Obama D.O.J. Sues Arizona to Force Illegal Alien 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Policy

President Obama Sides With Globalists Against Arizona/U.S. Sovereignty- wants a ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Policy' for illegal aliens before amnesty and fast track take over the congress..

The Obama D.O.J. has filed suit against the state of Arizona and its law to check the legal status of people its law enforcement officials encounter. Rationally, law enforcement officials should make a general check of individuals it encounters to determine if they have broken local, state or federals. The Obama administration seeks to protect the illegal status of Mexican and other nationals in the United States illegally with a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ principle for illegal aliens encountering Arizona police.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100706/ap_on_re_us/us_immigration_enforcement_lawsuit

Citing the well known legal principle ‘adverse possession is 9/10ths of the law, the Obama Department of Justice has said in a legal opinion that it’s immigration control powers extend beyond the border and entry into the United States all the way to Flagstaff and Sioux Falls. Apparently, wherever illegals are located in the United States they are still immigrating here, and will be so until given the top Executive jobs as remedial anti-discriminatory corrections by the Obama administration.

The Obama legal alumni team from Harvard also extends to the Harvard Medical School in advocacy of the Boston-Harvard global axis of accentuating the positive economic effects for concentrating wealth of illegal immigration. In a rather vague legal theory, state law officials may not support the federal Government’s laws because the several states are not materially part of the United States, which is instead a transcendent, amorphous legal entity of global stature. The Obama pro-illegal alien team offers this advice to Arizona legal officials; “keepa yo fingers off these illegals or we breaka dose fingas”.

It may seem reasonable to state governments that have modeled their own constitutions upon the federal in many cases, to pass state laws reflecting U.S. Federal laws, and to confirm the legal residence status of all individuals encountered by law enforcement. In fact the best way to reinforce U.S. border security is to deputize or otherwise empower all U.S. law enforcement officials to arrest illegal aliens and remand them to federal custody for deportation.

Thus far the Obama administration has been utterly incompetent at enforcing U.S. border security. One might summarize the Obama Executive opinion as "I made it easily to the best opportunities in the U.S.A., and see how this nation has benefited. Why shouldn't illegal aliens become citizens and race to the top like myself? There is no compelling reason why citizens born in the 48 states should have any legal rights to secure their borders or to control immigration much less restrict it to a quarter million foreign immigrants every year. Neither domestic law enforcement persons of interest or citizens should feel they have any right whatsoever to determine through a democratic process who may enter this nation. That is the prerogative of globalists with dual citizenship such as your's truly. Besides, the illegals make good cheap laborers and keep down wages for the native drudges" security.

General Petraeus and Winning ‘Counter-Insurgency’ Strategy for Afghanistan

General Petraeus has said that the Taliban ‘insurgency’ is a ‘test of wills’ for control of the country. Afghanistan is unlike Iraq economically and politically though, the General’s presumptions may not be effective equally well in each nation.

Counter-insurgency strategy for El Salvador could confront an alien, Marxist political paradigm like it might a virus unnaturally introduced into the body. The Marxist leadership of the rebels could be attacked as a hierarchical and insular organization and reduced. The populist Muslim powers of central Asia are not alien though, and are instead popular without an elite cadre of leadership to decimate or co-opt into the powers of the dark side of the force of Spenserian capitalism.

U.S. military efforts have prowess and personnel equivalent to the 800-pound guerrilla of Afghan myth. We make employ predator drones to kill remote trans-border resistance leaders in Pakistan yet fail to develop a high monthly body count of insurgents. Instead, several suicide bombers perish each month along with the elites abroad, and a squad or two attacks sensationally and symbolically some powerful, well defended U.S. garrison in Afghanistan now and then. In comparison to the Afghan war to expel the Red Army of the former Soviet Union, the Afghanistan resistance to establishment of a U.S. puppet state tolerant of homosexuality and global business domination suffers comparatively few casualties. Instead of a test of wills, the Taliban seems to be waging a test of I.Q. and winning; they could have 250 suicide bombers and leaders killed annually for decades perhaps, and not have even one year’s worth of casualties incurred fighting the Red Army in the 1980s.

There are many compelling economic reasons for The Fundamentalist Muslim world to wage a protracted counter-U.S. insurgency in Afghanistan that will support al Qa’eda goals of economically reducing the United States. They may perceive themselves as a righteous power of the poor combating the decadent rich, international nation (the U.S.A.) that sponsors their local dictator, monarch or despot. Because of U.S. budget tactics in responding to al Qa’eda and Taliban tactics, the strategy is viable n drawing the U.S. to spend asymmetrically abroad. The Taliban know that as soon as they stop the suicide bombing and general resistance, the U.S.A. can begin slow withdrawal and financial recover over decades of course, of its own house affairs.

