Dr Ford Forgot Washington Post Reporter Meeting Detail

Dr. Christine Ford in testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee today said that she could not remember if she gave written notes to a Washington Post reporter she met with. That meeting occurred just a few weeks ago; not 35 years ago. The notes were very important as they described what she told her psychiatrist about her sexual assault memory from the high school party she says Judge Kavinaugh attended. When making a decision to present her story to a Washington Post reporter the item she would have made a choice about were the notes. Before going to any important meeting where one must provide witness one usually would choose what evidence in support she would take. Since the only evidence she had were the notes of what she told a psychiatrist, it is rather unconvincing that she could not remember if she took her notes to the meeting to let the Post reporter look at them of if she just casually described the content.

Hillary Clinton  told Ken Starr that she could not recall or could not remember more than 300 times in answering various questions. Ken Starr said he felt like he should charge her with perjury yet didn't. Dissimulation is within the power and practice of Democrat Party leadership.

The relativist and associationist truth schools following John Dewey's teachings believe truth is whatever they say it is. In other words they can pass a polygraph test about anything so long as they regard everything they say as being implicitly true. Those are the Democrats today, and especially psychologists.

President Trump Ought to Shut Down Government

President Trump is likely to veto the spending bill sent over by the House and shut down the government. Congress has blown him off repeatedly on funding the wall so there isn't much else he can do excerpt close government down until they finance the wall or look like the toy of Congress.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/26/trump-may-force-government-shutdown-over-border-wall-spending.html

It may be President Trump's last chance to fund wall construction so the government may really shut down until the people that prefer Mexican financial security over American theoretically rot.

New Allegations Against Judge Kav Reveals DC's Sewer Side

Washington D.C. is a sewer breeding corruption in its youth going on the basis of the swingie prepper stories emerging as Brett Kavanaugh is in the stocks during confirmation proceedings. Even though the Harvard Yale axis of dope is what SCOTUS is made of, there is a difference between men and women that pundits and cognoscenti have noticed. How can the Court have fair and balanced male-female members in the future that includes non-homosexuals and leftist wackos too?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/09/26/explosive-new-allegations-against-kavanaugh-demand-a-full-investigation-now/?noredirect=on

There should be a definite protocol for letting accusations pile up, as if it was a legal hunting season, that ends so the Senate Judiciary Committee may rightly consider the stuff dumped their way- and not at the last minute so the Senate seems like a bunch of jackasses manipulated by any collusionists out there.

http://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/2018/09/26/russian-law-student-fed-up-with-manspreading-allegedly-dumps-bleach-on-passengers-in-viral-video.html

Should juvenile records be allowed that don't involve criminal convictions? That is a tough question. Adults are supposed to be more mature and with different conduct than juveniles.

And what about college parties? Is everyone that attends one responsible for everything that goes on there-especially in DC where the last President was a confessed minor cocaine user like former Mayor Marian Berry I suppose. 

If women are going to be held accountable for immoral behavior in some way that approximates male misdeeds, what can be considered; extra-marital sex or sex outside of marriage? Should every accusation of promiscuity be allowed against a female nominee in the years ahead. Where do the queer judges fit in? Is juvenile queer activity a fair reprehensible target for accusers to make against any judge that it might possibly stick to for a while at least?

Washington D.C. and environs is an ugly city morally speaking where some of the most corrupt and treacherous people anywhere gather to pile up vast public debt and let in drug traffickers and their fruits over the border illegally to supply their hench-persons that supply Hollywood. Someone has to judge the perpetrators with accomplices and collusionists who won't build a wall to keep the illegals out of the nation. In some way those living in Washington DC should be protected from all of the evil that California has to offer. Really, there should be some sort of protocol to defend Washington D.C. insiders.

Pope John Paul II Was a Moral Leader; the Present Guy?

Pope John Paul II was a moral leader. The present Pope mostly stands for moral ambiguity. He said about homosexual marriage; 'who am I to judge'. Recently he signed off on letting the Chinese Communist Government nominate Bishops for that nation. That raises a few points of interest to non-Catholics and Catholics alike.

One. Will Alaska be allowed to nominate Bishops too, and of course the U.S. Government should have a few. Switzerland shouldn't be rated below China by the Vatican and has a right for a Bishop or two from its cantons. I understand completely that the Pope would not want to let Canada nominate Bishops. I can't say that I blame him for that. Russia though...

The Tsar used to appoint the head of the Orthodox Catholic Church so I suppose Vladimir Putin will demand appointing several Bishops to be on equal footing with the Chinese who have been given most favored nation bishops to nominate status. And don't forget about Google and Ford; they might want a bishop or two.

