03 February 2012

In Answer to the Question; 'Can Definitions Be Wrong?'

With ontological relativism as the phenomenal norm of language, definitions can be defined as whatever they are given values as. Definitions are comparable to algebraic literals that await content.

The formal, logical mapping of given language values would be a metaset. Logic would need to be correct instead of incorrect for effectiveness.

Definitions can be locations within a constructed space-time matrix with temporal values. The ontology of any given matrix would comprise a linguistic Universe for-itself.

A user would want to discover the meaning of definition and of right and wrong values within a given ontology if concerned with transactionally meaningful communication.

No comments:

Gemini Said That Even After Nancy Grace Roman ST Just 12 percent of the Observable Universe Will Have Been Observed

 I asked Gemini about what area of space the new Nancy Grace Roman space telescope will see. I asked if Hubble and Webb hadn't already s...