Following a U.S. economic withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan the usual local conflicts and contentions will return. New local and regional balances of power would emerge; the United States should not put itself in the position of being a remembered anathema to whoever emerges to rule from the chaos as it may. There are many tactics to interact with a popular Muslim vox populi in Central Asia and Iraq that are better cognizant of the lack of hierarchical ecclesiastical tradition in the Muslim world. That imam and populist neo-priesthood of believers phenomenality is well suited for a volunteer emanation of resistance movement fighters periodically against a foreign business-military hierarchy searching for ways to control the masses. In selecting its particular methods of reply to the decade old attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the leadership of the United States has continued to financially endanger the security of the United States as well as the physical security and well being of the people of the United States. The book of proverbs indicates that the borrowers end up being ruled by the lenders. General Petraeus and President Obama would do well to read the book of proverbs regularly.

The United States ought to develop a better, more thoughtful method of reply to challenges set by fundamentalist Muslims to U.S. and European security. A powerful minority with superior military weapons systems has dubious prospects of permanently subjugating billions of poor Asians; we should have learned that lesson in Vietnam. Neither must a Muslim nation necessarily be permanently antipathetic to U.S. national interests if the United States were to develop a better policy of ecological economic technical development at home and for support abroad. Because war for the United States today has become a form of economics through other means, a rectification of policy would require a rational economic foundational paradigm as a political philosophy appropriate for sustainable economic development of Afghanistan regardless of who is actually running the government there.

As it is, the United States has created a non-sustainable military enterprise that is of a phenomenal nature that later can be explained away with apologetics and PR for national political purposes. One hates to consider that sort of rhetoric tat will arise the next two or three decades as other, important challenges are set aside. Some sort of military assurance of non-belligerency and benevolent neutrality is required of Afghanistan because it allowed al Qa’eda to train there as well as in South Florida and Arizona, Minnesota and elsewhere before the 9-11-2001 suicide hijackings. The method to accomplish that requires a few more I.Q. points and a hundred thousand fewer soldiers and marines.

Selections from the Book of Proverbs and the Revelation for the 4th of July

Here are a several verses from the books of Proverbs and from the Revelation I thought I would share on the 4th of July.

Proverbs (King James Version)
“8:22-36 22The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old.
23I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was.
24When there were no depths, I was brought forth; when there were no fountains abounding with water.
25Before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth:
26While as yet he had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world.
27When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth:
28When he established the clouds above: when he strengthened the fountains of the deep:
29When he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of the earth:
30Then I was by him, as one brought up with him: and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him;
31Rejoicing in the habitable part of his earth; and my delights were with the sons of men.
32Now therefore hearken unto me, O ye children: for blessed are they that keep my ways.
33Hear instruction, and be wise, and refuse it not.
34Blessed is the man that heareth me, watching daily at my gates, waiting at the posts of my doors.
35For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favour of the LORD.
36But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death

10:15 The rich man's wealth is his strong city: the destruction of the poor is their poverty.
11:28 28He that trusteth in his riches shall fall; but the righteous shall flourish as a branch.
13:14 14The law of the wise is a fountain of life, to depart from the snares of death
13:20 20He that walketh with wise men shall be wise: but a companion of fools shall be destroyed.
14:12 12There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.
14:25 25A true witness delivereth souls: but a deceitful witness speaketh lies.
15:7 7The lips of the wise disperse knowledge: but the heart of the foolish doeth not so.
15:17 17Better is a dinner of herbs where love is, than a stalled ox and hatred therewith
15:21 21Folly is joy to him that is destitute of wisdom: but a man of understanding walketh uprightly.
16:22-23 22Understanding is a wellspring of life unto him that hath it: but the instruction of fools is folly. 23The heart of the wise teacheth his mouth, and addeth learning to his lips.
19:1 1Better is the poor that walketh in his integrity, than he that is perverse in his lips, and is a fool.
22:7 7The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.
18:11 11The rich man's wealth is his strong city, and as an high wall in his own conceit.
23:1-7 1When thou sittest to eat with a ruler, consider diligently what is before thee:
2And put a knife to thy throat, if thou be a man given to appetite.
3Be not desirous of his dainties: for they are deceitful meat.
4Labour not to be rich: cease from thine own wisdom.
5Wilt thou set thine eyes upon that which is not? for riches certainly make themselves wings; they fly away as an eagle toward heaven.
6Eat thou not the bread of him that hath an evil eye, neither desire thou his dainty meats:
7For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he: Eat and drink, saith he to thee; but his heart is not with thee
23:23 23Buy the truth, and sell it not; also wisdom, and instruction, and understanding.

