I wonder about the Southern Poverty Law Center being an extremist organization using words and target listings of individuals in the attempt to socially marginalize them. Alex Jones, Bo Gritz and Gary Demar all made the list with Alex Jones being listed first on the list of 129 extremist individuals. American individuals should be free from organizational social terrorism. Sure the Southern Poverty Law Center includes numerous people that probably deserve being listed, yet I suppose they also omit numerous people and organizations including ANTIFA, because they are leftist or communist. Alex Jones reports on an important side of current events and social structure the establishment usually ignores. The 1% concentrating wealth is not an illusion. The Democrat Party is deaf, dumb, blind and stupid these days in working as hard as they can to destroy the heritage of national independence and self-reliance so far as possible. They are shop stewards working for the rich as leaders of a company-owned union. The broadcast media is owned by that 1% establishment- it isn't imaginary. A good Canadian philosopher named John Sauls published a book on corporatism in contemporary society in 1999 named The Unconscious Civilization. I don't believe he has written another book on that topic since. I recall him writing someplace that he had a family to take care of. Corporatism can shut anything down just like Muslim theocracy, imperialism and communism can. https://www.engadget.com/2018/08/06/facebook-removes-alex-jones-pages/ https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/06/apple-pulls-alex-jones-infowars-podcasts-for-hate-speech.html Apple the Trillion dollar corporation removed most of Alex Jones' podcasts; that's corporatism at work and a reason why the government should have some kind of citizen back-up venue to let publishing remain permanently even when public corporate platforms disappear. SPLC appears to have left a semblance of neutrality and objectivity these days being so far removed from the 1960s and later when there were actually numerous groups perping violence that required tracking. SPLC could include CNN and the Washington Post these days and possible the Governor of New York on the list of extremists if they wanted to be objective. Throwing in powerful political bullshit in with the genuine articles degrades the credibility and reputation of SPLC. They aren't Elie Wiesel Inc.
PPC means pay per click. The Chinese government has already suggested that pay per click promotion be limited to 30% of search engine page results for search engines like Baidu.
While Facebook recently avoided being skunked entirely in China by buying up a local proxy, it remains largely outside the vast left-wing Chinese market. China has required that foreign corporations establishing in China allow the state to own a 51% share. I don’t know how that would work with Multi-national corporations and/or Internet corporations like Facebook. Mr. Zuckerberg already has a Chinese wife who may be his better, 51% half. Maybe that counts.
Foreign search engines working in China might need to sell half of their shares to China and then allow government censorship of content as well as full access to the company database as majority shareholders. I think the sanctions or trade tariffs of the trade war will have little effect on long term trends on capitalists of the west’s tendencies to sell Communists the ropes to hang them with.
Ad hoc Communist-anarchist gangsters in Portland (not the broadcast media) along with other opponents of free speech and civil rights for others besides themselves harassed and tried to intimidate a peaceful street-conservative rally. People lawfully assembled should be free to march or meet without abuse from masked goons. The United States tolerates dissent and free expression of dissent. Antifa, imperialists, corporatists and Democrat Party affiliates try to suppress it.
Antifa are willing tools of global imperialism and the most rich. The people they conflict with are mostly the poor and lower middle class. Those people are the second generation of poor and middle class white guys that have been socially and economically degraded by federal laws including affirmative action for females, non-whites and homos, and by loose border security that has flooded the nation with illegal workers undermining domestic labor. Those people have been kicked around for nearly 50 years and encounter the results of affirmative action on the street. Some of those people inevitably will peacefully assemble to express dissatisfaction, having few political alternatives with a Democrat party become a British imperialist treason annex.
Antifa is not protesting the concentration of wealth; they are simply idiotic goon-tools attacking Americans. A video of Alex Jones' Infowars captured some of the misdemeanor.
