Sarah Palin and the U.S. Republican Party tend toward political presentation with a territorial and extra-territorial litigious accent upon non-renewable economic and energy policy. The historian Arnold Toynbee noted in his A Study of Civilization the cycle of a formerly creative majority merging into being a non-creative minority. The Harvard law school cum political prep academy, exemplifies the college of uncreative corporate boring-of-holes into the economic hull in which lower class and middle class Americans live like storm-tossed, nauseous Pilgrim-work chattel below the salon decks of upper-class corporatists cavorting with caviar while eying cheaper immigrant workers lustily above..
The problems with the economy of the United States today with a slow recovery from recession with continuing high unemployment are largely factors of corrupt anti-ecological economic practices of corporatism taking maximum profits in the wake of the end of the cold war. A corrupted populist concept of capitalism that allows large corporations to seem to embody the ideal of Adam Smith is ubiquitous and also wrong. Adam Smith’s capitalist criterion was a de-mockratic body-checking empowerment of individuals and small businesses versus the oppressive powers of the state and any large organizations that intimidated individual free enterprise.
Large international corporations have basically taken over government, advertising for political office, and through their control of politicians-the economic choices of direction of the United States of America. It is pervasively an anti-conservationist and non-ecologically economic foundation of non-renewable use of environmental resources.
The Democratic Party in the U.S. Congress in 2009 and 2010 has failed to achieve much besides propping up over-extended corporate profit takers and restore global capitalism for another round of shaky harvesting of available resource. There isn’t much creative thought in the U.S. Congress regarding how to solidify a new American democratic nationalism economically.
The Republican Party of the United States stands to benefit with the Democratic Party failure. In Alaska the Republican Party is the majority in state government. It provided the Republican Vice-Presidential candidate in the 2008 election; former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. The Alaska Republican Party in some respects is representative of U.S. national political phenomenality.
The State of Alaska Republican majority in the Alaska House And Senate seems to have a majority of lawyers with a few psychologists thrown in. There are a few head of construction or fishing large men as well--the kind of guy that might be a football coach. A couple of districts have sent a medical doctor and of course there are veterans and even a teacher with a B.E.D. yet there are no scientists or philosophers. There is a dirth of creativity--the Republican Party is formed to apportion existing resources. As adults none sought to be creative inventors or to boldly go where no economic innovators have gone before. None seeketh after ecological comprehension, none pursues new ways of thinking. The Alaska state Republican Party has appointed their most charismatic member--with the least education, to the chairmanship of the renewable resources committee. Since the Republicans in government simply line up in support of existing large trans-national corporate oil and extraction business in the state, or advocate harvesting the Tongass National forest and drilling for oil offshore in critical habitat areas, it is understandable that they wouldn’t appoint a sharp scientist to lead the renewable energy committee--they have no scientists anyway.
In the 15the century strong militaries and a flock of first-rate lawyers could have rightly defended economic policy based on consumption of environmental resources and a policy of economic growth transforming ecological and mineral resources, water power ad coal into products and energy for economical development. Today in the 21at century that policy is profligate and despoils the environment as well as the nation’s economic future.
The United States must have a renewable energy and resource use policy based on sustainability within national borders as should all nations. Taken together such a policy would generally promote planetary economic sustainability. U.S. public spending sold be allocated for the United State rather tan Afghanistan, Pakistan or Iraq; while a moon base as a long range ongoing project to secure helium 3 and begin an ecological economic policy of growth of biosphere where none exists should begin.
The national Democratic party, in giving up the moon, has retreated from the heritage of John F. Kennedy. Backing down in areas where they should stand up, and moving forward in global policies from which they should sober-up to a sea-change of reason, is reason enough why they may lose their majority in November 2010.
Jobs could be created building a Mexican border control zone across the nation with elevated berms, salt-water canals and fishing lagoons useful for recreation. Desalinated water could be used to bring more water to New Mexico, Arizona and Texas.
A July 2006 issue of Scientific American had a fine article on a national energy infrastructure of a new kind--a super-conducting grid for power and hydrogen. A smart Congress would pursue each of these plans as well as restore the moon base Constellation-Orion with an accentuation of positive super-conducting wire loop leads collecting solar power and mass organic photoelectric capture. Fiber-optics bringing light underground and super-conducting storage loops, will make perpetual lighting for food growing practical.
When Congress is filled with lawyers litigating, economics tends to become non-creative and of service more to the wealthy than the people--pervasively corrupting society and precipitating the decline and fall of civilization. Lawyers are like a leavening in the bread--too many and the banking and financial systems rise too much like a gaseous soufflé, to collapse with a requisite that government inflate it once more.
More scientists, philosophers and ecological economists are required for a right democratic government and a new spirit of nationalism and zero growth economic prosperity with full employment. Growth must occur in quality and spirit rather than in consumption and waste of finite resources.
2/6/10
Moon is Not Deep Enough Space For President Obama
President Obama has presented seven fundamental errors regarding his decision to terminate the Constellation/moon-base/Orion construction program;
1) The construction of an Orion-moon base program would be mutually exclusive with research on 'deep space' engines
--right answer; The Constellation-Orion program could be funded simultaneously with increased support for more unused faster space-transport technologies to reduce the Delta V factor.
2) Research of another deep space engine would actually produce something that would be used
--right answer; The United States may be so far in debt that it won't be able to afford construction of future new space ships, and there are existing technologies already unused because of federal mission design incompetence the President seeks to duplicate.
The Orion capsule to get a moon base construction gang going for practical future growth of extra-terrestrial building and research facilities could be funded with cuts to the trillion dollar military industrial complex budget to war upon foreign box cutter commando training facilities. Many people believe that conventional military approaches to the problem of confronting and repressing international terrorism are ineffective in comparison with intelligence, espionage and special forces along with competent homeland security policies including zero tolerance of entry of illegal aliens to the United States. Saving federal budgeting with good policy design is another way to fund the moon base project.
3) The third Obama error is that the moon base would be less international than the research project for another deep space engine. The moon base would support the entire Earth nation's research and development projects for lunar research and should receive ready investment support for a lasting presence.
Errors 4-7 are those of ommisions;Magnetic plasma engines, ion drives, laser beams driving space ships and electro-magnetic accelerators pushing ships to half of the speed of light are present or near term technologies that require construction and real application--the moon base is a good place to begin mass-driver construction, gathering of space direction homing beacons for the solar system guidance/control networks of accelerated ships and so forth. The President should approach the moon base on a year by year funding basis to keep the project alive instead of rashly killing it. Some money could be taken from the corrupt investment in Afghanistan.
The 2011 N.A.S.A. budget should include funding for the Constellation-Orion program even if at a slower pace. If the next President chooses to restore the program in case the Congress allows President Obama's wish ending the dream of J.F.K on manned moon missions to become law, he or she should not have to bring up the moon base program from a cold, moth-balled start.
From the moon a variety of super-conductor, solar-power, helium 3 collection, electro-magnetic mass driver, space-station construction, off-moon modules and other projects could be developed. It could be a space-port to support private and government ventures by all the people of the world. The wisdom of developing a moon base for construction of space-ships in a low gravity environment is obvious. The concept of building orbiting fuel space-stations is somewhat ridiculous-as wasteful as was the disposable present international space station that may be funded until 2020 before being allowed to burn up in the atmosphere or sold to the highest bidder. Moon base projects short of war, could last for millions of years.
1) The construction of an Orion-moon base program would be mutually exclusive with research on 'deep space' engines
--right answer; The Constellation-Orion program could be funded simultaneously with increased support for more unused faster space-transport technologies to reduce the Delta V factor.
2) Research of another deep space engine would actually produce something that would be used
--right answer; The United States may be so far in debt that it won't be able to afford construction of future new space ships, and there are existing technologies already unused because of federal mission design incompetence the President seeks to duplicate.