24:1-2 1Be not thou envious against evil men, neither desire to be with them.
2For their heart studieth destruction, and their lips talk of mischief.
24:30-34 30I went by the field of the slothful, and by the vineyard of the man void of understanding;
31And, lo, it was all grown over with thorns, and nettles had covered the face thereof, and the stone wall thereof was broken down.
32Then I saw, and considered it well: I looked upon it, and received instruction.
33Yet a little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to sleep:
34So shall thy poverty come as one that travelleth; and thy want as an armed man.
25:4 4Take away the dross from the silver, and there shall come forth a vessel for the finer.

28:11 11The rich man is wise in his own conceit; but the poor that hath understanding searcheth him out.

28:6 6Better is the poor that walketh in his uprightness, than he that is perverse in his ways, though he be rich.

29:2 2When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.”

Revelation 10:1-4 (King James Version)
“ 1And I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his head, and his face was as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire:
2And he had in his hand a little book open: and he set his right foot upon the sea, and his left foot on the earth,
3And cried with a loud voice, as when a lion roareth: and when he had cried, seven thunders uttered their voices.
4And when the seven thunders had uttered their voices, I was about to write: and I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Seal up those things which the seven thunders uttered, and write them not.”

President Obama to Shore-Up Coast Guard for Afghanistan? (Humor rating: L (light))

As a multi-service Department of Defense investment the ‘war’ of nation building in Afghanistan to create a ‘democratic’ government like that of the Shah of Iran is dedicated to the capitalist ideal of spending money and bullets to promote civic virtue.

The foreign policy adventure is presently under the supervision of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullins-an advocate for a gay friendly military affording servicemen a political incorrect opportunity for happy dating of Afghanistan’s Taliban warriors, blowing kisses and so forth. Admiral Mullins has the military and political skill set needed to bring the Democratic Party vision of a brave new world to the high Asian barbarians. Afghanistan needs a Coast Guard like the U.S. Government needs an Admiral to coordinate military security for the Karzai Government. Admiral Mullins knows all about running ships in excellent patterns at sea.

With job losses in the United States putting millions out of work the synthetic government-building project in Afghanistan is another federal jobs stimulus program for-itself. Admiral Mullins is the right guy to create a Coast Guard for Afghanistan following along with the logic of the endeavor.

How many Afghanis have been matriculated into the Naval Academy one might ask, for that could be the reason the Taliban homicide-suicide bombers have been destroying fossil fuel powered vehicles without right proper interdiction instead of being arrested by an Afghan Department of Homeland Security.

Making an economically efficient government in Afghanistan following the role model of the U.S. Government is challenging for the administration; Afghanistan has few resources to waste as extravagantly as does the United States, and hasn’t got as high of a credit rating to borrow money for expensive machines and other pollution producing devices to stimulate economic development.

Republican Party Chairman Steele rightly called this ‘Obama’s war. President Obama could really make it so by directing a supplemental appropriations bill that would create an Afghanistan Coast Guard and simulated ocean shoreline. Coast Guardsman from the U.S. East Coast could be relocated to Afghanistan to man-woman the new potential fleet in shoreline bunkers until the ships arrive, and replaced offshore with former Louisiana oil skimming civilians once their oil clean-up job details are completed.

The cost for an Afghanistan Coast Guard fleet of fourteen efficient aluminum gas turbine powered dreadnaught turbo interceptor-destroyers should be just $199 billion dollars borrowed from China at 10% interest to taxpayers—a steal at the price. One can never be patriotic enough about national defense and keeping Afghanistan free of the Taliban so Americans can be free to be unemployed and afford their own tents in reasonable security.

The 4th of July, The Russian October Revolution, and Dr. Guillotin's Efficient Economic Reform

An essay briefly considering elements of the U.S. revolution in comparison to others past and contemporary including speculation about the future has quite a substantial quantity of political history to consider. As this is a brief essay it will in no way attempt a comprehensive review.

Dr. Guillotin invented an expeditious technology for chopping off the heads of the old regime in the aftermath of the French revolution, and the 150 or whatever that piled compiled in peach baskets latter perhaps was not an inspiration for the inventor of basketball (originally fruit baskets nailed up high for boys to toss a pumpkin sized ball in), yet the effort of the inventors was considerable inn each instance.

