Some
people believe the world began in 1945; it didn't, political currents
existed before then that continue to the present. Protestant
reformers were effectively the leaders of revolution against
historical Catholic and state monarchy,feudalism and theocracy in
1776. The continuing revolution of politics and theology that started
when Martin Luther posted 96 theses on the door of a Catholic church
in Germany reached England and eventually Puritans seeking religious
and political liberty moved to America. Kicking over British trade
restrictions on tea and rum and taking Lard Fairfax's vast Virginia
estate were contingent to the fundamental revolt of the protestant
masses against hierarchical church and state rule from the old world.
As
generations passed after the founding of the United States by
protestant revolutionaries the reasons for the founding of the nation
were lost and reinterpreted through purely economic glasses. The
Supreme Court interpreted the constitution existentially so far as to
decree homosexual marriage in a triumph of juridical Eleatic paradox.
The American left grew blind to problems of autocracy, imperialism,
corporatism, theocracy and atheism. It could not recognize Islam as
a theocratic invasive species in regard to western civilization.
Like the invasive plant kudzu, Islam expands to the maximum extent of
its capacity to do so; it does not become 'assimilated'.
As
the people of the United States forgets national, historical
Protestant and moral origin in Bible scripture and moves to
existential atheism, concentration of wealth, outsourcing of
industry, globalism and immigration of Muslim population as well as
atheists of China, Catholic Mexicans, other 'Latinos and Latinas' and
Hindu of India there is no good cause to think the U.S.A. will
continue as a democracy. If America was a democracy starting with the
Protestant era, when that era ends so might democracy. Wealth is
alreadyconcentrating in the U.S.A. One percent of the population has
more of the nation's wealth than 150 million (about half) of the
people. The founders revolted against that sort of thing.
Catholic
and Islamic nations were or are supporters of imperialism and the
concentration of wealth and power. Jeb Bush is a Catholic plutocrat
who wants vast military deployments to enrich a Bush ally
military-industrial complex another decade even if it results in vast
public debt increase (its nearing 19 trillion dollars) and
concentration of wealth to global plutocrats with further erosion of
U.S. civil liberties. Hillary Clinton is a Chicago lawyer like
President Obama. They are of the left existential British imperial
amalgam of David Hume , John Dewey, Zeno of Elea, the Russian
anarchist Kropotkin and Charles Darwin (if President Obama isn't a
closet Sunni Muslim); why should Americans expect a balanced
protestant reformed moral authority with fundamental scriptural
hermeneutic and support for a limited and moral government with a
separate, independent Protestant church social environment to prevail
in the U.S.A.? N.P.R. is the de facto propaganda broadcast outlet for
the U.S. government. It promotes an atheist religion, a corrupt
interpretation of Christianity and a false theology of Islam and the
Quran that fails to recognize the implicit expansionism of Islam
through any means starting with Muhammad the horse warrior.
Western
values tolerate religious independence. The wars of the protestant
reformation preceded the establishment of western democracy.
Previously the Catholic church and the Catholic Hapsburg dominated
state and church relations for the benefit of monarchy The Protestant
reformation with allegiance to Jesus Christ and the Bible
increasingly through the word of God in natural language translations
of scripture instead of the scholastic Latin evolved the removal of
state control of Christian ecclesiastical structure and vice versa
that has been as close as Wall Street and the U.S. Government are
today. From Russia to England and Vienna, Madrid to Rome just one
religion an monarchy were permitted and all others deemed as heretics
and rebels.
Islam is not part of western tradition and is instead a rival
civilization.
Historically mollycoddled leftists
cannot comprehend politically invasive species and under the
political parameters of the theory of evolution believe that with
enough dope and homosexuality they can assimilate Muslims and evolve
them to become godless atheist Muslims comparable to the evolution of
some Christian sects such as the PCUSA toward leftist, godless values
where sin is OK. and the values of state socialism inform
hermeneutics.
It may be the case that science will
eventually develop methods to slightly alter the genomic content of
D.N.A. used in the reproductive cycle such that people could choose
what sort of characteristics they want to pass on to progeny. If
short people such as midgets want to have kids that are 7 feet tall
they can have their reproductive D.N.A. gene tweaked to that effect.
Like a computer graphic portrait of and individual that can be
altered to be of any color, shape, lip thickness and so forth human
reproductive genetics may one day be selectively recombined to allow
designs conforming to the will of individuals involved. Even though
the human genome may be malleable to willed determinism rather than
just mate selection for breeding particular characteristics
eventually, it does not follow that cultural beliefs are equally as
malleable nor that they may be designed a priori.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/all-gene-editing-research-should-proceed-cautiously-scientists-conclude1/
Because the left seeks its own kind of
political stasis utopia with dope, sexual licentiousness for
hedonistic and economic purposes of convenience and has a corrupt
political leadership class that is rather unintelligent and
over-reliant on a costly volunteer, professional military it wants to
use as a substitute for a draft occupation army increasingly to
accomplish social engineering, it hasn't an ability to recognize
invasive species. It has implicit assumptions in a political
philosophy of hedonism and atheism, unisex military androgyny in film
and reality,existential economic empiricism etc precluding
recognition of the existence of lasting dissent . Its ideal
narcissistic regard for itself brings it to believe that all others
want to be as they are too, and the high ground of evolution will
bring them there. Besides, the river of time flows all of the
conflicts under the bridge of the present to the non-troubling realm
of the past while their own pleasant lives complete.
In
the United States the terms left and right, liberal and conservative
have evolved to become corrupted. The meanings of either are rather
lost in relation to origin circa 1776. The dangers of concentrated
wealth to a democratic society haven't changed since the time of the
Republic of Socrates and Plato when the oligarchy was at odds with
the democracy. Neither have the dangers of apathy, and ignorance to
democracy that Aristotle noted in his book The Politics
disappeared,
each are evident in the president failure of the left to defend the
nation against illegal immigration building a large internal
proletariat adjacent to a large external proletariat and construction
of another internal proletariat of Muslims with cell phones and the
Internet able to coordinate with a large external proletariat. They
are problems that require intelligent leadership and immigration
control, rational environmental economic policy and limited military
responses abroad rather than large importunate militarily
conventional reactions to moderate or control foreign political and
demographic circumstances.
In meeting the Muslim challenge
Republican leaders tend to want to put a square peg in a round hole,
and democrat politicians want to suck the peg or put hole on hole. If
the crusader leadership and European leadership had been so daft as
today's politicians Europe and the U.S.A. would already be Muslim.