The Orion capsule to get a moon base construction gang going for practical future growth of extra-terrestrial building and research facilities could be funded with cuts to the trillion dollar military industrial complex budget to war upon foreign box cutter commando training facilities. Many people believe that conventional military approaches to the problem of confronting and repressing international terrorism are ineffective in comparison with intelligence, espionage and special forces along with competent homeland security policies including zero tolerance of entry of illegal aliens to the United States. Saving federal budgeting with good policy design is another way to fund the moon base project.
3) The third Obama error is that the moon base would be less international than the research project for another deep space engine. The moon base would support the entire Earth nation's research and development projects for lunar research and should receive ready investment support for a lasting presence.
Errors 4-7 are those of ommisions;Magnetic plasma engines, ion drives, laser beams driving space ships and electro-magnetic accelerators pushing ships to half of the speed of light are present or near term technologies that require construction and real application--the moon base is a good place to begin mass-driver construction, gathering of space direction homing beacons for the solar system guidance/control networks of accelerated ships and so forth. The President should approach the moon base on a year by year funding basis to keep the project alive instead of rashly killing it. Some money could be taken from the corrupt investment in Afghanistan.
The 2011 N.A.S.A. budget should include funding for the Constellation-Orion program even if at a slower pace. If the next President chooses to restore the program in case the Congress allows President Obama's wish ending the dream of J.F.K on manned moon missions to become law, he or she should not have to bring up the moon base program from a cold, moth-balled start.
From the moon a variety of super-conductor, solar-power, helium 3 collection, electro-magnetic mass driver, space-station construction, off-moon modules and other projects could be developed. It could be a space-port to support private and government ventures by all the people of the world. The wisdom of developing a moon base for construction of space-ships in a low gravity environment is obvious. The concept of building orbiting fuel space-stations is somewhat ridiculous-as wasteful as was the disposable present international space station that may be funded until 2020 before being allowed to burn up in the atmosphere or sold to the highest bidder. Moon base projects short of war, could last for millions of years.
2/4/10
Skepticism of Summer Solstice (poem)
With the winters warmer than spring formerly was
melted ice is easy upon memory scapes
sidewalks covering over the former uneven terrain
were worth days to cover before
snow plows and diesel exhaust easing the way today
tomorrow will have a deep water port on the Arctic Sea
where Beluga whales could dream without the assault of oil
with the military industrial complex M.I.C.rowfones ubiquitous
contributing untold millions in ads of support
the high Arctic is safe to gather carbon monoxide
as water at four degrees centigrade resists freezing
superfluous and modestly chaotic molecules energized
dance in the sunlight
The U.S.N. Obama will gaily bring officers with fur collars up
dreadnaughts of war to the northern pole at Summer Solstice
parades of peace will break out and Boston will become the new capital
a corporate blanket of security will cover us all.
melted ice is easy upon memory scapes
sidewalks covering over the former uneven terrain
were worth days to cover before
snow plows and diesel exhaust easing the way today
tomorrow will have a deep water port on the Arctic Sea
where Beluga whales could dream without the assault of oil
with the military industrial complex M.I.C.rowfones ubiquitous
contributing untold millions in ads of support
the high Arctic is safe to gather carbon monoxide
as water at four degrees centigrade resists freezing
superfluous and modestly chaotic molecules energized
dance in the sunlight
The U.S.N. Obama will gaily bring officers with fur collars up
dreadnaughts of war to the northern pole at Summer Solstice
parades of peace will break out and Boston will become the new capital
a corporate blanket of security will cover us all.
Blundering D.O.D. Policies are a 21st Century Tradition
There is nothing like the federal military blundering in to wars and policy it does not understand. Did they know it would cost two trillion to rebuild Iraq and get oil contracts for Exxon-Mobil? Is homosexuality a behavior caused by choice or a trait that is genetically caused? Does the federal government care to make an informed decision before they act without the consent of the majority?
The Preference of Sect. Gates and Admiral Mullins for a gay friendly love boat navy raises the question about homosexuality that is fundamental to the issue; is its causation genetic or behaviorial? If it is behavior then their is no excuse to worry straight personnel with a federally forced tolerance of behavior undesirable to the majority. If it is genetic and demonstrably so then it is understandable and the afflicted comprise a genuinely different kind of homo sapien that should be tolerated as a separate military species of citizen in their own units.
Unfortunately the corruption of the term 'liberal' has made many comfortable Americans feel the whole world should be as decadent as they are and that sympathetic non-Americans really admire their values as much as their wealth. Liberals and corporatists each seek a dialectical evolution of large organization power. Homosexuals in the military would erode further the nationalism of the United States as they tend to enjoy corporate top-down promotion. That is a behavioral phenomenon rather than implicitly a trait of politics.
Corporate leadership seems to prefer that a moon base be aborted perhaps because it would reinforce the concept of American national leadership in anything besides debt and ill-planned foreign nation building ventures. Is the opportunity cost of killing the budget for peaceful development of moon base construction technology of concern for them
If homosexuality were simply a behavior trait like that of alcoholism or narcotics use I do not believe that it should be approved in the military even if 15% more or less like it and feel its 'hate' to proscribe it from the ranks. Its a question of the window being open or shut in the winter barracks perhaps in which the majority decide what they are comfortable with.
Sin is very plain in the Bible as are the consequences for nations. If the United States makes a gay love boat sort of military it may suffer disaster ahead. It would be unpopular today to say that Haiti suffered such losses because of voodoo, however research on water molecules has shown that hydrogen bonds are of less strength than atomic bonds, and a reason why water freezes from the top down rather than the bottom up. The Big Tree of Voodoo economics may suffer a similar adjustment as Haiti without transitioning to ecological economics. Ecological economics in turn is resisted by the military industrial complex that also wants to kill the Kennedy Space-Port on the moon. All of those consequences of sin compile to bring a nation to ruin. That is unfortunate when it is so easy do do things right.
Hate speech means being politically incorrect. To right about issues such as don't ask, don't tell or Haitian voodoo and voodoo economics is to occur the wrath of Boston corporatist liberals as using hate speech. Defending the southern border against illegal alien invasion also is said to be hateful. Americans are 'deficit hawks' on balancing the federal budget so that too must be ripe for the declaration of hate speech labels when one talks about cutting the federal debt.
The fine line between hate speech and writing about issues legitimately is at least as wide as the Mississippi yet nevertheless unrecognized by the 'left' mobs of corporatist-socialists that declare everything they hate as a kind of thing that only 'phobes' believe. The topic is so hateful its difficult to deal with of course, yet I must say that issues are not attacks upon individuals personally as the 'loving' crowd of leftist and homosexuals seem to do in internet forums generally neglecting issues. If the leftist-gays can say that all they want to do is lick you up then their reasoning goes that one must be hateful to resist. Well, shares of anti-septic lotions and towelets are up. Resistance is not futile.
The Preference of Sect. Gates and Admiral Mullins for a gay friendly love boat navy raises the question about homosexuality that is fundamental to the issue; is its causation genetic or behaviorial? If it is behavior then their is no excuse to worry straight personnel with a federally forced tolerance of behavior undesirable to the majority. If it is genetic and demonstrably so then it is understandable and the afflicted comprise a genuinely different kind of homo sapien that should be tolerated as a separate military species of citizen in their own units.
Unfortunately the corruption of the term 'liberal' has made many comfortable Americans feel the whole world should be as decadent as they are and that sympathetic non-Americans really admire their values as much as their wealth. Liberals and corporatists each seek a dialectical evolution of large organization power. Homosexuals in the military would erode further the nationalism of the United States as they tend to enjoy corporate top-down promotion. That is a behavioral phenomenon rather than implicitly a trait of politics.
Corporate leadership seems to prefer that a moon base be aborted perhaps because it would reinforce the concept of American national leadership in anything besides debt and ill-planned foreign nation building ventures. Is the opportunity cost of killing the budget for peaceful development of moon base construction technology of concern for them
If homosexuality were simply a behavior trait like that of alcoholism or narcotics use I do not believe that it should be approved in the military even if 15% more or less like it and feel its 'hate' to proscribe it from the ranks. Its a question of the window being open or shut in the winter barracks perhaps in which the majority decide what they are comfortable with.