The French decimated their ranks of nobility though not well enough to preclude their survival as a class, yet the French had more bourgeois that mitigated the social exclusivity of royalty such as existed in Russian during the period following Peter the Great until the October revolution of 1917. In the west, in the United States in particular, our tradition of egalitarianism may not have grown from a stunted condition in the hierarchical churches-a priesthood of believers never formed and the clergy largely reflect the exclusive values set by concentrated wealth globally, yet it did dampen and politically enfeeble the existence of the British nobility in early history of the United States. Americans thus regard revolution abroad from the position of the bourgeois, and have been trained Pavolianishly to support the rich politically whom are considered not as nobility but instead as something like themselves in origin, and whom they can reasonably aspire to be like.

The antinomy of bourgeois egalitarianism is, in the United States of America--communism as espoused by Marx and Lenin. Americans celebrate their own 4th of July in commemoration of social revolution; yet hate the Marxist-Leninist revolution of Russia. All right-fair enough, yet lets consider the social background of Russian during its final 200 years before the 1917 revolution.

Nobles owed a lifetime of service to the Tsar. They were thus granted the right to possess serfs-white slaves generally of Slavic origin (not all were white) to work the land and serve as military troops. The nobility eventually emancipated themselves, yet they increased their power over the serfs who were basically enslaved, bought and sold--they also had to pay taxes. That condition persisted until about 1862 when the serfs were technically emancipated, yet the royal advantage continued for the nobility.

Ninety-Five percent of Russians had been enslaved as serfs. Consider what the United States would have been like in 1862 if ninety-five percent of white people as well as black had been slaves. Though the Tsar technically liberated them the nobility retained nearly complete economic power until 1917. The wonder is that a larger Jacobean reaction did not follow the October Revolution.

Yet Russia did purge it's nobility murdering the royal family so far as possible and removing vestiges of the class social and economic supremacy. Americans today with their prosperous history and natural, national freedom outside of the former slaves and an institution largely inherited from the British that was defended by the powers of concentrated wealth owning slaves, have little comprehension of class oppression by powers of concentrated wealth that comprise a de facto nobility.

Networks of a global nature supporting concentration of wealth and the oppression of U.S. citizens economically and ecologically are today’s American nobility. This 4th of July Americans continue letting their ecology, economy and political liberty slip away into the powers of concentrated wealth and they have no theory about how to change that.

Today the U.S.A. requires an ecological economic renewable policy of egalitarian democracy with limited power to concentrate wealth--with no citizens excluded from at least a reasonable minimum income, in order that a vicious natural selection of the rich and narcissistic value class--from sports to fashion and finance, does not simply reproduce itself and sanction others to extermination in the expansive family economic labyrinth of the United States today. The United States needs a revolution to purge itself of social economic iniquity, and has virtually no prospect for attaining that. Its recent history is not revolutionary at all, but an evolutionary one of Toynbean historical cycles.

The Soviet Union continued the policy of denying freedom to its citizens. Yet it had at least the virtue of purging the nobility from its society effectively. When such powers persist the insider-trading sort of social advantages corrupt social progress inevitably. Yet the political methods required for the change toward a secure egalitarian society for all were bloody and of the less than optimal menu of political evolutionary possibilities.

This 4th of July we may be mostly, or preponderantly thankful that a modern automatic guillotine has not been deployed in Washington D.C. and Boston to deplete the rich in America--even those just visiting, for being nobility of a sort.

We should be cautious about extending out failure to comprehend the nature of reasons for revolution abroad in foreign policy errors. Will we make of Afghanistan another Iran with a Shah as a dictator oppressing fundamentalists eventually? Will the popular Egyptian, Saudi and Yemeni movements to end themselves of royalty or neo-authoritarian leadership bring them to attack America further for supporting the corrupting powers of concentrated wealth and neo-nobility actualized through corporatism?

Our political choices should be laden with intelligence and understanding as well as rhetoric if we are to prosper through legitimate and ecological renewable means rather than through exploitation.

President Obama, British Petroleum vs the Tea Party Movement; The Opponents on the 4th of Julye 4th of July

The original tea party revolted against the British tax on tea by throwing a ship load into Boston Harbor. Today British Petroleum is spilliing oil into the Gulf of Mexico 'harbor' to indicate the futility of U.S. energy independence efforts. President Obama has allowed the oil to flow 50,000 barrels each day for two months in a tepid response to the crisis. When he is voted out of office in two years, his legacy will have been failure to ram bangalore torpedoes down the avenue of egress and detonate and seal the monster demonstration of crude political power. The United States will continue to be dependent upon global fossil fuel corporations for automotive energy.

