Philosophical questions and the contemplation of the meaning of life in relation to a consumerist, globalist political economy juxtapose paradoxes of mind, God, transcendence freedom and the problems of quantitative analysis with finite material opportunities. Vast human historical movements coerce people to live in social currents simultaneously bettering and degrading individual experience of existence. Discovering a real-time synthetic course paradigm for developing human potential without spiritual decay is challenging.
Perhaps it's something like a chess game deliberation of the array of pieces and potential vectors in combinations that may occur yet that are mutually exclusive scenarios in the future with or without intervention (if one is playing the standard theory). Can one make the world a better place in a limited human life span? What would comprise making it better? Would a society with mass extinction of life be better, or one with global warming or thermonuclear war, deforestation, dictatorship, doped up proles in Matrix style containment clusters or atheistic bioforms that don't believe in free will and so have no ethics at all? Can individuals work to preserve individual liberty with the networking power of corporatism and socialism merging together to repress personal liberty from ubiquitous social pressure?
I wish you luck in the effort to make the world a better place. Jesus Christ with the humility of God made quite an effort that was the foundation for western civilization after late antiquity. The Church was an element unifying pagan tribes in the British Isles and elsewhere. The brevity of life and uncertainty affecting human choices bring a certain log-rolling slipperiness to the effort.
Perhaps it's something like a chess game deliberation of the array of pieces and potential vectors in combinations that may occur yet that are mutually exclusive scenarios in the future with or without intervention (if one is playing the standard theory). Can one make the world a better place in a limited human life span? What would comprise making it better? Would a society with mass extinction of life be better, or one with global warming or thermonuclear war, deforestation, dictatorship, doped up proles in Matrix style containment clusters or atheistic bioforms that don't believe in free will and so have no ethics at all? Can individuals work to preserve individual liberty with the networking power of corporatism and socialism merging together to repress personal liberty from ubiquitous social pressure?
I wish you luck in the effort to make the world a better place. Jesus Christ with the humility of God made quite an effort that was the foundation for western civilization after late antiquity. The Church was an element unifying pagan tribes in the British Isles and elsewhere. The brevity of life and uncertainty affecting human choices bring a certain log-rolling slipperiness to the effort.
No comments:
Post a Comment