Sin is very plain in the Bible as are the consequences for nations. If the United States makes a gay love boat sort of military it may suffer disaster ahead. It would be unpopular today to say that Haiti suffered such losses because of voodoo, however research on water molecules has shown that hydrogen bonds are of less strength than atomic bonds, and a reason why water freezes from the top down rather than the bottom up. The Big Tree of Voodoo economics may suffer a similar adjustment as Haiti without transitioning to ecological economics. Ecological economics in turn is resisted by the military industrial complex that also wants to kill the Kennedy Space-Port on the moon. All of those consequences of sin compile to bring a nation to ruin. That is unfortunate when it is so easy do do things right.
Hate speech means being politically incorrect. To right about issues such as don't ask, don't tell or Haitian voodoo and voodoo economics is to occur the wrath of Boston corporatist liberals as using hate speech. Defending the southern border against illegal alien invasion also is said to be hateful. Americans are 'deficit hawks' on balancing the federal budget so that too must be ripe for the declaration of hate speech labels when one talks about cutting the federal debt.
The fine line between hate speech and writing about issues legitimately is at least as wide as the Mississippi yet nevertheless unrecognized by the 'left' mobs of corporatist-socialists that declare everything they hate as a kind of thing that only 'phobes' believe. The topic is so hateful its difficult to deal with of course, yet I must say that issues are not attacks upon individuals personally as the 'loving' crowd of leftist and homosexuals seem to do in internet forums generally neglecting issues. If the leftist-gays can say that all they want to do is lick you up then their reasoning goes that one must be hateful to resist. Well, shares of anti-septic lotions and towelets are up. Resistance is not futile.
2/2/10
U.K.'s Pebble Mine Threatens Bristol Bay Alaska Fishery
That Copper Mine is just one example of metaphoric homosexual economic influence of global corporatism if we consider small business to be personal genomes of sexual reproductive creativity. Corporatism reduces the fecundity of individual small business entrepreneurs and conforms independents into support of large scale corporate profit goals and resource consumption as just one requirement for the satiation of mass corporate appetites. The mass homosexual consumption ego of modern global corporatism is rivaled only by the Chinese Communist Party phenomenality. Corporatism is like a few Chinese dragons with tens of thousands of employees ravenously devouring the ecological health of the world--no slight upon the Chinese as being gay, the communist party is itself a homosexual economic phenomenality even if it was formerly required to defeat the homosexual economic metaphor that was imperial China.
Adam Smith's capitalism was a sexual liberation from the homosexual aristocracy and monarchy of his day. Instead of the individual genomes being reproduced in sexual recombination with other individual small businesses homosexual corporations with more than 2000 employees have dedicated single minded goals to just produce profit for elites. It is an incestuous global network of corpoations that conform all ideas to serve their particular capital advantages repressing individuals and quashing business species diversity in the process.
The environment becomes degraded because the corporate scale of size requires vast resource exploitation to produce sufficient profits to sustain the homosexual business world of monstrous scale. A constellation of small businesses would better be able to adapt to changing resource and environmental circumstances as well as more effectively create a governing democratic over-watch helping structure a zero growth prosperity.
__________________________________________________
This issue of a U.K. corporation developing virgin land for mining with the implicit potential for mass habitat destruction of a world class fishery raise several issues of political importance for the world's ecological survival. Corporatism and the basic problem of businesses with more than 2000 employees needing to trample on the natural resources of the world that are finite--juggernauts of economic power basically antipathetic to the paradigm of Adam Smith.
Smith's ideas about 18th century capitalism was a citizen and small business liberation movement that was a form of economic sexual liberation of the individual citizen's economic genes of idea and effort to synthetically conceive new enterprises without the repressive power of large organizations to abort or consume the young progeny. The monarchy controlled international trade and required genomic breeding control of energy and ideas for the support of the elite such as monarchy, aristocracy, communist party or corporate shareholders in more than three corporations.
Basic social philosophical ideas about the state and of government, for business large and small have been in suspension since Karl Marx wrote his book on dialectical materialism. I believe he foresaw that human organizational tendencies for greed and consolidation would drive business to grow larger and increase in size until as we see today corporatism becomes global and can only subside like a spent volcano cone after its net working and consolidating have eliminated the fecund sexual ecosystem of individual enterprise and business with less than 2000 employees. What remains will be a global network of elite corporatists exploiting Alaskan and global resources until they are mired with communist rulers from China.
I had quite a few thoughts about this recently especially with the effort of President Obama and SECDEF Gates to let heterosexuals be on the defensive against homosexuals in the military with the promotion of openly homosexual military personnel. Corporatism is a kind of ending of small scale business creativity satisfaction of the most ravenous homosexual mass appetites.
Of course writing about political issues isn't an example of 'hate' of people. If homosexuals want to bugger themselves in their private lives they have as much right as any citizen, as citizens for privacy. Politically however one has a right to argue pro or con about what laws are and how they should or should not change. It is not hate to oppose making marriage a bisexual institution and invalidating the heterosexual marriage contracts of all living married people--it is a political opinion that things should remain as they are in that regard.
So the idea of zero growth economics as Steve Heimel had ecological economic guests talking about today such as the author of 'Zero Growth Prosperity' Tim Jackson and a co-founder of the science of Ecological Economics Bob Constanza along with Daly and Farley, brings me to the awareness that large corporations are an implict problem and causative agent for maladroit mass resource development and exploitation. With the adaptability of smaller businesses it would be simpler for government to find alternative and better adapted developments than somewhat random environmental extractions simply to produce profits for elites within a corporate economic homosexuality.
Corporations of Wall Street are an economic homosexual elite,as is the British Footsie, that are incestuously owned and kicking back political power within their own kind. Mussolini foresaw that state corporatism was a righteous fascist foundation--yet corporatism (when large corporations own most everything and influence everything else including politics like tag teams of 800 pound guerrillas) can be reduced still through political will,perhaps even in time to conserve some of the remainder of Alaska's environmental health--and this is about the warmest winter in Juneau the last 200 years because of global warming perhaps.
I oppose the immediate development of the Pebble mine and believe the Copper could be better extracted by smaller Alaskan business ventures in about 20 years using some sort of a waterless technology and topology conserving methods with zero waste. A reason for the need for such amounts of metal is because of the national and global phenomena of large corporations obsessed with producing profit without regard to the finite scale of world resources.
If Alaska is to forfeit non-renewable resources I have no idea why they should be removed on the cheap by foreign corporations.
Adam Smith's capitalism was a sexual liberation from the homosexual aristocracy and monarchy of his day. Instead of the individual genomes being reproduced in sexual recombination with other individual small businesses homosexual corporations with more than 2000 employees have dedicated single minded goals to just produce profit for elites. It is an incestuous global network of corpoations that conform all ideas to serve their particular capital advantages repressing individuals and quashing business species diversity in the process.
The environment becomes degraded because the corporate scale of size requires vast resource exploitation to produce sufficient profits to sustain the homosexual business world of monstrous scale. A constellation of small businesses would better be able to adapt to changing resource and environmental circumstances as well as more effectively create a governing democratic over-watch helping structure a zero growth prosperity.
__________________________________________________
This issue of a U.K. corporation developing virgin land for mining with the implicit potential for mass habitat destruction of a world class fishery raise several issues of political importance for the world's ecological survival. Corporatism and the basic problem of businesses with more than 2000 employees needing to trample on the natural resources of the world that are finite--juggernauts of economic power basically antipathetic to the paradigm of Adam Smith.
