Harvard vs. Bigots and Deplorables

Harvard vs Trump

In the 2016 Presidential race-what some regard as the last democratic election, Harvard law is again pitted against an American with a more ordinary background (although prosperous). For some observers Harvard lawyers running on the Democratic ticket appealing charismatically to voters of the underverse (women, homosexuals, ethnic minorities) like Julius Caesar did appealing to plebians on his way to ending the Republic have found a way to transform the Democratic party into a shill for Harvard globalism and the wealth concentrating 1%.

Barrack Obama- a Harvard lawyer and class favorite, went a long way toward confirming the suspicion that the Democrat party is the real Wall Street party today when he signed permanent tax cuts for the rich into law after repressing any and all dissent. The value of the Democrat party as the basic tool for promoting Harvard globalism is great. Harvard University is first and foremost and elitist institution concentrating wealth and power drawing the ambitious sons and daughters of the rich, the highest achievers academically though perhaps preponderantly unsympathetic to the political causes of the poor and middle class, and others putting their own lofty ambitions above anything else in the world or beyond.

https://hbr.org/2016/10/how-to-build-an-exit-ramp-for-trump-supporters

Free enterprise does require individual desire to help oneself or at least to fulfill goals and discover what the world is and can be. Good political leadership in democracy and sometimes in war requires a semblance of altruism though. Altruism tends to be lacking from organizational concentrations of wealth and power. Harvard like many other elite institutions works first for the advancement of its own class, and that class is not those traditionally comprising the Democrat Party.

In some respects Democrat Party leadership today is more like that of the Klan in the early 20^th century. The late Senate Majority leader Robert Byrd was an alumni of the clan. The clan was about the promotion of a hidden economic agenda regionally that would keep an abundance of cheap labor and a minority- the 1% of the southerners that were aristocrats in the slave era- dominant and able top continue concentrating wealth and power.

The Democrat eloite today reinforces the concentration of wealth with economic and monetary policy. Since the cold war ended and cheap labor is abundant globally, and U.S. labor has declined in comparative value, destroying political resistance from Americans of the poor, middle and working classes is easy; simply promote the underverse to prominent positions to serve the 1% and describe U.S. nationalists as racists and various kinds of 'phobes. Chelsea Clinton recently urged Artizonans and Americans to vote against the 'bigots'. Presumably she was referring to American nationalists that oppose illegal migration to the U.S.A. American nationalists however respect Mexican sovereignty as well as their own. It is Harvard globalists that have no respect for international borders, national sovereignty, labor or the poor and middle class though. For them, Americans should be peons equally without meaningful political self-determination as Mexicans.

The broadcast media is owned by the rich in the U.S.A. Even NPR survives with corporate pay along with federal payouts. It's a perfect propaganda tool for the corporate and harvard elites that has transformed the Executive branch and Supreme Court into a leafgue of harvard alumni. Chief Justice Roberts is the most Wall Street invested of the members of the court and voted deciseively for corporate-approved Homosexual marriage and Obamacare. The 1% are happy ebnough to give the underverse what they want so long as it does not include tax increase of substance, national border security or ecological economic reform.

The Harvard government wasn't a result of a grand conspiracy (probably although who knows what the skull and bones league really think), I just evolved. The underverse does not concern itself with macro-political issues beyond those of its class special interests. If Americans are evolved into a toothless political class amidst a planetary proletariat ruled by global elites that is way out there...not a thing of today.

President Obama proved that money flows out of the ground to the government like water via the Federal Reserve and sales of bonds. That deficit policy and pumping up the rich with zero interest loans allowed Wall Street elites to expand investment globally. It does seem like a hollow, unsustainable policy in the long run, and meanwhile, far too many Americans are just marginalized into oblivion. For Chelsea Clinton the 40% of Americans for nationalism, independence and democracy are bigots. To her mother they are deplorables. Imagine that.