Genetic Engineering and Chess Middle Games

 It is challenging to anticipate who will qualify for the remaining seven slots in the 2018 challenger’s tournament; the world’s number two and three ranked players chose not to compete in the qualifying grand prix tourney this year-currently in progress, leaving just three remaining ways for them to become qualified to enter and try to win the challenger’s and the opportunity to play world chess champion Magnus Carlsen in November 2018.

The challengers 2018 has perhaps nine players that are or have been ranked over 2800 in the competition, plus 17 year old next-gen Wei Yei who is on Magnus Carlsen’s pace of advance in the ratings. Before Yei turns 18 he may equal Carlsen’s 17 year-old rating of 2780. People expect Wei Yei to challenge Magnus Carlsen for the world chess title between the years 2022 and 2030 with the interim being filled by one of chess’ mystery players with enigmatic motivation and purposes such as Fabiano Caruana, Alexander Grischuk etc.

Chess has many faces in its book of ages. Transitions three and four levels deep arise with discovered checks and double attacks appearing as if a chess engine designed them. In that regard a chess board is like the human genome; changes through genetic engineering of the human genome to correct error structures/positions may lead to discovered and double attacks because of the complexity of relationships across the helixian board with time  and the complete complex of compresent pieces arrayed.

Chess is however like a multi-dimensional tic tac toe game devoid of other intellectual content. Unlike the actual void with a Higgs Field and zero point energy and virtual particular energy a chess board has just eight pieces and eight pawns with two colors and little charm, different motion freedom for pieces and some pawns sharing with electrons the inability to occupy a given space or orbit with same has determinist characteristic like those of genetic genome paradigms that cannot continue after select phase changes or in some circumstances any phase change at all. To lose one’s pawns and pieces or genetic bearing is effectively to lose the game without residual zero point energy from which to attempt a Universe restart.

Within deterministic structures without super-conduction, common structures such as power transmission lines, it might be desirable to discover some way of sending internet transmissions and affixing Wi-Fi capabilities ubiquitously. One may debate pros and cons of politics that are empowered to fund research of such matters or energy even when the era is dominated by a party of unrepentant sinners versus another of repentant sinners each trusting their leaders to enrich themselves and global oligarchs who shall rule mankind in a Soviet Union style fusion-corporate jazz utopia replete with dramatic pathos.

Hidden temporal dimensions wherein are hidden discovered chess and genomic attacks on the body politic exist for-themselves in any generation. Kleeping a balanced ecospheric and social economy is challenging through continua of leadership incapacity of popular governing bodies. Thus regular progression of players advance to challenge the reigning champions of the day from the basis of an historical pyramid of plays differing mainly just at the top.

Fallacy of Adequate Taxes and the Welfare State

A modern state requires a lot of tax dollars to pay for making it work; keeping the flow moving together. Public spending is like the lubricant in an automobile engine. WIthout engine lub the independent parts would grind away with much friction.

Public spending in the wrong place creates inefficiency in the economic and social engine of a nation. Too much lube and too few engine parts doesn't work for progress. Cutting taxes to ridiculously low levels with a 20 trillion dollar public debt with a belief that reductions in 'welfare state' entitlements can be exploited top create a balanced budget and eliminate the public debt is silly.

Wealth in America is progressively concentrated with Republican and Democrat Party policies from leaders reinforcing the trend. Media sycophants and manic political leaders seem to want to keep mob hysteria and polity divisiveness gpoing over non-economic issues. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hillary-trump-foes-keep-resistance-persistence-n725436

 Democracy is about the well being of the majority and politicians shouldn't be ashamed to pursue rational policies in behalf of the majority.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States

The richest 1% are said to have more wealth than 90% of Americans put together. The poorest 73% have most of the debt. Washington politics primarily benefit the ultra-rich and globalism.  It has been said that 50% of the people of the United States share just 1/2 of 1% of the national income.

