Each
nation originated with yeoman farmers forming the backbone of an Army of
freemen defending what would become a Republic. Over time the strong hands on
farmers egalitarian social and political standing became diminished by
concentrated wealth and landed gentry. The main occupation of Americans was
farming until the 20th century and one could be describing the
preponderant facts of Rome as well including that of
the Republic.
We
know that globalism and a Universal state developed for each, although neither Rome nor the United States ever controlled the
entire world. The Parthian killed a Roman legion and the richest
Roman-Marcus Crassus-acting as a general was defeated along with his legion by the Parthian Spahbod with his head delivered to the leader in a basket. China is beyond the military
reach of the United States -yet so is Russia and most other first
world nations realistically. Since World War two the United States has had difficulty
defeating even second and third world nations conclusively.
Ancient
Rome’s leaders became decadent. The stories of Transalpine Gaul’s Roman estates
and their luxury are legendary-while the restive masses of Germans and others
outside were not adequately recognized. Ordinary Romans tended to emulate the
decadence of their leaders not uncommonly when the libations could be afforded
along with pagan debauchery. America’s role model Hollywood leadership class is
renowned for its moral depravity and the President has supported ingressing
homosexual empowerment and legal dope smoking. The state of Washington has a
movement to allow dope smoking in bars. Not quite the opium dens of China
though there is no Boxer rebellion in the offing either.
The ancient Roman Republic collapsed with a popular civil war leader (Julius Ceasar) defeating a less popular General-Pompey thereby bring the arrival of an Empire. It is not impossible to imagine such an historical development in the U.S.A. one day. Maybe a broadcast media head will be the top dog ruling by decree.
Historical
paradigms are not exact models. Instead they are templates for understanding
the evolution of social history that may in part recur.
No comments:
Post a Comment