Smith's ideas about 18th century capitalism was a citizen and small business liberation movement that was a form of economic sexual liberation of the individual citizen's economic genes of idea and effort to synthetically conceive new enterprises without the repressive power of large organizations to abort or consume the young progeny. The monarchy controlled international trade and required genomic breeding control of energy and ideas for the support of the elite such as monarchy, aristocracy, communist party or corporate shareholders in more than three corporations.
Basic social philosophical ideas about the state and of government, for business large and small have been in suspension since Karl Marx wrote his book on dialectical materialism. I believe he foresaw that human organizational tendencies for greed and consolidation would drive business to grow larger and increase in size until as we see today corporatism becomes global and can only subside like a spent volcano cone after its net working and consolidating have eliminated the fecund sexual ecosystem of individual enterprise and business with less than 2000 employees. What remains will be a global network of elite corporatists exploiting Alaskan and global resources until they are mired with communist rulers from China.
I had quite a few thoughts about this recently especially with the effort of President Obama and SECDEF Gates to let heterosexuals be on the defensive against homosexuals in the military with the promotion of openly homosexual military personnel. Corporatism is a kind of ending of small scale business creativity satisfaction of the most ravenous homosexual mass appetites.
Of course writing about political issues isn't an example of 'hate' of people. If homosexuals want to bugger themselves in their private lives they have as much right as any citizen, as citizens for privacy. Politically however one has a right to argue pro or con about what laws are and how they should or should not change. It is not hate to oppose making marriage a bisexual institution and invalidating the heterosexual marriage contracts of all living married people--it is a political opinion that things should remain as they are in that regard.
So the idea of zero growth economics as Steve Heimel had ecological economic guests talking about today such as the author of 'Zero Growth Prosperity' Tim Jackson and a co-founder of the science of Ecological Economics Bob Constanza along with Daly and Farley, brings me to the awareness that large corporations are an implict problem and causative agent for maladroit mass resource development and exploitation. With the adaptability of smaller businesses it would be simpler for government to find alternative and better adapted developments than somewhat random environmental extractions simply to produce profits for elites within a corporate economic homosexuality.
Corporations of Wall Street are an economic homosexual elite,as is the British Footsie, that are incestuously owned and kicking back political power within their own kind. Mussolini foresaw that state corporatism was a righteous fascist foundation--yet corporatism (when large corporations own most everything and influence everything else including politics like tag teams of 800 pound guerrillas) can be reduced still through political will,perhaps even in time to conserve some of the remainder of Alaska's environmental health--and this is about the warmest winter in Juneau the last 200 years because of global warming perhaps.
I oppose the immediate development of the Pebble mine and believe the Copper could be better extracted by smaller Alaskan business ventures in about 20 years using some sort of a waterless technology and topology conserving methods with zero waste. A reason for the need for such amounts of metal is because of the national and global phenomena of large corporations obsessed with producing profit without regard to the finite scale of world resources.
If Alaska is to forfeit non-renewable resources I have no idea why they should be removed on the cheap by foreign corporations.
Small Business Sexual Creativity vs. Corporate Homosexuality
Small business evolution through sexual reproduction--serving as a metaphor for the individual genome of ideas and self-interest--can become repressed by the homosexual effect of large corporations with more than 2000 employees. Homosexual reduction of sexual reproductive diversity of ideas for innovation and invention is a natural characteristic in the dialectical material concentration of wealth and political power put on steroids through corporate networks off fiduciary and material varieties.
Corporatism reduces social creativity and incestuously turns all invention inward to corporate profits and goals. Ideas that would be excellent in a free market will be repressed because they would upset the established corporate power and profit. In some nations as Japan and the U.S.A. patentable ideas become owned by the corporation--the pervasive networking effect reduces the social sexual creativity of ideas and prefers a homosexual consumerism amidst ideas and a business environment of their own kind or even corporate self and selves.
Adam Smith dreamed of a business fecundity in a sexual reproduction of small ideas, entrepreneurs and citizens pursuing their enlightened self interest. Smith sought to free the individual business genome from the oppressive and pervasive homosexual ruling monopoly of the monarchy and aristocracy of his day. That lesson became obscured from view by the vast wealth and power surges of the late 19th century in which concentrated wealth and unlimited capital were still thought of as existential agents acting in an unlimited environment of natural resources.
The advantages believed to exist in new technological inventions and mass production were thought to implicitly outweigh any concerns about environmental damage or political oppression of individuals generally, yet there were a series of anti-monopoly laws passed early in the 20th century that tacitly acknowledged the harm of control of an industry by the advantage of capital. Not seen was the harm to the political economy that would follow the late 20th century networking of business corporations and markets within a given social class. The fecundity of small business sexual reproduction was eclipsed by the subjugation of the markets to a homosexual corporate environment that compelled all ideas to be subject to their value for the enrichment of the incestuous class of homosexual corporate and political leadership.
When the modern mass production environment became a homosexual business environment with the primary aim of increasing corporate profits for a global elite inclusive of communist party members in China the transition of Capitalism from s sexual liberation from neo-autocratic homosexual domination into a Marxist dialectical material engine of evolving homosexual business organizations was complete. In 2010 the Defense Department Director of the United States with the same name (Gates) as the world's wealthiest businessman (Gates) advocated that the U.S. military freely and openly accept homosexuals in the ranks...not considered was the mal-effects upon heterosexual soldiers social health. The the Defense Secretary and his naval top military Commander Mullins both voiced the opinion of the President who in turn reflects the Harvard-Boston axis of corporatism.
I should point out in order to clarify the salient political point, that social analysis and criticism of homosexual practices in no way implies hate for any individuals. Individuals have rights while social behaviors generally have none. Social rights ought to be equal for all and not specially set aside with more protection or defenses for some than for others. Homosexuals often consider political opposition to their political efforts to secure special rights for practitioners of homosexuality to be a kind of hate attack upon themselves and that is simply wrong. It is a valid political opinion or activity regarding the formation of laws of the polity in which all have an equal right to participate--even those that oppose homosexual hegemony in business or government. Unfortunately homosexual advocates tend to make personal attacks or to denounce as hate generally any opposition to their political and business expansion explicitly. To return to the topic of homosexual corporate networking and political effects of repressing sexually creative small business ventures.
Corporate homosexual business practices draft natural resource mass consumption to satisfy the dedicated and rather inertially inflexible corporate profit agenda. This is perhaps the most interest environmentally deterministic and harmful aspect of the large corporate phenomena--They require expansion of sales units regardless of the ecological consequences. The mass power of corporations and their networks of owners overpower social change, and when it changes it changes at a very large scale often consuming and extirpating natural resources because of the quantity demanded.
Because of the large size of corporations they are unwilling to change business practices except as they are compelled to by market circumstance, and in the networked environment the criteria for market circumstance may often be a non-consumer factor and a complex corporate best advantage function instead. Needless to say the small business and its ability to reproduce and innovate quick inventions and changes that adapt to ecological challenges is generally repressed and subject to the effects of the homosexual corporate domination of markets. The obvious solution is to limit the maximum size of a corporation doing business in the United States to 2000 employees, and also to limit imports to the United States to corporations abroad with less than 2000 employees. In time a more ecologically responsive an diverse technological environment might be developed that would make the world a more interesting place. Government might be more democratic and able to offer guidance to zero growth prosperity in economic with the homosexual dragoon of the globe confined to a cave in Translovenia.
Corporatism reduces social creativity and incestuously turns all invention inward to corporate profits and goals. Ideas that would be excellent in a free market will be repressed because they would upset the established corporate power and profit. In some nations as Japan and the U.S.A. patentable ideas become owned by the corporation--the pervasive networking effect reduces the social sexual creativity of ideas and prefers a homosexual consumerism amidst ideas and a business environment of their own kind or even corporate self and selves.
Adam Smith dreamed of a business fecundity in a sexual reproduction of small ideas, entrepreneurs and citizens pursuing their enlightened self interest. Smith sought to free the individual business genome from the oppressive and pervasive homosexual ruling monopoly of the monarchy and aristocracy of his day. That lesson became obscured from view by the vast wealth and power surges of the late 19th century in which concentrated wealth and unlimited capital were still thought of as existential agents acting in an unlimited environment of natural resources.