What will the communist bishops think about homosexual marriage though? The Pope said reportedly that the church needs to change because of its pedophile priests that have cost millions and millions or even billions in damages to victims. If the church allows marriage as it has in prior historical times, it will probably allow homosexual marriage priests and return to the pedophile problem.

Yet as the Pope said; Who am I to Judge? In the Revelation Jesus said to the seven churches (paraphrase) to shape up or be cast out. God is already judging people. Catholic leaders are supposed to advocate what the Bible instructs as right behavior. Homosexuality isn't o.k. It's God's judgment that is meaningful. Christians need to follow the rules.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/732052/catholic-church-child-abuse-celibacy-pope-rome-germany-clergy-news

Dr. Ford's Negotiating is Worse then Bobby Fischer's

Christine Ford's negotiating to appear at the senate to testify is worse than those that Bobby Fischer or the North Vietnamese might have demanded, respectively, for their appearances at a chess championship or the Paris Peace talks. That was all about the size and kind of the table. One would think that Dr. Ford wants to appear to testify rather than it being an onerous burden for her. If that is the case the Senate should simply let her off the hook and cancel the day for her to testify and hold a vote instead. There is no need to keep setting back the date for her testimony because of her unwillingness to appear unless certain conditions are met.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/25/kavanaugh-hearing-once-again-in-doubt-as-christine-ford-raises-new-concerns.html

AI Apps for Language Interaction Would be Useful

An artificial intelligence app for learning a foreign language interactively would be useful; spoken language that is. The app should recognize at least two languages and be able to converse meaningfully. Maybe it already exists. It would also be useful to have a fast 1/10th second speech translator improvement phone tool for making foreigners speaking one's own language more intelligible.

Dem's Kavanaugh Craziness Driving Up Repub Poll Numbers?

Republicans have achieved their highest favorabililty rating in polls in seven years. The reasons may be the craziness about the Kavanaugh confirmation hearing support for unproven accusations against a spotless nominee.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/408123-republican-partys-favorability-rating-comparable-with-democrats-gallup

In one case, an accuser admits that she isn't sure who the dick belonged to that she believes she saw at a frat party while buzzed from booze, yet thinks it may have been Brett Kavanaugh's spotted dick because she saw him tucking in his shirt soon after the alleged dick spotting. Did anyone think to ask if Brett Kavanaugh himself may be suffering ptsd from a boob flashing while at Yale?

http://time.com/5405343/facebook-lawsuit-mental-trauma-content-ptsd/

In the case of Dr. Christine Ford, there is lack of verification from any other source. The high school year book scrivening though...that is damning. Brett Kavanaugh's high school essays ought to be examined for implicit, latent, chauvinism as well, by Special Inquisitor Mueller. Somewhere amidst the fog of war there might be Russian collusion.

Pres Putin Errs in Sending S-300's to Syria

Russian President Vladimir Putin has made a tactical error in sending Russian S-300 air defense missiles to Syria. The Middle East doesn't really need that kind of destabilizing missile presence. The United States doesn't actually need to regard Russian threats to Israeli security as non-hostile. One wants to overlook Russia's Syrian military activities that contribute to stabilization of the Syrian civil chaos when possible, and it usually is possible except when they are a threat to U.S. allies and U.S. military aircraft in the area. No one needs a possibility of a regional conflict between allies or larger powers in Syria or even Israel.

 For Vladimir Putin to allow the Assad regime to have the tools to attack U.S. and/or Israeli aircraft just wasn't a good idea. Letting Russian crews operate and perhaps shoot at U.S. and/or Israeli aircraft is even worse. Syrian security does not need S-300 missiles. In fact it undermines Syrian security to a limited extent as it increases awareness that the Assad government with Russian help could return to a status of being a danger to Israel and other nations. Then the moderate western support for a non-Sunni government in Syria might dry up.  People may suggest that more missiles be deployed in Europe along Russian borders to counter Russian air threats.