Democrat politics under the Obama administration slopped the poor and anyone they could reite or put out of the work force without adding to unemployment stats. Even so they focused on enriching politicians and the most rich sigining off on Bush II tax cuts with enthusiasm. Republicans simply like to berate the poor and starve them with a misbelief that good jobs are easy to be had with effort. Those that are comfortable and well do do cannot imagine that real effort can pay off with virtually nothing in the U.S.A. There is no objectively even field for work and individual progress over the course of a lifetime any more.

F.D.R. got a 90% tax rate on the rich and only very sklowly didi that decrease over several decades. He did create something of a welfare ethos since the private sector put millions on the bread line with the depression.

With a 60% tax rate on the 1% government could reallocate capital to ecological economic policy actualization through private enterprise rather than just welfare payments. Government could set paradigms for business bidders to fullfill that would be financed upon winning competetion. Today though the Trump administraion should create incentives for business to higher those out of work the most time, first. Real nationalism means taking up policy that benefit the majority of the people rather than the ultra-rich that tend to have globally allocated portfolios at any rate.

The people of the United States should try to keep some sort of reality in their thinking about what concentrated wealth and power means. The nation's founders revolted against concentrated wealth and power of British aristocrats. Several revolutions that shaped the modern world were against concentrations of wealth and power that reduced ordinary people to the status of peons or slaves. 

Some have said that if one is happy living in a political manure pile one shouldn't stick one's neck out. The media tend to pacify the public when they are stimulating panic or hate, yet it is intelligent analysis that too often or generally is lacking. One needs to be circumspective too about current events in regard to history. Perhaps no one in the U.S.A. should have more wealth than 300x that of the average. Maybe corporations should be limited in size to 5000 employees. 

Can Inflation Occur With E-Dollars ?

A modern state requires a lot of tax dollars to pay for making it work; keeping the flow moving together. Public spending is like the lubricant in an automobile engine. Without engine lub the independent parts would grind away with much friction.

Public spending in the wrong place creates inefficiency in the economic and social engine of a nation. Too much lube and too few engine parts doesn't work for progress. Cutting taxes to ridiculously low levels with a 20 trillion dollar public debt with a belief that reductions in 'welfare state' entitlements can be exploited top create a balanced budget and eliminate the public debt is silly.

Wealth in America is progressively concentrated with Republican and Democrat Party policies from leaders reinforcing the trend. Media sycophants and manic political leaders seem to want to keep mob hysteria and polity divisiveness gpoing over non-economic issues. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hillary-trump-foes-keep-resistance-persistence-n725436

 Democracy is about the well being of the majority and politicians shouldn't be ashamed to pursue rational policies in behalf of the majority.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States

The richest 1% are said to have more wealth than 90% of Americans put together. The poorest 73% have most of the debt. Washington politics primarily benefit the ultra-rich and globalism.  It has been said that 50% of the people of the United States share just 1/2 of 1% of the national income.

Democrat politics under the Obama administration slopped the poor and anyone they could retire or put out of the work force without adding to unemployment stats. Even so they focused on enriching politicians and the richest signing off on Bush II tax cuts with enthusiasm. Republicans simply like to berate the poor and starve them with a misbelief that good jobs are easy to be had with effort. Those that are comfortable and well to do cannot imagine that real effort can pay off with virtually nothing in the U.S.A. There is no objectively even field for work and individual progress over the course of a lifetime any more.

F.D.R. got a 90% tax rate on the rich and only very slowly did that decrease over several decades. He did create something of a welfare ethos since the private sector put millions on the bread line with the depression.

With a 60% tax rate on the 1% government could reallocate capital to ecological economic policy actualization through private enterprise rather than just welfare payments. Government could set paradigms for business bidders to fulfil that would be financed upon winning competition. Today though the Trump administration should create incentives for business to higher those out of work the most time, first. Real nationalism means taking up policy that benefit the majority of the people rather than the ultra-rich that tend to have globally allocated portfolios at any rate.

The people of the United States should try to keep some sort of reality in their thinking about what concentrated wealth and power means. The nation's founders revolted against concentrated wealth and power of British aristocrats. Several revolutions that shaped the modern world were against concentrations of wealth and power that reduced ordinary people to the status of peons or slaves.