The advantages believed to exist in new technological inventions and mass production were thought to implicitly outweigh any concerns about environmental damage or political oppression of individuals generally, yet there were a series of anti-monopoly laws passed early in the 20th century that tacitly acknowledged the harm of control of an industry by the advantage of capital. Not seen was the harm to the political economy that would follow the late 20th century networking of business corporations and markets within a given social class. The fecundity of small business sexual reproduction was eclipsed by the subjugation of the markets to a homosexual corporate environment that compelled all ideas to be subject to their value for the enrichment of the incestuous class of homosexual corporate and political leadership.
When the modern mass production environment became a homosexual business environment with the primary aim of increasing corporate profits for a global elite inclusive of communist party members in China the transition of Capitalism from s sexual liberation from neo-autocratic homosexual domination into a Marxist dialectical material engine of evolving homosexual business organizations was complete. In 2010 the Defense Department Director of the United States with the same name (Gates) as the world's wealthiest businessman (Gates) advocated that the U.S. military freely and openly accept homosexuals in the ranks...not considered was the mal-effects upon heterosexual soldiers social health. The the Defense Secretary and his naval top military Commander Mullins both voiced the opinion of the President who in turn reflects the Harvard-Boston axis of corporatism.
I should point out in order to clarify the salient political point, that social analysis and criticism of homosexual practices in no way implies hate for any individuals. Individuals have rights while social behaviors generally have none. Social rights ought to be equal for all and not specially set aside with more protection or defenses for some than for others. Homosexuals often consider political opposition to their political efforts to secure special rights for practitioners of homosexuality to be a kind of hate attack upon themselves and that is simply wrong. It is a valid political opinion or activity regarding the formation of laws of the polity in which all have an equal right to participate--even those that oppose homosexual hegemony in business or government. Unfortunately homosexual advocates tend to make personal attacks or to denounce as hate generally any opposition to their political and business expansion explicitly. To return to the topic of homosexual corporate networking and political effects of repressing sexually creative small business ventures.
Corporate homosexual business practices draft natural resource mass consumption to satisfy the dedicated and rather inertially inflexible corporate profit agenda. This is perhaps the most interest environmentally deterministic and harmful aspect of the large corporate phenomena--They require expansion of sales units regardless of the ecological consequences. The mass power of corporations and their networks of owners overpower social change, and when it changes it changes at a very large scale often consuming and extirpating natural resources because of the quantity demanded.
Because of the large size of corporations they are unwilling to change business practices except as they are compelled to by market circumstance, and in the networked environment the criteria for market circumstance may often be a non-consumer factor and a complex corporate best advantage function instead. Needless to say the small business and its ability to reproduce and innovate quick inventions and changes that adapt to ecological challenges is generally repressed and subject to the effects of the homosexual corporate domination of markets. The obvious solution is to limit the maximum size of a corporation doing business in the United States to 2000 employees, and also to limit imports to the United States to corporations abroad with less than 2000 employees. In time a more ecologically responsive an diverse technological environment might be developed that would make the world a more interesting place. Government might be more democratic and able to offer guidance to zero growth prosperity in economic with the homosexual dragoon of the globe confined to a cave in Translovenia.
2/1/10
Airport Cancer Screening and other Obama Budget Plans to Outsource Body Building (humor) to China & Moon Base to Davosites
Inspired by the execution of the J.F.K. Memorial moon base and space port from his second year budget, President Obama plans to use the same reasoning to accomplish health care reform in the United States 'in order to save the taxpayers trillions of dollars'. The U.S. budget would be tentatively 3.8 trillion dollars with the largest ever on Earth one year and two year budget deficits.
The moon base would have been developed with 'old technology' said an Obama press mouthpiece. The Orion system was 'an Apollo on steroids' and like Kennedy's dream of landing Americans on the moon, just old. Since Americans haven't landed a many on the moon since the December 1972, President Obama believes he can achieve as much by spending billions of rocket research until he is out of office. Americans should be able to return to the space station by 2016 he conjectures.
With the failure to create a Federal Physical Health Service for the poor or to keep out 100% of illegal aliens so the poor in the U.S.A. can get work painting homes and mowing lawns the President has boldly envisioned bulking up American's health by vigorous weight lifting supports. The cheapest bulk weightlifting can be done in China so he will cut the old way of muscle building and privatize weightlifting contracts to China and the Taliban thus ending the problem of war expenses fighting the Taliban.
The President built up his bowling scores by having a bowling alley constructed in Beijing and employing the Red Army's best amateurs to throw several lanes a day. His scores improved remarkably and he now bowls a perfect 300.
I have considered suggesting that the 1000 airport passenger screening devices in the budget be upgraded such that they provide free mammograms and other cancer scans for all passengers, yet with the new Chinese weight-lifting regime and development of a moon base by not building a moon base but instead going for research until the Enterprise can be built with a Captain Kirk quantum computing robotic-Captain at the helm downloaded with President Obama's memories and lawyerly skills the need for free passenger tumor body screening to seek out and destroy subcutaneous bags of bomb materials on timers is not needed. Neither is it necessary to build on the moon and let everyone have the opportunity to build space-ships, employ Haitian crew and do scientific research of their when it can all be given to the world's richest corporatists and communist united in the common goal of letting Harvard alumni rule the world.
The moon base would have been developed with 'old technology' said an Obama press mouthpiece. The Orion system was 'an Apollo on steroids' and like Kennedy's dream of landing Americans on the moon, just old. Since Americans haven't landed a many on the moon since the December 1972, President Obama believes he can achieve as much by spending billions of rocket research until he is out of office. Americans should be able to return to the space station by 2016 he conjectures.
With the failure to create a Federal Physical Health Service for the poor or to keep out 100% of illegal aliens so the poor in the U.S.A. can get work painting homes and mowing lawns the President has boldly envisioned bulking up American's health by vigorous weight lifting supports. The cheapest bulk weightlifting can be done in China so he will cut the old way of muscle building and privatize weightlifting contracts to China and the Taliban thus ending the problem of war expenses fighting the Taliban.
The President built up his bowling scores by having a bowling alley constructed in Beijing and employing the Red Army's best amateurs to throw several lanes a day. His scores improved remarkably and he now bowls a perfect 300.
I have considered suggesting that the 1000 airport passenger screening devices in the budget be upgraded such that they provide free mammograms and other cancer scans for all passengers, yet with the new Chinese weight-lifting regime and development of a moon base by not building a moon base but instead going for research until the Enterprise can be built with a Captain Kirk quantum computing robotic-Captain at the helm downloaded with President Obama's memories and lawyerly skills the need for free passenger tumor body screening to seek out and destroy subcutaneous bags of bomb materials on timers is not needed. Neither is it necessary to build on the moon and let everyone have the opportunity to build space-ships, employ Haitian crew and do scientific research of their when it can all be given to the world's richest corporatists and communist united in the common goal of letting Harvard alumni rule the world.
President Obama Pulls Trigger on J.F.K. Apollo2/Orion Memorial Moon Base Budgeting
The Obama budget blow-up of N.A.S.A. return to the moon to build a space port funding--the John F. Kennedy memorial space-port on the moon-is another tragedy for the U.S.A. and for world prospects of democracy on Earth and around the solar system An assassin's bullet felled the young J.F.K. but the people kept the dream alive--now President Obama seeks to kill the Kennedy dream of Americans on the moon for good.
