intelligence. Dialectical evolution loosely would have been the Universe trying to be and become interacting with itself.

An analogy might be that the world-spirit began its material paradigm self-awareness program as a tiny seed at the big bang and evolved through interactive change into something larger and more pluralistic with sentience being the highest phase achieved within a government and society that was Germany. That was a practical way for a philosopher to get some approval from the Aristocrats of his nation, though I doubt that Hegel invented the theory just to kiss a of the most rich rulers.

Hegel was rightly called an idealist; all of this dialectical progress was working of Spirit. Hegel wrote a nice, smaller version of The Phenomenology of Mind titled- Realms of Absolute Spirit (in a version I read).

What if Ford and Tesla Merged?

Tesla has been great technically at innovation yet sometimes a little shaky on sales and production. Ford is going increasingly electric and trying to be more forward looking. It would seem like a reasonable opportunity for the two automakers to merge.

https://www.tesla.com/models

https://electrek.co/2019/07/25/tesla-plans-massive-production-battery-cells-delays-unveiling/

The advantage of using Ford showrooms to sell Tesla cars and Ford production experience to produce the all electric tech leading cars more efficiently is apparent enough on the surface at least. Ford could benefit from Tesla quality electric tech insight, and Elon Musk could work more on new innovations and his space x projects and leave much of the mechanics to Ford.

It might be useful for the advance of hypertubes if Tesla and Ford continued to work together to improve various design improvements, if anything were actually going to be built in the U.S.A. in the lifetime of the present generations, instead of being a concept set aside for a half century like the moon landings and Apollo program.

https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/tesla-straubel-chief-technology-officer-leaves-q2-earnings/

https://corporate.ford.com/microsites/sustainability-report-2018-19/index.html

Some Context for 'America Love it or Leave it'

America Love it or Leave it'' was a common 1960s-70s era bumper sticker. Conservatives felt there were communists in the anti-Vietnam war movement back then. There were some communist-Trotskiites associated with the anti-war movement that had an origin in the end of the Stalin era in the Soviet Union and the decision of following Soviet leaders to resume a global policy of support for communist insurgent movements everywhere possible. Stalin before had supported just a 'communism in one country' policy (the Soviet Union). The North Vietnamese Army were heavily subsidized by the post-Stalin Soviet Union.

image credit US Army

Because the communists were atheists, some Baptist church pastors were especially inclined to support the pro-capitalist side of the United States, of which they were citizens anyway. It was easy to have a fairly consistent patriotic, pro-American policy in that era. Today, alternatively, shamefully, the left have tried to associate pro-America with racism, disingenuously. Today, not only are globalism socialism and communism a recrudescent threat, some U.S. politicians appear to be too happy to be associated with a benevolent attitude to foreign terrorist organizations.

A democracy is a nation of laws- civil laws, and sovereignty of ordinary people. Many today seem to take democracy for granted and support bum-rushing of the borders illegally with race as a justification. Their work reinforces globalist concentration of wealth and elite imperialists, corporatists, plutocrats and communists. Even (U.S.) federal courts have caseload backlogs that are not helped with expenses that need go to adjudicating legal matters of millions of illegal aliens. Federal courts are required for inter-state dispute resolution, and that includes civil matters. So good luck in trying to get a court date to resolve civil affairs for compensation from convicted interstate criminals.

7/24/19

Democrat Investigation of Trump Proved Vladimir Putin Really Won 2016 Election (satire)

The monumental, precedent shattering Mueller Investigation Intifada of the Democrat Party and allied mainstream media has come to an end; at least phase one. President Trump has failed to prove his innocence once more, thus he is by default and Democrat demand, guilty, of letting Russia win the 2016 election.

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2019-07-24/mueller-hearings-donald-trump-obstruction

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-says-mueller-did-horrible-job-at-hearings-but-had-nothing-to-work-with

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/24/pelosi-nadler-rebuff-impeachment-mueller-hearing-1432925

Before Democrats made the point plain with three years of public education reform, the nation had forgotten the legal principal that everyone is guilty until proven innocent. Some future Democrat Congress may overcome onerous rules of habeas corpus that prevent locking up Republicans on sound moral principals for beating Democrats in elections too often.

President Trump has been a puppet of Russian marionette Vladimir Putin and hops to every whim of Moscow's bagpipers and different drummers. Democrats; thanks to their interminable conviction and actions to prove that Vladimir Putin the Elector is the real leader of America and President Trump just a figurehead representing Russian control of Wall Street and all red things in the White House and across the heartland brought America to focus on election stuff for three years instead of other stuff. Who knew Russia ruled the rubes so easily?

https://time.com/5634675/trump-turning-point-russia-golf/

Democrats have shown the way that Russia will again win the White House and after 2021's January inauguration force the American East coast to drown in Sky and Stolichnaya vodka on the rocks in celebration.