Some have said that if one is happy living in a political manure pile one shouldn't stick one's neck out. The media tend to pacify the public when they are stimulating panic or hate, yet it is intelligent analysis that too often or generally is lacking. One needs to be circumspective too about current events in regard to history. Perhaps no one in the U.S.A. should have more wealth than 300x that of the average. Maybe corporations should be limited in size to 5000 employees.

Toward Better U.S. Middle East Policy

I have limited time today to write so this incomplete note; A month prior to the Islamist assault on the U.S. Embassy and C.I.A. station at Benghazi Libya Senators Graham and McCain extolled military intervention in Libya as a reason to militarily intervene in Syria. Evidently they did not comprehend the situation of sandals on the ground in either Libya or Syria. Before military can work to bring about a non-violent peaceful transition to democracy within a global Facebook webpage empire the U.S. need airdrop in crack Democrat Party liberal elites to supervise and coach the inexperienced neophyte godless atheist young professionals who must locally lead their underverse Muslim brothers and sisters to full liberal accountability as good citizens.

American leadership apparently were clueless about Syria before supporting military escalation of that conflict that led to the deaths of a quarter of a million people or so. They didn’t like Assad because he is authoritarian-yet there were reaso0ns for that such as that any middle eastern Arab government must be authoritarian if it is to exist-even an ostensibly democratic one for some time if it is to survive and put down attacks form dissident elements within and extraneous violent military interventions from without.

Americans perhaps didn’t realize that when Syrian boundaries were invented by the British in the aftermath of the First World War Sunni and Shi’a Muslims were thrown into the same bag as it were. Historically Middle Eastern sects and tribes of patristic societies were not all that comfortable with one another unless forced to live bucolically under authoritarian rule such as that of the Ottoman Empire or Saddam Hussein and his Baathism. The minority Alawite population needed to have an authoritarian power to let itself exist along with an antagonistic Sunni majority. For the U.S. to support democracy in Syria was fundamentally to support religious democide and purging of a religious minority. U.S. leadership should instead support a reconciliation of the British-set Syrian boundaries such that each party gets a fair viable portion of Syria. I believe that Jordan should rule the Sunni portion for a century.

Many war-mongering leftist corporatists of the Obama administration and media seeking war and removal of the Assad government did not realize that besides securing a Syrian peace-that now would require an authoritarian Alawite government for the Alawite-Shi’a-Christian part of a divided Syria simply to reduce the number of Sunni truck bombers for a century since the area is saturated with liberated c-3 and c-4 from Iraqi and Libyan arsenals-the U.S. should support just those nations it has a real responsibility for such as Israel, Iraq, Syria and possibly Kurds in a state of their own, with military support. The Sunni nations otherwise must find their own natural balance and battle it out for-themselves. America can only practice constructive engagement and be a good example if possible.

American foreign policy following the end of the cold war hasn’t always been enlightened. When President Clinton for example used a political rohipnol to get Boris Yeltsin to relinquish its soft southern parts as Vladimir Lenin had done before at Brest-Litovsk to Germany, the opportunity for long-range positive progress with Russia in economic and security issues was forfeited. Apparently the urge of Butch Street to snatch and grab land while they could was irresistible. They may look enviously at the remainder of Russia’s natural resource wealth and choose to engage negatively in the long range using military power and sanctions to make unreasonable demands upon Russia such as being happy to give it all up in the south and not share Ukraine even to the Dnepr. Russia also has Syrian allies and that was a point against them too when the United States sought to follow a Pollyannaish policy of Arab transition to democracy non-violently.

It may be that some U.S. leaders resented Bashir Assad’s support for insurgents in Iraq. Yet most of the Middle East hated American military intervention there and regarded America as overly supportive of Shi’a in Iraq. For many Sunni conservatives the Shi’a should not exist at all and should rather become Sunni. Assad was however an Alawite leader in a majority Arabian Sunni state. He needed to walk both sides of the line in a tightrope act to keep Iranian friends and Sunni too happy enough. He erred in supporting the insurgency of course.