The grassy knoll for the Moon space-port--the Texas Book Repository awaiting passage of the budget bill underneath on the street--is now under the control of the U.S. Congress--won't they stop the assassin's bullets from felling the dream of J.F.K. and Americans on future U.S. space-port jobs on the moon?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2006/0207-back_to_the_moon.htm
More Americans are economically stimulated by high frontier Kennedyesque moon construction than in defense spending on shoddy, ill-planned wars. The Vietnam War was a comparatively bad investment for America compared to the Apollo program--now the President seeks to overturn that 1960's legacy and kill the return to the moon space-port Kennedy and invest trillions in war against box cutter highjacker specialists---that is dumb economic leadership.
President Obama plans to keep the 'space shuttle to nowhere' program another decade at high cost and let the future of the moon be in the hands of global corporatists and communists. Corporatism evolves capitalism into a Marxist totalitarian state unless democracy limits corporate size to 2000 people and ownership of stock investments by an individual to three corporations. Real democracy cannot exist when individualism in small business is eclipsed by global networks, corporate corporate and state broadcasters and so forth.
The moon will thus have a better chance of becoming an elite retreat for the world's rich and communist party paramount leaders instead of a J.F.K. spaceport for international peace and voyages to the hundreds of other moons and rocky bodies strewn around the solar system. President Obama's effort to kill the J.F.K. Apollo II/Orion continuum for a moon space port must perish quickly with a full restoration of funds. Future Haitian astronauts will have a better chances of reaching the J.F.K. space-port if it is an American outpost welcoming all instead of a 5 star Hotel for race of ruling Zarathustrain supermen, super-women ans super-gender neutral or transformative citizens of Planet Davos.
The grassy knoll for the Moon space-port--the Texas Book Repository awaiting passage of the budget bill underneath on the street--is now under the control of the U.S. Congress--won't they stop the assassin's bullets from felling the dream of J.F.K. and Americans on future U.S. space-port jobs on the moon?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2006/0207-back_to_the_moon.htm
More Americans are economically stimulated by high frontier Kennedyesque moon construction than in defense spending on shoddy, ill-planned wars. The Vietnam War was a comparatively bad investment for America compared to the Apollo program--now the President seeks to overturn that 1960's legacy and kill the return to the moon space-port Kennedy and invest trillions in war against box cutter highjacker specialists---that is dumb economic leadership.
President Obama plans to keep the 'space shuttle to nowhere' program another decade at high cost and let the future of the moon be in the hands of global corporatists and communists. Corporatism evolves capitalism into a Marxist totalitarian state unless democracy limits corporate size to 2000 people and ownership of stock investments by an individual to three corporations. Real democracy cannot exist when individualism in small business is eclipsed by global networks, corporate corporate and state broadcasters and so forth.
The moon will thus have a better chance of becoming an elite retreat for the world's rich and communist party paramount leaders instead of a J.F.K. spaceport for international peace and voyages to the hundreds of other moons and rocky bodies strewn around the solar system. President Obama's effort to kill the J.F.K. Apollo II/Orion continuum for a moon space port must perish quickly with a full restoration of funds. Future Haitian astronauts will have a better chances of reaching the J.F.K. space-port if it is an American outpost welcoming all instead of a 5 star Hotel for race of ruling Zarathustrain supermen, super-women ans super-gender neutral or transformative citizens of Planet Davos.
1/31/10
Why Capitalism Evolves Into Marxist Dialectical Materialism
Why Capitalism Evolves Into Marxist Dialectical Materialism
A video on Gary C. Gibson's theory of why global capitalism concentrating wealth and power evolves into becoming Marx's dialectical material solution for global corporate/communist totalitarianism naturally.
A video on Gary C. Gibson's theory of why global capitalism concentrating wealth and power evolves into becoming Marx's dialectical material solution for global corporate/communist totalitarianism naturally.
Plastic Haiti; Floating Banks and Continents
The way the islands roll and tear the time
of plastic crust and contents of prayer
brings collision and crashes to trash the tapes
--measures of articles and moments without faith
For what else runs with the media of dread
and locks of hair arise with the dead
planets theories of abandoning lunar scapes
when progress of wind socks run far abroad
Faster Earthquakes restructure each shaken plastic fury
slower progress and geodesics lines plastered walls down
for all to their dream of pain and networks
bodies broken and government artfully buries the past
With remainders for the revisions unsaid
vectoring another way outward bound to 2050
with new dawns profitable and tomorrows gathered
shapes of response fade with three billion ahead
Those profits of structure that slough rising into being
artfully imply the usual way no one knows
screened from seeing the real world
it is the reduction of Gödel’s incompleteness theorem
confined to constructing knols
with cream puffs at Davos.
of plastic crust and contents of prayer
brings collision and crashes to trash the tapes
--measures of articles and moments without faith
For what else runs with the media of dread
and locks of hair arise with the dead
planets theories of abandoning lunar scapes
when progress of wind socks run far abroad
Faster Earthquakes restructure each shaken plastic fury
slower progress and geodesics lines plastered walls down
for all to their dream of pain and networks
bodies broken and government artfully buries the past
With remainders for the revisions unsaid
vectoring another way outward bound to 2050
with new dawns profitable and tomorrows gathered
shapes of response fade with three billion ahead
Those profits of structure that slough rising into being
artfully imply the usual way no one knows
screened from seeing the real world
it is the reduction of Gödel’s incompleteness theorem
confined to constructing knols
with cream puffs at Davos.
1/30/10
Obama Budget: Create Jobs for Taliban/Ax N.A.S.A. Moon Settlement?
President Obama rightly should invest in space science while cutting the military budget and Afghanistan expenses so far as needed. A few Air Force pilots can be shifted to fly for N.A.S.A. The post-shuttle lunar exploration and habitation mission should be fully funded if the non-A Team in government can get away from the blood investments abroad a little.
The moon is a place where an advanced space outpost can be innovated with a policy of frontier cache drops in a variety of innovative missions. A lunar campus should be an ongoing N.A.S.A. mission in order to construct a low-temperature super-conductor hydroponic research facility and high frontier post for travel beyond. For some reason the Federal government excels at throwing money away so the end result is nothing real. A lunar colony should at least outlast the nuclear plant melt-down pollutions and dysfunctional trade and energy policies.
The Obama administration and General McCrystal seem to want to have President Karzai of Afghanistan hire Taliban to decrease antipathy between beligerants while possibly cutting the N.A.S.A. budget. Fundamentally, in the big picture, the Taliban seem to have the advantage in that prioritization rather than the people of the United States.
Most people believe that Al Qaeda attacks on America must go through just one layer of Federal defense to make successful attacks. Good flight screening into the U.S.A. would have kept out the underpants suicide bomber, besides which as a former Muslim Student Association University president in London he should have been on some kind of federal no-fly list permanently without special underpants sniffing dogs giving him the once over before flight.
Many people believe that Al Qaeda attacks just need to be the federal governments defensive line to have free roaming into the homeland secondary and that perhaps the rich just don't give a darn but just want to spend money--lots of it. The federal Mexican border defense is never better comparatively than the worst N.F.L. defensive line out there.
N.A.S.A. investments are for science, give intelligent people jobs and is a lot better place to borrow money from the Chinese from so the federal government can spend it and the people can repay the principle and taxes for the interest. Chinese engineers will steal the data anyway, yet in Afghanistan just giving jobs to the Taliban so they can merge with the Karzai administration, warlords and poppy growers returns nothing. The counter-terrorist mission in Iraq requires that the people own the oil in an issue of private shares per citizen, while in Iraq the U.S.A. needs to build new hydroponic and moisture capture technology, irrigation canals and so forth--perhaps sealed.
The foreign war in the third world budget of the U.S.A. could be cut with more innovative leadership rater than through just buying allegiance for a while--although bribery is the logical federal way. When the creative majority becomes a decadent, repressive minority it does not follow that the post-majority era will usher in intelligent reforms. The Obama administration must do much better than the Bush II administration at building up N.A.S.A., space science and a functional way for the future to merge into an intelligent direction rather than a retarded, deadly dimension of draught, dust, death, wars, famine and pervasive and a heritage of mass social desperation because of cutting the scientific research and development budget. Wars engender more wars while science produces more science. One can know what kind of a tree something is by the fruit it produces obviously. The investment in N.A.S.A. has a far better social return than does dubiously enacted policies of defending against foreign terrorism.
