The fact that a porn star was able to suck a Presidential candidate better than any student intern (if that was the role she played) and is the Democrat Party's leading attacker on the Trump administration at the present time is rather unusual. The people tend to prefer that a President hasn't got to spend too much time away from genuinely public interests, and affairs of pornography aren't usually considered to be first place on the public interest agenda for a President to spend his or her time with.
The Mueller probe looking for a way to stick it to the administration on behest of the losing Clintonistas have had to look to porn stars as their go-to people for levering their way into surveilling the phone calls of the President's personal attorney. In lieu of actual collusion to take over the Executive branch of government with a foreign power, presumably in order to mutually benefit a foreign power (no I don't mean England), the President's possible sex entanglement with a porn performer is in the media glare. Stormy Daniels isn't Monica Lewinsky. Why should a federal prosecutor be free to tap the President's personal attorney's phone so far as to know anyone he conversed with by phone? The ubiquitous surveillance state knows no bounds. It is as if maggots have finished debridging gangrenous meat and are eating into healthy flesh.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/feds-tapped-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-s-phones-n871011
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/9-11-anniversary/did-patriot-act-change-us-attitudes-surveillance-n641586
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Security_Service Russian Internal Police Agency
If the President did have sex with that woman, no one really cares so far as it does not concern the nation's business. One elects a President for positions on policy rather than on his or her personal life besides things that qualify or strictly disqualify for or from the performance of the duties of office.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5780101714001/
The Mueller probe looking for a way to stick it to the administration on behest of the losing Clintonistas have had to look to porn stars as their go-to people for levering their way into surveilling the phone calls of the President's personal attorney. In lieu of actual collusion to take over the Executive branch of government with a foreign power, presumably in order to mutually benefit a foreign power (no I don't mean England), the President's possible sex entanglement with a porn performer is in the media glare. Stormy Daniels isn't Monica Lewinsky. Why should a federal prosecutor be free to tap the President's personal attorney's phone so far as to know anyone he conversed with by phone? The ubiquitous surveillance state knows no bounds. It is as if maggots have finished debridging gangrenous meat and are eating into healthy flesh.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/feds-tapped-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-s-phones-n871011
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/9-11-anniversary/did-patriot-act-change-us-attitudes-surveillance-n641586
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Security_Service Russian Internal Police Agency
If the President did have sex with that woman, no one really cares so far as it does not concern the nation's business. One elects a President for positions on policy rather than on his or her personal life besides things that qualify or strictly disqualify for or from the performance of the duties of office.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5780101714001/