One would need great expectations to be surprised by the Euro leadership attitude toward President Trump. The world is full of those seeking to dominate and lever against the U.S.A. whatsoever way they can. George Washington in his farewell address notably warned against making permanent foreign alliances. Bill Clinton attended Oxford and has acted like a British tool since. The Brits like their own devices and Donald Trump isn’t one Europeans expected another Muslim and immigrant promoting neo-leftist to be elected. One in the mold of Barrack Obama or Hillary Clinton who would feel like they were detached from nationalism and were world citizens benefiting foreign economies and themselves instead of Americans. Euros were aghast at the election of the movie star of crass capitalism and have hated Donald Trump since. There isn’t anything surprising about U.S. allies- whoever those are, that diss the President of the United States. Donald Trump seems as patriotic as Theodore Roosevelt and enjoys mixing it up. Sure it would be good if Donald Trump was well versed in ecological economics and inclined to reform capitalism in such as way that everyone had enough capital to never be stuck in a whirlpool or an undertow of poverty. Realistically world leaders are generally a load of crap (except Vlad Putin does seem to benefit Russia as much as possible) and purely self-seeking. Not all perhaps, yet I have trouble thinking of exceptions myself.
South
Africa's President and the ruling African National Congress have
decided to go ahead and expropriate land from white farmers without
compensation. The purely racist land redistribution may provide for
short term advantages to Zulu and Bantu negroes, yet it may create a
Zimbabwefication of the agricultural section of the nation leading to
long range economic and political consequences as whites are marginalized and driven out.
One of the
reason that South African apartheid was ended was because of general
western support for political equality and democracy along
non-rational lines. South Africa was something of a test case, with
time be given to observe the outcome of the political sea change.
President Ramaphosa in a sense is making a significant blunder in
forcing a purely racist land redistribution for he confirms the
belief of many that there was no reason to trust non-whites to respect
abstract political civil rights, when plain racist advantage politics
would follow in time.
Democracy
is not just about voting. It is about ideas. A marketplace of ideas
from which voters select the best to implement at the ballot box. There were myriad alternative ways of bringing blacks into farming without crass complete expropriation. One obvious method would have been simply to end land monopoly by one race exclusively; take 50% of land farms owned by whites and give that, with conditions, to black farmers. The farmers would pay fair market price for the land to the original land owners eventually from future crop sales. The original owners would provide assistance in crop productivity and profit until the land is paid off. Corporatism may regard ideas as nothing more than products and
repress rival ideas as if they were rival products from the Internet
and other mass communications outlets that are privately owned. Purely racial politics essentially pursues the same lines for
repression and redistribution. South Africa's land expropriation
program is a turn toward the dark side of the force. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6019117/South-Africa-plan-seize-land-white-farmers-catastrophic.html
Apparently the Executive branch of government works for the Judicial branch and requires Judicial approval to rescind executive orders, though not to create them, if the Judicial branch likes them. A Federal Judge ordered the President to restore President Obama's D.A.C.A. program because President Trump capriciously rescinded it. In other words the President had no reason or right to monkey with Executive orders made by Democrats. http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/400332-federal-judge-says-trump-must-fully-restore-daca Constitutional law experts would know where the President stands in regard to capricious judicial legislating from the bench. That is, what remedies the President has, such as hanging the judges or whatever. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deferred_Action_for_Childhood_Arrivals
The media, including Business Insider, evidently believe the President of the United States should gag himself and ignore things happening around him. https://www.businessinsider.com/trumps-russia-probe-tweets-may-be-evidence-in-an-obstruction-trial-2018-8 Does the media really need to invent charges for the President to worry about a priori and expect him to self-censor executive comments? How can public remarks comprise obstruction of justice theoretically. It is public speech rather than behind the scenes criminal activity? There seems to be no end of media invention of theoretical charges and theoretical incriminating speech the President may be doing whenever he speaks or tweets about things openly- Apparently the media don't yet choose to call it hate speech. The President is so lucky.
Some people are wondering if Vlad the Elector has picked his rackets for the Novermber 2018 aka "Mid-term" election brackets yet. The odds against picking a perfect bucket of brackets are five billion Quintillion, however Vlad the Elector is said to pre-determine the outcome rather than just watching it. Bettors don't know if Vlad selects all the way down to the level of municipal elections. It would not be wise to misunderestimate his capacity to pre-determine US elections; Santa knows whether or not each individual kid and adult has been naughty or nice spanning the globe so it might be simple and require nothing more than a dilitente with a vast center-winged Federal'naya sluzhba bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii to pre-determine U.S. elections.