President Putin should seek for some way to let Israel and Syria work together and find solutions to troubling issues in such a way that gardening can return to the fore as possible activity for people interested more in peace than in military and terrorist activity. Russia has a Soviet past that brings an aura of evil to its Syrian activities that is reinforced with introduction of the wrong kind of weapons to an evil though understandable regime. If Russia chooses to be with the side of the lost and unsaved souls of Syria instead of national Israel, or or hopes for sympathy from the godless atheists co-anti-religionists of the west to work with the atheists of the former Soviet Union, that misdirected hope would not be worth a ruble

https://www.rt.com/news/439243-s300-missiles-syria-israel/

Vote on Kavanaugh Now- Impeach Later if Need Be

SCOTUS nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh has been accused by two women of sexual impropriety several decades ago. The accusations are last-minute kinds of things that accomplish Democrat Party objectives in a significant way; they hope to take over Congress in the mid-term November vote and stand to disapprove any conservative nominee. The nation should have a conservative justice and unless there is a legal reason why he shouldn't be on the court, the vote should proceed.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/new-brett-kavanaugh-accusation-has-a-bunch-of-flaws-but-democrats-already-using-it-against-him-anyway

Did Brett Kavanaugh do what Christine Ford and Mr. Kavanaugh's Yale classmate; a Ms Ramirez, say he did? There is apparently no way to know right away. Plainly there isn't a legal issue existing after all the time that has passed without a charge ever being filed, it is simply a political issue and one that any reasonable soul knows is a favorite of the Democrat Party this year. They are accusations that stimulate Me Too ire and wrath and work to help bring out the vote.

Brett Kavanaugh is the primary victim of the accusations that may or may not be true. If his nomination doesn't go ahead the smears persist in public memory as if he was some kind of sex offender that escaped legal requirements to register wherever he chooses to live. If he is innocent that would make little difference for the public remembers the accusations rather than dismissals.

 http://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/2018/09/26/russian-law-student-fed-up-with-manspreading-allegedly-dumps-bleach-on-passengers-in-viral-video.html

With months to make public accusations in a timely way the Democrats involved choose to wait until the timing would stop replacing Judge Kavanaugh before the next court session starts in October and the election occurs in November and that can't be a coincidence. It may be a cold-blooded political calculation that should not be rewarded. Dr. Ford renegotiates her appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee more often than the parties of the Paris Peace talks regarding the size of the table. If she is so reluctant to testify she ought to be excused from testifying and the vote directly proceed.

Fortunately the constitution provides a remedy for the present problem. A Supreme Court Justice may be impeached and removed from office by the House and Senate comparable to the manner a President may be. The Kavanaugh vote should go ahead as he is a remarkably well qualified Judge with an otherwise impeccable reputation. Yet an investigation could go ahead too and if Judge Kavanaugh turns out to be worthy of being removed from the high court later, the legislature will have the power to do so. It should not be that the orderly execution of government is disrupted or corrupted by last minute unsupported accusations that serve to accomplish a political purpose. Ample opportunity from several sectors existed for a timely presentation of accusations about the Judge's high school and college years. At least the issue is not as superfluous as the Harvard filled court hating to have a Yale man join them. Neither is it some kind of skull and bones frat collusion- probably.

King's Gambit 3M Blitz

                                                                                  I played white in this game.

Democrat Congress Could Perfect Do-Nothing Status

A Democrat Party win in November could achieve a perfected do-nothing except costly pork congressional transition to the dark side of the force. Republicans in theory are somewhat less immoral than Democrats hence they get the moral voter block, yet even with encouragement rising to chastising they too achieve little of solid value to the poor and middle class that is positive except of course in forestalling Democratic waves of demonic doom of individual civil rights subsuming individuals into the Borg of Democrat Party control.

Democrats controlling one or more houses of the legislature this fall while President Trump is in the White House of course would reject any effort to secure the border with a control barrier. Republicans haven't delivered on that one simple promise either. Neither really want Americans to manufacture their own electric bikes or actually have an independent and secure manufacturing base, borders or ecosphere that is sustainable for generations. Both parties could be conflated into do nothing oneness that isn't primarily for the benefit of globalists plutocrats and their depraved legions of doom following them like the most vile creatures of Mordor.

Blitz Chess-3 min Indian-Game-Yusupov-Rubinstein-System

                                                                                I played black in this 3 minute blitz game. 0-1 on time

Sketchy Military Affairs After 1918

The United States bailed out Britain with its decisive entry into the First World War. Patton on the western front believed the United States should have not signed an armistice but should have forced Germany to fight until unconditional surrender. Britain was decimated with casualties in the war. The Cambridge University class of 1914 for instance, had something like 80% casualties. Britain wasn’t in any condition to fight another war, while the United States was strong and getting stronger.

Eisenhower wanted to go to Europe from his job being a tank instructor at Ft. Hood, yet the army wouldn’t let him. It turned out that he had a role to play in the final battle of The First World War named The Second World War.

The United States perhaps should not have got involved in the First World War and instead could have let Germany win. Crown Prince Ruprecht led a break-through just before the end of the war 250 miles into France and then ran out of troops to continue. The entry of the United States had provided much manpower to wear Germany down. If Germany had won the war there would not have followed an Adolph Hitler and Third Reich.

