Carla
asked Solomon Eban about the sociopology rationale for Calvin
Luther-Caesar’s people’s reason for exodus from their former
world; “Solomon, what were a few of the practical reasons that
brought your exo-planetary reformation? I am a sociopologist when not
an observer of monstrous Aristarch attacks.”
“Yes
Carla. There are numerous causus beli for
the exodus that I can tell you about while we travel from here to a
surface site that I feel may draw some opposition-force interest
Marriages
became a progressive mockery of the initial life duration
heterosexual monogamy. The line between marriage and prostitution
blurred. Eventually they reduced to pay-by-the-hour conjugation
permits from licensed government vendors.
We
tried legislating the end of prostitution with a cashless society
that would keep a transparent record of every financial transaction
in a society founded upon ecological economics and reformed
capitalism that supplied all basic human needs and provided some
start-up capital for everyone to invest in research to have a chance
to get a project actualized through approval of a social board
reviewing ecospheric value to social order and progress. There were
far too many obstructions for that to work though, and the most rich
owned and controlled every agit-prop outfit.
Humans
were troubled with any sort of meaning or responsibility and sought
to live in a cellular condition. Homosexuals became an analogue of
lysergic hydrochloric acid agents of nihilism destroying the vestiges
of integral cellular citizenship eroding the properties of rights and
privacy of individuals- the future Aristarchs abhor individual human
rights for non-elites.
The
end game of earth-like planet economics became too plain. Human
demographics showed increase of population over time. The world had
finite surface area, ecosphere and natural resources hence economists
like Malthus and Ricardo foresaw problems. That paradigm hasn’t
gone away though the misguided space operas with faster-than-light
ships trivialize the reality of Earth. That generation may be said to
have forged the end game of Earth.
It
is a tale with two primary outcomes; one is of sound and fury
signifying nothing and the other is a reasoned stabilization at a
level of maximum productive stability. They believe that development
should continue irresponsibly as if they were in a child’s
playground of delights with sweets of light crude oil under every
wildlife refuge for ever. There’s is a tale told by idiots
signifying dystopia, deforestation and the death of most species of
mammals on Earth-like worlds.
Every
generation that has a 1% annual rate of economic or population growth
at the end of 30 years has about a 33% per generation increase. The
law of accumulation is ignored by the ignorant. Over a century the
increase is thousands, and that law of accumulation applies to
demographics as well. Thousands of times of increase on Earth-like
planets without a capacity to provide even a fraction of the natural
resources is a pattern that will repeat on countless worlds. When we
build a new world of Earth size these days we may begin with a
construction population of 10 billion yet soon thereafter reduce
population for the new planet through measured one birth per family
for a few generations to the normal carrying capacity for an Earth
world of two billion. Some of the extra population may relocate to
construct another world. It is normal that each new world has an
optimal ration of humans per surface area for production and a
healthy ecosphere simultaneously.
We
know in retrospect that as the age of the gentiles is being fulfilled
the human race has expanded its construction of living ecospheres as
if they were meta-terrariums in a myriad of forms beyond the solar
system’s moons and planets and wherever possible across the 100
thousand light year in diameter galaxy. There is no pre-tribulation
eschatology that is valid unless humans force their own disaster even
if it the Aristarchs that are the source of disaster. The philosophy
of personal egoism drives forward proximate short term advantage for
a minority even over the existence of everyone.
Populations
cannot achieve zero population growth static stability then
experience a flood of immigrants to replace them without causing more
damage to social infrastructure and the ecosphere. With a calm
draw-down of population growth while technology and education of the
masses increases world ecospheres could be directed to recover and
new opportunities for building off-world ecospheres explored. It is
important to begin building terrarium ecospheres with as much
wildlife from Earth-like worlds as possible to improve the art.
Innovative ideas for moons and planets can bring new ways of letting
life flourish including new human populations intelligently designed
to be in appropriate numbers for the new ecospheres.
