China-Mart, 43, and the Anti-Secession Bill in Beijing

Walking into a Wal-Mart Super Center recently I was astounded to see a woman seated high on an elevated shoe-shine stule chair with naked feet being rubbed and washed by another, smaller woman kneeling on the floor. Wal-Mart, perhaps over influenced by the ancient Chinese tradition of servility, has imported and emulated elements of that practice in Texas. Texas with a tradition of segregation and servile roles for some elements of American society, would obviously be a good place to market such a groveling, foot-washing tradtion. Americans over-readily adapt to the new ethos of service workers waiting upon them, and give up their liberty and hertitage of egalitarian social justice and roles so easily that they allow millions and millions of illegal migrant or immigrant workers to arrive each year to serve and ultimately replace their freedom with their own.

Wal-Mart's Chinese production contributes a full 1% of the annual gross national product in China. Chinese law-makers planning to pass an anti-seccession law to intimidate the Taiwanese and to expand their extortionist influence on the free Taiwanese have relied upon the Bush administration's interest in oil profits and its lack of integrity to set up a second term challenge to parallel that of the first term of President G.W.B. when it attacked and captured a U.S. Orion spy plane flying in international airspace near China. The Communist Government knows that the Bush administration and it's neo-Corporatist Government is interested in plundering two trillion dollars from U.S. taxpayers to drive them into additional servitude with generations paying interst through taxes to Beijing after first providing a windfall to private collectives on Wal-Street as a vast front-loader fee.

An administration with environmental integrity and sound ethics would support the Taiwanese by advancing theit cause to have a seat in the U.N., and woiuld of course support them in event of war should the Communists attack when the Tiwanese declare formal independence of the collectivist mainland government.

Yet President Bush may be too far mired in the pit of oil interests and transnational collectives to have any awareness of thye tremendous damage that he is wreaking upon the present and future U.S. economy. It is well possible to have a government and economic policy that accentuates the individual instead of the vast collective corporate interests spanning across global boundaries instantanteously. It is possible to develop a U.S. produced non-fossil fuel transportation infrastructure, and to discourage a decadent slight into oriental despotism even though that may be part of the ante-bellum heritage of the south in that it's oppression of the southjer blacks was like the royal oppression of Chinese peasants.

The Rush Limbaughs of the world in the transnational corporate, collectivist sphere of influence may enjoy a prestige of emplacing themselves at the pinnicle of a collectivist hierarchy, yet the historical trend of oppressing masses is not what America was about, and it will more quickl;y accellerate the nation's slide into dependence and decadence, corruption and chaos, rave and ruin thatn any other single likely to occur political direction. Their is no substitute for secure borders and a do it yourself attitude with inventiveness and fundamental human decency with right reason leading the spirit of America to a coincident experience with the sacred and the politically neccessary.

The Republican administration shopuld stay out of ANWR, balance the federal budget, share international defense costs, cut highway spending in that vast collective pork-barrel to let alternative transport possibilities grow, etc.