Summary Evaluation of Condition of U.S. Electorate 2020

Both of the nation's major political parties seem unfit for leadership. For some the electorate's composition is itself a problem. That is queers, feminists, dopers, flat-earther global warming deniers, goon-thugs with help from anti-white hispanics, blacks and anti-Christian scientists comprise a powerful political element. All work for greed guided by the media employed by the rich. That tenth of one percent of the people have elite Ivy Leaguers on their side with the ideal of concentrating their wealth and power as reproductivity demographics reduce. In a zero growth economy capital increases faster for the richest.

This is obviously a disparaging evaluation. The elites tend to regard humanity as empty abstractions that can be organized whatsoever way they require with enough dope and liberalism. My blog has few readers so I think it useful to use plain brief language without decorations and diplomacy. I wish every soul well though, and believe that sober rectification of society would find a better balance and way of life for all Americans regardless of their present perversity preferences.

The electorate appears to be conforming to social engineering designs that are typical for aristocratic inclined elites seeking to concentrate wealth and power. The first priority is to eliminate strong opposition to aristocracy. A tried and true way over and replace the opposition (independently minded straight white males in this instance). The newly empowered class forgets or abolishes the ideals of the founding straight white males and are glad to redistribute the income of the obsolete class unto themselves. That is what has occurred in the United States since the 1980s and Reagan administration.

The naturally submissive electorate are no danger to the upper 1%. The upper 10% of U.S. income earners take in 70% of the nation's income, so that leaves 30% for everyone else. Fundamentally since the 1970s income for straight white males hasn't increased and the new income went to put the naturally submissive classes to work. The goal of the newly empowered class is full income equality with straight white males as well as social equality. The founder's ideals were what enabled the equalization of all people, though that took quite a bit of time, because it was an ideal rather than an actuality when the constitution was written.

There should be no mistake;  the issue of slavery was about economics rather than supremacy. In former centuries until the start of the 1860s perhaps, it took a lot of servants or slaves to have what is today an average middle class standard of living; maybe 25 to 50. One needed yard slave, cooking slaves, coach driving slaves, stable and farming slaves and  so forth. People all over the world had slaves or cheap, indentured servants quite usually, and they were the elites.

Western civilization and the pinnacle in the founding of the United States was about liberation from aristocracy and dictatorship to establish freedom and economic independence for everyone; That is why minorities in the United States should regard the founders quite well; for their ideals expressed in the constitution instead of the actualization in society. When they take their eyes off the economic angle of politics and simply believe the problems with the U.S.A. are in racism they fall into millennia old traps where the elites come out on top and everyone else is oppressed and even servile.

There was no assurance that people that support equal economic rights for all in western civilization would win the wars of the 20th century; it just worked out that way. There were and are elites in  the world that don't share those ideals.

Since the 1980s tax policy has been regressive. The rich get vast zero interest loans from the federal reserve with which they can loan out 5 times every dollar loaned, and therefor it is as if they were given 4 dollars for free. Inheritance taxes have been cut, corporate taxes after paperwork tend to be zero. Capital grows faster than national income in the long run so weath naturally accumulates without corrections. The founders understood the dangers of aristocracy that Americans of the new upwardly mobile (until equalization with straight white men in the vast pool of low savings, renting of homes and stagnant income) class seems to have forgotten as they are full of visions of material prosperity. Income progress to stagnant equality for all while wealth is concentrated so that 10% of Americans have 90% of the income assures compliance with social engineering goals of elites to annihilate traditional families because they consume to much materially in a planet ecosystem with finite resources. Citizens without morals that are sated with perversity, dope and entertainment can be better controlled as spineless political jellyfish by concentrated wealth elites of the 1% defended by their praetorian political guard of the 10%.

Income equality for individuals can be measured accurately; not so for race. With wealth concentrated at the top where there are white billionaires of the 1% (and others) counted as average income for the whites of the 90% the stats will always be useful for deceit. Bill Gates for example has wealth equal to may be a half million average white people. Add in a few other white billionaires like Warren Buffet and the stats are quite misleading. Whites might need to earn 25% of blacks for the stats to show that whites and blacks have the same income averages annually. The problem of counting people by race if one simple legislates to relieve those that are poor regardless of race.

That is my viewpoint on the future of U.S. election content for the next 30 years, I am not sure that is leads anywhere good, and isn't the way I would like it to be. I prefer an enlightened electorate with income security for all while the political economy transitions to one of ecospheric sustainability.