Iran may have been pleased with the harm to U.S. interests of the insurgency in Iraq yet simultaneously concerned with suppressing it enough to cooperate with the U.S.A. U.S. leadership may have help precipitate the Iraqi invasion of Syria that left more than a million dead and a little payback might have been regarded as being in order. The U.S. may have felt that Iran got its just deserts for taking the U.S. embassy hostage during the Iranian revolution. And Iranians hated the U.S.A. a little for the Eisenhower administration’s support of the restoration of the Pahlavi dynasty to the Peacock throne early subverting the Iranian democracy in the process.

Plainly where the U.S. intervenes militarily beyond its own areas of existing special interest it just throws accelerant into the fire of Arabian confusion, chaos, populism morphing to Islamism etc. It ISIS were to become an established government anywhere the Reagan doctrine might contain it and more easily destroy its leadership if it comprised a threat to the U.S.A. or other N.A.T.O. countries. Human behavior and degrees of Muslim fundamentalism are variables and constants too. N.A.T.O. should defend Europe against Muslim infiltration, yet also constructively engage the Middle East to restore the 95% of Syrian refugees that live in the Middle East to get out of the camps and return to Syria.

Conflated theories about causes of conflict in the Arab spring wars and the worth of military intervention should not be allowed to bring the U.S.A. to throw more munitions and temporal targets that vanish and reform like some kind of amoeba composite. The desire for populist revolt against authoritarian regimes finds resonance with not only emergent godless atheist yuppies but with Islamist radicals that can politically organize best in the sanctity of mosques. The Arab Sunni states will need to balance themselves with evolving forms of states. When the U.S. intervenes it just resets the entire cycle of authoritarian, aborted democratic movement/fundamentalist revolt and so forth. In practice democracy exists in Arab states when a military that is westernized supports it. The military intervenes domestically whenever Muslims become too powerful and want to move toward theocracy. The formation of democratic political institutions is challenging and requires long-term tech support to just grow out of isolated economic and social submission to repress government, royalty or global oligarchs.

Facetwits2

I had thought of going to church Sunday. Yet there are not any Priesthood of Believers churches franchised yet so I wrote this slowly with a broke keyboard. . . Nothing about Erastian errors or the unsaved left on base.

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg recently published a manifesto describing how Fbook can be a neo–governing political facilitator evolving new world order. Hegel thought the German state the highest stage of the world spirit realizing itself in history. Mr. Zuckerberg apparently believes its Facebook. Democratic nationalism is based on land and secure borders– a gold standard vs floating currency globalism.

More people than Mr. Zuckerberg may field websites as evolved, sophisticated new format news–packing–stuffing world governments. Domain name bidding may drive prices sky high (i.e. True Sedition, Carefree Government, Acme Government, Best Government, N. W. O. 2, Zipperflipper). Maybe will China start a clone site sharing advertising cash proplits with users.

A hypothetical CEO of a startup– Facetwits2 seems like a good name for a social networking site to organize a level 4 Multiverse (presence of mind traveling through universe permutations with branching).

Planet peoples get their own user ID and user page universe. I shall make a covenant with my users so they may form secret groups and nobody else shall know what goes on – except me. I shall give news feeds that nurture users in the way of Oz.

Oz shall be held harmless and all revenue streams from Facetwits2 shall flow to moi as long as rivers run untaxed. I may give billions away and have no tax liability decades. Everyones a winner.

Toynbee would have considered me just an Oz man making way to ending the Republic in the Universal phase of American civilization (rightly). Yek I am so much more. Marx knew dialectical (political) evolution led in stages to structuretopia under a benevolent central committee. Nietzsche knew a Super Oz man would arise to lead the underverse (women, homosexuals, ethnic minorities) to reason overcoming class enemies and serving as experimental vectors someday after genetic engineering and artificial intelligence are perfected.

