News
reports of suicides by youth after abuse from internet trolls are common enough
these days. The response has been on an anti-bullying axis instead of anti-wimp
coaching. The former tends to increase government power and the latter that of
individuals. Coaching individuals new to the internet to withstand and
successfully fend of troll attacks is probably a better course to pursue.
Those
new to the Internet discover a planetful of communications they are not familiar
with from the neighborhood. Often they go unprepared into cyberspace and
experience direct personal attacks and public smears by trolls or anonymous
posters. Newbies don’t know how to filter out those messages and are shocked by
the public smears. I encountered that a lot at the now defunct N.P.R. Your Turn
Discussions arena in 1999-2005. I got a lot of experience at posting political opinions
in an unregulated frontier forum. Personal attacks are a characteristic of not
only the left, but of the far right as well, though more so the left. Some do
not know that it’s o.k. to criticize politicians and political policies but not
individual citizens for expressing their criticism. The mob mentality is to
stifle any dissent or alternative concepts with personal attack on citizens.
Internet
trolls come in many political colors. There is a cornucopia of reasons why
human beings given free communications access send deprecatory messages to
others. For one thing it’s a juvenile trait. Another good cause is emulation of
the wise-guy broadcast media. Internet coaching needs to arise to brief youth
and other newbies on the facts of Internet use so they don’t need to mature
through the hard knocks of personal experience that is too common, time-wasting
and really ubiquitous for public forum users without filter control.
In
a former era instead of political advocacy for protection from bullying an
American response would have been to ‘Just say no to trolls’. Like those that
interrupt a house painter from going about his phenomenal application as
directly as possible Internet trolls disrupt writers and other posters from
executing their personal interests without the trolling sort of generic
personal attacks that are mass produced spam quality expressions of
inferiority.
Free
speech is the vital social blood of a democracy bringing competition of ideas
to produce the best social results possible. Oppression of free speech through
personal attacks amounting to a denial of services (the service of expressing
one’s ideas for the public good) attack ought not to be tolerated. Standardized
procedures for defending against personal attacks should be common in Internet
forums such as Facebook. It is difficult to defend against mass communicated
slanders and challenging too to defend against Internet dissing, yet coaching
of Internet users to the facts of life would at least arm newbies with the
knowledge of the nature of the beast.
No comments:
Post a Comment