In a mano y mano I.Q. competition between President Bush and Vince Young; how much would the Texas quarterback win by? Vince Young has obvious non-linear reasoning ability useful in politics in applying circular and aggressive spin on budget processing. President Bush scrambles reasonably well behind a solidly financed global corporate dominated broadcast media offensive line, and passes the buck with exceptional skill when needed such as in the Hurricane Katrina disaster planning that allowed corps of engineer underfunding of levee inspection and improvement by a few thousand percent since taking office. President Bush however has had trouble in completing transfer of control of American port operations to foreign governments and especially royal oil governments. Vince Young dispatched S.C. fairly readily in the title game and can at least execute mission objectives properly, yet like Dan Marino who won a Super Bowl early in his pro career, perhaps lower I.Q. makes repetition of skill assertion problematical except in second term election campaigns amidst American voters where the opposition is likely to field their own lame duck self-described war criminal in opposition.
President Bush’s non-linear reasoning skills have allowed construction of an unhealthy economy that borrows half a trillion or more annually from foreign governments to prop up purchases by domestic consumers of foreign manufactured imports that allow Americans low-wage jobs distributing the products to themselves. President Bush will have accumulated a 10 trillion dollar federal deficit before turning over the grave digging chores to the next corporatist leader. First advice to nationalist leaders seeking a balanced budget is if digging an economic rave for oneself stop digging it deeper. An actually healthy economy produces domestic output without reliance on vast foreign lending.
Like patricians of the decadent Roman republic President Bush has connections with the terrorists/enemies abroad, and with heavy foreign investments that provide obvious conflict of interest in oil, energy and domestic infrastructure development he is like one of the decadent Patrician families leaders of the Roman Republic: Reformation and development of national strengths atrophy.
To reiterate political ‘guessenomic’ points President Bush has let immigration, domestic investment, energy, education and environmental policies rot. The Republican Party has become globalist and hides behind a saccharine religiosity that turns presidential elections into a referendum on faith and faithlessness; the intellectual Weltanschauung has strayed far from the ideal into the purely secular.
Immigration policy presently serves globalist policies to keep labor wages down through increased labor supply. For any illegal alien given amnesty allowed to take a legal job in the U.S.A. three more illegals will arrive to provide new support services in the underground economic sector. More cheap labor creates an ability for decadent Americans to prosper from low-IQ business expansion. It is a cycle perpetuated by corrupt and decadent politicians presently. It is just politicians that can run vast debts and receive corrupt payments and bribes while ordinary citizens must file tax returns if possible when the papers aren’t lost or destroyed by flooding or hurricanes or the postal service.President Bush has on last claim to recover ground lost to Vince Young in the quarterback IQ competition; line item vetoes.
President Bush seeks a line item veto power to eviscerate congress, and asks for it before the Democratic Party can retake congress. The line item veto is probably unconstitutional because it would give the President the power to make legislation through censoring and creative editing of congressional bills (like a hostage taker making a note out of newspaper letters). A President might seek to take the powers of a dictator as occurred in the Roman republic when times were perilous and the Senate would confer the privilege. If the U.S. Senate consider giving the line item veto to a President, it should wait until Vince Young take s office and a man of superior intellect is at the helm of the unlevel playing field of the slope.
President Bush would require a line item veto to completely gut any national prospects for wresting national destiny from global corporate rule. President Bush has already completed his mission of running up the biggest budget deficit in world history and to squeeze more juice from the lemon asks for a line item veto to redistribute any remaining federal payouts to poor people to fairly reallocate them to the globalist rich loyal to Halliburton and the Emir of W to the point of death. If congress cannot rationally support national development, if it believes that the highway bill for instance isn’t a form of state corporatist socialism redistributing wealth to loyalists, a dictator can’t be expected to provide right economic reason for them.
If Dallas does find Vince Young available when the 17th pick comes up in the NFL draft May 30th(?) it should select him as Bledsoe may only have enough gas for two or three years, otherwise take one of the perennial fine Red Raider Quarterbacks from Lubbock to train for the day when the transfer to new leadership arrives.
On the efforts of the Iranian Government to build a nuclear weapon or at least just a nuclear reactor able to produce materials that can by perfidy be compiled for occasional nuclear bomb building and the U.S. relations with Iran that produce such mutual antagonisms I can only wonder. Pondering the ponderable can at times be a useful activity. Considering American/Iranian policy since the 1920's and discovery of oil, change of regional governance from that of Ottoman Empire hegemony to forms of decolonialism followed by various forms of corrupt government or even imperialism, it is still a mystery why a prosperous nation like the United States cannot use a likable, affable and friendly approach with Iran that would be more effective than the distant threat approach.
While the United States certainly has a concern that is valid about nuclear weapons proliferation, there is a real conflict of interest in administration energy policy interests and global corporatism that may too quickly resort to the mallet to hammer the 'negatives' downward into positive positions, or perceived positive positions. It is possible that hammering away ceaselessly upon Muslim anti-imperial movements will be counterproductive in a world in which populism founded in defense against restricted or expropriated national or natural resources by imperialist fascocracies tailor made to subvert democracy are perhaps on the rise at least quantitatively.
In the United States globalists have used moral issues in politics to compel anti-atheist voters to vote Republican, and the Democratic Party has twittedly failed to adapt a political platform of core economic and security issues that would not contain a poison pill for a majority of voters. The Democratic Party can have 60% of its platform perhaps that would include a majority, and let the extreme abortion, homosexuality and socialist planks fend for themselves as independent issues that oil popularly supported in congress or by voters could receive legislative support. A core of non-controversial rather moderate or conservative economic and nationalist objectives should comprise a core party plank of which actual Christians would not be ashamed to be included.
In bilateral Iran-U.S. issues Muslim fundamentalism and radical revolutionary movements present a problem for an oil-based support administration that has aligned itself with oil royalty in the middle east fundamentally opposed to democratization. The U.S. Secretary of Defense seems to be trying to implement a new an improved Vietnam end-game strategy in Iraq that would be qualitatively improved as the military strategies were. Yet the ideal of transitioning ordinary two-sect Iraqi Muslims into democrats within a bipolar fundamentalist theocratic Iran and several oil royalties with a mix of suicidally hateful Hamas militants in control of a Gaza and an inventive, global bunch of decent Jews in possession of a crude oil-free Israel (meant those that have seen God in the pre-Jacobian version of the word evidentially) isn't assured, while Kurds long trodden upon and independence minded with the menace of Turks at their rear must watch the situation with an interested sort of fatalism even worse than Wal-Mart shoppers have in deciding to go through the automated bar-code checker-scanner to pay for the goods from China or wait for the Muslim-Mexican from Iowa chewing gum and reading how an Alien Dog from the Future is held Captive by the C.I.A. an Undergoing Interrogation (an actual tabloid headline recently)
No comments:
Post a Comment