Luckily for the nation, Democrats can be counted on to inform the nation of what's what when it counts- year after year.

Google and Google Blogspot is Too Large for Easy Takeover by Corporate Censors

Of the numerous web sites that were also social media locations with free writing venues I have posted at, Google blog-spot is the sole survivor. Virtually any place I wrote and posted sometimes politically contentious material eventually was closed down(or I was banned).* Even Google blogspot originally was Geocities that Google bought. Geocities before it was taken over by Geocities was also named something else. Corporatism and the Democratic left cadre infiltrating internet sites greedily marginalize or close down outlets for free speech they believe don't support their proprietary interests. So I am concerned about A.G. Barr's anti-trust targeting of Google, Facebook and not so much about Amazon since I prefer to use e-bay for looking for used stuff.

https://www.foxnews.com/tech/barr-facebook-google-amazon-antitrust-probe

Corporatism has taken over the democracy of the United States. Its managers are simply intolerant of non-corporate agenda writing on its venues. They find some pretext to marginalize, ban or otherwise censor free speech consistently. It is true that Google is very large, however without some kind of public Internet writing forum that last through political vicissitudes and the capacity of the 1% to buy out, take over and shut down web-sites where antipathetic free speech occurs, Google is about it. In the case of free speech Google's capitalization is the best factor for independent writing remaining.

* If you look at my archive history you would see the 400% increase in the number of posts I made for the year 2010. That was a result of being banned from Helium after a Democrat was elected to the White House in 2008 and sworn in January 2009. On Dec. 24th I was banned from a no-longer existing for-profit website for writers and so brought my articles over to blogspot.

A Comment on Omniscience

I tend toward belief in God's omnipotence and omniscience. For instance, in the Mathematical Universe paradigm of Tegmark's with a level 4 multiverse, IMO, the entire construct is actualized thought of God in which human subroutine's experience what God wills. Evil in the Bible is natural disaster while wickedness i human malevolence to others. The capacity of God exceeds human understanding- humans are contingent being, wot.

Plotinus' Enneads (Plotinus was a neo-Platonist) illustrates some of the mystery of The One (God). Being omniscient he has no questions to answer or choices to make...those are temporal phenomena of contingent beings that do not know the past present and future of everything including every possible actualized form of multiverse.

Omniscience is not like temporal phenomenon including sentient minds. Everything that exists is temporal, God is more than that of course. All human or theoretical sentience of contingent beings is less than a fraction of everything that is God. Sentient besides God that wants more knowledge has questions, needs to learn etc. It is endemic to the criterion of temporal, thermodynamic being. God is more than everything he creates including Multiverse(s). There is much temporal language not well suited to describe the non-temporal, eternal that yet encompasses the appearance of temporal, thermodynamic change that contingent beings experience.

To answer the second paragraph first; God said; "I am". He does not need to prove His own existence. That would seem somewhat neurotic from a human point of view.

It is interesting that he encompasses temporality yet is eternal. God is spirit. The temporal thermodynamic, physical Universe is always in change. It seems to be made of quarks and strings. Strings have one dimension- points have zero dimensions. Leibniz believed that one-dimensional monads were the primary element of matter.

However one regards the smallest component, particle-wave pieces of matter, it is built up from basic, very basic field components of some unknown kind and the protocols add up to form the steady state of matter and energy comprising the Universe. Pure spiritual foundation in the mind of God is challenging to understand, yet the size or scale is relative unto God and His own being.

Tegmark's book is worth reading- The Mathematical Universe. He does not intend for it to be a theological paradigm at all; simply math. He believes math makes up the Multiverse at the fundamental level. A Multiverse may be fully actualized (it is very large), yet static; mind travels through the Multiverse and each though one has switches a mind through it to another Universe with the correct corresponding structure for the thought. Thought is all that moves. Heraclitus and Parmenides-two pre-Socratics, commented on what change is and how it might be viewed relativistically

There are innumerable ways to have a purely spiritual Universe and Multiverse. It may appear from some perspectives to grow and expand, and from other perhaps not. People are familiar with the paradoxes of general and special relativity, so one should be able to imagine what scale and how a Multiverse might be just a thought of God’s within his other non-temporal stuff.

If humans are comparable to real numbers, and to a small fraction between zero and one, at a virtually infinite level of reduction between those numbers- a set of some arbitrarily small number repeated equal to the population of the Earth, and are unaware they are of that scale and made of spirit set aside by God, they have a challenge before them in understanding all numbers and number theory that could possibly exist to its infinite scale. And the numbers and math are just a single aspect of God’s nature.

NASA-Chandra-Center of Milky Way Galaxy

Gary C. Gibson - Essays