The U.S. counter-terrorism mission seems to get less out of its substantial budget than should be the case. Better, more intelligent paradigms for defense against terrorism have been mentioned--conventional military engagements do little to keep terrorist off scheduled flights to the U.S. Terrorists don't actually need substantial terrorist training bases or numbers abroad to send occasional infiltrators with weapons into Arizona, Texas or Nome quite possibly. The spook show and a better screening method for all foreign arrivals is perhaps a better approach than war on the century old Taliban organization phenomena in the Tribal area of Pakistan.
By flunking N.A.S.A. and U.S. investment in scientific research and applications of technology the administration and the Congress accomplish Al Qaeda'a mission of inflicting financial damage upon the United States. The U.S. Government can become the worst financial enemy of the people of the United States if they are perennially daft.
The moon is a place where an advanced space outpost can be innovated with a policy of frontier cache drops in a variety of innovative missions. A lunar campus should be an ongoing N.A.S.A. mission in order to construct a low-temperature super-conductor hydroponic research facility and high frontier post for travel beyond. For some reason the Federal government excels at throwing money away so the end result is nothing real. A lunar colony should at least outlast the nuclear plant melt-down pollutions and dysfunctional trade and energy policies.
The Obama administration and General McCrystal seem to want to have President Karzai of Afghanistan hire Taliban to decrease antipathy between beligerants while possibly cutting the N.A.S.A. budget. Fundamentally, in the big picture, the Taliban seem to have the advantage in that prioritization rather than the people of the United States.
Most people believe that Al Qaeda attacks on America must go through just one layer of Federal defense to make successful attacks. Good flight screening into the U.S.A. would have kept out the underpants suicide bomber, besides which as a former Muslim Student Association University president in London he should have been on some kind of federal no-fly list permanently without special underpants sniffing dogs giving him the once over before flight.
Many people believe that Al Qaeda attacks just need to be the federal governments defensive line to have free roaming into the homeland secondary and that perhaps the rich just don't give a darn but just want to spend money--lots of it. The federal Mexican border defense is never better comparatively than the worst N.F.L. defensive line out there.
N.A.S.A. investments are for science, give intelligent people jobs and is a lot better place to borrow money from the Chinese from so the federal government can spend it and the people can repay the principle and taxes for the interest. Chinese engineers will steal the data anyway, yet in Afghanistan just giving jobs to the Taliban so they can merge with the Karzai administration, warlords and poppy growers returns nothing. The counter-terrorist mission in Iraq requires that the people own the oil in an issue of private shares per citizen, while in Iraq the U.S.A. needs to build new hydroponic and moisture capture technology, irrigation canals and so forth--perhaps sealed.
The foreign war in the third world budget of the U.S.A. could be cut with more innovative leadership rater than through just buying allegiance for a while--although bribery is the logical federal way. When the creative majority becomes a decadent, repressive minority it does not follow that the post-majority era will usher in intelligent reforms. The Obama administration must do much better than the Bush II administration at building up N.A.S.A., space science and a functional way for the future to merge into an intelligent direction rather than a retarded, deadly dimension of draught, dust, death, wars, famine and pervasive and a heritage of mass social desperation because of cutting the scientific research and development budget. Wars engender more wars while science produces more science. One can know what kind of a tree something is by the fruit it produces obviously. The investment in N.A.S.A. has a far better social return than does dubiously enacted policies of defending against foreign terrorism.
The U.S. counter-terrorism mission seems to get less out of its substantial budget than should be the case. Better, more intelligent paradigms for defense against terrorism have been mentioned--conventional military engagements do little to keep terrorist off scheduled flights to the U.S. Terrorists don't actually need substantial terrorist training bases or numbers abroad to send occasional infiltrators with weapons into Arizona, Texas or Nome quite possibly. The spook show and a better screening method for all foreign arrivals is perhaps a better approach than war on the century old Taliban organization phenomena in the Tribal area of Pakistan.
By flunking N.A.S.A. and U.S. investment in scientific research and applications of technology the administration and the Congress accomplish Al Qaeda'a mission of inflicting financial damage upon the United States. The U.S. Government can become the worst financial enemy of the people of the United States if they are perennially daft.
Obama's 'Jobless Economic Recovery' Program At Least Creates Jobs for Taliban/edited version of prior post
The prior post on the don't ask don't tell' policy I wrote required some changes so I just made a new one instead of replacing the prior version that still exists...
Will President Obama's plan to end 'don't ask, don't tell' in the U.S. military lead to the establishment of gay NCO Clubs in Afghanistan and Iraq? Will own-gender sex oriented soldiers demand equal military housing as good as that of married hetero families while strait single soldiers get small shared rooms and barracks?
President Obama said that he would be strict with President Karzai such that corruption would be chastised. That’s a good policy that has coincided with the economic recovery program in the United States. President Obama and general McCrystal have created a jobs for Taliban program in Afghanistan that will erode the ‘jobless recovery phenomena’ in the United States through reverse osmosis.
I mean to examine this issue respectfully and with sensitivity in order that my internet account won't be deleted. On many web sites anything politically offensive will be deleted--and the homos find the abbreviation of the lengthier term to be offensive. The issue is serious for the United States and may cost the President control of Congress in November 2010. There are those that would censor free speech on the topic for technical reasons--the Roemer homosexual leadership of Hitler's Storm Troopers was equally vigorous in securing the deletion of opposition to Nazi rhetoric. I do not consider the President a Nazi nor perhaps his militant gay-rights advocates that write on occasion of their hate of heterosexuals. The Roman Republic and Empire experienced equal or worse challenges of depravities in the leadership policy of their day--narrow is the gate that leads to political salvation and few there are that stay on the straight and narrow.
President Obama could use some education on the difference between civil rights and civil wrongs so far as his State of the Union speech goes. His intention to seek the repeal of the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy in the military is simply wrong-headed. Never having served in the military he evidently has no concern about the value of peace and harmony amidst ranks. No heterosexual soldier needs to have his tranquility disturbed in any way by brothers in arms who are homos and proud of it. It is sufficient to be a soldier without raising the point that anyone has a cannibal-like sexual attitude in sexual appetites. The enemy is supposed to be over the horizon rather than in the next foxhole; soldiers need to be concerned with the conduct of the enemy rather than of themselves. They must be free from superfluous myopia and have the ability to discern adverse movement upon the horizon or even close in. Existentially, mortal threats need to be reduced rather than increased. Some do not comprehend why people are foes of sin rather than lovers of it.
The President spent about 20 minutes in a kind of coming-out State of the Union speech to let us know the he has much sympathy for own-gender-for-sex-preferring soldiers that must repress their love for fellow soldiers or at least their preference for sex with their own genre, from fellow soldiers. Yet that is the point of don't ask, don't tell' and don't make the homo issue a sort of ponderous, needless hell; for no one is to be concerned about homosexual activity while in the military. In theory soldiers should be as devoted as monks to their celibate duty of killing or capturing the enemy. Some fall short of the perfection of celibacy in service I suppose, yet they are not given commendations for that.
The majority of Americans are not homosexual; President Obama in defending civil rights of own-gender-for-sex preferers simultaneously inflicts civil wrong upon the strait majority that must shower sleep, breakfast and perhaps fight amongst all in uniform and should be free of infrastructure same-sex issues.
A U.S. military all gayed up will not be one with increasing social stability. One considers the situation of butch sergeants with young recruits and the potential problems fraternization could create.
President Obama may want next to liberate women for embedding with male soldiers completely to prevent their inferior status of female segregation from male soldiers and to reduce discretionary spending on segregated showers for men and women. Soldiers can be trusted to maintain military respect for their showering brothers and sisters of the opposite sex at all times.
