The
question is can failed Soviet government management models it work in 21st
century America ? Is it practical for the
U.S. Government to act as a monopoly health insurance exchange brokerage
without breaking the U.S. health care system? Can U.S. foreign policy impose a
placid democratic government on Syria or any other nation
through force when its own perfect system of corporatism with 17 trillion
dollars of public debt, decaying ecosphere etc required more than 200 years to
evolve? I believe the answer is no.
Many
Americans learned that just two forms of government exist; communism and
capitalism and that they are mutually exclusive. They were wrong. It is plain
that a third way of corporatism has supplanted each bringing the worst of each
system along the course of economic evolution toward Unitarian godless global oligarchy
under the mindlessness of media moderators of Plutocrats.
While
it is true that the 85 richest people on Earth has as much wealth as the 3.5
billion poorest it is also true that like the Allan Parson’s song lyric ‘I
really wouldn’t be like you’ reduces the severity of the statistic since not
everyone signs off willingly on globalist economic policy that concentrates
wealth. Yet the defenders of networked capitalism concentrating wealth through
preferred network advantages that dominate capital employ the straw man of
socialism as the alternative. What would George Washington have said about
contemporary networked capitalism?
An
interview with George Washington...
“Mr.
President, what do you think of corporatism and the concentration of wealth
through expert computer program guided electronic trading of Wall Street?”
“Well
Ted, I am all for that. Capitalism was created to concentrate wealth and power
for the few. If they live around the globe and control the U.S. economy like puppeteers
that’s fine. The people never had any write to run their own lives to start
with.”
“Mr.
President, what about foreign control of U.S. politics?”
“I
like to think that we’re above all that in political elites. We don’t like to
get our hand dirty in my eponymous village now do we? WE need a king to let us
know our place but have to settle for Rhodes scholars. If wealth and power are
globally controlled it will spare the people the burden if thinking for
themselves and developing worry lines.”
“So
what about the environment? Some think that the right role of government is t
defend the people from environmental and social threats, insults and decay.”
“Ask
yourself Ted, how the environment can be in decay if the right elites are
managing it from the best offices with the finest furnishing on the planet? Is
that reasonable? There is no need for environmental defense, and the people
shouldn’t expect to own anything in the future anyway hence no need for their
defense; they won’t have anything that needs defending.”
“What
about their rights?”
“What
rights are left Ted? The people realize themselves in being people as a class.
They have class consciousness as consumers and unconscious as consumers of
alcohol, marijuana and so forth after the game is over.”
“So
you aren’t for reform of capitalism?”
“Ted
these are really nice questions. Go suck a lemon is still good advice. I will
say for your edification though that if Adam Smith had wanted reform and not to
let the King run the economy he would have said so. St. Smith was canonized and
the grail of derivatives trading, arbitrage, dark pools, LBOs Hedge funds and
tax cuts require true faith. Heretics may be permanently downsized and outsourced.”
No comments:
Post a Comment