George S. Patton’s poem

Peace -- November 11, 1918 - Poem by General George S Patton Jnr

“I stood in the flag-decked cheering crowd
Where all but I were gay,
And gazing on their extesy,
My heart shrank in dismay.

For theirs was the joy of the 'little folk'
The cruel glee of the weak,
Who, banded together, have slain the strong
Which none alone dared seek.

The Bosch we know was a hideous beast
Beyond our era's ban,
But soldiers still must honor the Hun
As a mighty fighting man.

The vice he had was strong and real
Of virtue he had none,
Yet he fought the world remorselessly
And very nearly won…

And looking forward I could see
Like a festering sewer;
Full of the fecal Pacifists
Which peace makes us endure….

None of the hold and blatant sin
The disregard of pain,
The glorious deeds of sacrefice
which follow in wars train.

Instead of these the little lives
Will blossom as before,
Pale bloom of creatures all too weak
To hear the light of war.

While we whose spirits wider range
Can grasp the joys of strife,
Will moulder in the virtuous vice
Of futile peaceful life.

We can but hope that e're we drown
'Neath treacle floods of grace,
The tuneless horns of mighty, Mars
Once more shall rouse the Race

When such times come, Oh! God of War
Grant that we pass midst strife,
Knowing once more the whitehot joy
Of taking human life.

Then pass in peace, blood-glutted Bosch
And when we too shall fall,
We'll clasp in yours our gory hands
In High Valhallas' Hall. “

The Kavanaugh Process is Important

Judge Brett Kavanaugh is one of the most highly qualified Judges for the Supreme Court available. To allow unproven allegations arriving at the eleventh hour to halt nominee selection votes regularly could make it very difficult to ever add anyone to the court. In a nation of 320 million people there is no end of possible accusations that could be made.

Democrats want to stop the addition of any conservative to the U.S. Supreme Court. Most Republicans would prefer not to add a liberal-leftist-corporatist judicial activist again, hence the present fight.

The next session of the court begins in early October so any delays the Democrats can make help to keep their agenda at SCOTUS more viable. The Ford accusation is a partial birth abortion of the nomination vote. Any tool to spike conservative guns will be tried.

In the future some sort of regular time table should be established to stop last-minute accusations with amorphous evidence credibility from delaying proceedings. Objections to a nominee should be required to appear within an open season that ends at least 30 days prior to the Senate Judiciary Committee vote on the nominee.

A good working procedure for future nominations might be for the Judiciary Committee to accept accusations against a nominee for 30 days after the public announcement of nomination, then close the open accusation enrollment period and study the accusations for two weeks in addition to two weeks of general interviews, before voting. Criminal accusations would have a life of their own outside the scope of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Where is the Electric Lincoln?

Cadillac has some high performance models and some nearly compact coups yet Lincoln is something of a wonder. Why isn't there a high performance all-electric compact Lincoln convertible with a platform designed to one day allow the batteries to be replaced with a hydrogen fuel cell and for now a high performance liquid or nitrogen cooled gaming computer?

In theory electric car platforms and component parts could be so simple that they are nearly snap-together utilizing pieces from various companies conformed to select industry standards- rather like building a computer at home from parts selected on the Internet.

In the not too distant future electric transport platforms could enter automobile races such as the Indianapolis 500 with self-driving A.I., win, then go to the supermarket to pick up a load of groceries and drop off the owner at home before driving itself to Home Depot to pick up a pallet of building material loaded by a self-driving and loading pallet, while recharging, and bring the building materials back to the future new hut of the home owner moving up to a full ten by ten dwelling from his rental.

The hut could be manufactured as a battery-in-itself coated with voltaic materials  able to recharge the electric vehicle, although with power lines being ubiquitous and the equivalent of being filled with gasoline, future recharging should be transparently easy.

Mobs in the Street Can't Substitute for Democracy

Theoretically the United States democracy is a representative republic, hence mobs in the streets aren’t the preferred way of working political opinion and the will of the people. The Congress has representatives of the people; elected representatives, that get first crack at making laws. It seems as if people aren’t contented with that these days goaded on by media cameras. The second amendment plainly provides for gun ownership.

People have written reminders that the founders allowed for constitutional amendments if the people want that, neither is that process accomplished through mob demonstrations in the streets, trails, parks or waterways. Courts must enforce the constitution. Democrats in the judiciary sometimes act as if they could interpret the constitution in any way they prefer; as if it were the intellectual equivalent of Silly Putty, and that making bad precedents ends the debate. That is known as judicial activism. Unfortunately that method conflicts with truth, language and logic over time, and requires correction.

Field Poems (video) Incld 'Invictus Saved'