In what evolves like an immoral draft of corrupt
planks President Obama's queer gentrification expropriating marriage movement
fogs more important financial issues with new age evolution of moral
nullification beyond good and evil. Homosexuals would get federal benefits
while unmarried women would get nothing besides maybe, abortion.
The Obama
administration intention to evolve expropriated marriage in benefit of the
corrupt is consistent with their history of redistributing economic opportunity
from the poor and working class to the rich, promotion of illegal alien
economic power in the U.S.A. over those of citizens and approval of destruction
of traditional morality and national economic health. In the drive to
immoralize and degrade U.S. culture foisting Neitzschean values and economic
practices subverting heterosexual marriage is for that acceleration of
slopocracy just a bump on the road to eternal doom.
For those
that support D.O.M.A. inclusive of House and Senate members that passed it in
to law President Obama's unwillingness to defend it from legal challenge before
the U.S. Supreme court is a defining moment in embrace of moral and
intellectual sloth, and wickedness with selective and discriminatory
enforcement of the laws of the United States by the Chief enforcement
executive. In a moral era that would be regarded as an impeachable offense, yet
today in the era of global networking finance it is regarded as cool evolution.
No honest
individual would consider a couple of guys or a couple of women the same as a
man and a woman coupling to procreate and raise their genetic offspring. After
decades of illegal drug use and imports from Mexico the Democratic Party
reasoning is too corrupt to discern night from day or truth from falsehood.
They have corrupted their time in political power pursuing idiot economics
twitting trillions of dollars with no interest for the rich instead of
constructing restorative ecological economics with full employment and deficit
reduction.
If George W. Bush had ordered Chairman Bernanke to
twit over trillions of dollars at no interest to banks so they could buy
distressed mortgages or Wall Street stock while downsizing payrolls and
outsourcing jobs Democrats would have been critical rather than models of
quietism while Democrat President Obama is plundering the economic future
dumping debt obligations harming non-prosperous Americans. Democrats have
destroyed hope and trust in even vaguely moral government confident that the
poor and working class would not be comfortable being yes men to Goldman-Sachs
neo-Republican Party Wall Street politicians or global warming,
anti-environment iced Tea Party neo-libertarians.
Marriage is historically an institution for
procreation. Several institutions, laws and traditions were developed to make
marriage and family raising as humane as possible.
The Democratic Party economic leadership is
paradigmatically senile, repressive and economically otiose. Instead of advancing
ecospheric economic genius and reform it sucks and promotes homosexual
expropriation of marriage for predators unwilling to innovate new social
structures suitable for their queer establishment of homosexual relations
instead of disestablishing and perverting existing cultural structures. Taking
away guns, twitting trillions to rich banks, queering up marriage-those are not
the acts of intelligent new leadership of benefit to all Americans, but a front
for the peonization of the people and operant destruction of democracy for an
ad hoc global imperial class of importunate greedy predators in-themselves.
The trouble with queer coupling lies with
non-heterosexual behavior rather than in society. As in Sodom and Gomorrah
queers want to enable access to all of society for renormalization unto
queering so they do not feel queer for-themselves. Yet even if that corrupting
transformation of society were to occur the homosexuals would still feel queer
while society would be in ruins. In the west matrimony largely developed in
support of women's rights. If women no longer require civil support for
procreation and it's consequences the institution should be abolished rather
than enlarged to include Curlie, Moe and Larry. Some of the Clinton and Obama
court appointees seem to act as if discriminating between sane or insane and
corrupt or uncorrupt applications of law is wrong. Recent federal budgeting is
consistent with that practice. None of the founders of the United States would
have supported homosexual relationships being regarded as marriage. Neither
would they have allowed permanent vast public debt held in part by foreign
nationals and governments. The founders were smart enough to know that marriage
is an establishment created to produce and support children rather than a ploy
for queers buggering one another to get government benefits through expansion
of a realm of queer power to expropriate marriage, and that economic
independence is requisite for actual social independence amongst nations.
If civil marriage were abolished as an institution
while religious marriage still existed, American homosexual demand for marriage
would probably be minimal except where homosexuals expropriate Christian or
other churches corrupting the Biblical message of necessity in order to move
over churches from the red to the blue side of town.
If marriage is no longer about procreation and
child support, but about any two adults even of the same sex having sex or a
permanent spousal relationship without regarded to the procreative paradigm it
is not requisite that the federal government expand its roster of benefits
given to heterosexual marriage partners to the new criterion. As in the state's
rights issue of slavery where the federal government can choose to intervene
and make federal law supersede state law, it is agreeably constitutionally for
the U.S. Government to defend rational citizen and taxpayer interests by
passing laws that prohibit recognition of states laws that are frivolous,
unfair, unjust, corrupting, decadent or against reason passed in order that
citizens of several states might lever financial contributions from the federal
Government, especially if they place an onerous burden upon single citizens.
Inevitably after the rational procreative and
child rearing purpose of marriage is legally set back and regarded as a
coincidental and secondary paradigm for its existence, and when same sex
marriages are established by Federal and state governments, the abolition of
marriage altogether will advance as an issue to renormalize all citizens on an
equal legal footing. There is no reason why two queers should be entitled to
federal benefits denied to single Americans for instance, who might just go out
and have casual sex now and then, or not. If heterosexual procreative marriage
is not what marriage is about, then perhaps benefits formerly given to marriage
should be reallocated to impregnated women until progeny reach adult status
with contractual relationships filling in any other obligations individuals
require of other individuals as an evolution from lost social support provided
in anachronistic artifact of marriage. Federal benefits that flowed to married
couples in the era before queering of marriage ought to transfer just to
pregnant women and their children for it is the unmarried mothers raising
children alone that would be screwed financial losers by gentrification of
queers in the elite hostile takeover of marriage by the homocrat government
axis of new soviet infrastructure.
It is appropriate that quasi-federal agency NPR
uses the word 'evolution' liberally in describing public opinion changes. A
godless, atheist evolution toward federal ignorance on what marriage is well
serves a decline of political reason. In the brave new world of globalism and
global networks there may be little room for dissent from politically correct
opinions in a world in which the same corporate employers exist everywhere. To
be banned from Big-Box employment on the North American continent might be to
be banned anywhere on Y'Earth from the big PX. With the increase of global
employer networks political dissent may eventually decline, wealth concentrate
and the avant guard of homosexual corruption swell to further undermine
personal civil liberties and independence as it did for Adolph Hitler and his
Roemer led S.A. As in the corruption of political dissent through networking
global employment the independence of national legal systems may be corrupted
such that one legal system evolves to allow the simplifying of planetary legal
corruption by the corrupt and regressive establishment of concentrated wealth
and power globally.
Interestingly enough, the Biblical book of The
Revelation seems to present paradigms echoed by such reprehensible evolutions
of maladroit public policy. The times ahead may be interesting and insolvable
by just sending Stealth bombers to blast the poor once more.
No comments:
Post a Comment