Government
is the right application of regulations to civil order. Government regulation effectively
means regulatory reform. That’s not fundamentally a question of too many or too
few regulations but of the right regulations applied rightly to structure civil
well-being.
A
philosophy of governing sets social goals and parameters of control for
actualizing the optimal state of affairs. A nation or polity is usually a
physical region with citizens approving regulations for governing themselves.
Most citizens of a democracy would vote if they only knew for parameters that
profit themselves and their environment best.
Political
wags for some decades have talked about too many or too few regulations as if
quantitative easing in either direction would elect good laws to develop social
prosperity, security and spiritual health. A good philosophy of government
comprises a selection of regulations to moderate the physical economy of the
people for their benefit. It does not become the practitioners of the civil
economy for-itself as in a communist or socialist system. Neither does it
withdraw to become economically isolationist and let the strongest of the
roughhouse capitalist dominate the ring as 8 billion pound guerrillas.
Good
regulation is cost-effective. Promulgating laws is far cheaper than bui8lduing
large capital intensive redistribution organizations. A good political
philosopher in office selecting the right regulations for enactment as law is
like a musical conductor directing his own composition with the orchestra of
small and moderate size business performing the music. Economics is a free
spirited sort of improvisation within limits phenomenally that require
regulation rather than an anarchic battle of the musicians in a musical clash.
One might believes that an invisible hand of evolution will generate the
perfect economic balance after planetary apocalypse and perhaps it is so. I
have felt that it is better to use intelligent design rather than the blind forces
of evolution to move the privileged urban meatheads toward fair and balanced
economic excellence for all.
Obamacare
unfortunately is a synthetic attempt for government to operate and ossify a
large business activity substituting compulsory participation for a competitive
excellence attracting customers. It’s as if the government didn’t like the
costs of computer technology so they created an affordable computer act
requiring all computer sales and purchases in the U.S.A. go through the
government. That’s a fundamentally wrong step for providing affordable health
care or computers. Inevitably the free capitalist providers will find a way to
make that mandatory civil participation an opportunity for maximum gouging.
There
is an argument to be made for government being a substantive provider in some
circumstances where the people aren’t able to provide for or defend themselves.
An expanded V.A. system to well treat veterans that also treated America ’s poor would have
relieved hospitals and other providers and ultimately insurance companies and
taxpayers from the high cost of the way emergency rooms have historically
provided medical care to the poor. If the economy significantly improved fewer
poor would eschew affordable free market health insurance and use the government
provided V.A. medical structure for emergency treatment.
There
is not just one right way to set the mix of regulations for the citizens,
business and economy that is right and a few ways that are wrong. There are
thousands of ways that would work inclusive of important concerns such as
ecosphere, demographics, national security and ordinary quality of life and
there are just as many ways that are wrong.
If
the American economy today is a leaky cruise ship with a million globalist
holes making it slowly sink there are few or none in politics willing to repair
the hull while it still could be bailed out. If it is doomed, unlike the
Titanic, the wealthy passengers can helicopter away from the top deck yet that
is small comfort to those that can’t and yet remember when traveling even on the
lower decks wasn’t so bad.
No comments:
Post a Comment