U.S. Ambassador to Libya Killed By Mob- A Comment

The U.S. embassy in Cairo apologized 9-11 to the Moslem world in general for free speech apparently referring to You Tube videos and so forth. That apology was made before the Cairo mob and that in Benghazi attacked the U.S. embassies.

At the funeral and memorial service for the late Ambassador one hopes that an American instrument-the banjo-is played instead of the Unamerican, globalist bagpipes effecting such  alien noise.

The Moslem world sinks in a gravitational-like field toward Sharia and represses free speech somewhat inevitably and it's is unreasonable for the administration to expect that free speech would or should stop in western civilization so that no Moslem would look out their window and see Lady Godiva riding her trusty steed.

It is a paradox that the Harvard-Corporatist-Administration axis of hate speech ideology that represses particular language use and bans users from select web pages for using select non-partisan language takes the anti-free speech side when their own ox's are disrespected from their partisan point of view. It is difficult to rate the lack of foresight about leaving an ambassador so vulnerable to terrorism and killing when it is well known that Al Qa'eda and radical terrorists are swimming in that Libyan social ocean of revolutionary instability as well as in Cairo.

Probably the administration should have had better mid-east logic, policy and embassy security.

The restive Moslem world should not be given a message that free speech is anything less than necessary for democracy to exist. What would Jesus do as a question takes the reality out of context in the course of history. Eschatological issues and determinism are actual factors not subject to such criteria I think.

We would not expect that a new generation of neutron bombs for new Crusader series missiles would be a necessary response to intimidation of video bloggers of course. The point might be made though that toleration for terrorism from Moslem radicals upon Americans can have its limits though.

Terry Jones was not the producer of the video named 'The Innocence of Islam' that is alleged to be the motivator for the mob violence. Free speech especially about historical figures cannot reasonably be limited at all-that's how historical accuracy is developed and they way quality video production occurs.

In reading about the investigation leading to the arrest of KSM the Daniel Pearl video was mentioned. Its still on the Internet too-KSM cuts off his head and holds it up for the camera. The Democrat party seems to be unable to universally support free speech while condemning evil actions and explaining that difference to the Moslem world or developing tolerance for free expression in Molsem nations especially Pakistan.