Facebook's New World Order

Facebook has a CEO who got lucky with one idea in college during the rapid growth phase of social media on the Internet. For whatever reason it was welcomed and Mark Zuckerberg became a billionaire. Now of course he wants to rule the world, or rather, have the political thought of humanity exist within his vast leftist global empire on-line.

https://arstechnica.com/staff/2017/02/op-ed-mark-zuckerbergs-manifesto-is-a-political-trainwreck/

Actually independence and nationalism are requisite for meaningful democratic politics. Strong national boundaries are needed for the possibility of ecological economic transition to develop from the present non-renewable economics. Change needs to happen in particular areas rather than sort of generally. Zuckerberg would like to form millions of people into little regional groups where they are given appropriate news of public concern. Like the broadcast media owned by the rich those concerns cannot really be in conflict with the way things are.

The Unibomber also wrote a manifesto. He also wanted to change the world to conform to a radical vision. If he had owned Facebook perhaps he would have required humanity to be brainwashed in planetary groups that would support his goals for a new world order.

Mark Zuckerberg should write a few books on environmental economic theory and let the sophomoric approaches to a new world order go.

http://www.vox.com/new-money/2017/2/18/14653542/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-manifesto-sapiens

Everybody wants to rule the world. Logically the first guys with preferred network locations would want to get in on the action. Facebook would morph like the planet eating blob into an organism containing everyone. All would be subject to Facebook's ability to know what they write as if they were a super-N.S.A. toying with it's prey.

Facebook would become the real political means of being with overwhelming power to raise up or put down those that make the global corporate agenda function more smoothly. As the present media hates Trump now except for some honest reporters like Rush Limbaugh, it would be able to coordinate and promote attacks on political systems anywhere.

Facebook's goal seems to be to move directly to Mussolini's corporatist utopia that failed in Nazi Germany but in a brave new world order might fulfill Mao's ideal state with the central committee being a planetary oligarchy dwarfing even the Chinese Communist Party. It is a logical, evil turn toward the dark side of the force.

Questions of Matter, Space and Gravitons

Are gravitons attracted to mass or vice versa? Are there states of mass that do not attract gravitons (such as neutrinos) such that one might say it is in a state comparable to that of monatomic elements?

If gravitons overwhelm matter condensing its implicit forces and structure to a state of matter unique to gravitons; in fact a stable state of mass, it might have finite size. It also might have warped space around it in such a configuration that when released with the monatomic phase of the graviton solid it unfolds with an apparent faster-than-light speed.

Monatomic elements

http://www.zptech.net/science.html

Of course gravitons might be something that pushes space. They might be something like virtual particles surrounding a particle wave like a digital field that activates into being briefly then switches off. Gravitons may be embedded within space and when drawn to mass release a certain amount of weight from space taking it to mass.

One wonders about being and nothingness. Smallest particle-waves theoretically like strings or membranes perhaps with virtual fields of their own. It seems though that all particle-wave are emergent characteristics of potential energy unpacking from a big bang-inflation field possibly emitted by the monatomic equivalent state of the graviton solid. Or not.

The idea that a digital field without space is entirely subject to the will of God is interesting.

Yazdgird, Islam and Sassanids; Leashing the Wild Bitches

When ISIS tried genocide on the Yadzi people of upper Iraq they were following an ancient Muslim tradition. The last great King of the Sassanid Empire was named Yadzgird III and he was killed by Muslim forces after the conclusive battle of ending the Sassanid Empire at Qadisiyya in 637. From then on the Muslim advance increased inexorably until being revered in 1061 by Roger the Norman at Palermo Sicily. Sicily had been invaded and occupied by Muslims since 831. Innumerable interesting historical facts can be found in Michael Angold’s 2001 book named Byzantium.

The left have developed a narrative for decades whereby the Crusaders one day decided to invade south of the Mediterranean. Nothing is mentioned of the real history of the Middle East’s history of the Sassanid, Byzantine, Muslim and Carolingian Empires meeting and interacting militarily and theologically. The Sassanids worshipped fire. Isis described the Yadzis as devil worshippers. When Islam expanded the Sassanind was it first rival followed just later by the Byzantine.

