With
Republicans accomplishing little except to assault ecospheric health
so far in Congress even with a friendly Republican President in the
White House the public may look toward the Green party more so than
historically in 2018 as an alternative third party possibly
interested in getting something positive done for the U.S.A.
Republicans
passed bills ten times to get rid of Obamacare while Mr. Obama was
President, and yet with complete control of two branches of
government (Democrats largely control the Supreme Court of the United
States) they cannot pass an Obamacare reform bill even once.
The
Democrat Party obviously lost public trust after the Clinton era
started that still seems as if it will never end. They became a
celebrity party concentrating wealth for the rich and running class
tokens while cutting taxes for the rich. Their primary appeal to the
masses was debauchery in some form or other prioritized instead of
reasoned legislation to economically better the poor and middle
class. Republicans don’t have much incentive to be creative or
reformist when Democrats enrich them so well.
The
public for several election cycles has looked toward various
combinations of Republicans and Democrats to get the nation working
right eliminating debt, restoring the ecosphere and building quality
life for all U.S. citizens without satisfactory results. The Clinton
effect was like a gas giant planet sweeping and clearing all the
little planets out(other candidates of quality like Bob Kerry in
1992) of a solar system leaving nowhere for poor and middle classes
to live. The rich can afford to buy up exclusive space station
property around gas giant politicians-not the poor.
The
Green party may realize that national environmental legislation and
strong border security are requisite for having sufficient sovereignty
to lead the U.S.A. toward and ecologically sustainable economic
policy using free enterprise with direction. Though the Greens would
find it challenging to win even ten seats in Congress, where else can
the public look?
With no limits on campaign spending contributions via PACS that are heavily corporate and that perhaps don't support less corporatism or ecological economic transformation it may be inherently challenging for Green candidates to afford the 2 or 3 million dollars it costs to run a successful House campaign.
With no limits on campaign spending contributions via PACS that are heavily corporate and that perhaps don't support less corporatism or ecological economic transformation it may be inherently challenging for Green candidates to afford the 2 or 3 million dollars it costs to run a successful House campaign.
No comments:
Post a Comment