Donald
Trump’s Presidential campaign ran aground again in the shoal waters
of accusations of sexually groping women without permission.
Following the release of a video where he bragged about having done
exactly that (later recounted and ascribed to locker room boasting
(perhaps so high society didn’t think he was a dinky, shyterish
lover of money in-itself rather than a bold man of the world sleeping
about recklessly as a youth cranked up with the designer dope of the
day), Trump’s republican Party support continued to abandon ship
like rats running from a fire below deck.
Many
Americans for some time have believed the inside the beltway crowd is
a Harvard leaning clan running puppets as yes men for Wall Street
and/or the British and recrudescent imperialism. Bill Clinton as a
Waco Christian burner that required Oval Office fellatio from student
interns to grease his loquacious speech making is sort of the same
old kind of stuff already impeached. Some wonder why Trump isn’t
given a chance to be impeached for-himself-by-congress so Mike Pence
can move up as an exemplary conservative.
In
Alaska the two U.S. Senators that claim to be Republican have jumped
ship from State Party Leadership so they too can avoid supporting
Trump. The one-party system that would make men slaves of Hillary
Clinton and force homosexual marriage upon the world as best as
possible probably as a step in scientific population reduction and
generous corruption of individual rights within a planetary
neo-imperial economy concentrating wealth seems supported as an
actually existing fact by the recrudescent Clinton campaign and the
worst Presidential campaign run in the U.S.A. since maybe the 19th
century by the potentially nation-saving billionaire Trump.
Do American voters really believe a moral, intelligent candidate with good policy ideas could actually be nominated by a major party? One wonders what moral standard U.S. politicians should be comparatively held to? Don't the policies matter at least as much to citizens as a candidate's morality?
If one was poor and trash talked by the Democrat party and wanted political economic change would such a voter care more about getting a candidate elected that would advance his or her economic interests rather than one that was not caught lying, cheating or in some non-sanctioned sexual activity? Sure it would be great if politicians in the U.S.A. never cheated on taxes, didn't lie, were never getting millions from Wall Street for making an ass kissing speech for a half hour, and didn't use dope or have sex before marriage etc. Yet if voters somewhat delusionally look in that direction instead of their national economic and secure interests they may suffer attrition to those, though they elect a leader that can claim never to have been in as morally compromising of a situation as the other.
I must wonder how a nation that approved-even via Supreme Court force-or rather tolerated homosexual marriage can be concerned about morality as an issue. They also tolerate abortion, support for the construction of protracted civil war abroad- murder in a sense, allow the federal Reserve to provide trillions of dollars for nothing to the wealthiest banks via zero interest loans-theft in a way since it gives to the rich and pisses on the poor, destroy the world ecosphere, live as examples of spoilt over-consuming, irresponsible sycophants of wickedness too much etc.
Do American voters really believe a moral, intelligent candidate with good policy ideas could actually be nominated by a major party? One wonders what moral standard U.S. politicians should be comparatively held to? Don't the policies matter at least as much to citizens as a candidate's morality?
If one was poor and trash talked by the Democrat party and wanted political economic change would such a voter care more about getting a candidate elected that would advance his or her economic interests rather than one that was not caught lying, cheating or in some non-sanctioned sexual activity? Sure it would be great if politicians in the U.S.A. never cheated on taxes, didn't lie, were never getting millions from Wall Street for making an ass kissing speech for a half hour, and didn't use dope or have sex before marriage etc. Yet if voters somewhat delusionally look in that direction instead of their national economic and secure interests they may suffer attrition to those, though they elect a leader that can claim never to have been in as morally compromising of a situation as the other.
I must wonder how a nation that approved-even via Supreme Court force-or rather tolerated homosexual marriage can be concerned about morality as an issue. They also tolerate abortion, support for the construction of protracted civil war abroad- murder in a sense, allow the federal Reserve to provide trillions of dollars for nothing to the wealthiest banks via zero interest loans-theft in a way since it gives to the rich and pisses on the poor, destroy the world ecosphere, live as examples of spoilt over-consuming, irresponsible sycophants of wickedness too much etc.
There
is no mistaking the fact that many Americans consider this the last
U.S. election with a chance to conserve the nation’s borders and
people. Even so the Reagan administration probably was the last real
American administration. Like that following the Antonines of ancient
Rome the subsequents seem incapable, corrupt, inclined to concentrate
wealth, promote moral decay and or so forth. The people as well vote
for superficial characteristics of candidates (though race and gender
are not superficial they are not indicators of good or bad policy as
might lizard behavior be thought to be consistent with physical
characteristics.
Democrat
voters and Republicans seeking to provide effectively a third and
fourth term for the impeached Bill Clinton as confident that his
wi8fe can lean on him for advice and support for every critical
decision she must make about how to mollify American voters as they
become poorer and lose national advantages while concentrating wealth
better; not easy decisions to make.
No comments:
Post a Comment