How
could Senate feminists not vote for a female CIA chief?
Fundamentally it's a no-brainer. There are perfectly good
Baldacci or Berenson novels, I believe it is, that have a female CIA
chief. Gina Haspel being qualified for the job in Madelane Albright qualification criteria (except for being held responsible by some for enhanced interrogation techniques ordered by some higher ups I suppose)makes her something like the third coming of Hillary. Democrats will just sign
off and cut out the show on the public dime because the Haspel spite value in flunking the nomination would not be that much to President Trump.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/second-democratic-senator-backs-cia-nominee-haspel-1526142425
Plainly the CIA's feminine era is about to start. That means more movies with female spooks, novels with women in the spy leading roles and so forth. That is not an entirely bad thing.
Plainly the CIA's feminine era is about to start. That means more movies with female spooks, novels with women in the spy leading roles and so forth. That is not an entirely bad thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment