The United States economy is heavily invested in foreign
production; especially in Asia. China’s
emergence after the Cold War 1.0 into being a major trading partner of the
United States was fomented by its vast market demographics, low labor costs for
productivity and people culturally trained first in Confucian then Maoist
ethics evolving toward mixed capitalism and enterprise that drew western
investors. China in the 1990s was an emerging global economic power eager to
throw off the shackles of poverty that had kept it in a second or even third
world status decades before. Democrat policies to develop enmity over Taiwan
and Chinese support for Russia’s position regarding the west and Ukraine in
particular are a key element of the Democrat Party’s construction of the
perfect economic and environmental storm that may lead ahead to depression.
Sure it is good occasionally to enjoy irrational exuberance
and optimism in order not to walk into self-fulfilling prophecies to malaise
and bankruptcy. Optimism as a construction tool for do-it-yourselfers of any
scale need be coupled with actualizable plans and work. Trusting in economic
optimism for itself, or about good weather in disregard of tornado warnings,
hurricane storm tracking and quantitative political and financial analysis is
political malpractice when it’s the President moving down the wrong path like a
horse wearing blinders. Financing an avoidable war with Russia is the U.S.
leaping morons on fire into the troubles of the old world. War was second nature
to Europeans and even Asians; the United States should not easily be drawn into
those lunatic conflicts when possible; much less finance them. The only reason
Europeans including Brits were less warlike since 1945 is WW II was a block
buster and the rise of nuclear weapons discouraged precipitate engagement in
new conflicts. The United States took the lead for the west in waging wars
instead of finding solutions in its nuclear empowerment era. Today most people
on Earth probably regard the U.S.A. as the most active belligerent nation on
Earth pro war, though some conflicts were hard to avoid. Leadership to better
ways is required for good, rather than evil, political leadership. The United
States as an emerging godless, atheist power that doesn’t know the difference
between good and evil except for purposes of partisan rhetoric may have trouble
finding Christian leadership in Eurasia that would have good sense and
recalcitrance to engage in mass conflicts.
In the past, the U.S. Government has bailed out major
financial and auto manufacturing establishments that failed financially; that
may not be possible with large scale failures of U.S. businesses invested in
China. There is also a temptation for U.S. business to sever ties with U.S.
employees and simply move operations entirely to China; the workers are paid
far less than American financial sector and service workers and exports to the
United States could continue. Apple is such a possible corporation that could
profit handsomely if it fired its U.S. staff and decided to just hire Chinese
workers and American workers willing to relocate to China. When force and
stress is applied across the board to U.S. businesses because of recession
caused by Democrat Party and media policies/implementation corporate leaders
are compelled to make hard choices (maybe to move) that they wouldn’t
otherwise. Gradual evolution might have continued and economic exodus never
have occurred. If Pharaoh had liberated the Jews they might not have needed to
escape captivity with divine help and could have developed the Egyptian economy
as well as that of Israel..
The American economy may be mostly financial related and
service workers today. It probably produces less material goods as a percentage
of its economy in comparison to China and other nations than it has ever
before. Many of those financial sector jobs as well as U.S. headquarters
employment for businesses that produce in China could be lost to China and
elsewhere in a second wave of jobs leaving the United States that were in the
first wave mostly manufacturing. No amount of unskilled illegal aliens entering
the United States, that mostly don’t pay taxes at any rate, will replace those
better paying financial sector jobs lost to foreign competition. Blue collars
lost offshore were the first wave, the second wave will be the loss of white
collar jobs.
It is ironic that Democrat Party policy to support foreign
wars indirectly and to leave wars directly if involved personally has yet to
quit support for Ukraine when it would be in the interests of the U.S.A. to do
so. Russia may have realized that it erred in trusting the west at all when it
built the Nordstrom gas pipeline to Europe instead of China and it probably is
building a pipeline to the more stable and reliable for growth prospects
Chinese economy or plans to. In failing to recognize Russian interests in
Ukraine that are historically valid in spite of being victimized by one of the
greatest carpet-bagging land-grab swindles in human history perpetrated in 1994
by President Clinton Democrats have invested in building a lasting rift with
Russia and thereby forcing it to become China’s perfect natural resource
supplier and perhaps partner in defending Asia against Western encroachment and
expansion eastward.
Russia has been converted into a insulator and backstop for
China against flanking by Wall Street from the East. India with its large
population is working with Russia too. Russia may become a midway for trade and
business between China and India. Roads and pipelines may develop, especially
if Russia’s Muslim population finds itself able to coordinate friendly trade
relations with corridors crisscrossing shared borders. The United States is
somewhat irrelevant in that scenario except as a military threat.
Democrat have partnered with Wall Street to compel immoral
choices upon the nation. It was better
to take a Singaporean approach to homosexual marriage than the Obama-Roberts,
for Singapore recognizes the cultural values of others rather than just one
side preferred by wealthy elitists. Democrat assumptions that the core of the
U.S.A. will remain a constant while they as globalists can compel global
culture to take up Democrat Party values are wrong. When corporate wealth awakens to the
India-China market and relocates its wealth abroad including intellectual
capital, in pursuit of profit; while the U.S. economy falters and millions of
poorly educated workers relocate here, and while public debt increases the
U.S.A. will still have a vast nuclear arsenal and modern military. The world
will not be a safer place divided as global warming changes accelerate and
myopic politicians strive for a better standard of living based on conventional
economics and dwindling natural resources for their patrons.
In dividing the world economy in order to try to force
conquest of Russia’s valid historical claims to Ukraine the Democrat Party has
imperiled the global economy at a time when it should be providing leadership
to transition to sustainable ecological economic policy instead of classical
economics that have existed since the Industrial Revolution. Russia did invade
Ukraine, yet they already owned it in a sense. Russia may have been like an absent vineyard
owner returning to throw out predators that had killed his caretaking son and claimed
the breadbasket and vineyard of Russia for-themselves. The Democrat Party never
gave Russia any chance to use legal remedies as alternatives to war since the
Clinton-Yeltsin paper took Ukraine away from weakened, vulnerable Russia in
1994. The Democrat Party has substituted hatred of Vladimir Putin and Donald
Trump for economic reason. Besides failing to take adequate steps to halt the
ongoing mass extinction that may lead to the end of human life too, they are
f’ing up the classical economy and setting the nation on course for recession,
depression or break up.
The United States has millions of boomers leaving the
economy forever and drawing on public retirement payments. Not all want to
retire either. Some were put out of work by Covid closures and others are too
poor not to need to work into their 70s. Obamacare did nothing for retirees; if
one gets the minimum $500 social security check they would still need to pay at
least $200 to $250 for Medicare plan B medical coverage. Realistically if
Americans have fewer than $15,000 annually to live on full Medicare benefits
should be free. Dividing the global economy and throwing the United States into
recession will just make it that much harder for older Americans to get work in
an economy that would rather hire young illegal aliens and discriminates
against the elderly anyway.
The U.S. government so mangled up by Democrats may not be
able to bail out failed U.S. business not big enough to not be allowed to fail.
The big companies can simply relocate to Asia and let the United States enter a
lasting slump. Senior benefits could be reduced or lost entirely if there is
war domestically after a time of chaos. Public education may collapse;
government may be reduced to minimal infrastructure vital services costing just
a fraction of the present.
Without much credibility the dollar may not be trusted
enough to allow full faith and credit in doubling the public debt to bail out
the economy with a flood of Keynesian permanent priming. Basically there isn’t
a way to make stupidity work efficiently, and new methods and styles need be
developed to create a healthy national economy and ecosphere.
No comments:
Post a Comment