Adroit
political management rather than coercion need be the political
method for stabilizing human populations as it bides its time before
increasing again in new ecospheric regions it learns to build. Those
ecospheres should be as robust and teeming with life as that God gave
unto mankind rather than depleted of it. There is a time to grow a
population and a time to hold fast or even decrease. Sometimes,
fortunately rarely for politicians, conservative, sober rectitude is
requisite for species survival.
Population
wasn’t the sole or even primary problem Carla. There is a failure
of any sort of ethics in the evolution derived philosophies even if
evolution is itself contingently factual.
Ethics
and moral norms die within modern evolution culture. It is amusing to
consider how far the demise of morality and ethics go, for there is
no basis for preferring one moral order over another on the basis of
necessity, except as one believes in a natural law and necessary
moral order inferred from that. Logicians and ethicists might argue
however that any ethics of evolution based on natural law is forced
by circumstance and without coherent or compelling necessity.
Some
evolutionary scientists that are militant atheists have argued that
the sole moral value or imperative is passing on genes. Of course
they are entirely wrong about that. It is not at all necessary to
pass on genes, and one outcome of evolution is as valid in its
entire, complete meaninglessness as any other. Life is itself
meaningless and nothing more than sound and fury signifying nothing
as Shakespeare wrote in Hamlet.
If
evolution ethics is less meaningful if possible than that of
Buddhism, it is interesting to consider some of the formulations
possible with the meaninglessness. If we give symbols for various
ethical systems and consequences, moral orders and etc and put them
into a mathematical logic expression the results return 0 for
meaning, * equals multiplication or process of regard by Evolution...
i.e.
Evo * morality = 0
Evo
* moral system 1 to infinity= 0
Evo
* political ethics = 0
Evo
* environmental conservation = 0 etc.
Assuredly
people can make moral systems and orders themselves and sometimes
even collectively yet the result is still meaningless. Power may be
meaningful yet the end result of power and politics is
meaninglessness. As a Christian I believe in a coherent divine ethics
and grace of God yet for evolutionary atheists that is a non
sequitur.
I
was motivated to note the meaninglessness of evolution in its own
logic wherein everything that exists is phenomenal and a fluke,
godless and a kind of joke upon itself, after noting a history paper
taking an indirect shot at Christians via environmentalism. Actually
the most important role of Christians is to talk about the Lord Jesus
Christ. Scientists should be concerned more with science instead of
religion yet as they generally have the polarizing filter of atheism
that moves them to view religion as a sociological phenomenon it is
irresistible for contemporary scientific evolution based atheists not
to try to rid the world of Christians and their ethics as if it would
be a better place.
Evolution
is however completely godless in the scientific, atheist point of
view, even though some Christian philosophers regard God as quite
capable of evolving anything he deems worth evolving at any time
before or after any given Universe he [plans to actually mortal human
life in at some point. Scientific evolutionist-atheists today believe
the entire concern is one of a requirement that all be atheists
because evolution is true and evolution requires a world without God,
and that is not logically valid either.
I
would suggest that the value of meaningfulness in nature and
meaningfulness in words and ideas have some natural validity. Words
and ideas have meaning in communication. Valid communication isn’t
meaningless and neither is the truth or falsity of expression or
words representing ideas. In fact it is challenging to prove the
meaninglessness of the Universe and everything in it when sentient
beings finding meaning in things, and it becomes churlish to deny in
theory the existence of any being greater than humanity or other
biologically based life. Evolution-atheists cannot tolerate any sort
of immaterial nature of meaning and thought, spirit or values based
on spirit though there are some intellectual hazards in attempting to
do so. Semiotics must leads to quarks or strings ultimately and
meaning must vanish into meaninglessness as a Universe must too even
if only to reappear in a cyclic tree of infinite Universe blossoming.
Modern
science while being technologically strong is also morally
indefensible. That is it hasn’t a shred of ethical validity within
its own logic, and that’s the way they want it.
