People have their own unique point of view

 That is sort of a paradigm of general relativity if one applies the principle to space-time, yet bear in mind that they may perceive different slices of reality and 'real objects' are two dimensional, massless objects embedded in the Higgs field with an apparent 3rd dimension, and people experience 'reality' from where they are at, which is never where someone else is located.

Solzhenitsyn in the Gulag of a communist Stalinist society was quite practical- that is the meaning of what he said was accurate politically speaking. The Gulag had two classes of inmates- common criminals and political prisoners like Alexander S. The myth of a communist Utopia had bitter relevance for political prisoners whom had incurred disfavor of the state. Matters of the heart- a will to be free and live in freedom, and the search for a perfect social order, were somewhat antithetical when the state sought to eliminate resistance or non-conformity in order to attain that Utopia of dreams.

Nature is 2-dimensional massless particles embedded in the Higgs Field that seem to have mass when they gain an additional dimension (3rd) being slowed in the field Nature could have been created by an eternal God or perhaps even a very advanced A.I. created in another Universe created by God. In either case the physics seem to be logical with uncertainty and indeterminism within determinism; for know we see through a glass darkly.

The Quran scrolls for instance, of the Old Testament, cost the lives of those who wrote them. Legionnaires slaughtered that community. None of the Bible canon was written by fiction authors. Scholarship and writing was so rigorous they missed not a jot or iota- and the same books separated by hundreds of years were found not to have changed 1%.

Actually everything is perfect that isn't an imperfect copy of something else. Perfection is simply flawless imitation or performance of a standard. Things that are original are in-themselves and for-themselves and cannot be imperfect since there isn't anything or anyone original can be in meaningful comparison with. Otherwise one gets some sort of logical fallacy like post hoc ergo propter hoc except the original had no line of subsequents- those were grafted on.

Christopher Hitchens wrote- "“Faith is the surrender of the mind, it's the surrender of reason, it's the surrender of the only thing that makes us different from other animals."

It’s a logically weird statement such as M=R and if R then not F, If M and F(M=A)/.It would be a pretty hocus pocus trick-a super-power to transform a human brain and healthy mind into that of a non-human all-of-a-sudden with a thought. It also begs the premise that R cannot equal F. It is a way of dehumanizing people something like Eichman might have preferred as he regarded Jews as sub-human especially or because of their faith.