The most irritating aspect of the Presidential coming-out policy is that no one really cares if a soldier is a pervert on his or her own time if they aren't breaking any federal, state or local laws. The military is sworn to defend the U.S. Constitution and obey their officers (even if the officers are secretly homosexuals eyeballing them with admiration and ideas), yet the military itself is supposed to be an ineffable arm of political power through other means designed to fell evil oppressors of human liberty. Individual citizen-soldiers have as much right to be free from the gleaming, bloodshot eyes of lecherous perverts in uniform gazing upon the ranks as a kind of Playgirl utopia as the aforementioned own-gender sex preferers have to co-mingle under their own flag with those of other-gender opinion.
Heterosexuals naturally find it offensive to allow homosexuals close in, while homosexuals consider it hate, sometimes, to keep them at arms length with words and fists or whatever else is necessary. That military isn't designed to be a home for lovers, but a phenomenal tool of victory over evil. Soldiers could be given extra rations of Saltpeter, or have some sort of chemical castration while they wear the uniform so no one need be concerned about horny soldiers of superior rank leveraging inferior ranking soldiers. The prospect of a butch non-commissioned officer cadre is not very appealing to parents of young potential recruits I would guess--President Obama seems to want to break something that presently is not wrong with the military.
The cost to the taxpayers to get a soldier to enlist for duty in Afghanistan or Iraq already is about $25,000 for a private E-1. If strait youth are required to serve with the gay and proud crowd it is possible their numbers will decrease and the costs for filling enlistment quotas will rise--or at least not drop in the post-war draw down. I will definitely not recommend that anyone enlist in the U.S. military. After the issue is concluded those thinking of signing on will have a better idea if the Navy will be a gay butch love boat or not. It would be better if the President spent time on learning about ecological economics from the Daly/Farley textbook so he actually would have a clue what zero-growth economics is.
Probably the negative PR value of making the U.S. military a reputedly homosexual, butch aggressor force will bring more Al Qa'eda Muslims to be inspired to join the offensive Many Americans will not like the concept of a butch military oppressor force reinforcing homosexual elite globalists running the U.S. Government into debt and wage slavery, if that's the way it is.
Will President Obama's plan to end 'don't ask, don't tell' in the U.S. military lead to the establishment of gay NCO Clubs in Afghanistan and Iraq? Will own-gender sex oriented soldiers demand equal military housing as good as that of married hetero families while strait single soldiers get small shared rooms and barracks?
President Obama said that he would be strict with President Karzai such that corruption would be chastised. That’s a good policy that has coincided with the economic recovery program in the United States. President Obama and general McCrystal have created a jobs for Taliban program in Afghanistan that will erode the ‘jobless recovery phenomena’ in the United States through reverse osmosis.
I mean to examine this issue respectfully and with sensitivity in order that my internet account won't be deleted. On many web sites anything politically offensive will be deleted--and the homos find the abbreviation of the lengthier term to be offensive. The issue is serious for the United States and may cost the President control of Congress in November 2010. There are those that would censor free speech on the topic for technical reasons--the Roemer homosexual leadership of Hitler's Storm Troopers was equally vigorous in securing the deletion of opposition to Nazi rhetoric. I do not consider the President a Nazi nor perhaps his militant gay-rights advocates that write on occasion of their hate of heterosexuals. The Roman Republic and Empire experienced equal or worse challenges of depravities in the leadership policy of their day--narrow is the gate that leads to political salvation and few there are that stay on the straight and narrow.
President Obama could use some education on the difference between civil rights and civil wrongs so far as his State of the Union speech goes. His intention to seek the repeal of the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy in the military is simply wrong-headed. Never having served in the military he evidently has no concern about the value of peace and harmony amidst ranks. No heterosexual soldier needs to have his tranquility disturbed in any way by brothers in arms who are homos and proud of it. It is sufficient to be a soldier without raising the point that anyone has a cannibal-like sexual attitude in sexual appetites. The enemy is supposed to be over the horizon rather than in the next foxhole; soldiers need to be concerned with the conduct of the enemy rather than of themselves. They must be free from superfluous myopia and have the ability to discern adverse movement upon the horizon or even close in. Existentially, mortal threats need to be reduced rather than increased. Some do not comprehend why people are foes of sin rather than lovers of it.
The President spent about 20 minutes in a kind of coming-out State of the Union speech to let us know the he has much sympathy for own-gender-for-sex-preferring soldiers that must repress their love for fellow soldiers or at least their preference for sex with their own genre, from fellow soldiers. Yet that is the point of don't ask, don't tell' and don't make the homo issue a sort of ponderous, needless hell; for no one is to be concerned about homosexual activity while in the military. In theory soldiers should be as devoted as monks to their celibate duty of killing or capturing the enemy. Some fall short of the perfection of celibacy in service I suppose, yet they are not given commendations for that.
The majority of Americans are not homosexual; President Obama in defending civil rights of own-gender-for-sex preferers simultaneously inflicts civil wrong upon the strait majority that must shower sleep, breakfast and perhaps fight amongst all in uniform and should be free of infrastructure same-sex issues.
A U.S. military all gayed up will not be one with increasing social stability. One considers the situation of butch sergeants with young recruits and the potential problems fraternization could create.
President Obama may want next to liberate women for embedding with male soldiers completely to prevent their inferior status of female segregation from male soldiers and to reduce discretionary spending on segregated showers for men and women. Soldiers can be trusted to maintain military respect for their showering brothers and sisters of the opposite sex at all times.
The most irritating aspect of the Presidential coming-out policy is that no one really cares if a soldier is a pervert on his or her own time if they aren't breaking any federal, state or local laws. The military is sworn to defend the U.S. Constitution and obey their officers (even if the officers are secretly homosexuals eyeballing them with admiration and ideas), yet the military itself is supposed to be an ineffable arm of political power through other means designed to fell evil oppressors of human liberty. Individual citizen-soldiers have as much right to be free from the gleaming, bloodshot eyes of lecherous perverts in uniform gazing upon the ranks as a kind of Playgirl utopia as the aforementioned own-gender sex preferers have to co-mingle under their own flag with those of other-gender opinion.
Heterosexuals naturally find it offensive to allow homosexuals close in, while homosexuals consider it hate, sometimes, to keep them at arms length with words and fists or whatever else is necessary. That military isn't designed to be a home for lovers, but a phenomenal tool of victory over evil. Soldiers could be given extra rations of Saltpeter, or have some sort of chemical castration while they wear the uniform so no one need be concerned about horny soldiers of superior rank leveraging inferior ranking soldiers. The prospect of a butch non-commissioned officer cadre is not very appealing to parents of young potential recruits I would guess--President Obama seems to want to break something that presently is not wrong with the military.
The cost to the taxpayers to get a soldier to enlist for duty in Afghanistan or Iraq already is about $25,000 for a private E-1. If strait youth are required to serve with the gay and proud crowd it is possible their numbers will decrease and the costs for filling enlistment quotas will rise--or at least not drop in the post-war draw down. I will definitely not recommend that anyone enlist in the U.S. military. After the issue is concluded those thinking of signing on will have a better idea if the Navy will be a gay butch love boat or not. It would be better if the President spent time on learning about ecological economics from the Daly/Farley textbook so he actually would have a clue what zero-growth economics is.
Probably the negative PR value of making the U.S. military a reputedly homosexual, butch aggressor force will bring more Al Qa'eda Muslims to be inspired to join the offensive Many Americans will not like the concept of a butch military oppressor force reinforcing homosexual elite globalists running the U.S. Government into debt and wage slavery, if that's the way it is.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Here and there pointillist continua build rowing the skiff clambering over the road staying in shadows until spring insouciant compact snow ...
-
Why do F-22 pilots lose consciousness and let their planes crash and burn? The air superiority fighters are designed to survive oppositio...
-
Alaskan officials have cut down or banned King Salmon fishing in much of Alaska because so few of the large fish are returning. The Ancho...