The book Byzantium; The Bridge from Antiquity to the Late Middle Ages is a brief, informative read. Perhaps the examination of iconoclasts vs iconodules would be too much theology for today’s godless atheists of the Democrat Party. Angold notes that some theologians actually used polemic in their writing and policy expressions. It seems that politics were fused with religion in the day. Even Charlemagne brought together theologians and scholars to form opinions and works for the western church that was not subordinated then to the church under the Papacy at Rome. Angold’s treatment of the relationships between the Frankish Church, the Roman Church and the Byzantine as well as from theological and political points of view is quite interesting.

The three major civilizations of the day outside of China were all devoted to religion. If one thinks about it, illiteracy, images and popular ideas about God and government were inextricably meaningful and continue to shape the politics of the world. Classical civilizations, pagans (an equivalent of modern atheists in some ways especially if they worship string theory) and even scientifically inclined philosophers receded into the past.

When Muslims ruled Sicily from 830 to 1061 it is written that the major export was Slavs south as slaves. Roger the Norman ended that, however slavery of Europeans continued for hundreds years more elsewhere in Islam. It is thus ironic that the Byzantine Empire itself disassociated itself from an Arab tribe of Christian monophysites that guarded 'the desert approaches' (to the east) for Byzantium because they were monophysite Christians (from Yemen). The byzantine Emperor's decision to get rid of those Arabs with a theology somewhat at variance with their own allowed an easy avenue of attack for first Sassanids and later, Mohammadans.

It is important for American policy makers to be aware of world history beyond the rather narrow viewpoint of far western Europe and the transatlantic migration that at any rate misses the history of Irish and Viking journeys to America. As wild feminists go about their intifada of the new Potus as unleashed wild bitches without historical reason they should be aware that the world is not a potential Utopia, that Soviet communist sentimentality still is alive and well in many municipal, state and federal government workers, that Soviet collective bargaining and godless atheist bureaucratic power is not an actual supporter of civil liberties beyond those required for conformity to Bitchdatorship bureaucracy.

Not all American women voted for the Bitchtatorship of the proletariat that felt Zillary was entitled to rule. Americans should support individual excellence and likeability in their politicians though when they worship money instead of educated, selfless service to the Republic the choice is slim pickens indeed.Copulation without consequence is a feminist fact and ideal since the 1960s and birth control pills. Methodical destruction of moral sensibilities of tradition and increases in abortion were partners of the rise of the ideal of feminist dictatorship through the ballot box and coalitions if if it required flooding the nation with illegal aliens. Perhaps they should have been content to trust a little in the people of the U.S.A. Over time women would naturally have found an acceptable opportunity for social personal expression and participation in work without going over to wild bitch status hateful of men.

 American sanctuary cities should support internal refugees from the U.S. economy as well as non-citizen Muslim ‘refugees’ from Syria driven from their homes by U.S. foreign policy of the Obama administration that threw fuel on the fire of that civil war so far as it possibly could. The radical left should be leashed and harnessed to the sled of bettering the U.S. economy for all Americans including straight, white males. The sole competent policy for any party calling itself democratic should be the economic betterment of the poor and middle class-not just placing feminists and homosexuals in high public places. Perhaps they are so cinched economically that they are concerned solely with power for-themselves.

All the Marbles

There is an app for Linux named Marble. It's a scalable map of Earth in the form of a movable sphere-somewhat like Google Earth. It would be great if someone produced a topographical relief global app;-able to show planetary landmass and-sea-level area at any time in Earth history. People should be able to extrapolate future theoretical contours with reciprocals of-ice-sheet melting andf sea level rise. In fact topo-globes of every substantial world and moon of the solar system would be good.

State-of-the-Union Show not Until January 2018

Waiting until next January for the President Trump state of the Union speech may be tough yet worth the wait; it could be great. Press conferences will be-an acceptable substitute if the Washington Post and N.P.R. stay away. What would the President say to that globalist pack?

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/trump%E2%80%99s-two-year-presidency/ar-AAmPfaZ?li=BBnb7Kz