Today's Tea Party branch of the Republican Party is led by the 'drill baby drill' offshore and onshore oil advocate Sarah Palin, the personable former Alaska Governor. The Tea Party is for defense of U.S. borders against illegal immigration unlike the Obama administration which seeks to reward illegal aliens with citizenship while flooding the labor market with more cheap labor to stimulate economic expansion of quantity and profit for those concentrating wealth The Tea Party is not vocal enough in support of electric cars and intelligent design of a new electrified national transportation infrastructure,and it must if it is to differ from the Republicratic transportation and energy policies of Presidents Bush II and Obama

4th of July: Obama Supports Illegal Alien Citizenship and Poverty for Unemployed Born in the U.S.A.

Is Support for Illegal Immigration; Crazed Sex Poodles of Political D.C. Bling?

Purple prose in political writing isn’t desirable unless it more accurately represents political circumstances of wildly and inexplicably wrong concepts. President Obama’s support for illegal alien immigration as a way to achieve citizenship and good jobs deserves purple prose. I shall however, employ plain and honest language. President Obama needs political support from homosexuals and symps of illegal aliens to stand a chance for re-election 2012. The President’s policies are unaffordable and continue the parting-out of U.S. well being of his predecessor.

There has been demonstrated no human genomic factors thus far indicating a predisposition for support of illegal alien immigration into the United States by federal politicians, nor for simpatico posturing toward the nation sheltering the primary route for cocaine importation into the United States of America. Human genome mapping is still a primitive science. We do not know why President Obama used cocaine as a youth, nor how much; what we know is that he is against deporting illegal aliens-saying it would be ‘wildly expensive’. Of course he is dead wrong.

The fourth of July is a celebration of American political independence from the British. It is a time when a nation of laws regarding all citizens as equal before the law is celebrated. Today, America’s political, economic and environmental destiny is being determined more by illegal aliens and foreign symp political pimps of globalism than rational and enlightened election by the electorate. President Obama supports radically subversion of the integrity of the electorate through support of illegal alien immigration-as have all U.S. Presidents since the end of the cold war. President Obama has not stopped the British Petroleum oil effusion despoiling of the Gulf of Mexico. The President served in concert with the rejection of the Tea Party more than given real support to the effort for U.S. energy independence and independence form illegal alien, extra-territorial determination.

Rectification of U.S. border security requires building in triplicate a Mexican berm and barrier control zone—creating many jobs in the process. Attrition of illegals voluntarily returning home and unable to return will deplete their numbers without cost to taxpayers—if they aren’t replaced by new arrivals.

The U.S. Government is incompetent and deporting legal aliens overstaying their visas that become illegal. The President unwillingness to deport such people comprising about half of the illegals is an abandonment of the duties of the office of President. New and better legal alien turned rogue illegal alien needs to be developed. Some of those people are worse than federal politicians using cocaine or tobacco occasionally who have developed obsessive minds turned toward bling for-itself.

In the United States, the high unemployment rate is supported by illegal immigration swelling the labor market. The wealthy like such human bling. Poor, unemployed Americans would like the bling to return to Mexico so that labor-side wage advantaging conditions regarding supply could arise.

President Obama has said he wants the U.S. economy to grow at 5% or 6% annually, yet he adds growth-retarding public debt by the trillions. Besides, if the growth isn’t in quality instead of quantity; if the economic growth is not on an ecologically renewable economic basis, the future of the U.S. economy is doomed to cheap tricks progressively deceiving the people of the United States into loss of their political and economic heritage, environmental health, and hope for a better life for native born U.S. citizens not amongst the ranks of the privileged.

President Obama’s Harvard axis of globalism is of a milieu creating concentrated wealth for the wealthy. In a low-intelligence economic paradigm of unconcern for depletion of non-renewable resources, the corporate world tends to increase its wealth by increasing the quantity of consumers-including illegal aliens. Though the U.S. economy may expand eventually at a five or six percent rate, the national quality of life for the poor and middle class will be stagnant and the economic improvement will go to concentrated wealth and profits for the rich. Gross national product increase will be founded on disposable resources and a flood of cheap foreign workers. Such a quantity rather than quality national economic improvement is the same old politics that also supports financial fraud profit schemes by global corporations and public debt for the U.S.A.