Small Business Sexual Creativity vs. Corporate Homosexuality

Small business evolution through sexual reproduction--serving as a metaphor for the individual genome of ideas and self-interest--can become repressed by the homosexual effect of large corporations with more than 2000 employees. Homosexual reduction of sexual reproductive diversity of ideas for innovation and invention is a natural characteristic in the dialectical material concentration of wealth and political power put on steroids through corporate networks off fiduciary and material varieties.

Corporatism reduces social creativity and incestuously turns all invention inward to corporate profits and goals. Ideas that would be excellent in a free market will be repressed because they would upset the established corporate power and profit. In some nations as Japan and the U.S.A. patentable ideas become owned by the corporation--the pervasive networking effect reduces the social sexual creativity of ideas and prefers a homosexual consumerism amidst ideas and a business environment of their own kind or even corporate self and selves.

Adam Smith dreamed of a business fecundity in a sexual reproduction of small ideas, entrepreneurs and citizens pursuing their enlightened self interest. Smith sought to free the individual business genome from the oppressive and pervasive homosexual ruling monopoly of the monarchy and aristocracy of his day. That lesson became obscured from view by the vast wealth and power surges of the late 19th century in which concentrated wealth and unlimited capital were still thought of as existential agents acting in an unlimited environment of natural resources.

The advantages believed to exist in new technological inventions and mass production were thought to implicitly outweigh any concerns about environmental damage or political oppression of individuals generally, yet there were a series of anti-monopoly laws passed early in the 20th century that tacitly acknowledged the harm of control of an industry by the advantage of capital. Not seen was the harm to the political economy that would follow the late 20th century networking of business corporations and markets within a given social class. The fecundity of small business sexual reproduction was eclipsed by the subjugation of the markets to a homosexual corporate environment that compelled all ideas to be subject to their value for the enrichment of the incestuous class of homosexual corporate and political leadership.

When the modern mass production environment became a homosexual business environment with the primary aim of increasing corporate profits for a global elite inclusive of communist party members in China the transition of Capitalism from s sexual liberation from neo-autocratic homosexual domination into a Marxist dialectical material engine of evolving homosexual business organizations was complete. In 2010 the Defense Department Director of the United States with the same name (Gates) as the world's wealthiest businessman (Gates) advocated that the U.S. military freely and openly accept homosexuals in the ranks...not considered was the mal-effects upon heterosexual soldiers social health. The the Defense Secretary and his naval top military Commander Mullins both voiced the opinion of the President who in turn reflects the Harvard-Boston axis of corporatism.

I should point out in order to clarify the salient political point, that social analysis and criticism of homosexual practices in no way implies hate for any individuals. Individuals have rights while social behaviors generally have none. Social rights ought to be equal for all and not specially set aside with more protection or defenses for some than for others. Homosexuals often consider political opposition to their political efforts to secure special rights for practitioners of homosexuality to be a kind of hate attack upon themselves and that is simply wrong. It is a valid political opinion or activity regarding the formation of laws of the polity in which all have an equal right to participate--even those that oppose homosexual hegemony in business or government. Unfortunately homosexual advocates tend to make personal attacks or to denounce as hate generally any opposition to their political and business expansion explicitly. To return to the topic of homosexual corporate networking and political effects of repressing sexually creative small business ventures.

Corporate homosexual business practices draft natural resource mass consumption to satisfy the dedicated and rather inertially inflexible corporate profit agenda. This is perhaps the most interest environmentally deterministic and harmful aspect of the large corporate phenomena--They require expansion of sales units regardless of the ecological consequences. The mass power of corporations and their networks of owners overpower social change, and when it changes it changes at a very large scale often consuming and extirpating natural resources because of the quantity demanded.

Because of the large size of corporations they are unwilling to change business practices except as they are compelled to by market circumstance, and in the networked environment the criteria for market circumstance may often be a non-consumer factor and a complex corporate best advantage function instead. Needless to say the small business and its ability to reproduce and innovate quick inventions and changes that adapt to ecological challenges is generally repressed and subject to the effects of the homosexual corporate domination of markets. The obvious solution is to limit the maximum size of a corporation doing business in the United States to 2000 employees, and also to limit imports to the United States to corporations abroad with less than 2000 employees. In time a more ecologically responsive an diverse technological environment might be developed that would make the world a more interesting place. Government might be more democratic and able to offer guidance to zero growth prosperity in economic with the homosexual dragoon of the globe confined to a cave in Translovenia.